The developer is aware of this need, but suggests that you submit
an RFE to request this function. RFEs are helpful when the decisions
are being made as to which items get funded.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
> I looked at SMFLIMxx and was
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
> A colleague of mine just asked me if ISPF statistics in a data set,
> especially the USERID field, can be manipulated. We used ISPF 3.5 and we
> were both astonished that I was easily able to fake a userid as the one who
>
Evidence of what Barb ? Don't hang anyone on this evidence. Anyone with
update access to the pds can update this field..
I do it all the time to source code libraries to set the version level in
the uid field.
I can't think how you would do it. The ds name in the RACF call will not
contain a
Frank Swarbrick wrote:
For PL/I experts: Can a PL/I procedure declared with a CHARACTER(*) VARYING
parm be called passing a CHARACTER VARYINGZ or CHARACTER VARYING4 argument?
Thanks, Frank
Those are different data attributes, but the answer is "kinda yes".
The VARYINGZ and VARYING4 value
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 08:05:42 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote:
>A colleague of mine just asked me if ISPF statistics in a data set, especially
>the USERID field, can be manipulated. We used ISPF 3.5 and we were both
>astonished that I was easily able to fake a userid as the one who last changed
>a
For PL/I experts: Can a PL/I procedure declared with a CHARACTER(*) VARYING
parm be called passing a CHARACTER VARYINGZ or CHARACTER VARYING4 argument?
Thanks, Frank
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Free PDS command on CBT Tape can do this, see the ATTRIB subcommand:
SYNTAX -
ATTRIB member AMODE24/AMODE31/AMODE64/AMODEANY
AUTH/NOAUTH or APF/NOAPF
On 7/7/2017 11:07 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
I'm curious what else might lurk in that "PDSE AX cell". Perhaps an
immutable creator ID?
8 characters in z/OS 2.3?
Note that 8-byte userid support was added to MVS way back in 1995. Only
TSO/E lagged behind...
.* $04=OW13376 HBB4420 950329
Anyone running DB2 version 8.1 on z/OS 2.1? I'm looking to verify, any links or
information would be appreciated. Thank You.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:17:52 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>It will surprise me if IBM hasn't given some serious thought to this
>for PDSEs. A formally managed interface to PDSE member metadata,
>subject to RACF etc. controls, would be quite doable. Of course it
>would be tricky to make it
There should be no performance cost, other than the cost of the
instructions to manipulate the access registers, as long as an
access register is loaded far enough in advance of its use
to avoid a pipeline delay, and for an ALET other than 0 or 1,
there is already an ALB entry, so that Access
Here is something I wrote a while back. (I pulled out some proprietary code,
but this should work).
Enjoy.
Ren
Example to test:
/* REXX */?
pds_nam = '.BBB.CCC'
mbrnam = 'CCC'
m_dat_4 = '2014/11/07'
c_dat_4 = '2014/11/07'
c_dat = Substr(c_dat_4,3)
m_dat =
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 16:56:09 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>W dniu 2017-07-07 o 15:29, Lizette Koehler pisze:
>> As far as I know, the statistics have always worked that way. That as long
>> as you had the ability to edit (change/alter/del/create) the PDS you could
>> use
There should be no performance cost.
Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp.
Poughkeepsie NY
> Subject: Z performancequestion #2 - key 9
> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>
> What is the performance cost of using key 9 storage when
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 09:59:01 -0500, Donald Likens wrote:
>We run our product on somewhere around 15 client site. We have had this
>problem on one client site (multiple LPARs) since we started running there. We
>have only seen this problem on one other system during a
On 7 July 2017 at 09:30, John McKown wrote:
> There are no control possible for this. The ISPF statistics are simply
> data in the "user data area" portion of a member's directory entry.
>
John McKown wrote:
>There are no control possible for this.
There are some control. ISPCCONFIG can be used to FORCE stats using module
ISPCFIGU, but hahahahahaha, override it with option =3.5 as the OP said.
>The ISPF statistics are simply data in the "user data area" portion of a
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Donald Likens
wrote:
> We run our product on somewhere around 15 client site. We have had this
> problem on one client site (multiple LPARs) since we started running there.
> We have only seen this problem on one other system during a trial
We run our product on somewhere around 15 client site. We have had this problem
on one client site (multiple LPARs) since we started running there. We have
only seen this problem on one other system during a trial (they did not keep
the product). The client site that sees this problem sees it
W dniu 2017-07-07 o 15:29, Lizette Koehler pisze:
As far as I know, the statistics have always worked that way. That as long as
you had the ability to edit (change/alter/del/create) the PDS you could use 3.5
to change the ID field to anything you like.
...except the dates.
Sometimes I want
[...]
List -
Just curious if the EAV volumes can be used for SYSRES volumes or if there are
any concerns with using them for SYSRES volumes?
If they can be used for SYSRES, any considerations with using them?
Just looking for advise.
IMHO there are few things to consider:
1. EAV consist
The 3.5 option has been able to manipulate member stats since I first saw "SPF"
somewhere around 1980. The most useful function I have found is being able to
delete member statistics. This is one way you can save a new member when the
directory is out of space. It is usually my second
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Barbara Nitz wrote:
> A colleague of mine just asked me if ISPF statistics in a data set,
> especially the USERID field, can be manipulated. We used ISPF 3.5 and we
> were both astonished that I was easily able to fake a userid as the one who
>
As far as I know, the statistics have always worked that way. That as long as
you had the ability to edit (change/alter/del/create) the PDS you could use 3.5
to change the ID field to anything you like.
I typically change it to BASE and then as I update members, I can see what has
been
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 08:05:42 -0500 Barbara Nitz wrote:
:>A colleague of mine just asked me if ISPF statistics in a data set,
especially the USERID field, can be manipulated. We used ISPF 3.5 and we were
both astonished that I was easily able to fake a userid as the one who
A colleague of mine just asked me if ISPF statistics in a data set, especially
the USERID field, can be manipulated. We used ISPF 3.5 and we were both
astonished that I was easily able to fake a userid as the one who last changed
a member (testing in my own dataset, of course).
This
How big is the performance cost of running ARMODE?
Should there be a section of code that uses only ALET 0, is it best to go into
primary mode for that section?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should
What is the performance cost of using key 9 storage when the PSW is not in key
9?
--
Binyamin Dissen
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Pew, Curtis G
> Sent: 13 June, 2017 23:15
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: SMFLIMxx sample?
>
> I’m going through our SMF exits and reviewing them. I was able to
>
Lizzette:
I have been looking at various LOGREC reports recently and looking at
processing the logger and remembered seeing this in the EREP user's Guide about
the LOGREC history data set:
"When you include history data sets as input for your report you must define
them on the ACCIN
1. As a reminder, IBM Knowledge Center for z/OS is a standard, included
feature of the z/OS base operating system (Version 2.2 and above). Please
take advantage of it. If your mainframe is not already "self-documenting,"
please make it so.
2. A "local" IBM Knowledge Center is also available for
31 matches
Mail list logo