On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 22:05:33 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>> (In case you have some sort of irrational attachment to FB.)
>
>I have an irrational attachment to providing library concatenations that will
>work. Concatenating LRECL 80 and LRECL 255 REXX libraries will not work.
>
>Are you
> (In case you have some sort of irrational attachment to FB.)
I have an irrational attachment to providing library concatenations that will
work. Concatenating LRECL 80 and LRECL 255 REXX libraries will not work.
Are you proposing that the installation convert the IBM libraries to FB with a
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 19:34:48 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>It's more than a custom; FB80 doesn't allow long lines.
>
True. But FB needn't be 80. In fact, FB supports records with 8 more data
bytes than the maximum supported by VB.
(In case you have some sort of irrational attachment to FB.)
Sometimes it takes a while for the proceedings to be made available
after a SHARE conference event.
For quick reference, here are links to the slides for the three
presentations I was a part of last week:
https://share.confex.com/data/handout/share/131/Session_23592_handout_11789_0.pdf
MVS
> recursion which is difficult to do in assembler.
Almost as difficult as breathing. The same programming techniques that you use
to make a program reentrant and reshble also make it recursive.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
It's more than a custom; FB80 doesn't allow long lines.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 1:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Hello,
We will shortly be listing a job for a mainframe systems programmer. z/OS and
CICS skills are highly desirable. Please contact me for further information.
Randy Haefka
State of Montana
Department of Administration - Enterprise Technology Services Bureau
Section Supervisor
406-444-0107
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 17:46:43 +, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
>(OK, I know my question sounded dumb, but I was afraid I was grossly
>misinterpreting the thread.)
>
I wondered, too. Your contributions to some recent threads have not shown the
sophistication I had come to expect of you.
>If I
(OK, I know my question sounded dumb, but I was afraid I was grossly
misinterpreting the thread.)
If I were gifted with the luxury of building a new MVS environment from
scratch, I would make all REXX and CLIST libraries FB-80. For one thing, that's
how virtually all vendors deliver execs.
What was the attendance?
In a message dated 8/23/2018 12:07:06 PM Central Standard Time,
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com writes:
Catch up with us in Phoenix next March...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On 8/23/2018 9:01 AM, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote:
Could I ask what 'SYSREXX' means? At first I thought this referred simply to
the standard common set of REXX execs that users allocate at logon. Is it
something else?
System REXX. AXR address space. Scott Fagen's last project before
leaving IBM.
If you attended SHARE in St Louis, you were part of an
ahhhMAZING event!
If not, here is a taste of what you missed: https://youtu.be/kL3T_6NatqI
Catch up with us in Phoenix next March...
--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
also
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ieaa800/systemrexx.htm
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse 1 Robinson"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 11:01:47 AM
Subject: Re: SYSREXX PDS size
Could
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:05:31 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote:
>SYSREXX is rexx code that can be run by the operating system. It allows
>for some automation in my shop.
>
Like, SYSREXX : Rexx :: MetalC : XLC?
I was about to sneer, "What century is this!? What of the desigh inntegrity of
OS/360!?
On 08/22/2018 05:09 PM, Rob Schramm wrote:
> While the keys that are processed in the Crypto Express cards should be
> safe.. I am less sure about anything else.
>
> https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/new-attack-recovers-rsa-encryption-keys-from-em-waves-within-seconds/
>
> Rob Schramm
ISRDDN would not help I don't think since system rexx is not part if TSO
SYSEXEC concatenation
an explanation from the fine manual :)
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ieaa800/plsysrexx.htm
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From:
SYSREXX is rexx code that can be run by the operating system. It allows
for some automation in my shop.
Tony Thigpen
Jesse 1 Robinson wrote on 08/23/2018 12:01 PM:
Could I ask what 'SYSREXX' means? At first I thought this referred simply to
the standard common set of REXX execs that users
Glad you have this solved, I've not dealt with switches in about 5 years, so
it's good to know you have this solved and kutos to those who helped and great
info for anyone who see's this issue in the future !
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "R.S."
To:
Could I ask what 'SYSREXX' means? At first I thought this referred simply to
the standard common set of REXX execs that users allocate at logon. Is it
something else?
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595
It all depends on the concatenation
Start ISRDDN and see how it reacts
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Carmen Vitullo
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 9:56 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SYSREXX PDS size
The problem is solved!
First, I would like to help all the people who helped me on this forum
and off-list. I appreciate it very much.
Thank you gentlemen!
For the record purposes the solution and full story:
I had to set HIF (High Integrity Fabric) to YES.
Note1, there is no such option in
our system rexx library is a library PDS-E, VB 255, I think the guy who set it
up said FB 80 would not work,checking the fine manual he was correct, VB 255 is
required
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Carmen Vitullo"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, August
Ours is VB 255. The only reference in Init & Tuna Reference:
All data sets
specified in the REXXLIB concatenation must have the same record type and
record length as SYS1.SAXREXEC. The data set must either be a PDS or PDSE.
Dana
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:42:52 -0400, Tony Thigpen wrote:
let me check, from what I recall sysrexx pds must be vb 255 :(
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Thigpen"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 9:42:52 AM
Subject: SYSREXX PDS size
Our SYSREXX PDS is currently defined as VB 255. We had a
Our SYSREXX PDS is currently defined as VB 255. We had a system problem
this week that one Sysprog thinks that the the VB 255 aggravated the
problem and is insisting that we change it to FB 80. I disagree, but I
thought I would though it out to the list for views.
Views?
--
Tony Thigpen
Sent Radoslaw some information off-line.
Looks like there is a configure option that needs to be turned on for HIF. I'm
not the guy who did the work, nor am I the least bit knowledgeable on these
directors.
From the support vendor:
You just need to run configure and y to fabric parameters.
I don't do the FD config's here, so I'm not well versed, but when I logon to
the Fabric Insight portal, and display the switch I see at the very end of the
details - HIF MODE Enabled:
FabricFICON_7B-10:00:00:27:F8:A9:B8:00
Namexxx
WWNx
IP
W dniu 2018-08-23 o 15:07, Jousma, David pisze:
Oh, and we had just loaded V7.4.2a1 onto the director's as well.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 9:02 AM
To:
I will post code later if I have the time. But Metal C's stack is about as
simple as you can get, although it does work without a net. I don't like
that at all: soiling yourself is not the way to handle stack overflow.
However, my code merely checks for overflow and then abends if it does. If
Oh, and we had just loaded V7.4.2a1 onto the director's as well.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jousma, David
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FICON "Invalid attachment
I've been out on vacation coming into this conversation late, so I apologize if
some of this had already been discussed. We also had "invalid attachment
failure". Don't POR the CPU or you will lose all your connections! Ask me
how I know.
The fix was to configure(turn on) HIF(High
W dniu 2018-08-23 o 13:36, Roger Lowe pisze:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:03:34 +0200, R.S. wrote:
It is Brocade DCX8510-4 connected to IBM z13 FICON Express16S. The
message is exactly as I wrote: "Invalid attachment failure". This is on
Channel icon on SE. There is no message on swtich side.
#1) that's what I was thinking, what level is the switch and is it certified
for FICON, also, is the port on the switch setup for the correct protocol ?
also, what device is this channel attached to , new DASD , or tape? are the
LCU's defined or configured for FICON and nor fiber connected ?
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 13:03:34 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>It is Brocade DCX8510-4 connected to IBM z13 FICON Express16S. The
>message is exactly as I wrote: "Invalid attachment failure". This is on
>Channel icon on SE. There is no message on swtich side.
>
>@Roger
>It is unlikely the problem come from
It is Brocade DCX8510-4 connected to IBM z13 FICON Express16S. The
message is exactly as I wrote: "Invalid attachment failure". This is on
Channel icon on SE. There is no message on swtich side.
@Roger
It is unlikely the problem come from dirty fiber. The problem regards
two channels, we also
On 22/08/2018 11:51 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
*Personally* I agree, but different languages for different folks. Some people
are very comfortable in assembler, especially with the structured macros. I
think I can state with some confidence that if @EdJaffe need to parse some JSON
documents he
36 matches
Mail list logo
