Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

Please remember that everything Paul talks about is running on a software based emulation of the IBM mainframe ... Hercules. Please also remember that he changes the code of Hercules to make it run the way that he wants, rather than conforming to the actual IBM Principles of Operation. Everything

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

You didn't even read the post. I specifically said "IBM 370". There isnt an IBM 370 machine out there that can run AMODE 64. So yes it is correct. Joe On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:26 PM, Paul Edwards <mutazi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2018 19:17:37 -0500, Joe Monk &

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

as > the only choice. ie the 32-bit address registers > in the 32-bit program will be masked down > to 24 bits. > > A trimodal 32-bit module will run just fine > on S/370 MVS 3.8j. > > BFN. Paul. > > > > > On Wed, 9 May 2018 20:04:17 -0500, Joe Monk <joemon...

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

bar. Joe On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 6:48 PM, Paul Edwards <mutazi...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, that is not true. The 32-bit load modules > I produce run on MVS 3.8j, MVS/XA, OS/390 > and z/OS. It has nothing to do with Hercules. > > BFN. Paul. > > > > On Wed, 9 May 2018

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

mail.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 6:50 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu > Subject: Re: GETMAIN LOC=32 > > On Wed, 9 May 2018 20:45:46 -0500, Joe Monk <joemon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Once again, you dont comprehend. > > > >IBM 370 can run XA (31

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

expect existing code to continue to run. Joe On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:18 AM, Paul Edwards <mutazi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 10 May 2018 08:09:32 -0500, Joe Monk <joemon...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >For instance, if you look at his PDOS, the command processor is named > >

Re: GETMAIN LOC=32

"How did that work? Did a high bit in BASR cause AM32 to be activated?" No ... the 360-67 had to be IPL'd in extended PSW mode to activate AM32. Otherwise it was a BC mode PSW machine... Joe On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 5:32 AM, Paul Edwards wrote: > On Fri, 11 May 2018

Re: How do I use 3270-4E on TSO?

Try a generic logmode ... SNX32705 and see if the session binds. Joe On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote: > Failing. > > I tried it, but it did not work. First, I am on a real VTAM non-SNA > session using an OSA-C. So, I had to use: > logon applid(tso)

Re: How do I use 3270-4E on TSO?

I always logged on with a logmode that supported all models, then I could pick which one I wanted. Had three LT'a, so one was TSO 43x80, one was SDSF report display, and one was test CICS region,,, Joe On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Tony Thigpen wrote: > What is the TSO

Re: XSS and Host on Demand

The easiest way to remediate that is to use a URL filter (bluecoat, Cisco Sourcefire) that check URLS going thru the firewall and block any that contain scripting... Joe On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Joe Sumi wrote: > Hello, has anyone encountered a situation with a Cross-site scripting >

Re: compares

IEBCOMPR (compare) comes to mind... Data Set A on SYSUT1 Data Set B on SYSUT2 SYSPRINT=* and SYSIN DUMMY Joe On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Nai, Dean wrote: > > >Howdy, > > I have numerous lists of tape numbers that I need to compare so I can > remove any duplicate and only keep them in

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

I think it is saying that the system picks the volume from the referenced dsn, which must be cataloged (i.e. can't be a temp data set). Joe On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 3:49 PM, Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:07:07 -0400, Joe M

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Connect:Direct and VOL=REF ?

REF allows you to place a data set on the same volume as the referenced data set. It must be cataloged on the system where it is referenced. https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/CD_PROC_LANG/com.ibm.help.cdprocstmtsparams.doc/cdproc_stmt_zos_Process_Parameters.html Joe On Mon, Jul 2,

Re: RACF Special User Revoked System

You can try to RVARY INACTIVE. Then, failsoft processing will be in effect. Joe On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 7:19 AM, saurabh khandelwal < venkatkulkarn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Group, > > We are facing issue that someone by mistake used wrong password on special > user and this end up revoking

Re: RACF Special User Revoked System

t; > Also, once we login how can we solve that special user racf password issue > and let system to again use racf for security > > On Sat, Aug 4, 2018, 2:56 PM Joe Monk wrote: > > > > > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1. > 0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.icha2

Re: RACF Special User Revoked System

in > > > On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 2:37 PM, Joe Monk wrote: > > > You can try to RVARY INACTIVE. Then, failsoft processing will be in > effect. > > > > Joe > > > > On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 7:19 AM, saurabh khandelwal < > > venkatkulkarn...@gma

Re: using REXX to spawn a Java program

This kinda gives you a clue: "syscalls('ON') ensures that the SYSCALL host command environment is available in your REXX environment. If the call detects that SYSCALL is not available in your environment, it dynamically adds it." "Performance characteristics for dynamically added host commands

Re: DCB Open Exit

Coming in a little late here, but I don't understand the issue. Isn't EXLST coded on the DCB macro? So when the exit code gets invoked, why wouldn't you know in the exit what DCB called the exit? So, even in the case of a multiple open, the DCB macro invokes the exit list code... Joe On Wed,

Re: TSO STEPLIB Allocation

; On Oct 28, 2018, at 11:42 AM, Joe Monk wrote: > > > > you can always use TASKLIB to put in your own stuff ahead of step lib in > > the search order... TSO searches tasklib ahead of steplib. > > > > Joe > > > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 10:13 AM

Re: TSO STEPLIB Allocation

you can always use TASKLIB to put in your own stuff ahead of step lib in the search order... TSO searches tasklib ahead of steplib. Joe On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 10:13 AM Beverly Caldwell wrote: > Does anyone know, by any chance, if there is any (legitimate) way to rid > oneself of an unwanted

Re: TSO STEPLIB Allocation

ichman > 170-10 73 rd ave > Fresh meadows NY 11366 > > > On Oct 28, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Joe Monk wrote: > > > > you can only use TSOLIB outside of ISPF :) > > > > But from ISPF you can ALLOC and then execute ... > > > > Joe > > > >

Re: BALR and BAL in AMODE=24

In the 370 days, thats how we used to establish addressability! A BALR to a register with a zero in the link position merely loads the PSW instruction address into a register, like this: BALR 15,0 USING *,15 Joe On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 6:44 AM John Gateley wrote: > Hello. > > The link

Re: How about a little Christmas fudge? | Computerworld Shark tank

https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/en/icons/mainframe/ IBM themselves refer to the 1401 as a mainframe Joe On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 10:56 PM Joel C. Ewing wrote: > Well, ... the IBM 1401 was built in a substantial frame; and in the > context cited it appears to have the only

Re: Storage question

If you check the CBT, there is a VTOC TSO command that can do what you want. Joe On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 2:28 AM Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh < vignesh.v.sankaranaraya...@marks-and-spencer.com> wrote: > Hello again List! > > Is there a way to produce a listing of datasets (given the HLQs) based >

Re: z/OS 1.12 question

z/OS 1.12 is not supported on a z14. So, his only choice is to upgrade z/OS if he wants to run a z14. Joe On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 7:26 AM R.S. wrote: > IMHO the COD has nothing to do here. > Jerry wrote about mahcine change (upgrade) , not OS upgrade. > > Jerry, > Your system is out of service.

Re: z/OS 1.12 question

.13 still orderable from IBM? That might be a path, if we can > get the code base with all the necessary features. Thanks. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Joe Monk > Sent: Monday, January 07,

Re: z/OS 1.12 question

I dont see why he couldnt install z/OS 1.13 on the old box, then move that to the new box and upgrade... Joe On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:37 PM Ed Jaffe wrote: > On 1/7/2019 5:47 AM, Edgington, Jerry wrote: > > Our current situation is, we have zBC10 running z/OS v1.12. We want to > upgrade

Re: BLSUXTOD

es, 0 to 103. Bit 51 is incremented every 1 microsecond. Carries are propagated out of bit 0. Joe On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 8:32 PM Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 18:18:51 -0600, Joe Monk wrote: > > >So if you read the P

Re: BLSUXTOD

So if you read the POO, you see: - Communication between systems is facilitated by establishing a standard time origin that is the calendar date and time to which a clock value of zero corresponds. January 1, 1900, 0 a.m. Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) is recommended as this

Re: CICS IR I/O wait time (inter-region (MRO) I/O wait)

Do you have CICS Performance Analyzer? If so, a cross system work report will answer this question. Joe On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 2:48 AM Mehrshad Manshadi < 0056e0e17177-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Hi, > The IRIOWTT(Interregion I/O wait time) time is very high(14 min). > Would

Re: AMODE 32

"PSW bit 30 can be used to signify that an application is running AM32." Whats the ROI to the customer for IBM spending the $$$ to research and modify all of the micro/macro/OS code to allow bit 30 to be anything other than 0? You have to realize that the prices are going to increase to cover

Re: AMODE 32

" I don't agree that all new applications should be 64 bit. That is overkill. 32-bit/4 GiB should be enough for almost all commercial applications." "According to the analyst deck circulated with the latest set of quarterly

Re: AMODE 32

" I don't agree that all new applications should be 64 bit. That is overkill. 32-bit/4 GiB should be enough for almost all commercial applications." The market disagrees with you, as shown by 64-bit z/arch sales. Joe On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 7:20 AM Paul Edwards wrote: > On Thu, 4 Apr 2019

Re: AMODE 32

" As far as I am aware, if you do a: CALL xxx,VL to set the high bit to signify end of parameter list, then if the target is operating in AM64, it will fail with a S0C4." Nope. You will get this error: 12,*** IHB280 VL INVALID WITH 8_BYTE_ENTRY_PLIST Joe On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 11:18 AM Paul

Re: AMODE 32

"I'm trying to understand why some sites are running multiple CICS regions because 2 GiB is not enough. Yet they haven't gone to AM64..." Who is going to pay for programmer time to convert applications to 64-bit? The cost of running mulitple 2GB regions is less than the cost to convert the

Re: AMODE 32

At minimum, a recompile/reassemble. Takes machine time and programmer time. Amode 32 doesn't exist so I'm not worried about that. Joe On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 4:03 PM Paul Edwards wrote: > On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:55:42 -0400, Joe Monk wrote: > > >> I'm trying to understand

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.e0zb100/osproc.htm "z/OS V2R3 is not supported on the following servers: - IBM zEnterprise 196 (z196) - IBM zEnterprise 114 (z114) - IBM System z10® Enterprise Class (z10™ EC) - IBM System z10 Business Class

Re: z114 and z/OS 2.3

The minimum ARCH for z/os 2.3 is ARCH=10 (zEC12/zBC12, z13/z13s, z14) z114 is not in ARCH=10, so thats why everyone is confused... Joe On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 1:55 AM Brian Westerman < brian_wester...@syzygyinc.com> wrote: > Well, > > Tell me what you want dumped and I'll get it to you. All

Re: Anyone ever seen/hear about a set of programs called SUPERCOP/SUPCOP1/SUPCOP2/SUPCOP3

Maybe its this? http://bench.cr.yp.to/supercop.html Joe On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 9:17 PM Feller, Paul wrote: > Has anyone ever seen/hear about a set of programs called > SUPERCOP/SUPCOP1/SUPCOP2/SUPCOP3. We ran into an issue with these programs > related to EAV volumes. It seems we acquired

Re: calling a webservice using HTTPS from batch (and CICS)

Bernd, There is a CICS sockets interface for the C language. Ive written code in it. Joe On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:55 AM Bernd Oppolzer wrote: > Hello all, > > some months ago, I wrote a program which allows to call webservices > (HTTP POST or HTTP GET) > from batch programs, written in C or

Re: How to obtain DSN's on a cartridge on SL laber format

UNIT = 3490, LABEL = (, BLP, EXPDT = 98000), theres your answer right there. BLP = bypass label processing. Youre getting these messages: IEC502E R 0580, S03815, SL, TAPEMAP, STEP0010 IEC501A M 0580, TAPAWS, NL ,, TAPEMAP, STEP0010, AMSOURCE.AWS because you are not authorized to use BLP. So,

Re: Abend 052-512

One other thing ... The AX used in the AXSET macro must have been previously AXRES'd prior to being used in the AXSET macro "The caller can use the value returned by the system as an AX through the AXSET macro, or as an extended authorization index (EAX) through the ETDEF, ETCRE, and ETCON

Re: Abend 052-512

Problem 1: Youre not setting R13 to the 18 word save area required by the macro... Input register information The AXSET macro is sensitive to the SYSSTATE macro with the OSREL=ZOSV1R6 parameter - If the caller has issued the SYSSTATE macro with the OSREL=ZOSV1R6 parameter (Version 1 Release

Re: Abend 052-512

Peter, AXSET specifically says it is subject to 052... ABEND codes - 052 - 053 https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ieaa100/iea3a1_AXSET_Set_authorization_index.htm Joe On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 8:12 AM Peter Relson wrote: > You would not

Re: MQ7 on a Z14

Isnt MQ7 restricted to z/os 1.x? The z14 only runs z/os 2.x and above ... so you'd have to goto MQ8 or MQ9... Joe On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:28 AM Meehan, Cheryl wrote: > Hello- > > We are about to embark on an upgrade from a BC12 to a Z14. > > Does anyone know of any issues with MQ7 running

Re: Friday history query

Curtis, Any chance we could get some more info? Who was the signer? Is there any address/location info on the letter? Thanks! Joe On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:55 PM Pew, Curtis G wrote: > Since it’s Friday, I’ll go ahead and ask about this. > > My father, who passed away last spring, worked for

Re: ICKDSF QUESTION

The Syntax for ICKDSF is: FLASHCPY WITHDRAW UNIT(CCUU) TARGETVOL(LSS,CCA,CCUU) Example: FLASHCPY WITHDRAW UNIT(5C06) - TARGETVOL(X'01', X'07',5C87) Joe On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 8:26 AM esmie moo < 012780d99c7b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > I noticed that the jcl was

Re: PL/I TSO Interrupt - Attention handling - SLIP trap X33E / X13E

If youre trying to run under TSO, did you compile with the INTERRUPT option? Joe On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:37 PM Mike Stramba wrote: > I'm trying to compile and run the PL/I ON ATTENTION interrupt example > from the PLI prog guide ver 4 r4 (pg 542 / GI11-9145-03) > > The code contains an ON

Re: Ancient DASD connectivity

The 3375 (CKD brother of the 3370 FBA) was attached thru a 3880 storage control. There were A,B, and D units. The D units were the tails and the A units were the heads. The D units provided a second path but couldnt be attached to the same 3880 as the A unit of the string, nor could that 3880 be

Re: PL/I TSO Interrupt - Attention handling - SLIP trap X33E / X13E

ANCEL for a task). Except for the exceptions, of course. > > > > sas > > > > > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:03 AM Joe Monk wrote: > > > >> If youre trying to run under TSO, did you compile with the INTERRUPT > >> option? > >> >

Re: PL/I TSO Interrupt - Attention handling - SLIP trap X33E / X13E

u like an 'EOF' option to specify whether EOF should be detected? > > > > TSO is a very-multi-tasked environment. Each command is ATTACHed as a > > subtask, and the default for attention is to mercilessly DETACH it (which > > is essentially CANCEL for a task). Except for

Re: Job abend with S722

Or, you could try OUTLIM=16777215 on the DD SYSOUT card. Joe On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 8:56 AM Allan Staller wrote: > JES might also be supplying the OUTLIM. It does not necessarily come from > JCL. > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Mark Jacobs >

Re: STC gets gets DAIR error 0218/0000

in the catalog. Our server > does a dynamic allocation with DSN and DISP specified, so it's basically > the same as the above JCL. > > Thanks > Robin > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of Joe Mo

Re: STC gets gets DAIR error 0218/0000

Some possible reasons for this error are: - The dynamic allocation tried to use a VIO-eligible unit, but the data set name was not a temporary dsname (DSN=&). - The dynamic allocation tried to put a data set with a non-temporary dsname (DSN=dsname) onto a real DASD volume but -

Re: LU2 type sample logmode

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.istrdr0/deflogt.htm#deflogt Usually D4A32782 or SNX32702 is pretty good... Joe On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 1:46 AM Jake Anderson wrote: > Hi > > Are there a IBM supplied LU2 type logmode for tso logon ? > > I am looking

Re: LU2 type sample logmode

SNX32704 is for a model 4. SNX32702 is for a model 2. Joe On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 4:21 AM Peter wrote: > Mike > > Thank you so much > > The scenario is we are trying to access a TSO from a Netmaster. > > So we receive this sense code in netmaster log > > Also some IBM PCOMM users do complaint

Re: LU2 type sample logmode

He says he's getting prog723 so he can't do negotiated bind. Joe On Mon, Apr 22, 2019, 11:32 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > There are many. What screen geometries do you want to support? > > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz > http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 > >

Re: dfsort: Sort job to get price variance records

Thats not what is being asked ... In the sample output... 50338 789997580026.00 36052910DF 96.12 50338 789997580026.00 36052910DF 96.12 50338 789997580026.00 36052910DF 95.12 What is different about the first

Re: Local time in C on z/OS

"It needs redesign for use in CICS, IMS and most z/OS components." The time in CICS can be gotten in C very easily: "EXEC CICS ASKTIME ABSTIME(utime)" C char data_area[8]; ABSTIME(data-area) Specifies the data area for the number of milliseconds since 00:00 on 1 January 1900, which is

Re: Local time in C on z/OS

Code is right here https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.bpxbd00/localt.htm /* CELEBL07 This example queries the system clock and displays the local time. */ #include #include int main(void) { struct tm *newtime; time_t ltime;

Re: Local time in C on z/OS

of the current locale if POSIX(OFF) or TZ is not defined. Joe On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:22 PM Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:07:42 -0400, Joe Monk wrote: > > >Code is right here > > > >

Re: Local time in C on z/OS

/* get the local offset from GMT */ days_diff = mvsvar('SYMDEF','LYR4') - mvsvar('SYMDEF','YR4') if days_diff = 0 then days_diff = mvsvar('SYMDEF','LJDAY') - mvsvar('SYMDEF','JDAY') hours_diff = mvsvar('SYMDEF','LHR') -, mvsvar('SYMDEF','HR') + 24 * days_diff min_diff =

Re: LE 64 bit no main assembler ?

Perhaps this will help ... https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.cbcpx01/cexample.htm Joe On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:49 PM Joseph Reichman wrote: > Hi > > All of the code I have on my system is assembler. The Code is a TCP/IP > Serve > to a Windows

Re: LE 64 bit no main assembler ?

Reichman wrote: > > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ceea400/cee142446.htm > > Thanks I think I need to do this no ? > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Joe Monk > Sent: Frid

Re: LE 64 bit no main assembler ?

LQMAIN > > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Joe Monk > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 6:14 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: LE 64 bit no main assembler ? > > Have a look here... Youre calling 64bit C from assem

Re: LE 64 bit no main assembler ?

YES right ? > > > > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf > Of Joe Monk > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 8:08 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: LE 64 bit no main assembler ? > > Right you need a stub main. If you look at th

Re: IBM Destination z - Of Elephants and Mainframes

I can pretty much guarantee that NASA wasnt writing programs in the late 1950's in machine language... FORTRAN AND LISP were 704 languages. Joe On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 5:54 PM Seymour J Metz wrote: > Re 1957: with a SOAP II manual dated February 1957, how likely is it that > the original

Re: Transfering files from z/OS to VSE

OK, so you said transmit via open system. IMHO, The easiest way is to use IDCAMS to REPRO the file to a flat file (RECFM=V). Then, ZIP the file, and send it over the open systems, which should have no problem with a ZIP file. When it gets to the far end (VSE), just unzip it and use IDCAMS REPRO

Re: Water-cooled 360s?

"I am 99.9% positive there were no water cooled S360 or S370 processors." "The central processing complex of the System/360 Model 195 is made up of seven stand-alone units: a CPU, three CPU power supply units, a power distribution unit, a coolant distribution unit, and a system console (Figure

Re: CICS term _BLINK_

Set the field attribute HILIGHT to BLINK on the DFHMDF map definition OR Set the -H map attribute for the field in the generated data area to DFHBLINK Joe On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:23 PM Ward Able, Grant wrote: > Carlos - probably best to ask this on the dedicated CICS list >

Re: Calling amode 64 C\C++ From assembler

https://www-01.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/zOSV2R3SA380689/$file/ceeam00_v2r3.pdf Page 143 Joe On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 10:28 AM Joseph Reichman wrote: > Hi > > > > I am still wondering how to get this done would calling CELQPIPI to > initialize an assembler subroutine as

Re: Return code X'20' 32 from CELQPIPI INIT_MAIN

Where are your calls to CELQPIPI? Joe On Sun, Oct 27, 2019 at 6:05 PM Joseph Reichman wrote: > AMODE 64 rmode any > > BROWSEIBMUSER.DBGR.DLLLIB Row 022 of > 022 > Command ===> Scroll ===> > CSR >

Re: Return code X'20' 32 from CELQPIPI INIT_MAIN

So according to: "20 The routine_name contains only blanks and the routine_entry was zero. The PreInit table was not updated." https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ceeam00/ceeam141.htm Joe On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 8:55 PM Joseph Reichman wrote: > The

Re: "old" OS/390 documentation

Seems to be a lot on IBM Publications Center ... https://www-05.ibm.com/e-business/linkweb/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?CTY=US Joe On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 9:21 PM Thomas David Rivers wrote: > I know there was a lot of discussion on this, but my > searches have not been fruitful. > > I had a

Re: "old" OS/390 documentation

Try this: https://www-05.ibm.com/e-business/linkweb/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?CTY=US Joe On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 3:52 PM Farley, Peter x23353 < peter.far...@broadridge.com> wrote: > Sue, > > Maybe I am missing something, but on that "Library Archive" site you > pointed at I do not see any

Re: Paging Jay Maynard

try jay.k...@gmail.com Joe On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:59 AM Mike Schwab wrote: > https://twitter.com/tronguy > > Pretty much ignores anything Hercules related, won't assign a replacement > owner. > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:28 AM Seymour J Metz wrote: > > > > Does anybody have a valid

Re: prceprocess directives XL C\C++

Almost :) Its not PARM its CPARM Joe On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 4:45 PM Joseph Reichman wrote: > Hi > > > > Would anyone know where to specify pre-processor directives as said > previously I am compiling code that runs on windows as well z/os > > > > So I have #ifdef ZOS AND #IFDEF MSVC > > > >

Re: how to force a free of ispf allocated Dataset

you beat me to send :) Joe On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 3:44 AM ITschak Mugzach wrote: > You can't. Instead of rename, allocate a new one, copy into the current one > and update the tso proc with the new name. A they later you'll be able to > delete the old one. > > בתאריך שבת, 5 באוק׳ 2019, 11:39,

Re: IP 0.0.0.0

"0.0.0.0 is non-routable and a typical use in traffic would be in DHCP, in which an adaptor doesn't have an address assigned yet and the device sends out a DHCP request from 0.0.0.0 asking to be assigned a proper address." PCs dont send DHCP to 0.0.0.0. They send DHCP to 255.255.255.255 ...

Re: IP 0.0.0.0

The address 0.0.0.0 is nothing in and of itself to worry about. What you need to worry about are the port numbers to which it is trying to communicate. Joe On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 1:54 AM Jake Anderson wrote: > Hello > > Cross posted > > Out network vulnerability team has reported that there

Re: VSE related questions

http://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/iesrre30.pdf Page 169 gives the VSAMIO parameters... Joe On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 3:02 PM Mike Beer wrote: > Hi, > www.bsitcpip.com might be the contact you are looking for concerning your > client. > > This seems to be a complete (but outdated) collection

Re: 2 Spaces after periods [was: RE: Rexx parse using period as placeholder]

The rule now is 1 space after a period. Two spaces after a period was the rule on a typewriter, because the fonts weren't proportional, they were monospace. This led to uneven spacing of words on paper, so two spaces was the rule. Nowadays, on a computer, the fonts are proportional. For instance

Re: Connect upgrade Secure+ requirement

port CD V5.2 > > Thanks > Steve > > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 16:12, Joe Monk wrote: > > > This will tell you: > > > > > > > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.csfb200/csffmid.htm > > > > You need FMI

Re: PDSE V2 data set info

In SMF 14/15, there is a field SMF14DSNVER which will tell you the PDSE version... Joe On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 5:40 AM Greg Price wrote: > Hi Robin, > > I'm sure others will jump in if I am not up to date, but AFAIK, you > cannot get these pieces of information without opening the data set and

Re: Connect upgrade Secure+ requirement

This will tell you: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.csfb200/csffmid.htm You need FMID HCR77A0 or above. Joe On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:11 PM Steve David wrote: > Hi All, > > We are upgrading CD from V4.8 to V5.2, currently running in zOS 1.13, but

Re: TN3270 from 3174 -ExSel Problem

Dave, What model 3174? Joe On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 2:09 AM Dave Wade wrote: > Gentle Folks, > > > > I have a 3174 with Config C6 configured to connect via TN3270 to various > mainframes including the 43361 at LCM+L. I have two non-IBM terminals > connected. A NOKIA and Memorex Telex and both

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting

Technically it should be five thirds bank. Joe On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 11:53 Mike Schwab wrote: > Fifth is 1/5, Third is 1/3, > Fifth Third might be expressed as 1/5 1/3. > Maybe abbreviate to /5 /3 assuming the 1. > Improperly drop the first / to get the 5/3. > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:34

Re: Looking for tn3270 emulator that can run on macOS 10.15.2 (Catalina)

I use ZOC as well. I found Mocha to be lacking. Joe On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 4:43 AM Jim Taylor wrote: > I agree with the comments about c3270/x3270 but disagree when you say > there aren't any good macOS emulators - I really like ZOC and found it much > nicer to user than PComms on my Windows

Re: Looking for tn3270 emulator that can run on macOS 10.15.2 (Catalina)

I use zoc7. Joe On Tue, Dec 31, 2019, 11:49 leeb < 02ae733369f7-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > Huh, OK. Does 'x3270' include c3270 these days? I'm not near my work > machine > so can't check. > > > On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 12:44:04PM -0500, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > > Your command

Re: Looking for tn3270 emulator that can run on macOS 10.15.2 (Catalina)

I use zoc7 for tn3270 on my mac. Joe On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 11:49 AM Matt Hogstrom wrote: > Sorry, I was equally fast on send. brew installs x3270 but I believe it > requires X Windows. > > These items are installed using brew install x3270 in /usr/local/bin > c3270 ->

Re: Looking for tn3270 emulator that can run on macOS 10.15.2 (Catalina)

Ive emailed that guy about the rewrite he wants to do. Unfortunately its like a brick wall... no response. Joe On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 12:44 PM Seymour J Metz wrote: > There'd be an obvious option (https://www.brown.edu/cis/tn3270/) for a > tn3270 client if you could convince apple to upgrade

Re: VSAM record length 0

th record replaced with a 1 blank record. > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 1:39 PM Paul Gilmartin > <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 19:56:15 -0600, Joe Monk wrote: > > > > >ESDS uses RBA (relative byte addre

Re: RCA MCF and jukebox

Here's one you'll enjoy: The IBM 2321 Data Cell. It was a device that used magnetic tape strips (2" wide and 13" long) arranged in a circle. Each "segment" of the circle was called a "cell". https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/exhibits/storage/storage_2321.html Joe

Re: VSAM record length 0

ESDS uses RBA (relative byte address). You cant store a record at RBA 0, because that would be the last byte of the previous record. Joe On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 4:55 PM Frank Swarbrick wrote: > So I am trying to copy sequential file to a VSAM ESDS. One of the lines > in the source file has a

Re: VSAM record length 0

Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 19:56:15 -0600, Joe Monk wrote: > > >ESDS uses RBA (relative byte address). You cant store a record at RBA 0, > >because that would be the last byte of the previous record. > &g

Re: Memory-Lane Monday: System Zzzzz | Computerworld Shark Tank

I can attest to answering late nigh support and not remembering the answer I gave, only to sit in the morning production meeting and silently breathe a sigh of relief when it turned out I gave the correct answer. Joe On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:47 AM Bob Bridges wrote: > Boy, not me. I didn't

Re: Here we go again

9 digits = 999,999,999. There afe only 350,000,000 in the USA. Joe On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:08 AM Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 08:45:14 +, Seymour J Metz wrote: > > >My guess is that they needed to update the online

Re: Free 3270 emulator for Mac OS

x3270 is also in homebrew... https://formulae.brew.sh/formula/x3270 Joe On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 11:43 AM Jack J. Woehr wrote: > On 4/4/20 9:51 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > > I tried building x3270 on Mojave from source. > > Also, x3270 is in the Mac Ports tree. https://www.macports.org/ > >

Re: Free 3270 emulator for Mac OS

Paul, Just use homebrew ... you'll save yourself a lot of headache. If you dont have it already: /bin/bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/install/master/install.sh)" then: brew install x3270 Joe On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 12:05 PM Paul Gilmartin <

Re: Free 3270 emulator for Mac OS

Actually its not. https://github.com/XQuartz/XQuartz/issues/10 Joe On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 10:09 AM Paul Gilmartin < 000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote: > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 08:33:41 +, Martin Packer wrote: > > > >Note: xQuartz hasn’t been updated in FOREVER. While I use

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >