Re: list of cobol load modules and their cobol version

2017-08-07 Thread Nick
I can offer you a utility type program
It "reads" in a PDS/PDSE containing load modules/program objects and it uses 
the DESERV and IEWBIND API"s to list all csects in the objects and what 
compiler/product was used to build it.

This what your looking for? Shout if it is and I can mail you either source and 
or load offline.

Should be easy to wrap in a REXX.
again input is a loadlib 
output is written to a DD (FB80) in format 

first line for a program is LMODNAME datetime and userid amode rmode
Followed by one line for each csect it contains and it compiler product.

The utility program just contains an array of IBM product numbers - I dont 
cater for all!
it also contains a list of exclusion csects you dont want  reported on
see below

Example output.
 
MAXSTOR 160926160926ABNB529J  31ANY
MAXSTOR MAXSTOR 160926160926HL ASM V2 31 24
MYCODE  160302160302ABNB529Y  31ANY
MYCODE  160302160302C Z/OS   R2  MIN 24
MYCODE  TIEB160302160302C Z/OS   R2  MIN 24
MYCODE  EDCINPL 110318160302HL ASM V2MIN 24
NEILTIME170724170724ABNB529J  31ANY
NEILTIMENEILTIME170724170724HL ASM V2 31 24
NHM997D 170203170203ABNB529J  31ANY
NHM997D NHM997D 170203170203Ent Cobol V6 MIN 24
NHM997D DLM010  120514170203HL ASM V2MIN 24
NHM997D DLM010170203 .DLM010 MIN 24
NHM997DE170130170130ABNB529J  31ANY
NHM997DENHM997DE170130170130Ent Cobol V6 MIN 24
NICKTEST170504170504ABNB529N  31ANY
NICKTESTNICKTEST170504170504Ent Cobol V4 MIN 24
NICKTESTNICKTEST  170504ä.NICKTEST   MIN 24
NICKTSTA170504170504ABNB529N  31ANY
NICKTSTANICKTSTA170504170504Ent Cobol V4 MIN 24
NICKTSTANICKTSTA  170504ä.NICKTSTA   MIN 24
NICKTSTB170504170504ABNB529N  31ANY
NICKTSTBNICKTSTB170504170504Ent Cobol V4 MIN 24
NICKTSTBNICKTSTB  170504ä.NICKTSTB   MIN 24

Product codes and exclusion arrays

000468 PROD_MAX DCF'24' LUCKY FOR SOME   
000469 PROD_IDS DCCL28'360SAS037 FORTRAN   ' 1   
000470  DCCL28'40CB1 COBOL ' 2   
000471  DCCL28'566528408 HEWLH096  ' 3   
000472  DCCL28'566895801 COBOL II  ' 4   
000473  DCCL28'566896201 ASM H V2  ' 5   
000474  DCCL28'569623400 HL ASM V2 ' 6   
000475  DCCL28'5734-F02  FORTRAN   ' 7   
000476  DCCL28'5734-PL1  PL/I  ' 8   
000477  DCCL28'5734AS100 ASM H  V1.5   ' 9   
000478  DCCL28'5740CB103 OS/VS COBOL   ' 10  
000479  DCCL28'5741SC103 ASM F ' 11  
000480  DCCL28'5752SC104 IEWL  ' 12  
000481  DCCL28'5655G5300 ENT COBOL FOR Z/0S' 13  
000482  DCCL28'566895807 COBOL/370 ' 14  
000483  DCCL28'5648A2500 COBOL FOR OS/390  ' 15  
000484  DCCL28'5688040   C/370 COMPILER V1 ' 16  
000485  DCCL28'5688187   C/370 COMPILER V2 ' 17  
000486  DCCL28'5688216   SAA AD/CYCLE C/370' 18  
000487  DCCL28'5645001   C/C++ OS/390 R2   ' 19  
000488  DCCL28'5647A01   C/C++ OS/390 R4   ' 20  
000489  DCCL28'5694A01   C Z/OS   R2   ' 21  
000490  DCCL28'5655G5300 Ent Cobol V3  ' 22  
000491  DCCL28'5655S7100 Ent Cobol V4  ' 23  
000492  DCCL28'5655EC6   Ent Cobol V6  ' 24  
000493 EXCL_MAX DCF'4'   
000494 EXCL_LIS DCXL2'0003',CL3'CEE' 
000495  DCXL2'0003',CL3'IGZ' 
000496  DCXL2'0004',CL4'IEWB'
000497  DCXL2'0002',CL2'@@'  



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IXGBRWSE - SMF Logstream

2013-11-18 Thread Nick Jones
Hi Jose,

We do not ship an official mapping macro for the SMF buffers returned by a log 
stream browse.  The intended interface to get SMF records in log streams is 
IFASMFDL.  You can however IXGBRWSE the log stream and see the buffers are 
returned in a consistent format, but this is of course not supported by IBM.  

In some cases the data returned by the log stream browse has to be manipulated 
by SMF before the user sees it, such as if zEDC compression is turned on in 
z/OS V2R1.

-Nick  Jones
z/OS Development

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Need to move some DASD volumes that have system logger datasets on them

2013-06-23 Thread Nick Jones
From a logger perspective there is no clear answer, but there are a number of 
tools to get off the data set.  

Logger data sets are of the form HLQ.lsname.suffix and there are staging data 
sets and offload data sets.

To get off of staging data sets you can change the duplex method for the log 
streams to stg_duplex=NO  and that will get off the data set, and then change 
it back and it can re-allocate a staging data set on the new dasd.  You'll have 
to go through a user managed rebuild after each duplex change for the change to 
take effect.

For offload data set logger keeps the most recently used offload data set for 
each log stream and on each system allocated. The data sets remain allocated 
until a new offload data set is needed because the previous one filled. This is 
a tricky condition to force.

1) you can force an offload with the samplib proc OFFLDS. S 
IXGOFLDS,LOGSTRM=lsname
This is a relativley risk free option, but  if there is not enough log data in 
primary storage, it may not cause a new data set allocation to get off the 
current.

2) D logger,c,lsn=lsname,d
-- This will show you the jobs that are using the log stream,
You can find then use the recommended method to quiesce these applications.  

3) Many but not all logger applications will automatically reconnect if they 
are disconnected.  You can do a 
SETLOGR FORCE,DISC,LSName=x to disconnect from the logstream on a system,  you 
might have to do this from multiple systems and multiple log streams to relieve 
all data sets used in a volume.  Disconnecting should cause the data sets to be 
unallocated.  However if applications don't like being disconected they may 
have to be restarted.

You'll have to investigate each logger exploiters behavior to see how they 
tolerate these conditions and hopefully some combination of the above will get 
you what you need.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Copy a SVC Dump

2014-04-23 Thread Nick Jones
As far as I know, the supported method to copy dumps is using IPCS copy dump.

http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v2r1/topic/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieac500/cpydump.htm
http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r13/topic/com.ibm.zos.r13.ieac500/cpydump.htm

Copy dump can be invoked by batch jcl or via the IPCS dialog 3.2

-Nick Jones
z/OS Service Aids/IPCS

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IPCS BLSQMFLD NAME=

2014-05-06 Thread Nick Jones
Hi Dan,

I just opened up APAR OA45131 to update BLSQMFLD.  Were planning on adding a 
LABEL attribute to the macro.  This will allow NAME to specify length and 
offset, while LABEL will be up to 8 characters displayed that are displayed.

-Nick Jones
nrjo...@us.ibm.com
z/OS Service Aids

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: 3590 tape drives

2014-07-16 Thread Nick Z
Kurt,
Hope you were able to find someone to maintain your 3590-B11's and A50 
controller.  If you did, would you mind sharing who you made arrangements with 
for continued HW support?

Earlier this year I upgraded my 3590-B11's and A50 controllers to 3590-E11's 
and A60 controllers as I was aware that IBM would no longer maintain B11's and 
A50's as of July 1, 2014.  I did so with thinking that the 'newer' models would 
continue to be maintained for at least a few more years as there are more 
E11/E1A and H11/H1A drives still in use, as opposed to B11 drives. 

Unfortunately, IBM Withdrawal Announcement 914-145, dated July 15, 2014, will 
require me to revisit the issue of HW maintenance support for my 3590-E11 
drives and A60 controllers.

914-145 states:
IBM will withdraw from its lease, rental, and maintenance agreements the machine
types and models listed below, effective January 31, 2015.  (Only 6 months 2 
weeks notice!)
3590-E11
3590-E1A
3590-H11
3590-H1A

Also, effective January 31, 2016:
3590-A60

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IXGBRWSE (LogStream Browse)

2013-02-25 Thread Nick Jones
Hi John,

Nothing directly will tell you that more data is in the log stream. You can do 
one of these to simulate this.

1) If you own the writing and reading applications you can signal yourself to 
read some more
2) Your program can wake up once in a while and browse again.  Another 
EndReached will just mean you'll need try again later.
3) Logger issues ENF signal 48 for log steam events.  Listen to the ENF signal 
for specific events as they might signal logstream activity. (Offload complete 
is a good one to look at here)


-Nick

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Jes3 CI queue

2014-11-12 Thread Icke, Nick
Hi

   Wonder if anyone can advise or offer help. I myself an new to jes3

   We have a job that is stuck in the Convertor/Interpretor dispatcher and have 
been asked to cancel it.


1.   I have tried both jes3 and mvs commands to cancel it, but it still 
remains in the dispatcher, any suggestions how I can remove it?

2.   How can I determine why it is stuck on there, I can see nothing in the 
logs that give me a clue as to whats happening

Tia

Nick




--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Jes3 CI queue

2014-11-12 Thread Icke, Nick
Thanks Lizette

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: 12 November 2014 14:18
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Jes3 CI queue

If you have not done so, there is a JES3 List You can join at this URL 
http://www.listserv.uga.edu/archives/jes3-l.html

Lizette


 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] 
 On Behalf Of Icke, Nick
 Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 7:05 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
 Subject: Jes3 CI queue
 
 Hi
 
Wonder if anyone can advise or offer help. I myself an new to jes3
 
We have a job that is stuck in the Convertor/Interpretor dispatcher 
 and
have been
 asked to cancel it.
 
 
 1.   I have tried both jes3 and mvs commands to cancel it, but it
still remains in the
 dispatcher, any suggestions how I can remove it?
 
 2.   How can I determine why it is stuck on there, I can see nothing
in the logs that
 give me a clue as to whats happening
 
 Tia
 
 Nick

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Logger Space

2015-01-17 Thread Nick Jones
You don't want to 3.4 delete the data sets, this may cause logger to think the 
log stream is damaged.

You'll want to evaluate what is in the log streams and archive the data 
appropriately.  

See z/OS MVS Setting Up a Sysplex (SA23-1399), Planning for system logger 
applications, Deleting log data and log data sets.

The section on Deleting log data give you various options depending on what 
application using the log streams.

Using tso to delete the log data sets can cause a lot of trouble for system 
logger.

-Nick Jones, z/OS Development

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IPCS error help

2015-02-11 Thread Nick Jones
This solution is assuming that Jake is on the z13 ESP and has part of OA43495 
++APARs or PTFs applied.  

If this is not the case then, please open a PMR and we'll investigate the 
problem.

Nick Jones
z/OS Service Aids


On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:28:23 -0600, Nick Jones nrjo...@us.ibm.com wrote:

Hi All,

By IPCS 2.2, i believe he means option 2.2 from the main panel which points to 
IP STATUS.


We saw this internally recently--
I believe this specific 878-10 is due to the installation of a ++APAR for 
OA43495 which I think is for new hardware toleration.  Either some versions of 
the ++APAR don't have part IOSVFMTC included which has updates to IOS 
formatters that are called as part of IP STATUS, or IOSVFMTC wasn't applied to 
the miglib that IPCS brings up.

see canceled apar OA45781: ABEND878-10 on IPCS ANALYZE or IPCS IOSK, due to 
zero ULUT pointer in an analyzed dump  

This should be corrected by making sure your miglib has the updated IOSVFMTC 
in it, or making sure you are on the latest ++APAR build.
--
Nick Jones
z/OS Service Aids

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IPCS error help

2015-02-11 Thread Nick Jones
Hi All,

By IPCS 2.2, i believe he means option 2.2 from the main panel which points to 
IP STATUS.


We saw this internally recently--
I believe this specific 878-10 is due to the installation of a ++APAR for 
OA43495 which I think is for new hardware toleration.  Either some versions of 
the ++APAR don't have part IOSVFMTC included which has updates to IOS 
formatters that are called as part of IP STATUS, or IOSVFMTC wasn't applied to 
the miglib that IPCS brings up.

see canceled apar OA45781: ABEND878-10 on IPCS ANALYZE or IPCS IOSK, due to 
zero ULUT pointer in an analyzed dump  

This should be corrected by making sure your miglib has the updated IOSVFMTC in 
it, or making sure you are on the latest ++APAR build.
--
Nick Jones
z/OS Service Aids

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Contract for HLASM project

2015-07-15 Thread Nick Poulos
My group is currently looking for an individual or organization that can 
provide coding expertise for an HLASM coding project.

The project is to convert some HLASM programs that currently use XCF for 
communications between LPARs to using TCP/IP for the same communications. All 
other processing in the modules is working well and would not be changed, only 
the communication method used to transport the data between the two systems. 
Skills required are expertise in HLASM and z/OS, XCF understanding and solid 
TCP/IP skills.

Any interested parties can contact me offline for more information: 
nick.pou...@asg.commailto:nick.pou...@asg.com


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


HLASM Coding Project

2015-07-15 Thread Nick Poulos
My group is currently looking for an individual or organization that can 
provide coding expertise for an HLASM coding project. 

The project is to convert some HLASM programs that currently use XCF for 
communications between LPARs to using TCP/IP for the same communications. All 
other processing in the modules is working well and would not be changed, only 
the communication method used to transport the data between the two systems. 
Skills required are expertise in HLASM and z/OS, XCF understanding and solid 
TCP/IP skills.

Any interested parties can contact me offline for more information: 
nick.pou...@asg.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Fault Analyzer and LE ABTERMENC

2016-01-12 Thread Nick Baguley
Hi List

 

We are seeing behaviour under fault analyser where the ABTERMENC LE runtime
option is being forced to RETCODE instead of ABEND.

 

Can anyone confirm the behaviour?

 

TIA

Nick



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: CA7

2016-03-13 Thread Icke, Nick
Thanks Liz

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: 13 March 2016 14:50
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA7

Yes.  It is on communities.ca.com.  

Lizette


-Original Message-
>From: "Icke, Nick" <nick.i...@hpe.com>
>Sent: Mar 12, 2016 9:52 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: CA7
>
>Hi
>
>Is there a listserv specifically dealing with Ca7
>
>Regards
>
>Nick
>
>--
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
>email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


CA7

2016-03-12 Thread Icke, Nick
Hi

Is there a listserv specifically dealing with Ca7

Regards

Nick

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: FDR List

2017-01-03 Thread Icke, Nick
Whats the prob you are encountering and can you supply the exec pack, I maybe 
able to help

Ta

Nick

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Hardee, Chuck
Sent: 03 January 2017 18:56
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: FDR List

Does anyone know if there is an FDR list out there somewhere?
If there isn't one, is anyone willing to offer insight on an FDR RESTORE 
problem I am having?

Thanks,
Chuck

Charles (Chuck) Hardee<mailto:chuck.har...@thermofisher.com>
Senior Systems Engineer/Database Administration EAS Information 
Technology<mailto:DBA%20Engineering%20-%20DB2_IDMS>

Thermo Fisher Scientific
300 Industry Drive | Pittsburgh, PA 15275 Phone +1 (724) 517-2633 | Mobile +1 
(412) 877-2809 | FAX: +1 (412) 490-9230 
chuck.har...@thermofisher.com<mailto:chuck.har...@thermofisher.com>  | 
www.thermofisher.com

WORLDWIDE CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: Dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended recipient, 
or an employee or agent of a system responsible for delivering the message to 
the intended recipient, is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please inform the sender and delete all copies.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Merging two CTN STP

2017-03-17 Thread Nick G
Take a look at white paper WP102314 at http://www.ibm.com/support/techdocs 

This gives you various options of merging CTNs either disruptively or 
non-disruptively, I successfully used the non-disruptive approach last year 
having studied this paper very carefully.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: PDSE MAXGENS API

2018-05-02 Thread Nick Jones
Hi Gord,

Thanks for the heads-up on FAMS. Yes, I think this is going to hurt!

Nick

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: PDSE MAXGENS API

2018-05-02 Thread Nick Jones
Thanks for the confirmation, Steve.

I did consider the possible hacks you mentioned but unfortunately, neither the 
IEBPDSE utility nor TSO/E LISTDS (nor indeed the TSO/E REXX function, LISTDSI) 
have been updated to output the MAXGENS value of a PDSE V2 library. 

Even if these facilities get updated via an APAR, their use would be 
undesirable since ours is a commercial application and the functionality being 
developed would become conditional on the customers' application of the APAR 
SYSMODs.  

I think I am going to have to bite the bullet and request permission from 
management to get the FAMS licence.

Nick  

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: PDSE MAXGENS API

2018-05-03 Thread Nick Jones
Many thanks, Cieri.

However, this method obtains the system wide maximum as defined by 
MAXGENS_LIMIT in parmlib member IGDSMSxx, not the MAXGENS value defined to an 
individual PDSE V2 library.

Nick

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


PDSE MAXGENS API

2018-05-01 Thread Nick Jones
Is there an API that will allow my program to establish the maximum number of 
member generations defined to a PDSE version 2 data set (via MAXGENS)?

I have found a SHARE presentation that states this information is stored in the 
PDSE itself.

The ISITMGD macro will get the PDSE version and also indicates whether that 
PDSE is enabled for member generations. Unfortunately, it does not get the 
maximum number of generations supported by the PDSE.

From what I've gathered from my Google searches, I'm beginning to suspect that 
this information is only available via FAMS.

Nick

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Programmatic way to create unrecoverable ABEND?

2019-04-11 Thread Nick Jones
For authorized code, you can use the CALLRTM service. This can kill the current 
task or any task you want.  You could have a test program that abends a task in 
your main program.  It also has options to disable retry.

Nick Jones

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


SMFPRMFxx SYS SUBSYS and EXITs question

2019-11-26 Thread Nick Varley
In an SMFPRMxx member if you have this:

...
SYS(NOTYPE(4,5,20,34,35,40)
EXITS(IEFU83,IEFU84,IEFU85,IEFACTRT,IEFUJV,IEFUSI,
   IEFUJP,IEFUSO,IEFUJI,IEFUTL))
SUBSYS(STC,EXITS(IEFUJP,IEFUSO))
...

then why would the IEFU83/84/85 exits not fire for SMF records coming from STCs?
Documentation seems to imply that the SYS settings are the default/back-stop 
for all things.

We needed to make the last line read like this to make it work:

...
 SUBSYS(STC,EXITS(IEFU83,IEFU84,IEFU85,IEFUJP,IEFUSO))
...

The question:
  Does the list of exits in the SUBSYS specification overwrite all those in 
SYS, that is, in this case, it reduces the list of exits from the ten in the 
SYS specification to just the two that are explicitly listed?

Any pointers would be welcome!

Thanks,
Nick.

Nick Varley
Director, Customer Support
p +44 (0) 1823 226012 | m +44 (0) 7766 806780
nick.var...@syncsort.com
  
We organise data everywhere,
to keep the world working
Syncsort Limited
2 Tangier Central
Castle Street
Taunton
TA1 4AS
UK
www.syncsort.com--
ATTENTION: --
Syncsort Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales. 
Registered number: 01373158. Registered office: 3rd Floor, The Pinnacle, 20 
Tudor Road, Reading, RG1 1NH. VAT: GB295525177
The information contained in this message (including any files transmitted with 
this message) may contain proprietary, trade secret or other confidential 
and/or legally privileged information. Any pricing information contained in 
this message or in any files transmitted with this message is always 
confidential and cannot be shared with any third parties without prior written 
approval from Syncsort. This message is intended to be read only by the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the 
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that 
any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message, in any form, is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately notify the sender and/or Syncsort and destroy all copies of this 
message in your possession, custody or control.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Product usage metric question: is SMF89UZT meant to be a cumulative field?

2020-01-02 Thread Nick Varley
Happy New Year to all.



I'm looking at product usage data in SMF 89 subtype 1 records, and I see that 
TCB and SRB values go up and down, and look like reasonable interval values.



The SMF89UZT field for offloaded CPU time, however, only seems to go up and 
makes it look suspiciously like it is just a snapshot of the counter reading, 
not the true interval (delta) value for that interval.



The snippet below is for z/OSMF, but I can also see the same happens for IBM 
products like DB2, MQ, Websphere and IBM Integration Bus (IB).



 SMF DATE/TIME SRBTCBOFFLOAD

30 DEC 2019 00:00:00.00 0:00:00.01 0:00:00.33 1:31:58.37

30 DEC 2019 00:05:00.00 0:00:00.01 0:00:00.29 1:31:59.12

30 DEC 2019 00:10:00.00 0:00:00.01 0:00:00.32 1:31:59.86

30 DEC 2019 00:15:00.00 0:00:00.01 0:00:00.36 1:32:00.57

30 DEC 2019 00:20:00.00 0:00:00.00 0:00:00.30 1:32:01.30

30 DEC 2019 00:25:00.00 0:00:00.00 0:00:00.30 1:32:02.05

30 DEC 2019 00:30:00.00 0:00:00.01 0:00:00.34 1:32:02.79



I don't have any non-IBM product data with offload engine usage to check, so if 
anyone who does have would be prepared to have a look at their data and report 
back, that would be very useful. Whatever the results, I think there are some 
questions to pose to IBM:



Is the SMF89UZT field cumulative for all products?  If so, please can you 
document that in the SMF record description.

Is the SMF89UZT field cumulative only for IBM products?   If so, please can you 
document that in the SMF record description.

Is the SMF89UZT field meant to be an interval value?  If so, please can you fix 
the z/OS code so it is.



Any additional thoughts or comments are most welcome.



Best wishes

Nick

Nick Varley
Director, Customer Support
p +44 (0) 1823 226012 | m +44 (0) 7766 806780
nick.var...@syncsort.com
  
We organise data everywhere,
to keep the world working
Syncsort Limited
2 Tangier Central
Castle Street
Taunton
TA1 4AS
UK
www.syncsort.com--
ATTENTION: --
Syncsort Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales. 
Registered number: 01373158. Registered office: 3rd Floor, The Pinnacle, 20 
Tudor Road, Reading, RG1 1NH. VAT: GB295525177
The information contained in this message (including any files transmitted with 
this message) may contain proprietary, trade secret or other confidential 
and/or legally privileged information. Any pricing information contained in 
this message or in any files transmitted with this message is always 
confidential and cannot be shared with any third parties without prior written 
approval from Syncsort. This message is intended to be read only by the 
individual or entity to whom it is addressed or by their designee. If the 
reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are on notice that 
any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this message, in any form, is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please 
immediately notify the sender and/or Syncsort and destroy all copies of this 
message in your possession, custody or control.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: EBCDIC-ASCII converter and other tools

2020-12-30 Thread Nick Jones
There is a Microsoft Windows version of the z/OS OEM batch utility, SELCOPY.

SELCOPY for Microsoft Windows can be invoked as a line command in a Windows 
shell or from a shell script (BAT or VBS). It is capable of record based data 
manipulation (including ASCII<->EBCDIC) and also supports definition of user 
specific translate tables.

Product description - http://www.cbl.com/products.php#tab=selc

Examples - http://www.cbl.com/success.php


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


SAS Institute IP claims against World Programming fail again

2021-01-13 Thread Nick Ciancio
it appears that the copyright and patent infringement claims that SAS brought 
against WPS have been dismissed or withdrawn.

https://www.worldprogramming.com/press/sas_institute_ip_claims_against_world_programming_fail_again/

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/texas/txedce/2:2018cv00295/183557/465/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN