I hate doing a search in the KC, because you seldom get a pointer to what you
are searching for, but have to divine other searches to get to the data.
KC SEARCH STINKS!
Regards – Grant.
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
There is no
Previously posted to ISPL-List
I have a situation where I need to execute a single JCL procedure, but ONLY
execute some steps (including the DSN allocations) for part B or part C,
depending on the return code of part A. The problem I seem to be stuck with is
that in part B (STEP10 below) I
Thanks to all who have responded. I have decided to follow the route of having
a step which will run a REXX exec to do the allocations for me. Far, far easier
than any other solution I was considering :)
Regards – Grant.
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In
I seldom post here, but have been intrigued by this thread.
What are the problems (perceived or real) that will be resolved by replacing
JCL with REXX?
Regards – Grant.
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
There is no such thing as the
program products; REXX is that language.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:53 AM, Ward Able, Grant wrote:
> I seldom post here, but have been intrigued by this thread.
>
> What are the problems (perceived or real) that will be resolved by
> replacing JCL with REXX?
>
>
>
> Regar
I just looked in the REXX Reference manual and found this (which I did not know
before!):
There can be up to an implementation-defined maximum number of expressions,
separated by commas, between the parentheses. In TSO/E, the implementation
maximum is up to 20 expressions.
Regards – Grant
(Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu> on behalf of
Ward Able, Grant <gwarda...@dtcc.com>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 10:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Assem
I have an Assembler program linked AMODE(31) RMODE(24). It makes SQL calls and
under some circumstances I will call DSNTIAR to printout the DB2 error &
diagnostic info.
The call statement I am using for this is:
CALL DSNTIAR,(SQLCA,(6),LRECL),LINKINST=BASSM,MF=(E,PARM)
Yet I am getting an
Just a quick note to all who have so kindly responded. I am going to be out of
the office for this week and will look at these responses in more detail when I
get back.
I used LINKINST, as this was mentioned in the DB2 KC as my program is AMODE(31)
RMODE(24).
Regards – Grant
DTCC Internal
I have been following the ASMA034E discussion and am interested in learning how
to do the new-fangled relative branching stuff.
Can someone point me to a reasonably simple example? I learned my Assembler in
the 80's and have been using that way of coding ever since. I think it is time
to
ATTENTION! This email originated outside of DTCC; exercise caution.
On 2018-11-16 1:47 AM, Ward Able, Grant wrote:
> Can someone point me to a reasonably simple example?
If you can do branch instructions then you can do branch-relative instructions.
Apart from RR instructions (BR, BASR, B
X-posting to TSO-REXX and IBM-MAIN
Hi all,
I have an exec that uses SDSF to do some screen-scraping of messages from the
JES2MSGLG, but I am seeing something weird and I wonder if this is something I
have done, or a crazy anomaly.
Apologies for any reformatting that may take place. Does
This seems simple and I may be having a senior moment, but I don’t seem to be
able to get this to work.
I have a number of batch jobs that do ADRDSSU backups, then execute a variable
number of PROC statements to copy files.
TSOBATCH PGM=IKJEFT01 CC=
BKDSNPGM=ADRDSSU CC= 0004
Each
,
Would it work to use an IF-THEN-ELSE in the ADRDSSU step:
IF MAXCC LE 4 THEN SET MAXCC=0
Then you should be able to just check for RC=0 in your IF statement at the end
of the job
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Ward Able, Grant
Sent
I will give this a try in the real world. In my tests it has proven to be
correct.
Thanks Jon
Regards – Grant
DTCC Internal (Green)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jon Jon
Sent: 17 January 2019 21:51
To:
I have voted for these.
Will these be for ALL Knowledge Centres, or just the z/OS ones?
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
There is no such thing as the Cloud. It is just somebody else’s computer.
If you don't have time to do it right, when
If you are using MQ Server, rather than MQ Client, then you can use channel
compression, which works well for text based data, such as xml files. We use
these in some of our channels:
COMPHDR('SYSTEM') COMPMSG('ZLIBFAST')
Regards – Grant.
In theory, there's no difference between
This may be simplistic, but using REXX & EXECIO, as long as you can identify
the errant data easily enough, you should be able to get this done fairly
easily. Maybe not as quick as REPRO, but without much hassle.
Regards – Grant.
In theory, there's no difference between theory and
>>> Is there a batch method to UNNUM all members in a list of PDS's?
I guess you would have to write an EDIT macro.
Then write a REXX exec to invoke that macro for each member
Regards – Grant.
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
Worry more
Carlos - probably best to ask this on the dedicated CICS list
cic...@listserv.uga.edu you can subscribe here:
https://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=CICS-L=1
I don't remember the details, but you would have to turn on an attribute in a
MAP or in the 3270 datastream.
Regards - Grant.
In
Alles van die beste, Kees.
Regards – Grant.
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are. - John Wooden
If you don't have
There's no such thing as The Cloud - it's just someone else's computer...
Regards – Grant.
DTCC Public (White)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mitch Mccluhan
Sent: 09 June 2020 13:51
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: "Everyone wants
I think you have to send an email to the list server - something about NOMAIL,
but you can try send an email to mailto:lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Regards – Grant.
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
Worry more
With my FTP software (Ipswitch WS_FTP) I have to have a different session for
zOS and OMVS files. For OMVS files, I have to specify the host type of Unix
(standard)
Regards – Grant.
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
Worry more about your
Associate Director :-)
Regards - Grant.
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what you
are, reputation merely what others think you are. - John Wooden
If you don't have time to
From what I can find, VARSTORAGE only pertains to OUTTRAP:
VARSTORAGE (HIGH)
indicates that CLIST variables and REXX OUTTRAP variables containing output
from authorized commands invoked by REXX can be kept in storage above the 16M
line.
Regards – Grant.
In theory, there's no difference
I am interested in this routine please!
gwardable at dtcc dot comm
Regards – Grant.
Telephone Internal: 201496 (London)
Telephone External: +44 (0)207 650 1496
EAM – Enterprise Application Middleware
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
Worry
As stated by IBM Hursley (John Tilling) on the CICS-List, CICS does not ship
an IDENTIFY macro!
Regards - Grant.
Telephone Internal: 201496 (London)
EAM - Enterprise Application Middleware
In theory, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice,
there is.
Worry more about
28 matches
Mail list logo
