IOF End of Support Direction.....

2023-04-21 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Please excuse me if this is been asked already, haven't seen it.

https://www.triangle-systems.com/End%20of%20IOF%20Support.shtml

We have used IOF for quite a awhile, and frankly it has some wonderful 
functionality that I haven't seen in SDSF (like the ability to send the output 
to email address).

Curious what sites that use that product plans are.

Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Java And Specialty Engines

2022-08-11 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
We run a lot of JAVA workloads under WebSphere Liberty on our z15.

We are seeing hardly any utilization on our 2 specialty engines (ziip/zaap).   
It is my understanding that ALL java workload is eligible to run under those 
engines, so it has left me confused.  We are seeing some offloaded DB2 work for 
the distributed connections, so the engines are working.

Curious if anyone has any suggestions/thoughts on what we might be missing?  
All the settings we have chased down look correct.

Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Report on total tape usage?

2021-07-09 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
I am trying to figure out how much data we actually have backed up on tape.   I 
have run a few RMM reports, but haven't seen anything much that will just give 
me a total number of space used (i.e. 12.4 Terabytes used).   Report 11 seems 
the closest, but that will take much work to add up all the individual fields.  
 Anyone have a report, or is there another one already existing that you can 
point me to?  I'm going to look around in MXG today, but figured I'll check 
with the group.

Thanks,
Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Anyone have SFTP JCL to share?

2021-04-20 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Stuff is becoming such a pain.  I found in this situation it was much easier to 
FTP the file from the mainframe to my PC, and then to use FileZilla to sftp it 
up to Broadcom.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Ward, Mike S
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 12:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Anyone have SFTP JCL to share?




I believe SFTP is part of SSH, so you would have to install that. It's free 
from IBM. Then I believe Rocket Software has a freebee that allows you to use 
SFTP in batch with MVS datasets.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Billy Ashton
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [EXT] Anyone have SFTP JCL to share?

Please Note: This email is from an [EXTERNAL] sender. Do not click on links or 
attachments unless you expect them from the sender and know the content is 
safe. Please contact the Service Desk if you have any concerns regarding this 
message.



Hi everyone! I was just moved to support a CA product (I guess that's Broadcom 
now), and have to send in a sensitive file to one of my support cases. The file 
is pretty large, and the support tech said I have to copy it to OMVS to use 
SFTP for uploading it. I am not sure I have that space available on the other 
side, so I was wondering if anyone here has a BPX batch job that will send a 
file to CA or Broadcom from the z/OS file without having to first copy the file 
to my Unix filesystem.

I hope this is clear, and that someone can help me.

Thanks!
Billy


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

==
This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you 
have received this email in error, please notify the system manager. This 
message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by mistake and delete 
this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: z/OS LDAP Server

2021-03-25 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
We've been doing it this way for years.   Very simple configuration and works 
pretty well.

If you have any questions, feel free to send me an email.

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Jack Zukt
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 10:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS LDAP Server

External Email Warning! This email has originated from outside of the 
Washington State Courts Network.  Do not click links or open attachments unless 
you recognize the sender, are expecting the email, and know the content is 
safe.   If a link sends you to a website where you are asked to validate using 
your Account and Password, DO NOT DO SO! Instead, report the incident.



Hi,

I have been given the task of implementing a z/OS LDAP server on a sandbox.
I have been reading the manuals (the RedBook IBM Tivoli Directory Server for 
z/OS and the IBM Tivoli Directory Server Administration and Use for
z/OS)
The idea is to have this LDAP acting as a bridge between RACF and a program 
running on a Linux or windows platform (an userid administration program of 
some kind).
My doubt at this point is if I need to implement anything else besides the SDBM 
configuration. It seems to be that I do not need DB2 for the task at hand.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated
Thank you in advance for any help that you can give me.
Jack Zukt

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SKLM Servers

2021-03-24 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Have it on two Virtual Windows Servers.  I agree it is crazy we have to pay for 
such software to utilize encryption on our IBM Disk.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of Ed 
Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 9:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SKLM Servers


Curious what folks are doing to provide SKLM to your IBM Z DASD and tape
devices?

Are people using an IBM Storage Appliance (such as 2421 model AP1),
hosting SKLM on your own dedicated "in room" Linux machines, using
competing KMIP-compliant solutions, or something else entirely?

Thanks...

--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
https://smex-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=https%3a%2f%2fwww.phoenixsoftware.com=fac293a5-ed50-4d77-bd32-2b78f3775a9a=d15df2c165e24fb53bc026dba1ee9b619a161a5a-3acb7217a1221f25c4ed7cbac39d4bb4b811fd07



This e-mail message, including any attachments, appended messages and the
information contained therein, is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient or have otherwise
received this email message in error, any use, dissemination, distribution,
review, storage or copying of this e-mail message and the information
contained therein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies
of this email message and do not otherwise utilize or retain this email
message or any or all of the information contained therein. Although this
email message and any attachments or appended messages are believed to be
free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into
which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient
to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the
sender for any loss or damage arising in any way from its opening or use.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: EMC DLM over IBM VTL

2021-03-04 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
We did the same about 5 years ago.  Originally started using the DLM and Data 
Domain just for the mainframe data.  We also replicate to our cold site with a 
matching pair.   We started adding more Windows related data using SQL DD Boost 
and server Veeam backups to it. 

We absolutely zero performance issues on backups.   

We do see performance issues on Windows restores when it needs to reconstitute 
all the dedupped/compressed data such that it has me looking at alternatives.   
We do not see this issue on the mainframe data, just Windows.

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Jake Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 10:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: EMC DLM over IBM VTL


Hello

We are analysing if EMC DLM would be a right fit to replace IBM VTL.


I am trying to understand about backup cycles using EMC DLM when we use single 
backup solution and single virtual tape library to backup both mainframe and 
open systems.

Is there a possibility for contention ?
Will there be a impact to mainframe backup when there is a high backup volume 
for open system  ?

These performance do effect the open system as well ?

Trying to understand these from the DLM users ? Any feedback would be 
appreciated

Jake.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: TS7720 to EMC DLM migration

2020-12-24 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
We did this migration not too long ago.  It was actually pretty easy once 
everything was setup and the devices were available on all LPARs.

The main tool we used was FDRCOPY.  With a few simple jobs, we were able to use 
it and migrate almost 80% of the items on the TS7720 to the DLM.  It did the 
copies and recataloged everything to the new DLM "tapes".For my 7 years of 
FDRARCHIVE tapes, we used the FDRARCHIVE utilizes to copy everything that we 
needed to keep.   FDRCOPY also let us "stack" items onto "tapes", so a lot of 
the 30 years of "logs", we were able to "stack".  It was quite nice that it 
handled all the recataloging so that none of the using jobs needed to be 
modified at all.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Peter
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 8:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: TS7720 to EMC DLM migration


Hello

I am interested to know about your experience on migrating TS7720 to EMC
DLM ?

Basically what are the changes to be done in zOSA Before migrating ? Any
gotchas ?

We use HSM and is there anything to be done ?

Peter

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: CA Broadcom Replacement Software

2020-12-10 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
See you are getting lots of responses on this.

CA-1 we migrated to RMM
Migrated our automation to SeaSoft ODDS
Haven't found a viable replacement for TPX.  We use dynamic screens based off 
of attached RACF Profiles and rely a lot on SMF records, which no other product 
does.

I feel your pain though.

Dennis


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Elaine Beal
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 11:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: CA Broadcom Replacement Software


Any recommendations for CA1, CA Workload Automation (JSS/ESP), TPX session 
manager replacements?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SuperWylbur Users

2020-07-07 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
DDNAME not found   
? show ddns 26142   
JOB 26142 TECHDELD  PRT  LOCAL PUN  LOCAL   
  PN DD-IDENT TYPE LRECL   COUNT CPY FORM DEST   DISP   
Job record count= 0 
? show ddns 26142 all   
JOB 26142 TECHDELD  PRT  LOCAL PUN  LOCAL   
  PN DD-IDENT TYPE LRECL   COUNT CPY FORM DEST   DISP   
Job record count= 0 
?   

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
John S. Giltner, Jr.
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 5:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SuperWylbur Users

What happens if you do show sysout/ddnames and show sysout/ddnames all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SuperWylbur Users

2020-07-06 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
The z/os 1.13 to z/os 2.2 required some changes to all the JES interfacing 
modules.  One of the problems I found is with the my different LPARS, sometimes 
the JES BASETRAK would be different, so depending on which LPAR it was, I had 
to change that.  I created some automation that determined what the BASETRAK 
was in the LPAR SuperWylbur was coming up in, and then dynamically zap the 
offsite in the module  One of the SuperWylbur systems mods fixed that problem 
so I don't deal with that anymoreI'll look again to see if that fix is 
still there.

Back in 1980's I was always tweaking the SuperWylbur code and got pretty good 
at it, but through the years I stopped, so it takes a bit to get re-geared up 
to start looking at it again.

Right now, it is just the fetch that is not working.   Show JOBS gives what one 
would expect:

? show jobs  
JOB26146  TECHDELQ  AW FETCH LOCAL T=22236 CODE 12   
JOB26142  TECHDELD  AW FETCH LOCAL T=4159  CODE 0
JOB26141  TECHDELA  AW FETCH LOCAL T=11812 CODE 0
JOB26140  TECHDELD  AW FETCH LOCAL T=24632 CODE 0

But the fetch is not working...
? fet 26142 clear 
 DDNAME not found 
? 

I believe that is all that is not working...but that is a key function our 
helpdesk uses.

Like John, I am hoping to keep it working for a while.   When I last talked to 
SuperWylbur systems they said there were about 4 customers still using it.

I will put my Wylbur hat on later this week and do some tracing and see if I 
can see where it might be failing.

Dennis


-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
John S. Giltner, Jr.
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 5:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SuperWylbur Users

It is still distributed with full source code.  

Typically is new JES2 releases that require modules to be re-assembles.  I 
can't really remember the last time we had to re-assemble or make any changes 
because of z/OS upgrades. 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: SuperWylbur Users

2020-07-02 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Yes I did.   Assembles just fine.  Even put the code in to indicate z/OS 2.4.  
Everything works okay except for the fetch...which is what we need.

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 4:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SuperWylbur Users

Did you reassemble (assuming Wylbur code is available) with new JES2 macros?

> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On 
> Behalf Of Longnecker, Dennis
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 4:16 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: SuperWylbur Users
> 
> Hello -
> Anyone here still using SuperWylbur and have it up and running on a z/OS 2.4
> system?   Bringing up 2.4 now and the JES parts aren't working correctly.
> Before I start digging into the code, I wanted to see if anyone else 
> has solved it.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dennis
> 
> --
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


SuperWylbur Users

2020-06-29 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Hello -
Anyone here still using SuperWylbur and have it up and running on a z/OS 2.4 
system?   Bringing up 2.4 now and the JES parts aren't working correctly.  
Before I start digging into the code, I wanted to see if anyone else has solved 
it.

Thanks,
Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: ISPW Question

2020-06-17 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
This triggered me to look to see what version of ISPW we are on4.04.so 
I guess we are in the same boat as you!

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Steely.Mark
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 1:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: ISPW Question

Anyone on this list have experience upgrading Compuware ISPW from v17 to v18?

Is there a  listserv for Compuware and / or ISPW ?

Google couldn't find anything.

Thank You

*** Disclaimer ***
This communication (including all attachments) is solely for the use of the 
person to whom it is addressed and is a confidential AAA communication. If you 
are not the intended recipient, any use, distribution, printing, or copying is 
prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately delete it 
and notify the sender.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Question on MQ on the Z/os

2020-03-03 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Wondering if anyone here is using MQ Series on the z/os box and knows about the 
licensing?

If one had MQ on the Z and it was doing all the QMgrs/Queue work, do the 
clients (that aren't QMgrs/Queue) on the other boxes need cost/purchase 
licenses?   What I am finding is:

- The MQ clients are available as support pacs, they are freely downloadable.
- it's covered by an IBM license, they just don't charge for it.
- MQ Client comes with the Websphere MQ Package, it is a component. 
- The standard MQ Client is free

Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Question on LDAPSRV running on z/OS

2019-09-18 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
We are doing the same.  There was no LDAP server changes we needed to do to 
make this happen.  My first guess would be your web front-end is uppercasing it 
before sending it to LDAP.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 1:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Question on LDAPSRV running on z/OS

Cross-posted from RACF list because I'm getting desperate.

Hello list,

I hope this is the right place for this.  We're using LDAPSRV running on z/OS 
2.2 to take login requests from a browser front-end and authenticate them 
against RACF.  We just implemented mixed case passwords last night and it 
appears that LDAP is converting the passwords it gets to upper case before 
sending them on to RACF for validation, so logons are failing for people who 
have changed their passwords with the mixed case support.  Is there a parameter 
in the LDAP config files to pass passwords through LDAP as-is instead of 
upper-casing them or am I looking in the wrong place.  LDAP is a black box to 
me.

AFAIK, logons are still working just fine for those who haven't changed 
passwords, only those who have.

TIA,

Rex

The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from 
disclosure and may be legally privileged.  If the reader of this message is not 
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, 
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this 
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard 
copy format.  Thank you.


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Page/Alert notifications from z/os

2019-06-18 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Curious what people are using, if they are anymore, to send 
pages/text's/notifications/etc. from z/os to people on call.   The software we 
have been using runs on a Windows 7 box, which I need to get rid of and/or 
replace.   Rather than continue what we have been doing for 25 years, curious 
as to what other people might be doing for this.

The easiest thing I can think of is to change my alerting automation to send an 
e-mail/txt message to the cellphone of the person on call.

Thanks for any suggestions/ideas.

Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Accented Names in EBCDIC -> ASCII

2019-03-26 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
I believe it is the "ó small o acute"

The original Windows File has this in it.
Dón   (there is an accent on the o).

The file that gets delivered to z/os has this in it:
Dsn

In my FTPDATA for the FTP server, I have this:

;SBDATACONN   (IBM-1047,IBM-850)

Which is commented out, so I'm using the "default" .  I do have a 
"TCPIP.STANDARD.TCPXLBIN " dataset, which would be 7th on the hierarchy list.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 6:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Accented Names in EBCDIC -> ASCII

On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:48:50 +, Longnecker, Dennis wrote:

>I see there is an extended ASCII table which has accented characters; like the 
>hex A2 which is an accented lower case O.
>
>Is there such a character in the ebcdic world?   All my google searches for 
>EBCDIC to ASCII conversions aren't showing accented characters in EBCDIC.
> 
What does your "accented lower case O" look like.  What accent?  In Unicode.
I find at least the following:
ö small o umlaut
ô small o circumflex
ó small o acute
ò small o grave

What language does it come from?  That might be a clue to the EBCDIC code page.

In ISO8859-1, 'A2'x is "¢", a cent sign.   I might expect other languages to
overload that.

See: https://www.terena.org/activities/multiling/ml-docs/iso-8859.html

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Accented Names in EBCDIC -> ASCII

2019-03-25 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Thanks all for your responses.further investigation shows that the 
character is not getting translated correctly when a Windows System FTP's a 
file to a z/os file (not USS).

Our SBDATACONN statement is commented out in the FTPDATA settings.   I believe 
tomorrow I'll test various SBDATACONN settings and see what works best.  Any 
suggestions for a starter set?

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List  On Behalf Of 
Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 9:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Accented Names in EBCDIC -> ASCII

Indeed there are.  See code points X'CB' to X'CF' in these tables for accented 
lower case letter oh.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBCDIC_037

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EBCDIC_1047

HTH

Peter

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Longnecker, Dennis
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 11:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Accented Names in EBCDIC -> ASCII

I see there is an extended ASCII table which has accented characters; like the 
hex A2 which is an accented lower case O.

Is there such a character in the ebcdic world?   All my google searches for 
EBCDIC to ASCII conversions aren't showing accented characters in EBCDIC.

Thanks,

Dennis
--

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee 
and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader 
of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of 
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this 
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments from your system.

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Accented Names in EBCDIC -> ASCII

2019-03-25 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
I see there is an extended ASCII table which has accented characters; like the 
hex A2 which is an accented lower case O.

Is there such a character in the ebcdic world?   All my google searches for 
EBCDIC to ASCII conversions aren't showing accented characters in EBCDIC.

Thanks,

Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


z/os Access Windows SMB ?

2019-03-13 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
I've seen the information on how to get z/os data available via SMB to a 
Windows machine, but haven't seen anything on how to get the z/os side to send 
a file to a windows SMB.

Trying to get a bunch of mainframe files over to a Windows share, without 
setting up FTP servers on the windows side and doing it that way.

Anyone doing this already and have some pointers?

Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


node.js pricing ?

2018-09-21 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
I am going to trial a product that utilizes node.js.   It appears to be free on 
the windows side.  I see node.js is available for the z/os and was curious if 
anyone is actually running it, and how much it is.

Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: [External Sender] Re: LRS VPS Printer Replacment

2017-12-19 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
I did the VPS -> JQP/VVP swap out around 2003.  Have about 1500 printers 
defined in JQP/VVP.

I find the support really good with the JQP and VVP products.  I tried NPF 
first, but the administration would have been really hard for my help desk 
people.

The only reason I did the swap out in the first place was cost.   First it was 
the cost for CPU upgrades, but I am also seeing savings in the yearly costs.

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Porowski, Kenneth
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 6:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External Sender] Re: LRS VPS Printer Replacment

Another vote for MacKinney's JQP.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 9:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] [External Sender] Re: LRS VPS Printer Replacment

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Carroll, William < 
carro...@grangeinsurance.com> wrote:

> Another vote for NPF.  I have the same exact situation as Dana.  Works 
> well.  We do CICS , Mainframe, Network, printing all through the same 
> devices.  Not one issue for over 2 years.
>

​I got NPF working and it did well. However, it was (is still?) hard to 
administer. So hard that the VTAM person (we actually still had SNA 3270 nodes 
via Visara controllers) decided that it was unacceptable. We went with 
MacKinney's JQP. It was easier to administer than NPF (but not as easy as VPS); 
reliable (we still use it); and relatively inexpensive.​



>
> Bill
>
>

--
I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove it.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: NFS on Mainframe

2017-12-05 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
I'm jumping in on thisis there any quickstarts out there to get NFS (Client 
or server?) installed on z/os?

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2017 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: NFS on Mainframe

On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 23:23:18 -0600, Munif Sadek wrote:

>To start with. I am planning to l configure NFS client on my Sandbox zOS 2.3  
>LPAR  and NFS server  on sandbox AIX 7.1 LPAR (using classic IBM Hypervisor).
>
>Depending on the outcome, I may switch zOS to be the NFS server. Our main 
>objective is stop  FTPing tens of reports but write them to NFS so that 
>end-users (non mainframers)  can pick them up.
>
We tried that once.  Failed because of a certain application that used commas 
in filenames.

-- gil

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: CA1 to RMM conversion

2017-10-26 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
I miss CA-1.  I found it much easier to use than RMM.  I am constantly trying 
to remember how to find things in RMM that were so simple to find in CA-1.  
What I especially miss is the reporting in CA-1.  They were so simple to 
create.  I find that I have to utilize FDR/ABR reporting to give me the RMM 
reports I want.

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Ed Jaffe
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 10:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA1 to RMM conversion

On 10/25/2017 10:35 PM, Edward Gould wrote:
>
> The real question should be is how is IBM support for RMM?

I don't know in the general case, but anecdotally I once I had a situation 
where RMM was *DOWN* (SEV 1) abending at startup. The support folks on the 
other end seemed unable to glean much from the SVC dump I'd sent, so they asked 
a bunch of rudimentary questions, made one useless suggestion after another, 
asked for this and that trace, and generally "dinked" around until I was ready 
to pull my hair out. (We were dead in the water for a couple of days.)

In desperation, I wrote to Mike Wood (now retired) and sent him my PMR number. 
He was _astonished_ at the (lack of good) support I was getting! 
He scolded his support team and told them straight away what the problem likely 
was.

Thanks to Mike's help, my systems were up within the hour...

--
Phoenix Software International
Edward E. Jaffe
831 Parkview Drive North
El Segundo, CA 90245
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IBM Session Manager replacement

2017-08-18 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Good luck on this.  Every few years I look at what is out there to replace TPX. 
 TPX is a great multi-session product and does what we need it to do, but when 
I  get the about $60,000 bill every year I wonder what else is out there.

TPX ties in with RACF pretty well and it dynamically builds the persons "menu" 
when they signon based on their RACF profiles.  Love this capability because we 
never have to do TPX administration.  Just add the user to RACF and it all 
happens dynamically.  Some of the other products do this also.

TPX also lets you "view" a person's screen.  This is a wonderful feature the 
help desk uses.  When a customer calls in with a problem, the person just 
enters the RACFID of the person and they can see what they are doing real-time 
without the caller having to do anything. 

The main reason we still have TPX is SMF records.  TPX does an excellent job of 
writing out SMF data on all sorts of activity.  In particular we can see how 
many transactions a user did in total and per session they signon to.  We use 
this information a lot and have many reports for managers to view activity.

Good luck on your endeavor.

Dennis




-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Roberto Halais
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 3:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: IBM Session Manager replacement

Hi listers:

IBM has notified that IBM Session Manager product will be phased out by the end 
of 2018.

They suggest we migrate to IBM CL/Supersession.

I would like to know of other vendor products that do a similar function.

I will be searching but thought of tapping into your experience.

Thank you all for any hints.

Roberto

--
Politics: Poli (many) - tics (blood sucking parasites)

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Sort

2017-08-01 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Many years ago. (about 25).

Since then we converted to Syncsort (it was almost PL/Sort, but Syncsort ended 
up in the mix.)

Then we converted to IBM Sort

All of the conversions were fairly effortless and didn’t' run into any issues. 

I think it depends on how many sort related reports you have.

IBM's sort costs me about $300 a month, so we aren't talking about a lot of 
money.

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of gsg
Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 2:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Sort

Let me reword this.  Does anyone have any experience with CA-Sort?  How do you 
like working with the product?  Easy to use?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Displacement of ASG View Direct and PRO/JCL

2017-06-01 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
The list is still maintained, but not by John.  Very little traffic on it.

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Edward Finnell
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 1:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Displacement of ASG View Direct and PRO/JCL

Does John Anderson still maintain his ISV list in Canada? I googled a little 
but there's tons of Andersons.
 
 
In a message dated 6/1/2017 3:28:55 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
sipp...@sg.ibm.com writes:

Adding  to the list of candidate alternatives, for ASG-ViewDirect it might
be IBM  Tivoli Output Manager for z/OS or IBM Content Manager OnDemand for
z/OS.  For ASG-PRO/JCL, I agree with the RES suggestion. The full  product


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Third Party Maintenance on IBM DS8870

2017-04-14 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Morning -

When I purchase my DS8870 several years ago, I purchased it with 3 years of 
warranty/maintenance.   I am coming up to the time to renew.  IBM's one year 
maintenance is about the same price as my original purchase price and three 
years of warranty.   Crazy.

Anyone using a third party provider for support on the IBM DS8870?   If so, 
mind PM'ing me who it is so I can give them a call.

Thanks,

Dennis Longnecker

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Software vendor trying to force MSU based contract

2017-03-02 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
I would think that if you had a contract in place and were not requesting any 
changes to the contract, the T's would stay the same.   If the contract was 
based on machine serial number, address, OS, etc. and you were requesting a 
change, then they could do this to you.   Sometimes they try to change the name 
of the product with a new version, but my contracts usually have language to 
include new versions, etc.

It's pretty hard to amend a contract unless both sides sign on the dotted line.

Dennis

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of JT
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 6:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Software vendor trying to force MSU based contract

Has anyone else experienced this?

A vendor for a mainframe data entry product used for the last 30 years (with a 
perpetual unlimited seat license) has sent us a contract addendum where they 
increase the price by 60+% and include language to change to a MSU based 
license.

The use of this product is dwindling while our MSU foot print is growing.

When questioned about the change the representative indicated government 
contracts give him no room to negotiate on price.

This will be turned over to the legal department, but I am interested how 
others have handled similar situations.


JT

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

2017-02-15 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
I would agree with the below.

The remote screen via capability is excellent for help desk.  No other software 
required, they just enter the persons RACF ID and they instantly see what is on 
the persons screen and as it changes.  Again, we don't have to have any 
software on the persons screen or have them do a single thing.

Also, TPX at least, produces wonderful SMF records.   So no matter what VTAM 
application they visit, I can produce reports on the total number of 
transactions they did, along with signon times for both the session manager and 
any VTAM applications.

Oh, and if you implement it, you can have single signon to your VTAM 
applications.

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Jesse 1 Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

We depend heavily on TPX here. A session manager provides two key benefits:

1) A session manager 'holds' a session from which the user gets disconnected. 
Nowadays TSO/E is pretty good at reconnection, but other VTAM applications do 
not have this capability. There is no substitute for this function for 
productivity. 

2) A session manager can support far more connections than any emulator I've 
ever seen. As a z/OS sysprog, I can limp along fairly well with just an 
emulator, but we have altogether several scores of CICS regions across the 
enterprise. TPX can orchestrate as many concurrent sessions as a user needs. 

A third benefit that I rarely make use of is the ability to 'move' a 
workstation from one location to another. I can walk to another desk even in 
another building and 'take over' my original TPX session. This can be 
especially useful for help desk/debugging activities. Fourth, Tom Brennan makes 
a usermod available to Vista that, together with an available usermod to TPX, 
causes the current session name to appear continuously at the bottom of the 
screen. The more sessions you have open--especially if they look very 
similar--the more important this feature becomes.

.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
323-715-0595 Mobile
626-543-6132 Office ⇐=== NEW
robin...@sce.com

-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Dana Mitchell
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 6:17 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: (External):Re: IBM Netview Session Manager replacement

I think Tubes was acquired by IBM and became IBM Session Manager in the early 
2000's.  We converted several systems TPX, Cl/SuperSession etc to it at the 
time as part of the push to convert from ISV products to IBM products.

I haven't needed/worked with a session manager for many years with the easy 
availablity of just opening multiple Vista windows.  What sort of functions 
provided by a session manager do you require?

Dana

On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:28:13 -0500, Carmen Vitullo  wrote:

>I've used TPX, Teleview, not sure of Teleview is now TPX, both from CA, 
>Tubes from MACRO4 just to name just a few Carmen
>


--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


SHOWMVS ASMA972U Error

2017-01-04 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Trying to assemble SHOWZOS.  It is getting:

** ASMA972U Virtual storage exhausted; increase the SIZE option
STATEMENT NUMBER 83127 WAS BEING PROCESSED BY PASS 1 OF THE ASSEMBLER

I'm on z/os 2.2

The EXEC statement has:

//ASMH EXEC PGM=ASMA90,REGION=0M,

I've tried various SIZE options:

// PARM=(OBJECT,NODECK,BATCH,NOESD,NORLD,NOXREF,SIZE(MAX-1M,ABOVE))
// PARM=(OBJECT,NODECK,BATCH,NOESD,NORLD,NOXREF,SIZE(MAX,ABOVE))

And get the same results.

Any suggestions?

Dennis






--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


DB2 DBA Job Opening - Washington State

2016-02-09 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
We posted this also in the DB2 IDUG list...but just in case any of you know 
anyone who would like to move to the Pacific Northwest.  (Weather report for 
today. LOW LEVEL OFFSHORE FLOW WILL MAKE TUESDAY ONE MORE SUNNY AND MILD 
DAY WILL STILL MAINLY BE IN THE 55-60 RANGE...WITH HIGHS AROUND 60 ON THE 
COAST.)


The Administrative Office of the Courts has DB2 DBA opening in Olympia WA.  The 
position is for DB2 on z/OS, but any DB2 LUW experience on other platforms will 
be considered.

Below is the hyperlink to the Job Announcement:
DB2 DATABASE 
ADMINISTRATOR

If you would like any additional information, you can contact me at (360) 
705-5269

Dennis Longnecker



--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


XMITIP B37

2014-11-12 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Using XMITIP and getting a B37 error.SYSTSPRT has:

  3981 *-*   OGet file_omvs odsn Oget_fmt
   +++ RC(-2871) +++

Looks like the code is not preallocating of the ODSN so the system is 
dynamically allocating it, but not big enough.   Anyone know of a way to get it 
to allocate it larger?  Otherwise I'm going to have to go into the code and 
actually have it pre-allocate the space.

Thanks,
Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


z10 Memory

2013-08-09 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Since IBM dropped the z10 from marketing, it seems impossible to get anything 
done to the box from them.  Does anyone know if it is possible to acquire 
memory, from a third party, and have it put in the z10 and be actually 
operational?   I'm told everything is done via microcode now and IBM won't even 
update that on z10's...the memory will be there but the microcode isn't set to 
use it.

Thanks for any comments.

Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


REXX Socket Calls

2013-06-21 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Is it still true you can't encrypt (i.e. SSL) Socket Calls in REXX? I have 
some code which does a HTML GET on a webpage on port 80 and the webmasters want 
me to run it on port 443 encrypted now.I've been doing google searches and 
I found an older reference to it doesn't support it, but some of the newer 
manuals reference it.

Thanks,

Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


zIIP Enabler for Natural

2013-06-06 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Just ran across this that enables Natural to utilize the zIIP processor.

https://www.softwareag.com/us/images/SAG_zIIP_Enabler_FS_May12_web_tcm89-98519.pdf

Wondering if anyone is using it or has more details they can share.

Thanks,

Dennis

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN