This list has been a great source of ideas and information, although I've
never really been a 'contributor' here, but more of a 'lurker'. Whenever
I've seen a thread that I might be able to respond to, someone else gets in
first with a response very similar to the one that I thought of.
So, I
(Coming in a bit late on this thread)
As others have said, 'kicks' and Hursley are closely related (or rather,
_were_. It is my understanding that Hursley Grange is now some sort of IBM
museum.)
The local no. 66 bus goes between Romsey and Winchester via Hursley, so -
at least at some point in the
s the "Start Date" column in z/OS 2.5 to aid
> users trying to work out the up-time of the ASIDs.
>
> Rob Scott
> Rocket Software
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Sean Gleann
> Sent: 21 February 2023 10:01
> To: IBM-MAIN@
This isn't a 'problem' per se, just an observation that someone else may be
able to shed some light on...
In SDSF, the DA panel presentation can be modified using the 'View' option.
For my logon id I have brought the column named 'Tran-Act' in to view, and
then sorted the display so that Tran-Act
rences to get emails.
>
> Carmen
>
>
> On 9/6/2022 8:37 AM, Sean Gleann wrote:
> > test
> > Sean
> >
> > --
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> >
test
Sean
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
my posts aren't appearing
Sean
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
(Possible repeat - not sure if my previous response got through...)
We received email from RDP timestamped 03:07UTC:
"Due to required maintenance, the remote development environment is
temporarily unavailable.
We are working as quickly as we can to restore services, please be patient
and we
We received email from RDP timestamped 03:07UTC:
"Due to required maintenance, the remote development environment is
temporarily unavailable.
We are working as quickly as we can to restore services, please be patient
and we will update you as soon as possible."
Nothing new since then.
Have not
@Robert Garrett (with a sigh of relief!) 15 minutes for z/CX to come up on
a z/OS under z/VM at Dallas? Me too. I thought I was doing something
wrong, but couldn't get any useful feedback from IBM/Dallas about the
'problem'.
Sean
On Thu, 21 Apr 2022 at 04:57, kekronbekron <
. Apologies for my oversight here, but
what we're looking for is information on creating a channel program that
uses TCWs as opposed to CCWs (our software generates its own channel
programs).
Regards
Sean
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 07:31, Timothy Sipples wrote:
> Sean Gleann wrote:
> >Also
We are trying to improve our software product by including provision for
files in cylinder-managed space on EAV disks, and with using z/HPF to
access them.
'DFSMSdpf Advanced Services' (SC23-6861) helps somewhat for FTM8/9 labels,
but it does not go far enough, we feel.
Also detailed
David:
"...I still would like to know how to display which codepage I am using"
I can't see that anyone else has said this, so I might be repeating
something...
In PCOMM, start up a session, and you should see a menu bar at the top,
where one of the options is 'Communication'.
Click on that,
tion from scratch.
> IMHO there is no license enforcement hindrances.
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> (looking for new job)
> Lodz, Poland
>
>
>
>
> W dniu 14.04.2021 o 12:07, Sean Gleann pisze:
> > I recently saw mention somewhere of PCOMM version 14, and realis
I recently saw mention somewhere of PCOMM version 14, and realised that I
am still using version 13 and have been doing so for longer than I can
remember.
As a result, I've started down the path of upgrading to version 14.
The install package available from IBM appears to be
; The parse line should say:
>
> parse source . . me .
>
> Andy
>
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2021, 13:16 Sean Gleann, wrote:
>
> > Hi Andy
> >
> > The ISPLOG output doesn't give anything useful, unfortunately.
> >
> > Time*** ISPF
Hi Andy
The ISPLOG output doesn't give anything useful, unfortunately.
Time*** ISPF transaction log ***
07:08 Start of ISPF Log - - - - Session # 1
07:08 TSO - Command - - STRIPNOS
07:08 * Dialog Error *
Hi Andy
"is it just that you're seeing the RC20 from the ISREDIT" - in this
particular version of the REXX it is, but as previously detailed I had
problems with the syntax of the CONTROL ERRORS statement.
"Does the REXX continue afterwards if you uncomment the code" - in a manner
of speaking,
> members
>
> How about TSO EDIT (yes TSO, not ISPF) in batch.
> Lennie
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of R.S.
> Sent: 11 January 2021 10:21
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Request for help with remov
gt; //BATCHPDF.SYSTSIN DD DUMMY
>
>
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List För Paul
> Gilmartin
> Skickat: den 11 januari 2021 17:07
> Till: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Ämne: Re: Request for help with removing sequence numbers from PDS members
&g
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 15:37, Sean Gleann wrote:
> Many thanks to all who responded.
> I opted to adapt and (try to) use the REXX that Andy Styles gave, but I'm
> tripping up over something that has to be one of those 'simple, basic'
> things.
> The "ISPEXEC CONTROL ERRORS R
t TSO EDIT (yes TSO, not ISPF) in batch.
> Lennie
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of R.S.
> Sent: 11 January 2021 10:21
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Request for help with removing sequence numbers from PDS
&g
This has almost certainly cropped up before but try as I might, I can't
spot anything obvious in the archives.
I have a need to strip sequence numbers from members in a PDS or PDSE.
The input PDS(E) has DCB characteristics of REFCM=FB,LRECL-80, and contains
an unknown number of members. Of those
Thank you, Ernesto - much appreciated
Vote added.
Regards
Sean
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 15:55, Ernesto Figueroa wrote:
> You are correct. For now, you must specify all the path names, but we
> understand this is a capability that ought to be provided in DFSMSdss. As
> others have mentioned,
I'm hoping that it's still a 'work in progress' & that one day I'll be able
to say 'DUMP PATH INCLUDE('/foldera/folderb/**') or something close to that.
Sean
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 11:35, Andrew Rowley
wrote:
> On 30/09/2020 6:03 pm, Seymour J Metz wrote:
> > The DSS manual say that when you
:38 +0100, Sean Gleann wrote:
>
> >I'm currently investigating the use of DFDSS DUMP PATH to secure data held
> >in UNIX files and folders.
> >...
> >"DFSMSdss does not provide wildcard support when processing UNIX files."
> >...
> >I can se
I'm currently investigating the use of DFDSS DUMP PATH to secure data held
in UNIX files and folders.
As far as I can see, I have to specify the WORKINGDIRECTORY to establish
the starting point for the DUMP operation, then use INCLUDE to _explicitly_
specify the files I want. The available
Yuksel
Thank you for that information and I'm sorry I haven't responded sooner
(other work took precedence, as is so often the case).
Your modification to the 'run' command has worked exactly as required. I
now have cadvisor running on my zcx system and overall CPU utilisation is
down to a much
asurement tooling can cost more than the application being measured, even
> though it is "free".
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 6:02 PM Sean Gleann wrote:
>
> > Hi Attila - thanks for the pointers, but I'm not sure of how to act upon
> > them.
> >
> > Th
*sigh*. Oh, how I wish that various e-mail clients would quit re-formatting
stuff. My previous response here was so nice & neat & tidy before I hit
'Send'. Reading that response back via IBMMain makes me look like a
complete illiterate...
Sean
On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 09:01, Sean Glean
that cpu time is
> low cost (as is memory), while z/OS considers cpu to be high cost and path
> length worth saving. Same for the subsystems in z/OS and performance
> monitors.
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:43 PM Sean Gleann
> wrote:
>
> > Allan - "...count
wouldn’t
> make much difference during startup/shutdown.
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 3:40 AM Sean Gleann wrote:
>
> > Can anyone offer advice, please, with regard to monitoring the system
> >
> > resource consumption of a zcx Container task?
> >
>
Can anyone offer advice, please, with regard to monitoring the system
resource consumption of a zcx Container task?
I've got a zcx Container task running on a 'sandbox' system where - as yet
- I'm not collecting any RMF/SMF data. Because of that, my only source of
system usage is the SDSF DA
regards.
> Max
>
> <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail
> >
> Mail
> priva di virus. www.avast.com
> <
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail
>
Is there a way to force a maximum CPU% utilisation for a specific task?
Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but it is my understanding that WLM
only really starts 'doing it's stuff' when the system as a whole is heavily
loaded.
For example:
- If my system is running at 80%, and a new incoming
I hear what you say, Brian - perhaps I should be a little less trusting.
Nevertheless, the book goes on to cover installation of 'Cadvisor' and
'Prometheus', too, both of which are required for grafana to do its job.
(and I'm having similar difficulty with Cadvisor, too.)
Regards
Sean
On Fri,
Hoping that someone can help me out here...
I'm successfully running a zcx container task on a z/OS 2.4 platform, and
now I'm trying to get 'grafana' running to show me various system
performance stats, etc.
According to the RedBook "Getting started with zOS Container Extensions
and Docker",
protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, August 5, 2020 3:27 AM, Sean Gleann
> wrote:
>
> > The scratch job JCL should also have a DD with DDName 'MESSAGE'.
> > You might find more/better information in that file
The scratch job JCL should also have a DD with DDName 'MESSAGE'.
You might find more/better information in that file
Sean
On Wed, 5 Aug 2020 at 08:08, Gibney, Dave wrote:
> I am not using RMM, but I would expect the utility EDGHSKP to have
> documentation and an explanation of RC 12.
>
> >
;statusName": "in-progress",
> "system": "mySplex.mySystem",
> "vendor": "IBM",
> "workflowDefinitionFileMD5Value": "11b08002b4648a0778c35c76dcbe9f64",
> "workflowDescription": "
443 or
stuff associated with z/OSMF in the AT-TLS config files.
I 've obviously got some more digging to do...
Regards
Sean
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 07:43, Sean Gleann wrote:
> Thank you Dave - I was unaware of that qualification.
> Checked and, yes, 'localhost' is defined in my RESOLVER par
ve.
>
> Some browsers allow you to allow connections with an untrusted
> certificate. That would be a bad security practice but may allow an initial
> connection.
>
> Hope some of this helps. It is generic advice for any browser connection
> to z/OS.
>
> Mike Wawiorko
>
&
m my iPad
>
> > On Jun 8, 2020, at 8:16 AM, Sean Gleann wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the hint about thoroughly checking output, Michael.
> > I went back and studied all the saved outputs, hoping to find something
> > that might be helpful.
> > In the e
lways gets a syntax
> error.
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:05 AM Sean Gleann wrote:
>
> > It's been really quite a troublesome effort for me, Michael, but I guess
> > it's true to say that most of the problems are down to my rudimentary
> > knowledge of TCPIP and netwo
n is in GLZ messages.
> > >
> > > I don't have z/OS v2.4 running, so I can't really check.
> > >
> > > Gadi
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf
> > > Of Sean Gleann
&g
4.izso100/izso100_diagnosisservice.htm
>
> It looks like the real information is in GLZ messages.
>
> I don't have z/OS v2.4 running, so I can't really check.
>
> Gadi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Sean Gleann
> Sent: Thur
Can anyone point me at documentation for AZD... messages coming out of a
zcx container, please?
I'm getting:
AZDN0004E Failure configuring IPv4 address
and
AZDP0001E Unexpected error 5 configuring data disks
but various attempts at searching for these produce 'nothing found'
responses.
Regards
: https://www.lbdsoftware.com
>
> "Worry more about your character than your reputation. Character is what
> you are, reputation merely what others think you are." - John Wooden
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Sean G
thers think you are." - John Wooden
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Sean Gleann
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 5:08 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Request for help with CBT961
>
> I just noticed that one mysel
*
> FILE 961
> //*3. Copy YCLMACTB into the ISPTLIB library*
> FILE 961
> //* 4. Create a REXX Exec Y$xxx *
> FILE 961
> //* - where xxx is the 1-6 character name of the new *
> FILE 96
) step have I missed out here?
It's not a RACF thing. It's just as if I hadn't done anything at all.
Hopefully,
Sean Gleann
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
I was going to chip in earlier with my knowledge of VTAMAPPL, but got
beaten to it.
I've been using VTAMAPPL since working with multiple z/PDT systems, and
then copying the module across to z/OS LPARs as required.
I've got no idea where the source for VTAMAPPL is, nor of any documentation
for it -
"...It is 1000% better than the IBM VSE offering (name escapes me)"
It's 'ICCF' - but I really had to hunt for *that* particular brain cell.
I remember getting myself into trouble with my manager when recovering from
forgetting my password.
I dumped the first track of the ICCF VSAM(?), and
Something I noticed on the BBC web site this morning...
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-50840818/i-was-a-teenage-code-breaker-at-bletchley-park
My main take-away from it was "92 years old and still as bright as a
button!" I hope I last that well...".
Merry Christmas, all
Sean
I'd probably be inclined to use a TERSEd DFDSS dump, too - but that's just
because I don't implicitly 'trust' (read: 'understand') UNIXy things.
One such 'thing' I was shown was:
tar -cf - ¦ ssh -l "cd ; tar -vxf -"
Apparently this means something like: "create a tar ball of on
stdout then
2019 at 20:29, scott Ford wrote:
> The ADDSD is a profile if the dataset or HLQ isn’t found it will fail.
>
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 2:25 AM Jon Perryman wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, October 30, 2019, 08:52:22 AM PDT, Sean Gleann <
> > sean.gle.
ct that SMS data sets must be catalogued would prevent your non-admin
>> from creating TEST in the first place but once it is created the barn door
>> is wide open.
>>
>> The fact that PROTECTALL is off and you have many unprotected data sets
>> is a major security
Back in the days of IPS/ICS dispatching control, wasn't there something
that was referred to as the 'wheeler-dealer mechanism' & does it still
exist in some form in the WLM code?
>From memory:
1. New task gets created and is assigned a time-slice of 1msec, at a
priority of 32 (out of 64 - i.e
@Kurt - thank you for the qualification - "...but z/OS software will
continue to be serviced using PTFs and therefore using SMP/E".
I hadn't read or heard that until now. Its good to hear that that is the
case.
Sean
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 00:49, Mark Zelden wrote:
> z/OSMF can create an
On our z14, z/OSMF takes some 60m+ EXCPs and 300 seconds of CPU time
(according to SDSF) before it can even be used...
(and anything that announces its availability with "...ready to run a
smarter planet" just makes me cringe.)
Carmen's remark about 'clear documentation' is very much on point.
y hole. Any unprotected data set is just a problem waiting
> to bite you.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> > Behalf Of Sean Gleann
> > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2019 5:17 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
list was requested, was a volser specified on the panel?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> > Behalf Of Sean Gleann
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2019 12:45 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: T
king table entry that covers the dataset?
> >
> > Does the non-admin user have the OPERATIONS attribute?
> >
> > Is there a DASDVOL profile that covers the non-SMS volume in question?
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Di
Joao: yes, I have tried that, but it really doesn't give the information
that I want - I can see the monitored user creating and deleting file, but
I don't see anything about the RACF profiles that were used.
Having said that, I have managed to move things along.
The situation I now have is that
Thanks to all who have responded so far, and apologies for not responding
sooner (other work took precedence, unfortunately).
Trouble is - I'm no closer to a solution (but I haven't tried the GTF/IPCS
idea yet).
More on this if I have some news
Thanks again
Sean
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 at 22:44,
Following a set of somewhat distressing events here, I discovered - the
hard way - that our master catalog was poorly protected, and so I now have
to fix it. The situation is that all users of the my system can create,
read, write, update, delete files that are cataloged in the MasterCat.
The
t; If so there’s a lot one could do with that... :-)
>
> ... If the plane I was about to get on didn’t see me with my elbows (and
> knees) up round my ears I’d rustle up a proof of concept. :-)
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On 17 Sep 2019, at 08:57, Sean
Correction - the input is *probably* not ISPF tables (having cross-checked
with other ISPTLIBs that I have available).
Nevertheless, they are 'encoded' - not straight text...
Sean
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 08:06, Sean Gleann wrote:
> Having been in the same position as Jim, I asked practica
Having been in the same position as Jim, I asked practically the same
question here, a couple of years back.
Then, the basic answer was 'No', so I was highly pleased to see that some
sort of progress had been made on this.
I should have known better.
IWMINSTL is a great starting point, but it's
Take special care with date values...
Over here in Leftpondia, date values are (normally) 'dd-mm-yy', or some
variation thereof. This can lead to some difficulties when sending data
from m/f to pc.
As Mike says, surround such values with quotes, thus forcing Excel to treat
them as text strings
Erika, Simon
Thank you for coming back on this.
Up until the time of raising this thread, I was working with
RETENTIONMETHOD(EXPDT) specified, and getting the results I described.
Having sent my email, I moved on to RETENTIONMETHOD(VRSEL), but that didn't
help a lot - the EXPDT specified on the
I'm having considerable difficulty getting rmm to work on my system & I
wonder if anyone might be able to help.
The main problem is that I can't a seem to get it to retain tapes that have
unexpired files on them.
I've tried numerous combinations of settings in the EDGRMMxx parmlib
member, all to
the correct link back.
Regards
Sean
On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 11:18, David Spiegel wrote:
> Hi Seann,
> In which Group would I find TERSE.ZIP?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> David
>
> On 2019-07-01 06:05, Sean Gleann wrote:
> > Donald: From your initial query... "Terse is no good
Donald: From your initial query... "Terse is no good because Linux can’t
unterse it."
FWIW there is a TERSE application available from the old Hercules days that
includes implementations for Windows, DOS, MAC and Linux.
I tried it out on windows and found it worked tolerably well for handling
TSO segment and be
> > authorized to use SDSF.
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 3:14 AM Sean Gleann
> wrote:
> >
> > > I've been struggling with this one for a couple of days now, without
> > making
> > > any headway.
> > >
> > > I h
Please ignore my previous post.
I've manged to create a solution via a different method.
Using ADDRESS SDSF "ISFLOG READ TYPE(SYSLOG) (WTOR)" gives me what I need
to progress this work.
Regards
Sean
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
I've been struggling with this one for a couple of days now, without making
any headway.
I have a REXX that works through SDSF that is intended to issue 'D R,L'
and retrieve any outstanding console messages. It works fine when I invoke
it from ISPF option 6 with an EXEC... command, but when I
Solved!
Thank you very much Tony and Binyamin
PARSE SOURCE cracked the problem nicely
Sean
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 10:15, Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
> Lookup PARSE SOURCE
>
>
>
> On Wed, 1 May 2019 09:38:05 +0100 Sean Gleann
> wrote:
>
> :>Hello all
> :>I am dev
Hello all
I am developing a REXX that, for a number of reasons, needs to know the
name of the PDS that it is stored in.
The intention is that the REXX will be invoked from ISPF option 6, so
typing something like:
exec 'MY.REXX.LIB(TESTREXX)' 'MY.REXX.LIB'
*is* an option, but one that is prone to
d almost all x37 abends here.
> > I also still run FDR COMPAK, fairly aggressive DFHSM migration to ML2
> > VTL, and a good sized overflow pool.
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> > > Beha
*sigh* I sometime wonder why I spend so much time making sure that text
positioning, justification, etc is 'just right', only to see all that work
thrown away.
I hope those that read my previous response can make sense of it...
Sean
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 at 11:32, Sean Gleann wrote:
> Tha
upport
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
> > Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 6:33 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: Disk space alloc
Does z/OS / SMS have a set of default space allocation sizes and if so,
where are they held and can I alter or control them?
I have a situation where insufficient contiguous disk space results in
the SPACE request parameters supplied for a DISP=(NEW...) file with values
that are too low to fulfil
I remember having maintain a PICK system w back
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pick_operating_system
On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 09:20, Sankaranarayanan, Vignesh <
vignesh.v.sankaranaraya...@marks-and-spencer.com> wrote:
> Hi Arthur,
>
> Thank you, always open to history lessons
> Didn't
Wondering if anyone is doing anything with data from SMF type 92, subtypes
50-59...
These subtypes are generated if IOEFSPRM specifies
"smf_recording=On,", but there does not appear to be a way to
synchronise the recording interval with rest of SMF data.
If you know of a way to do this
Just for clarification:
No, we don't IPL daily - apologies for my poor wording.
My use of IEASYMU2 creates two 'new' system symbols 'PRYYMMDD' and
'PRYYDDD' after IPL, but then I change the values in those symbols at about
00:01 each day.
As for "This is the sort of thing that should be routinely
@ Peter Relson
Peter, you say "Adding system symbols is not something that a program
should be doing".
By 'a program', do you mean 'a user-written program', as opposed to a
'system utility'?
I'm using IEASYMU2 on a daily basis to create (immediately after IPL) or
update 2 system symbols.
These
gt; with instrumentation
> turned on, you're hallway to a solution.
>
> 4. Check your assumptions, especially about version control.
>
>
> --
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
>
> ____
> From: IBM Mainframe Di
Hello Peter
Problem solved!
Your idea(s) regarding the SMF30 record analysis eventually led me to
reproducing the test environment used by the developer so that I could run
the tests myself.
One look at the command being used showed what the problem was - there was
a parametrised upper limit of
Peter, Mike: Yes, I remember Peter pointing at Mark's page, but for some
reason I moved on past that to some other line of enquiry.
I've now done what you said, and the results from REXXSTOR in PuTTY are:
V I R T U A LS T O R A G EU S A G E
---
Thanks to all that have responded - we're back and running again, but not
due to any work on my part.
My description of the failed system was not complete, for fear of confusing
the issue - it is a guest z/OS under z/VM that is supplied by a.n. other
party. I contacted them and the bad IEFUSI
USI, reassemble you customized exit.
> IF not, copy SYS1.AOSB3 to SYS1.LLPALIB and re-ipl.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
> Of Sean Gleann
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 10:20 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subjec
Trying to follow-up on the stuff that Peter has suggested, I'm still
chasing that elusive '54M' - Who sets it? Where is it set? How can I
override it?
So, I created an IEFUSI that, whatever size is requested, whether it be
below, above or MEMLIMIT, you get '0M'.
Which, I agree, is probably a bit
Thanks for the responses, gents
Carmen: yes - that is what I see in the manual
Jim: Thanks for the update - it would appear that the manual requires an
update
Peter: I'm still trying to fully assimilate what you've said - very
detailed & complete. Where did you get all this from? Is it documented
rdus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:
> Sean Gleann wrote:
>
> >None of the suggestions so far check out, unfortunately.
> >David: all limits associated with memory come back as 'Unlimited'
> >Carmen: Yes, I've got MEMLIMIT(1280M) specified
> &
MVS tasks
>
> do you have a MEMLIMIT in the SMFPRMxx member ?
>
>
>
> Carmen Vitullo
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Sean Gleann"
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2018 7:51:04 AM
> Subject: Region size for OMVS tasks
&
We have a problem here that is proving to be … um... "resistant to
analysis" & I wonder if anyone on this list might be able to help.
Most of our developers submit work to the system from a PuTTY session, that
will result in multiple OMVS tasks being fork()ed or spawn()ed. Of late,
such work has
; calculated from the last midnight, so 24.05 means 00:05 tomorrow morning.
>
> Kees.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of Sean Gleann
> > Sent: 06 November, 2018 9:49
>
Hello all
I have a need to run a couple of batch jobstreams at the same time every
day.
The streams are fully developed and they run happily at the required
time(s), under control of a couple of JES 'TA' automatic commands:
£ T A0001,I=86400,T=00.05,'£VS,''S JOB,N=DLYWORK1'''
£ T
I wonder if anyone may be able to provide some pointers on my latest
investigation...
Our developers log on to the system via a PuTTY window which provides a
tunnelled connection to SSH - they very rarely log on to TSO.
Having logged on, they issue UNIX commands that initiate OMVS task(s) which
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
