On 2018-10-18 08:22, Peter Relson wrote:
FWIW, within IBM code, a BLDL could not get a 306-04. A module fetch after
a BLDL? Sure. But the directory entry is not relevant to that particular
"decision".
LLA does not care at all about the APF nature of a data set.
Abend 306-04 results specifically
On 2018-10-18 09:30, Ira Nelson wrote:
Is the library defined to the PDSMAN Dynamic BlDL facility?
I don't know, but can ask (not my system); however, it seems likely that
it is since the BLDL is never passed on to IBM's BLDL SVC routine.
--
Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software Internationa
Gord,
Is the library defined to the PDSMAN Dynamic BlDL facility?
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 17, 2018, at 1:34 PM, Gord Tomlin
> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-10-17 13:19, Clark Morris wrote:
>> Is the data set in the concatenation twice because a symbolic is used
>> to change the name of none, one or
FWIW, within IBM code, a BLDL could not get a 306-04. A module fetch after
a BLDL? Sure. But the directory entry is not relevant to that particular
"decision".
LLA does not care at all about the APF nature of a data set.
Abend 306-04 results specifically from checking DEBAPFIN and finding it
On 2018-10-17 15:25, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
you mentioned this was not your system but also add;
We are seeing a ABEND306-4 issued by FOCUS (not by IBM Contents
Supervision) after a BLDL against DDname USERLIB returns with GPR15=0004,
R0=, GPR1=0306. System trace shows that PDS
From: "Gord Tomlin"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 1:57:56 PM
Subject: Re: CA PDSMAN and dynamic additions to APF list
On 2018-10-17 13:41, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> I really don't belive PDSMAN refreshes / adds or deletes libraries from APF,
On 2018-10-17 13:41, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
I really don't belive PDSMAN refreshes / adds or deletes libraries from APF,
dynamic or not, I know 'it used to' update LLA IF the PDS was managed, this was
back Y2K, so things may have changed.
the 306-4 is I think related to the concatenation, you lo
to the STEPLIB concatenation, can't prove any of this without seeing JCL,
APF...etc
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Gord Tomlin"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 12:34:52 PM
Subject: Re: CA PDSMAN and dynamic additions to APF lis
On 2018-10-17 13:19, Clark Morris wrote:
Is the data set in the concatenation twice because a symbolic is used
to change the name of none, one or both at start-up time to another
dataset? If APF is changed dynamically, should the change affect both
members of the concatenation?
I don't have th
[Default] On 17 Oct 2018 09:50:18 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
gt.ibm.li...@actionsoftware.com (Gord Tomlin) wrote:
>On 2018-10-17 12:27, Steely.Mark wrote:
>> To be clear, the data set is being accessed via a private DD statement: Is
>> this the only Dataset specified on the DD statement ?
>
On 2018-10-17 12:27, Steely.Mark wrote:
To be clear, the data set is being accessed via a private DD statement: Is
this the only Dataset specified on the DD statement ?
There is a concatenation, but both members of the concatenation are the
same data set on the same volume.
--
Regards, Go
On 10/17/2018 12:31 PM, Gord Tomlin wrote:
On 2018-10-17 12:23, Tom Conley wrote:
Your client should open an incident with PDSMAN support.
Absolutely! I've already suggested that.
--
We both have an MO (Master of the Obvious) in Computer Science ;-)
On 2018-10-17 12:23, Tom Conley wrote:
Your client should open an incident with PDSMAN support.
Absolutely! I've already suggested that.
--
Regards, Gord Tomlin
Action Software International
(a division of Mazda Computer Corporation)
Tel: (905) 470-7113, Fax: (905) 470-6507
Support: https://a
11:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: CA PDSMAN and dynamic additions to APF list
On 2018-10-17 11:56, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> so you question is just 'in general' ?
> It's been a while since I was at a site that used CA-PDSMAN but I'm thinking,
> if ma
On 10/17/2018 11:49 AM, Gord Tomlin wrote:
On 2018-10-17 10:50, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Did you do an LLA Update or Refresh?
And is this a managed PDSMAN dataset or something in a STEPLIB?
This is not on our system. We don't have CA PDSMAN, so we are unable to
test for ourselves.
We are see
On 2018-10-17 11:56, Carmen Vitullo wrote:
so you question is just 'in general' ?
I'ts been a while since I was at a site that used CA-PDSMAN but I'm thinking,
if managed, it would automatically refresh LLA, not sure about the linklist,
that refresh sometime causes issues with some vendor softw
use to.
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Gord Tomlin"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 10:49:30 AM
Subject: Re: CA PDSMAN and dynamic additions to APF list
On 2018-10-17 10:50, Lizette Koehler wrote:
> Did you do an LLA Updat
On 2018-10-17 10:50, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Did you do an LLA Update or Refresh?
And is this a managed PDSMAN dataset or something in a STEPLIB?
This is not on our system. We don't have CA PDSMAN, so we are unable to
test for ourselves.
We are seeing a ABEND306-4 issued by FOCUS (not by IBM
U
> Subject: CA PDSMAN and dynamic additions to APF list
>
> If a partitioned data set is defined to CA PDSMAN, and is then dynamically
> added to the APF list, does PDSMAN automatically recognize the fact that the
> data set is now defined to APF, or is a command required t
If a partitioned data set is defined to CA PDSMAN, and is then
dynamically added to the APF list, does PDSMAN automatically recognize
the fact that the data set is now defined to APF, or is a command
required to cause PDSMAN to update its information? If PDSMAN does
automatically recognize the
20 matches
Mail list logo
