I've had the opposite complaint, after pushing each task to where I was waiting
on something, I was leaving the office about 3 PM one day and ran into the VP.
He questioned why I was leaving when others had to stay to all hours of the
night to get their work done. I said something like "I'm so
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:46:10 -0500, Phil Smith III wrote:
>John McKown noted:
>
>>Lack of loyalty (both ways) causes lack of trust. It also, IMO, is why
>>some people decide to defraud their employers in various ways. A kind of
>>tit-for-tat where the employee "gets back his own" from the compa
.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Phil Smith III
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 11:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM's Marissa Mayer moment: Staff ordered to work in one of 6 main
of
John McKown noted:
>Lack of loyalty (both ways) causes lack of trust. It also, IMO, is why
>some people decide to defraud their employers in various ways. A kind of
>tit-for-tat where the employee "gets back his own" from the company.
>Simplest example: __consistently__ coming in just a bit l
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:13 AM, scott Ford wrote:
> Phil and Charles,
>
> Amen...loyality and trust are paramount to me. I see a big gap in that area
> with some companies
>
>
Lack of loyalty (both ways) causes lack of trust. It also, IMO, is why
some people decide to defraud their employers i
Phil and Charles,
Amen...loyality and trust are paramount to me. I see a big gap in that area
with some companies
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:28 PM Phil Smith III wrote:
> Charles Mills wrote:
>
>
>
> >Yep. If you don't have a clue how to judge their accomplishment at least
>
> you can see if the
On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 21:55:21 -0500, Steve Smith wrote:
>Well, this about a marketing department. There's no way to tell whether
>they accomplish anything or not :-).
>
>sas
>
More than just marketing:
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/02/09/ibm_workfromhome_cull_companywide/
When the company
filling a chair.
>
> Charles
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of John Mattson
> Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 9:52 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IBM's Marissa Mayer moment:
Charles Mills wrote:
>Yep. If you don't have a clue how to judge their accomplishment at least
you can see if they are filling a chair.
There was a rumor last year that the CEO of a large company (not IBM, for
once) was walking around remote offices and leaving Post-Its on empty chairs
that sa
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM's Marissa Mayer moment: Staff ordered to work in one of 6 main
offices – or face the axe (2)
Why not admit that management it just not flexible, innovative, smart enough to
determine whether their employees are working effectively. I totally vie
+1
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, John Mattson
wrote:
> Why not admit that management it just not flexible, innovative, smart
> enough to determine whether their employees are working effectively. I
> totally view this as an admission of management's failure to keep up with
> changing technol
Why not admit that management it just not flexible, innovative, smart
enough to determine whether their employees are working effectively. I
totally view this as an admission of management's failure to keep up with
changing technology and workplace reality.
Needless to say, I may not be popular w
12 matches
Mail list logo
