Re: IBM LOOKAT not working?

I'm sharing a response that I just received from Kathy Pfeiffer (IBM Z Content Ecosystem Manager): "The search API issue affecting Look@ has been resolved. You can resume using Look@ and may need to clear out your cache. " -Marna WALLE IBM Poughkeepsie

IBM LOOKAT not working?

Classification: Confidential Whatever message ID is entered, I receive the following response: "Search couldn't find any matches. Be aware of your spelling. Even a single, misspelled word can impact your results. The more specific your search terms are, the better quality search results you

Re: IBM Lookat Down?

sion List On Behalf Of Martin Packer Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 2:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: IBM Lookat Down? Pok had a power blip - right while I was talking to someone there over Skype :-) - at 9:45AM local time. It seems to have affected quite a few things - such a

Re: IBM Lookat Down?

/mpt/or https://itunes.apple.com/gb/podcast/mainframe-performance-topics/id1127943573?mt=2 Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCu_65HaYgksbF6Q8SQ4oOvA From: Allan Staller To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 25/04/2019 18:58 Subject:Re: IBM Lookat Down? Sent by:

Re: IBM Lookat Down?

It seems to be back. -Original Message- From: Allan Staller Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 12:54 PM To: 'IBM Mainframe Discussion List' Subject: IBM Lookat Down? https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/lookatkc?OpenDocument Receive 504 Gateway Error - Backend

IBM Lookat Down?

https://www-304.ibm.com/servers/resourcelink/svc00100.nsf/pages/lookatkc?OpenDocument Receive 504 Gateway Error - Backend Application Server Unreachable when attempting to access. Cmon' IBM. When are you going to provide some reliable, functional and available tools for us? ::DISCLAIMER::

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Online lookup is coming

Thank you Yvonne for your feedback. It's all good news, especially that you're actively working on the online lookup capability. The jumpiness occurred on the components page. it seemed to result from dropdowns that I had opened up suddenly closing for reasons unclear to me. At other web

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

Susan, thank you for forwarding us the feedback. Thank you everyone for your comments and suggestions for the IBM Doc Buddy app. I am Yvonne Ma, project manager of the app. You can send any future comments for the app to our support email account spt...@cn.ibm.com. We also would like to

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

Byzantine!!! Boy you can say that again! At 12/7/2016 12:13 PM, Gord Tomlin wrote: On 2016-12-06 17:03, Dave Juraschek wrote: Apparently UX/UI is big stuff now. It has been for a long time. Jakob Nielsen has been leading the charge in this space for years: https://www.nngroup.com/ A good

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

On 2016-12-06 17:03, Dave Juraschek wrote: Apparently UX/UI is big stuff now. It has been for a long time. Jakob Nielsen has been leading the charge in this space for years: https://www.nngroup.com/ A good (and short!) book on the topic is "Don't Make Me Think" by Steve Krug. IBM's

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

I agree. Apparently UX/UI is big stuff now. Still IBM, the once biggest computing company, doesn't see this stuff as relevant or important. IBM is still green screen, block thought, SNA exclusive oriented. My son is now getting his Masters in UX/UI (User Experience/User Interface). Why

Re: LOOKAT gone?

This whole conversation about the merits/drawbacks of DocBuddy reminds me om my mantra for the last 5 years. In "modernizing" their support tools. IBM is providing replacements that are neither as available, as functional, or as reliable as the items being replaced. ::DISCLAIMER::

Re: LOOKAT gone?

On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 18:32:02 -0500, Susan Shumway wrote: >IBM Knowledge Center allows you to use Boolean operators (AND/+, OR/|, >NOT/-, and so on) to create complex queries. >Example: "dynamic vipa" | dvipa > - Finds topics that contain the phrase dynamic VIPA OR the word DVIPA >anywhere in the

Re: LOOKAT gone?

es a basket of deplorable MBA-stuff but hardly any binder hits on the first page. Years ago, I wrote a script to drive LOOKAT into Lynx which I had ported to MVS. Nothing needed on the desktop except tn3270. And there's Chicago Soft's Kwik-E-Ref (whatever) for $. And John McKown lately pondered in

Re: LOOKAT gone?

Answered in sequence... On 12/05/16 7:58 PM, Tony Harminc wrote: On 5 December 2016 at 18:32, Susan Shumway wrote: I don't know about scripted access to KC search, but I can offer up some Google search tricks for those of you that prefer that method over the (still

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

Hi Tony, I emailed the "spt...@cn.ibm.com" address that you also found. That's the official contact address for the IBM Doc Buddy development team, which is located in China (hence the "cn"). It's the only vehicle I know of for commenting or reporting problems on the app. From what I've

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

On 5 December 2016 at 17:35, Susan Shumway wrote: > This is actually very valuable feedback - thanks! I forwarded it on to the > Doc Buddy team. > Hi again, Susan. Is there somewhere official (or semi-official) to sumit problems with Doc Buddy. I imagine it's not formally

Re: LOOKAT gone?

On 5 December 2016 at 18:32, Susan Shumway wrote: > I don't know about scripted access to KC search, but I can offer up some > Google search tricks for those of you that prefer that method over the > (still improving) KC search function. These are from a NaSPA deck I helped

Re: LOOKAT gone?

An unfortunate "search terms" for site:ibm.com is "program management" which gives a basket of deplorable MBA-stuff but hardly any binder hits on the first page. Years ago, I wrote a script to drive LOOKAT into Lynx which I had ported to MVS. Nothing needed on the desktop e

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

com LinkedIn:www.xdc.com Facebook:www.facebook.com/colesoftware YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/colesoftware At 12/2/2016 02:29 PM, Jim Mulder wrote: > >have they replaced it with anything? > > There is a phone app called IBM Doc buddy. Try it, you might like it. > T

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 16:42:43 -0500, David Cole wrote: >Tried it. Don't much like it at all! I tried it, just to see what it is like. I can't really say that I liked it, but then I never liked LOOKAT either. I have Quickref available, and it is, IMO, far better than either LOOKAT or Doc Bu

Re: LOOKAT gone?

Add to the list the new face of Redbooks http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/ Thankfully, it's just the "face" (for now?) On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Charles Mills <charl...@mcn.org> wrote: > ... Why does IBM keep taking things that aren't broken (LookAt, Book Manager) >

Re: LOOKAT gone?

tally sold. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 3:34 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOOKAT gone? On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 10:31:13 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: &g

Re: LOOKAT gone?

f but hardly any binder hits on the first page. Years ago, I wrote a script to drive LOOKAT into Lynx which I had ported to MVS. Nothing needed on the desktop except tn3270. And there's Chicago Soft's Kwik-E-Ref (whatever) for $. And John McKown lately pondered interfacing curl to I

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Compiler incest

On 16Dec04:1431-0500, Gabe Goldberg wrote: > David Cole noted: > > In contrast, a compiler coded in its own language tends to be much > > better, user friendly in features, than a compiler coded in any other > language. > > Interesting observation. It's certainly true of

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

Good luck embarrassing IBM anywhere, including (or especially) at shareholders meeting. During the 1980 OCO wars I was involved in industry efforts (it wasn't just SHARE/GUIDE, ADAPSO pushed too on behalf of software vendor members) fighting. I went to shareholders meeting and suggested to IBM

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Compiler incest

Related, I think the VM community's wonderful Melinda Varian observed that the best software is developed by people (often individuals) who actually want to use it. On the VM side, that includes Mike Cowlishaw's REXX and John Hartmann's CMS Pipelines. I'm sure z/OS has many equivalent stellar

Re: LOOKAT gone?

From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 2:35 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOOKAT gone? I like it. I'm changing my LOOKAT bookmark to point to the SEARCH page. Than

Re: LOOKAT gone?

I like it. I'm changing my LOOKAT bookmark to point to the SEARCH page. Thanks Charles. Dave At 12/3/2016 03:42 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 11:06:08 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: I just tried something this morning. If you go to Knowledge Center search https://www.ibm.com

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously!

On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 03:00:15 -0500, David Cole wrote: >... >But if the worlds of Apples, PCs, iPhones, and Androids >has show us anything at all, >it has shown us that skins matter, >and that UIs matter. > >IBM has a decades long history of releasing unpolished products >and then polishing them up

Re: LOOKAT gone?

>see how that is any less satisfactory than LookAt. Better in that it gives >you additional references also (some of them irrelevant, but who cares). > Ah! So it's just that the documentation is insufficiently documented. -- gil -

Re: LOOKAT gone?

I just tried something this morning. If you go to Knowledge Center search https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/search/ and type in a message number the first hit seems to be the entry in Messages and Codes. Hard to see how that is any less satisfactory than LookAt. Better in that it gives

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

Systems Admin/Programmer 3 UFIT University of Florida (352) 273-1298 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 5:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously!

I will admit... it is easier to be snarky against something anonymous such as faceless development teams... I tend to forget that there are real people working hard to develop something other people hopefully will like. I got an email from one of the UI developers/testers. Someone I may know.

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Compiler incest

David Cole wrote: In contrast, a compiler coded in its own language tends to be much better, user friendly in features, than a compiler coded in any other language. Interesting observation. In a word: Forth -- Jack J. Woehr # Science is more than a body of knowledge. It's a way of

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Compiler incest

y does IBM keep taking things that aren't broken (LookAt, Book Manager) >and making them trendy, rather than keeping them in a form that is useful to >their customers? > One can often tell when a product is produced and supported by people who have no interest in using it. And the worst such

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

rsity of Florida >>(352) 273-1298 >>-Original Message- >>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List >>[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Cole >>Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 5:16 PM >>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU >>Subject: Re: LOOKAT

Re: LOOKAT gone?

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 17:41:25 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: > >Why does IBM keep taking things that aren't broken (LookAt, Book Manager) >and making them trendy, rather than keeping them in a form that is useful to >their customers? > One can often tell when a product is produce

Re: LOOKAT gone?

And FWIW, LookAt works perfectly well on my Android phone ... What the heck was broken and had to be fixed? An opportunity here for Chicago-Soft MVS/Quick-Ref? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills

Re: LOOKAT gone?

only 24-inch monitors, but they're still a heck of a lot more usable than my 5" Android screen. It seems to me that the name "Doc Buddy" tells you all you need to know: IBM was obviously going for cute and trendy, not actually useful. Why does IBM keep taking things that aren't

Re: LOOKAT gone?

On 2 December 2016 at 14:29, Jim Mulder wrote: > 1. I don't have an iPhone or Android. > That takes courage these days... > 2. If I need to look up a message, it is because I am >seeing that message via an Internet connection. I never >need to look up message

Re: Fw: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

@colesoft.com> To:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date:12/02/2016 05:25 PM Subject: Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously? Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> Thanks for the tip. >Is the ASMA033I message correct? Could it be AS

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 5:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously? Thanks for the tip. >Is the ASMA033I message correct? Could it be ASM033I (without the >second A) Yes, ASMA033I correct. Google it. ASMAnnnc me

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously? Thanks for the tip. >Is the ASMA033I message correct? Could it be ASM033I (without the >second A) Yes, ASMA033I correct. Google it. ASMAnnnc messages belong to the High Level Assembler. ASMnc message belong to the &quo

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

: Friday, December 02, 2016 4:43 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously? >There is a phone app called IBM Doc buddy. Try it, you might like it. Tried it. Don't much like it at all! Ok, I've just now downloaded and installed Doc Buddy (Android version).

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

SMA033I message correct? Could it be ASM033I (without the second A) Al Nims Systems Admin/Programmer 3 UFIT University of Florida (352) 273-1298 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 4:

Re: LOOKAT gone? - Doc Buddy? Seriously?

02:29 PM, Jim Mulder wrote: > >have they replaced it with anything? > > There is a phone app called IBM Doc buddy. Try it, you might like it. > The LOOKAT web site says: LookAt is no longer supported. This site is offered for use "as is" until z/OS V1R13 goes out o

Re: LOOKAT gone?

> >have they replaced it with anything? > > There is a phone app called IBM Doc buddy. Try it, you might like it. > The LOOKAT web site says: LookAt is no longer supported. This site is offered for use "as is" until z/OS V1R13 goes out of service later this

Friday (was:: LOOKAT gone?)

raphic=26.46,-4.95,327/loc=28.229,-25.748 >I remember those LOOKAT threads on IBM-MAIN ages ago. I'm not using that much. >Then came those horrible library website changes with the usual complaints on >IBM-MAIN! > I know once I become proficient at it, they'll c

Re: LOOKAT gone?

song. Much appreciated. Now, I'm off to enjoy my weekend to mow my lawn in the sweltering heat. ;-D I remember those LOOKAT threads on IBM-MAIN ages ago. I'm not using that much. Then came those horrible library website changes with the usual complaints on IBM-MAIN! Groete / Greetings Elardus

Re: LOOKAT gone?

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 07:43:27 -0600, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: > >Now, 'LOOKAT' reminds me of that song: 'Maa, he is LOOKING at >meee!' > >Who is that rockstar who cried out that song? Just curious... > Rockstar!? I can make you feel old: https://en.wik

Re: LOOKAT gone?

Ditto. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Dave Cole Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 3:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOOKAT gone? H. They've moved it. (The link I've been using

Re: LOOKAT gone?

Dave Cole wrote: >H. They've moved it. (The link I've been using is in a bookmark and has >been working for years.) >Anyway, thanks for the clue. >:-) Ok, it must be Friday today, something which I never got it in this month... ;-D Now, 'LOOKAT' reminds me of that song:

Re: LOOKAT gone?

Try here: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/lookat/ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 3:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: LOOKAT gone? LOOKAT

Re: LOOKAT gone?

On Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:51:39 -0500, David Cole wrote: >have they replaced it with anything? There is a phone app called IBM Doc buddy. Try it, you might like it. -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive

Re: LOOKAT gone?

H. They've moved it. (The link I've been using is in a bookmark and has been working for years.) Anyway, thanks for the clue. :-) Dave At 12/2/2016 05:59 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: Richards, Robert B. wrote: >http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/loo

Re: LOOKAT gone?

H. They've moved it. (The link I've been using is in a bookmark and has been working for years.) Anyway, thanks for the clue. :-) Dave At 12/2/2016 05:59 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: Richards, Robert B. wrote: >http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/loo

Re: LOOKAT gone?

Richards, Robert B. wrote: >http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/lookat/lookatm.html >You were missing "library" before bkserv Thanks! It is the same problem as in thread 'Re: IBM doc page - down or dead?' earlier this week. Groete / Greetings Ela

Re: LOOKAT gone?

http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/lookat/lookatm.html You were missing "library" before bkserv -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Cole Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 4:52 AM To

LOOKAT gone?

LOOKAT is (was?) an IBM web page that could be used to look up doc for IBM generated messages. Just give it the message number, and it would give you the doc. The page was "www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/", but just now I tried going there and got the IBM equivalen

Re: GUI vs 3270 Re: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT

In 52a9b59f.2090...@gmail.com, on 12/12/2013 at 09:09 PM, David Crayford dcrayf...@gmail.com said: Would they be seduced by a GUI? The Devil is in the details. Would they be seduced by a GUI that was as fast, functional, reliable and user friendly as the old interface? Probably most would.

Re: GUI vs 3270 Re: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT

In a90e503c23f97441b05ee302853b0e6290237e7...@fspas01ev010.fspa.myntet.se, on 12/12/2013 at 03:38 PM, Thomas Berg thomas.b...@swedbank.se said: Not I. If I compare a typical 3270-interface and a typical PC/WEB-interface I generally can observe that the response times is about 50 times better

Re: Lookat

In 0727804906280897.wa.elardus.engelbrechtsita.co...@listserv.ua.edu, on 12/11/2013 at 11:30 PM, Elardus Engelbrecht elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za said: Good idea, now I have pondering on it, I'll have a nice discussion with my DRP team so we can replace DVDs with external hard drives. Why

Re: Lookat

Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)wrote: Good idea, now I have pondering on it, I'll have a nice discussion with my DRP team so we can replace DVDs with external hard drives. Why not USB data keys? Thanks. It is also a good idea. We use easy-to-use technology in Primary and DRP sites whatever is

LOOKAT 404

Date:Tue, 17 Dec 2013 21:33:18 -0500 From:Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net Subject: Re: LOOKAT 404 On 17 December 2013 20:23, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote: This link worked for me just now http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ Works for me too, but it's

Re: LOOKAT 404

2013 13:59:56 +0800, Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com wrote: If you need to get to the correct page in the interim, here is the link: http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ Thanks, Paul

Re: LOOKAT 404

/os/zos/library/bkserv/lookat Messages and codes via LookAt/a/td (Who knows what mailers and LISTSERVs will to to that markup?) It's a relative URL, often a recommended practice. And the troublesome substring is not the -03, but the /library, as Timothy inferred. Avram Friedman On Wed, 18 Dec

Re: LOOKAT 404

The U.S. Gov't can't get it right! snip -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 8:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOOKAT 404 On 18/12/2013 10:33 AM, Tony Harminc

Re: LOOKAT 404

8:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: LOOKAT 404 On 18/12/2013 10:33 AM, Tony Harminc wrote: On 17 December 2013 20:23, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote: This link worked for me just now http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ Works for me too

Re: LOOKAT 404

IBM: LookAt - z/OS message help - http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ is the one working for me currently. That goes directly to the old, as-is internet LookAt interface. Can't speak for other pages that reference us. Kevin Minerley

LOOKAT 404

On page: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/index.html The LOOKAT link: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/lookat Gives me 404 Not Found. There happens to be a Report this problem button on the error page. I clicked on it. Let's all do

Re: LOOKAT 404

Gil, This link worked for me just now http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ Lizette -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 2:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN

Re: LOOKAT 404

On 17 December 2013 20:23, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote: This link worked for me just now http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ Works for me too, but it's not the link on the main z/OS Internet LIbrary page. IBM surely outdoes all other big companies

Re: LOOKAT 404

On 18/12/2013 10:33 AM, Tony Harminc wrote: On 17 December 2013 20:23, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com wrote: This link worked for me just now http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ Works for me too, but it's not the link on the main z/OS Internet LIbrary page. IBM

Re: LOOKAT 404

If you need to get to the correct page in the interim, here is the link: http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ Thanks, Paul. Timothy Sipples GMU VCT Architect Executive (Based

Re: LOOKAT 404

in the interim, here is the link: http://www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ Thanks, Paul. Timothy Sipples GMU VCT Architect Executive (Based in Singapore) E-Mail: sipp...@sg.ibm.com

Re: Lookat

I just tried it ! Lookat is back !! Now that's what I call good news. Bye for now, John On 13 December 2013 00:52, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote: zMan, Does mean the prices are better? Scott ford www.identityforge.com from my IPAD 'Infinite wisdom through infinite means

Re: GUI vs 3270 Re: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT

We have MVS QuickRef, but it is licensed on only one of our CECs and I often find myself logged onto one of the systems where it is not available. I have a small REXX CGI program, that runs on the z/OS HTTP server that displays MVS Quickref info in a browser window. Does this support

Re: Lookat

On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:47:47 +0100, John Blythe Reid johnblyther...@gmail.com wrote: I just tried it ! Lookat is back !! Now that's what I call good news. Great! Thanks to whoever revived it. Jantje. -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: Lookat

resurrected Lookat. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of John Blythe Reid Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 3:48 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Lookat I just tried it ! Lookat is back !! Now that's what I

Re: Lookat

What URL are you using. I used www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ And got re-directed to http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/index.html which *IS NOT* the LOOKAT I was expecting. ??? snip I just tried it ! Lookat is back !! Now that's what I call good news. /snip

Re: Lookat

I'm using http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ and it's working at this moment 2013/12/13 Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com What URL are you using. I used www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ And got re-directed to http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library

Re: Lookat

AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Lookat I'm using http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ and it's working at this moment 2013/12/13 Staller, Allan allan.stal...@kbmg.com What URL are you using. I used www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ And got re

Re: Lookat

On 12/13/2013 6:43 AM, Staller, Allan wrote: What URL are you using. I used www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ And got re-directed to http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/index.html which *IS NOT* the LOOKAT I was expecting. ??? snip I just tried it ! Lookat is back

Re: Lookat

On 12/13/2013 6:57 AM, Steve Comstock wrote: On 12/13/2013 6:43 AM, Staller, Allan wrote: What URL are you using. I used www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ And got re-directed to http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/index.html which *IS NOT* the LOOKAT I

Re: Lookat

Found 2 links on http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv/index.html purporting to be LOOKAT. Both point to an invalid URL Curiuosor and Curiuosor! Al Staller | Z Systems Programmer | KBM Group | (Tel) 972 664-3565 | allan.stal...@kbmg.com -Original Message- From: IBM

Re: Lookat

To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Lookat On 12/13/2013 6:57 AM, Steve Comstock wrote: On 12/13/2013 6:43 AM, Staller, Allan wrote: What URL are you using. I used www.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/ And got re-directed to http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/library/bkserv

Re: Lookat

Subject: Re: Lookat [top posting] Very curious since it worked fine for me using Firefox 25.0.1 Question: are you using an add-on like NoScript? -Steve On 12/13/2013 7:07 AM, Staller, Allan wrote: Curiuosor and Curiuosor! Works fine with Google Chrome Works OK with IE 10 (need to look

Re: GUI vs 3270 Re: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT

Does this support jumping forward from the initial message display. I'm thinking of messages with return codes. The 3270 interface displays the message header and prepares to jump to the RC section upon a simple enter. -- Peter Hunkeler No, I couldn't figure out a way to do that. It's

Re: Lookat

That Lookat web page may be there but it is not working very well. A search for message IEC036 generated this result: Message id IEC036 was not found. Ensure the message id is complete/correct. It is possible this message id is documented in a book that is not yet LookAt-enabled. You might

Re: Lookat

I wonder if someone sent the bean counters in internal memo something to the effect 'Hey, we use this too and we depend on it to do our jobs!' Looking ahead guess I would envision a mobile app Lookat. It would be like a News reader or RSS feed with continual updates and customizable via

Re: Lookat

IEC036I is the entire message. If you want to use just IEC036 use a wildcard such as IEC036*. I don't use Lookat too much so I don't know if this is new behavior. Bill Skeldum -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Farley

Re: Lookat

-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Lookat IEC036I is the entire message. If you want to use just IEC036 use a wildcard such as IEC036*. I don't use Lookat too much so I don't know if this is new behavior. Bill Skeldum -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN

Re: GUI vs 3270 Re: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT

re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2013o.html#25 GUI vs 3270 Re: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT this is quickdirty conversion of internal (cms) ios3270 green card to html ... trying to preserve a little of the original lookfeel http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/gcard.html very early in rex(x) days

Re: GUI vs 3270 Re: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT

, John McKown wrote: On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Arthur Fichtl fich...@kabelmail.de wrote: I'm just curious whether anybody out there has MVS Quick Reference from Chicago Soft installed. At my former assignment we had it and used it extensively. MVSQR is much more powerful than Lookat

Re: Lookat

I am a big fan of the TSO version of LOOKAT. Count me among those puzzled by the decision to get rid of BookManager. Sent from my iPad On Dec 13, 2013, at 2:21 PM, Farley, Peter x23353 peter.far...@broadridge.com wrote: I stand corrected! Thank you for spotting my error. Entering

Re: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT

is much more powerful than Lookat and it provides a comfortable UI. Note: I'm not affiliated with that company, just a user. Arthur -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists

Re: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT

@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Arthur Fichtl Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 8:25 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT I'm just curious whether anybody out there has MVS Quick Reference from Chicago Soft installed. At my former assignment we had it and used

Re: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT

: MVS Quick Reference, was: LookAT I'm just curious whether anybody out there has MVS Quick Reference from Chicago Soft installed. At my former assignment we had it and used it extensively. MVSQR is much more powerful than Lookat and it provides a comfortable UI. Note: I'm not affiliated

Re: Lookat

On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:11:14 -0500, Dave Salt ds...@hotmail.com wrote: I've never used Lookat as I've always found it very fast and easy to access BookManager on the mainframe using the SimpList interface. For example, let's say I'm in the middle of writing a DB2/COBOL program and I want

  1   2   >