:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
(on SMF schemas)
I think that it would be useful to consider processing SMF data in other
languages, like Perl, Python, System/R, C, etc. If you had record
schemas
you could generate the language bindings. Although
08:58
Subject: Re: SMF (was REXX Tutorial)
[snip] to get a formatted dump with the IFASMFDP program which is in RECFM=VBS.
[snip] change this dataset in a RECFM=VB Format i.e. with the IDCAMS REPRO
command. This dataset now is readable with REXX [snip
I have an SMF 30 REXX example code (JOB accounting report) that I can
contribute,
but I don't have time do all the other informational doc I see with the other
samples. Since virtually all my clients have had SAS, this is the only one I've
ever written in REXX (and it was a good exercise back
Thank you very much Mark. I will see how I can integrate it, at least
partly, into the book :-)
2014-02-04 Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com:
I have an SMF 30 REXX example code (JOB accounting report) that I can
contribute,
but I don't have time do all the other informational doc I see with the
Wolfgang Schuech wrote:
Last week I started a little bookproject at wikibooks:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/SMF_Records
Thanks. Looking promising!
The book is inspired by a series of articles in IBM Systems Magazine in spring
2013 where George Ng describes how REXX can be used to read the SMF
For correct addressing just read the Header/Self-defining Section which
contains the triplet fields (offset/length/number) and use the right
offsets. You should also read the articles by George Ng in IBM Systems
Magazine (the links are in the book). His example deals with SMF30.
Greetings
Hi Wolfgang,
I quickly read your book at http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/SMF_Records
Great idea, I'll try to help.
Is there any need to start your REXX via ISPF?
Thanks,
Horacio
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Horatio,
Thank you, any help is welcome :-)
No, there is no need to start the REXX in a TSO/ISPF environment. The trick is
just to get a formatted dump with the IFASMFDP program which is in RECFM=VBS.
Because in z/OS 1.13 VBS datasets are not readable directly with REXX you have
change this
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date: 03/02/2014 13:57
Subject:Re: SMF (was REXX Tutorial)
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Horatio,
Thank you, any help is welcome :-)
No, there is no need to start the REXX in a TSO/ISPF environment. The
trick is just
Last week I started a little bookproject at wikibooks:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/SMF_Records
The book is inspired by a series of articles in IBM Systems Magazine in spring
2013 where George Ng describes how REXX can be used to read the SMF record
fields. At the moment the book give two
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Wolfgang Schuech
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
Last week I started a little bookproject at wikibooks:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki
Schuech
Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
Last week I started a little bookproject at wikibooks:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/SMF_Records
The book is inspired by a series of articles in IBM Systems Magazine in
spring
On 4/01/2014 7:15 AM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
One possibility: an XML document with a grammar that included elements for
each data type used by SMF records, including dates, timestamps, triplet
defined structures, etc. You could then have utilities or XSL style
sheets that generated language
for you: a DSECT to XML schema converter.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 12:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
(on SMF schemas
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 11:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:35:44 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:10:15 -0600, Ed Gould
At 13:08 -0600 on 01/03/2014, Mark Zelden wrote about Re: SMF (was:
REXX tutorial):
As long there is internal communication within IBM and everyone
played by the same rules, the information could be kept consolidated
in a single manual or kept in sync with the component / subsystem
manuals
Dang, that's what we have computers for! Seems like a 'Smart manual' would
be able to handle this
seamlessly.
In a message dated 1/3/2014 12:35:50 P.M. Central Standard Time,
paulgboul...@aim.com writes:
As such, it would be onerous, untimely, perhaps even error-prone for
each utility
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:35:44 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:10:15 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
Interesting thing about SMF...
For 20 years IBM documented SMF records in one consolidated place the
SMF manual.
In the last 5 or so years IBM did an about face and
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 11:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:35:44 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote
: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Date: 03/01/2014 19:35
Subject:Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:35:44 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:10:15 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
Interesting thing about SMF...
For 20 years IBM documented SMF records in one consolidated place the
SMF
, but it sometimes lags reality.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 11:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:35:44 -0600
(was: REXX tutorial)
(on SMF schemas)
I think that it would be useful to consider processing SMF data in other
languages, like Perl, Python, System/R, C, etc. If you had record schemas
you could generate the language bindings. Although not readily available on
z/OS, any of these languages
: Friday, January 03, 2014 12:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
(on SMF schemas)
I think that it would be useful to consider processing SMF data in other
languages, like Perl, Python, System/R, C, etc. If you had record schemas
you could generate
Gil,
Could be. BUT it worked fine for 20+ years.
Maybe IBM should make it easier to consolidate the record types
(internally)?
Trying to hunt down the blasted records is daunting especially since
there is no standard place in each component.
Might be worth a SHARE requirement?
Ed
On Jan
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 11:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:35:44 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:10:15
, but it sometimes lags reality.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-
m...@listserv.ua.edu]
On
Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 11:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF (was: REXX tutorial)
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 12:35:44 -0600
27 matches
Mail list logo
