Eric Bielefeld wrote:
We used 3490 E models for all of our production at PH Mining until they closed
the datacenter a year ago. They worked well, although I noticed that the failure
rate of jobs was up slightly over when the drives where newer. We never got them
new, but then the 3480s that
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007g.html#18 The Complete April Fools' Day RFCs
for other drift ... old posting of the 1984 april 1st corporate
directive on passwords ... old posting
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#51 A beautiful morning in AFM.
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001d.html#52 A
This is second hand hearsay, but from a usually impeccable source:
Are you aware that 3480/3490 media is longer being manufactured?
IMATION has a bit over 300,000 units available and no more will be
manufactured.
BTW, IMATION expects the current inventory to be sufficient through
Hi,
From the IBM book, the first console processed at IPL with the MASTER
authority becomes the actual master console. I understand that but the
question is, if I have another console also with the MASTER authority,
what's the difference between them?
If the two consoles are all defined with
Abdullah
Apparently not.
I Googled IBM msys and
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/msys/msysops/
was my first hit.
The introductory paragraph states the following:
quote
z/OS msys for Operations is a base element in z/OS V1R2 that incorporates
well-proven automation technology
If the two consoles are all defined with ROUTCODE(ALL) AUTH(MASTER)
LEVEL(ALL), I can see all messages and issue any commands on either one.
Then, what
makes the MASTER CONSOLE unique?
History ... This has been corrected in the latest z/OS releases (1.8).
There is no longer a concept of a master
Thanks, Adam.
On 4/1/07, Gerhard Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the two consoles are all defined with ROUTCODE(ALL) AUTH(MASTER)
LEVEL(ALL), I can see all messages and issue any commands on either one.
Then, what
makes the MASTER CONSOLE unique?
History ... This has been corrected in the
Good Lord!
What idiot could have thought this counter-intuitive behavior is a
reasonable default:
When restoring data in a full volume or tracks operation,
DFSMSdss resets the data-set-changed indicator
in the VTOC entries of each data set that has had its data
restored. This is to
We have similar issues (maybe not as extreme) not only with vendor
supplied PROCs, but also EXECs and CLISTs that need local customization.
The best we've been able to come up with is to be sure to keep the
original vendor version around, compare that with what is supplied in a
subsequent
Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007g.html#10 Record Credit card heist ...TJM
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007g.html#15 T.J. Maxx data theft worse
than first reported
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007g.html#19 T.J. Maxx data theft worse
than first reported
and a
I hope that you will be trying to convince your management to send
this to your IBM sales representative or higher.
Incidentally how does Innovation's FDR handle this?
On 31 Mar 2007 13:24:05 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Good Lord!
What idiot could have thought this
On 30 Mar 2007 13:42:39 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gabe Goldberg) wrote:
The Complete April Fools' Day RFCs
$19.95
1-57398-042-0
Author's site: http://www.rfc-humor.com/
Peer site: http://www.peerllc.com/content/view/24/53/
Amazon:
First, lets clear up one thing: For most MVS shops this is a non issue.
The 3490 drives going off maintenance are not models that were most
widely used by MVS shops. The Fxx models are the somewhat peculiar
models (previously discussed in this forum) that actually have the
hardware
However, you do need to understand that stacking files needed for
recovery purposes on a tape already containing recovery data does put
the previous data at greater risk. Mechanical drives and physical tapes
have the potential at each tape mount for a failure that can result in
loss of all
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:27:51 +0200, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
is msys a feature of netview or need netview as a prerequisite.
...
Apparently not.
...
Chris,
It's not quite that simple. I know I don't this quite right, but some of
NetVlew's base automation are (under the right
If you're referring to the update indicator in the DS1DSIND field of the F1
DSCB,
FDR will by default always turn the update indicator on after restoring or
copying a dataset.
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
The only supported way I know to make a copy without recall is to use
an HSM ABARS backup. We have done this in a (very) few instances, and
depending on the reason for the backup it may suffice.
The main limitations of this technique are (1)someone with proper
authorities will have to define
Abdullah AlShaalan wrote:
is msys a feature of netview or need netview as a prerequisite.
http://www.ibm.com/common/ssi/rep_ca/7/897/ENUS205-167/ENUS205-167.PDF
z/OS V1.7 is planned to be the last release to support the z/OS msys
for Operations element. It is IBM's intent to remove the z/OS
http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?
command=viewArticleBasictaxonomyName=mainframes_and_supercomputers
articleId=9015078taxonomyId=67intsrc=kc_top
Watch for lots of wrap.
US Airways partly blames legacy systems for March glitch
Self-service kiosks crashed as airline integrated its
We are planning to implement a 100% virtual tape solution (VSM from STK)
with backend T1 drives in a STK silo. We will have NO real tape drives
attached to our z/OS 1.7 system. (I wasn't actively involved in the choice,
but now I have to implement and make the solution work).
I have
In a recent note, Robert Justice said:
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:31:53 -0400
now, yes.
You're cribbing from a Yogi Berra-ism:
Q: What time is it?
Yogi: You mean now?
Pipedream: coerce IBM to not discontinue 3270 IBMLink until
the web version has operated for 6 months
V1.4 and V1.5 go out of service tonight and I was just wondering how
many shops are going to be SOL because the system they are running have
hit EOS?
Christopher Y. Blaicher
BMC Software, Inc.
Austin Development Labs
(512) 340-6154
The comments made are my personal opinions. BMC Software, Inc.
22 matches
Mail list logo
