Hi,
We have a batch job that abends with the above code when creating a temp file
on a model-54 volume. We are in the middle of a data migration, and model-54s
are being allocated to this pool. However, we still have model-27s which will
be removed at a later stage. What I have done to bypass t
Theo,
S637 - BC
The last known volume for the data set could not be located while
reading a multivolume DASD data set.
I have personally never seen the above. But based on the space you a
Oops!
I meant the TEMP DDs (TEMP1 and TEMP2)
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 5:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEC026I - 637-BC
Theo,
S637 - BC
Thanks Bob,
I will try this parameter.
On our QA system the work pool consists of only model-54s and we do not have
this issue.
Regards
Theo
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Richards, Robert B.
Sent: 06 August 2017
Folks,
Recently I was working with vector processing on z13 and noticed that we
have 128bit add and sub instructions but no multiply(correct me here but the
multiply is on 64bit) or divide. Any idea on how to convert the 128bit
signed/unsigned binary integer to packed decimal. If anyone
Some additional questions
1) How man volumes are in the pool? How many 54s and how many 27s
2) How large will the allocation be? Using 16 extents for the dataset (this
may vary), then this is 2000 + (2000*15) or 32,000 cylinders total for the file.
Is there sufficient space?
3) How fragment
Since I do not know this tool you are using or what it will do, it might be
possible to use something like SORT to do what you want.
Then you may not have this issue.
1) How man volumes are in the pool? How many 54s and how many 27s
a) If not SMS, then how to do drive the allocation to these
> Can somebody shed light on this issue - in simple terms please :) ?
Theo,
It would be best to avoid concatenation with referback due to the
potential problems caused by the system restriction described here in the
second bullet:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.i
On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 10:34:42 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>> Can somebody shed light on this issue - in simple terms please :) ?
>
>Theo,
>
>It would be best to avoid concatenation with referback due to the
>potential problems caused by the system restriction described here in the
>second bullet:
Thanks for the additional info,
We have 40 mod-54s and 90 mod-27s - all sms managed. The program tool is
ICETOOL. The volumes are most of the time empty only in use by temp data
sets. I might have to monitor the usage during execution.
//SPDT02 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL
I need to provide a list of cobol modules and the Cobol version they were
compiled with from a REXX program. There are many large PDS libs to process.
These may include non-Cobol load modules so I need to be able to identify which
are Cobol.
I know I can get the member list for each PDS into a R
Have you looked at COBANAL on CBT(File 321)?
In a message dated 8/6/2017 9:58:02 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
roy.reyno...@ucop.edu writes:
Can anyone suggest a way to best approach this? The process must not
require a third party tool we probably don't have and probably can't buy. TIA
Would AMBLIST LISTIDR be of help?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Roy Reynolds
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 7:58 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: list of cobol load modules and their cobol version
I need to pr
13 matches
Mail list logo