Hi all,
I've recently modernised the aux2svg rexx procedure - which, until now, was
packaged as an example in the RexxXMLParser github repository and CBT FILE647 -
and moved it to a separate github respository at:
https://github.com/abend0c1/aux2svg
The new version (which I last updated in 200
Ditto, sorry to go "off-topic" again ... I hope IBM is reading this, and hope
they look to adding WireGuard support on Z.
>From what little I know, WireGuard is far more manageable and performant than
>IPSec & IKEv2.
Adding WireGuard support to z/OS shouldn't be too much of a "deviation" too,
co
Very cool, thank you!
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, July 2, 2020 12:52 PM, Andrew Armstrong
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently modernised the aux2svg rexx procedure - which, until now, was
> packaged as an example in the RexxXMLParser github repository and CBT FILE647
>
I recently enabled syslogd and have it logging to operlog. I now see
messages like this and could use some advice on how to resolve:
BPXF060I LOGGED BY SYSLOGD FROM A LOCAL SOURCE 000
Jul 2 08:33:52 S0W1 sshd[65785]: error: FOTS1503 __passwd: EDC5143I
No such process.
W dniu 01.07.2020 o 20:57, Frank Swarbrick pisze:
Thanks Tim.
I can't imagine being comfortable writing new code, at least, for a compiler
that has not been updated in 35 years, but maybe that's just me. 🙂
Now that we know what languages are still supported, I am still curious if
anyone out
Honestly, this whole discussion is kind of pointless, no?
z/os IBM/390 IBM/370 IBM/360 all share ... instruction set. While the
newer models all have newer instructions, object code assembled on a 360 is
just as valid today as it was in 1960.
Joe
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 4:13 AM R.S. wrote:
> W
Hello
Cross posted
Could someone have list of message ID of vtam and TCPIP which you normally
monitor via automation product ?
Jake
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@lists
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 5:56 AM Joe Monk wrote:
> Honestly, this whole discussion is kind of pointless, no?
>
> z/os IBM/390 IBM/370 IBM/360 all share ... instruction set. While the
> newer models all have newer instructions, object code assembled on a 360 is
> just as valid today as it was in 19
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 6:04 AM Jake Anderson
wrote:
> Hello
>
> Cross posted
>
> Could someone have list of message ID of vtam and TCPIP which you normally
> monitor via automation product ?
>
> Jake
>
>
The basics of our network startup.
JES2 automatically starts at IPL.
Message $HASP492 from J
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 6:20 AM John McKown
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 6:04 AM Jake Anderson
> wrote:
>
>> Hello
>>
>> Cross posted
>>
>> Could someone have list of message ID of vtam and TCPIP which you normally
>> monitor via automation product ?
>>
>> Jake
>>
>>
> The basics of our networ
Thanks a bunch Kolusu..
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Anyone have any dealing with Sailpoint product..
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender, which
may be legally privileged information. This information is intended only for
the use of the individual or entity addressed above. If you are not the
i
Unfortunately, yes. We run it.
First Horizon Bank
Mainframe Technical Support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ron
Wells
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: RACF-SailPoint
[External Email. Exercise caution when
Unfortunately --- lol
What experiences/problems you have had on MF
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jackson, Rob
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2020 8:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RACF-SailPoint
** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTION **
Unfortu
Unfortunately, yes, a bit. I only have to deal with the mainframe connector
and at this point it's only used for reporting but they're looking at making it
do a bunch more.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ron
Wells
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 7:29
That is what concerns me...too me it is a BREECH of security
Want to stay off list.. my email is ron.we...@omf.com
They only mentioned a exit/api needs to be installed >> bother me ... trying to
get pros/cons and what others have experienced..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Disc
As with Rex, I deal only with the Connector. The install is kind of kludgy,
but it's not bad. If I remember correctly, the security setup for the service
accounts (requires two) was not well documented.
Unlike Rex, we use ours for dynamic provisioning right now. Users request and
get approva
The exits are needed only if you use the Online Interceptor (send RACF admin
commands to SailPoint). We do not use that; I didn't put my foot down (but I
would have); instead, I gently steered them to nightly/on-demand Aggregation
only, and that has been good enough.
First Horizon Bank
Mainfra
Fortunately I didn't have to put my foot down. We also only use the offline
interceptor. I agree that the SP folks only understand AD so when they brought
it in, they dropped the mainframe manual on my desk and said "here, install
this and let us know when it's done" so I got free rein and mad
[Default] On 1 Jul 2020 21:39:05 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
sme...@gmu.edu (Seymour J Metz) wrote:
>Do you mean only that IBM has changed the underlying hardware used to
>implement what they called Machine Interface (MI) on the S/38, or do you mean
>that they have changed the MI itself?
I d
"... BREECH ..." Congratulations on the new baby!
On 2020-07-02 09:19, Ron Wells wrote:
That is what concerns me...too me it is a BREECH of security
Want to stay off list.. my email is ron.we...@omf.com
They only mentioned a exit/api needs to be installed >> bother me ... trying to
get pros/c
[Default] On 2 Jul 2020 02:13:34 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl (R.S.) wrote:
>> snip
>
>BTW: As a mainframe bigot I sometimes am forced to explain why so old
>things are still in use. Yes, z14 or z15 is veery old. As old as
>z/OS 2.4, or DB2. It is hard job,
I'm trying to use IEBCOPY to unload a single PDS member that has aliases.
According to IBM's documentation:
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.idau100/cpogrp.htm
this should be possible:
For unloading groups:
Using COPYGRP: PDSE to PS
Are the members Source or LOAD modules?
If Load modules, use COPYMOD
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Goetze
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Using IEBCOPY COPYGROUP to unload a PDS member with
.NET 3.5 includes all earlier versions.
Current .NET is 4.8.x which include 4.6.2 and 4.7.2.
Joe
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:39 AM Clark Morris wrote:
> [Default] On 2 Jul 2020 02:13:34 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
> r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl (R.S.) wrote:
>
> >> snip
> >
> >BTW: As a mai
Also review
COPYGROUP
COPYGRP
They behave a little different
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 8:34 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Using IEBCOPY COPYGROUP to unload a PDS member with
Hi Lizette,
Unfortunately, COPYMOD can't create an unload data set.
--Steve
Dovetailed Technologies
www.dovetail.com
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:33 AM Lizette Koehler
wrote:
> Are the members Source or LOAD modules?
>
> If Load modules, use COPYMOD
>
> Lizette
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
I have and usually the biggest problem is the intigrator
Sent from my iPhone
I promise you I can’t type or
Spell on any smartphone
> On Jul 2, 2020, at 08:15, Ron Wells
> <02ebc63ff5ef-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately --- lol
> What experiences/problems you have ha
> The only thing which might not work would
> be something which was CPU speed dependent.
That's not the only thing. A program that relies on getting certain program
interrupts might fail. Then there's the ASCII bit, although I would be very
surprised if anybody actually used it. There are optio
Try running, e.g., IBM 7094 EMULATOR FOR THE SYSTEM/360 MODEL 85 UNDER OS/360
PROGRAM NUMBER 360C-EU-134.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Joe
Monk [jo
If you are going to include OS compatibility as well as hardware
compatibility then there are issues such as control blocks that have been
moved above line.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Seymour J Metz
Sent:
WTF? Where do you see "OS compatibility"? The issues that I raised were all
architecture and instruction set.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of
Charles Mi
Obviously, there's an error in the documentation. Evidently, the manual
writer got the two commands mixed up in your first quote.
Which is hardly surprising. Having two commands with a subtle difference
in names and behavior is ridiculous.
sas
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:03 AM Steve Goetze wrot
On 7/1/20 10:19 PM, Brian Westerman wrote:
You can join developerworks and license z/PDT, which is what I and
most people do. It's not that expensive, and it won't kill you like
buying that big old Harley-Davidson will.
Does joining DevelperWorks change the pricing?
Because z/PDT (or whateve
Why do you have to be so hostile? I did not see any mention of OS
compatibility. That is precisely why I mentioned it. I raised additional
issues beyond what you raised. WTF indeed.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
FWIW there was a long thread here on COPYGRP/COPYGROUP March 3 through 6 of
this year.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Steve Smith
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
Tks for the info--anything else will be helpful ..
Smartphones not that smart..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Steve Beaver
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2020 10:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RACF-SailPoint
** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE CAUTIO
> Why do you have to be so hostile?
Why do you have to be such a hypocrite? I'm not hostile in general. But when
you rant about imaginary hostility and gratuitously insult me, I see no reason
to be concerned with your delicate feelings in subsequent messages.
> I did not see any mention of OS
+1
And it is more like $5600/yr if I read the ADCD pricing correctly at $900/yr to
continue support for another year ($4700/yr for the one-CPU dongle, $900/yr for
the ADCD stack).
So that is about equivalent to buying a new SUV on a 5- or 6-year purchase plan
(not including insurance), or abou
Yes I did. Assembles just fine. Even put the code in to indicate z/OS 2.4.
Everything works okay except for the fetch...which is what we need.
Dennis
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 4:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LI
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 08:40:23 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>Also review
>
>COPYGROUP
>COPYGRP
>
>They behave a little different
>
I recall this was discussed here several months ago.
IBM's design was irresponsible. The two terms are too easily
confused, particularly in oral communication betwee
How about the original question -
Is there a way to unload from a PDS the "group" (name plus aliases) for a
given member name and reload it to another PDS ?
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:02 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 08:40:23 -0700,
On 7/2/2020 2:06 PM, Kirk Wolf wrote:
How about the original question -
Is there a way to unload from a PDS the "group" (name plus aliases) for a
given member name and reload it to another PDS ?
Kirk,
If you don't have it already, you should install PDS (file 182 at
cbttape.org). It has mem
JTIP?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Longnecker, Dennis
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 2:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SuperWylbur Users
Yes I did. Assembles
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020 18:29:46 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>JTIP?
>
GIYF? https://www.google.com/search?q=JTIP
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with
JES TSO Interface Program.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 2:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTS
I'm not sure that I agree that this was a tech writer command mixup. The
COPYGROUP statement was created to be a superset of COPYGRP, adding better
PDS support in addition to providing SELECT member name filter patterns.
I'm not saying that it isn't working as designed, but it sure seems like a
h
It is irrelevant where the blame lies for the document. I should have just
said that it got the capabilities of COPYGRP and COPYGROUP switched.
You might try copying from the PDS to a temporary PDSE, and then you can
unload that. You can work on where and which COPYG* would work best.
I experim
I am seeing some DS8000s where a mod-27 is defined as 30051 cylinders. I
am seeing other sites were the mod-27 is defined with 32760 cylinders.
I know the architectural limit of a mod-27 is 32760 cylinders, but if
you work with multiples of mod-1 units, the 30051 number make sense.
I also kno
Some physical devices only allocate volumes in multiples of Mod 1s, or
gather scattered Mod 1 segments into a full volume. 32K cylinders is
29.4 times a Mod 1 of 1113 cylinders. Not much different, but need to
make sure DR site or replacement dasd unit uses same size or larger
for restores or rep
Keep in mind that you are dealing with virtual DASD. There never was a 3390
model 27 or 54, so DASD providers are free to use whatever sizes tey want.
Using 3 times a model 9 capacity and 6 times a model 9 capacity is
conventional, but there's noting wrong with using a slightly larger size. Ther
Tony to answer your questions. In this shop a MOD-27 is 32,760 cyls and a
MOD-54 is 65,520 cyls. As for how they are allocated, that I can't answer. We
don't have IBM DASD and the vendor we have does the configuration based on what
we ask for. Just to round things out the EAVs we do have are
On Jul 2, 2020, at 7:25 PM, Feller, Paul
<02fc94e14c43-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> In this shop a MOD-27 is 32,760 cyls and a MOD-54 is 65,520 cyls. As for how
> they are allocated, that I can't answer.
Several years ago I moved all our DASD to “3390-54” with 65,520 cylinders
On Jul 2, 2020, at 9:21 PM, Pew, Curtis G wrote:
>
> I consider them while
“I consider them experimental while …”
--
Pew, Curtis G
curtis@austin.utexas.edu
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruc
On 7/2/20 1:27 AM, kekronbekron wrote:
Ditto, sorry to go "off-topic" again ... I hope IBM is reading this,
and hope they look to adding WireGuard support on Z.
I would be mildly, but pleasantly, surprised to see WireGuard added to z/OS.
Adding WireGuard support to z/OS shouldn't be too much o
Mr Metz resolutely straightens everyone else's pictures, in this listserv,
but is very sensitive about his own. Most of us, it seems to me, forgive
him and ignore it.
You did cross a line, though, Seymour, this time. I perceive no hostility
in Mr Mills' post, and yours positively bristled with i
So you interpreted "If you are going to..." as "Because you are"; Charles
clearly meant it as "If one were to..."
English can be ambiguous, but comity will get you a lot further than
knee-jerk defensiveness. This applies in real life, too, and might explain
some folks' employment difficulties. Jus
How much would a hobbyist pay for a Harley, a really nice drone, or some of the
other expensive hobbies. People pay upwards of $1K a year for a new phone. I
did get a discount on that, but I suppose you are correct, if you can't justify
the cost, then it might seem too much. Although, the alt
58 matches
Mail list logo
