I am guessing you need a job step TTOKEN if you delete the ALET not under
the owning TCB.
Robin
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Joseph Reichman
> Sent: 09 October 2020 09:37
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>
If you know the dataset name structure, here's how I would break it down:
In option 3.4 enter the datasets wild card name, such as
PEOPLE.THAT.**.NEED.SOME.HELP
Save the list that is produced. It will be in your SPF LIST dataset. So PF3
until the option appears KEEP, ALLOCATE NEW.
Note the
I don’t see a TTOKEN parameter under ALESERV
Thanks
> On Oct 9, 2020, at 2:50 AM, Robin Atwood wrote:
>
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
I understand fully who the top vendors are. IBM doesn’t even try to get people
to store their photos, music, & emails in the cloud. Comparing AWS & AZURE to
IBM’s cloud is comparing apples to oranges. Or comparing PC’s to the Mainframe.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, October 9,
Why Do Mainframes Matter Today?
>From SHARE’s perspective, mainframes are an indispensable asset for businesses
>of all kinds. Here are just a few stats to back it up:
- Mainframes host critical core IT for: 92 of the world’s top 100 banks; 23
of the 25 top airlines; 10 of the world’s
>if there is any restriction on deleting an ALET entry
>(ALESERV DELETE) from a STIMERM exit
It is not a "restriction", it is a "does not make sense" situation. It
goes well beyond "delete".
IRBs (STIMERM exits being one such) do not get control with the access
list that their "mainline" (the
Maybe it’s 89% now.
https://www.share.org/blog/mainframe-matters-how-mainframes-keep-the-financial-industry-up-and-running
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, October 9, 2020, 4:23 AM, zMan wrote:
Nope, IBM doesn't process 90% of credit card transactions. Most processors
are on
2 completely different markets. AZURE & AWS are consumer market clouds. IBM is
enterprise.
Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone
On Friday, October 9, 2020, 5:28 AM, zMan wrote:
Actually, Bill, it's pretty clear that you didn't read the report. It's at
https://kinsta.com/blog/cloud-market-share/
We have HWIBCPII running on our KSYS, but as far as I know, nothing
exploits it.
The intent *was *to have homegrown automation make use of it, but at the
time (and it may still be the case), most of the functionality was
"read-only", meaning requesting a LOAD or SYSRESET wasn't possible. We
Let's assume that 'n' patterns of input exist. Above we see two. Code 'n'
number of OUTFIL statements, each with their own OUTREC constructs. Sorry I
don't have an example to show but in the past I've seen many of what's
being discussed. I've borrowed and taken advice from Sri K. and that's
always
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 13:24:47 -0500, Anthony B. wrote:
>Let's assume that 'n' patterns of input exist. Above we see two. Code 'n'
>number of OUTFIL statements, each with their own OUTREC constructs. Sorry I
>don't have an example to show but in the past I've seen many of what's
>being discussed.
Just more dragging Mainframe DOWN to the lower levels of OS's
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2020 11:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM splitting into two companies
** EXTERNAL EMAIL - USE
I think the issue has more to do with the security permissions on the lpar
image profile. There are a couple of BCPII check boxes there that need to be
checked.
_
Dave Jousma
AVP | Director,
I just noticed that we have not been running the HWIBCPII task. It looks like
it was never configured. I went back a year ago so this is nothing new. It does
appear that System Automation is able to use the services without the task:
ING815I BCPII CONNECT FROM A09NO/AUTHW002 TO CPC
Anthony - The file has data as below also
000657|VHO TRIVENTO RESERVA |MALBEC 750ML
007762|FJAO PTO CAMIL |T1 1KG
007762|FJAO PTO CAMIL |T1 1KG
007762|FJAO PTO CAMIL |T1 1KG
007762|FJAO PTO CAMIL |T1 1KG
007762|FJAO PTO CAMIL
https://share.confex.com/share/115/webprogram/Session7543.html
https://docplayer.net/13271209-Bcpii-for-dummies-start-to-finish-installation-setup-and-usage.html
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 1:57 PM Roger Lowe wrote:
>
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:56:49 -0500, Bonnie Barthel
> wrote:
>
> >I just noticed
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 10:56:49 -0500, Bonnie Barthel
wrote:
>I just noticed that we have not been running the HWIBCPII task. It looks like
>it was never configured. I went back a year ago so this is nothing new. It
>does appear that System Automation is able to use the services without the
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 11:43:44 -0500, Ron Thomas wrote:
>Anthony - The file has data as below also
>
>000657|VHO TRIVENTO RESERVA |MALBEC 750ML
>007762|FJAO PTO CAMIL |T1 1KG
>007762|FJAO PTO CAMIL |T1 1KG
>...
>Hence , coding fixed length OUTREC will not
The timer exit runs in the same TCB; it's the RB that is different.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Rob
Scott
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 4:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
paul- this was a typo error , what the output i got from my control card is
below
645|CASILLERODELDIABLO|VHOCASILLERODIABLO|
Thanks
Ron T
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
As usual, The Register is fairly informative:
https://www.theregister.com/2020/10/08/ibm_splits_off_services_division/
As I read this, if you're with IBM Outsourcing you job is headed off to NewCo;
for the rest of us nothing much changes.
Unfortunately I don't see much hope of an increased or
On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 10:46:00 -0500, Ron Thomas wrote:
>
>I have a sample file as below and we would need to remove the spaces
>
>000645|VHO CASILLERO DIABLO |PINOT NOIR 750ML |
>...
>i have coded as below
>SORT FIELDS=COPY
>INREC OVERLAY=(001:001,010,UFF,M10,LENGTH=10,
>
what is z/TPF, chopped liver?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
zMan
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 10:25 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM splitting into two
So create a second OUTFIL.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:43 AM Ron Thomas wrote:
> Anthony - The file has data as below also
>
> 000657|VHO TRIVENTO RESERVA |MALBEC 750ML
> 007762|FJAO PTO CAMIL |T1 1KG
> 007762|FJAO PTO CAMIL |T1 1KG
> 007762|FJAO PTO CAMIL
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 13:02:26 -0500, Anthony B. wrote:
>So create a second OUTFIL.
>
I don't understand what you're suggesting. Can you provide
details? I suspect that what Ron posted was not his entire input,
but other numbers of blanks might exist in a larger data set.
>On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at
>> I've borrowed and taken advice from Sri K. and that's
always proven to be the path of simplicity.
Anthony,
Honestly I would never suggest multiple passes of data. So I am not sure
when I suggested "n" outfil approach to handle pattern.
Thanks,
Kolusu
Don't believe whoever told you that about AWS. There are real companies
building real enterprise-level applications on AWS today.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Johnson
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 7:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Can DFSORT regular expressions do something similar?
Gil,
DFSORT supports regular expression for selecting/filtering data but it does
not support editing of the data.
>I believe Massimo Biancucci has already posted a simpler more general
solution.
Agreed. Massimo solution covers OP's case
The suggestion was mine alone, and not meant to imply that it came from
you. That was not my intent.
In the sketchy strategy I suggested, my past task involved some additional
data manipulations other than differentiating various input formats.
Philosophically I agree that multiple passes of data
After all, Amazon, which ain't chicken feed, presumably runs on AWS.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 3:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM
I’ve studied them extensively. I’m an investor. So I really don’t need the
lecture but I understand that’s what the frequent posters here need to do.
Large enterprises aren’t building on AZURE & AWS. Lots of smaller companies
are. Because of the costs. AZURE & AWS are on the way to
Perhaps IBM are prepping to sell off Global Services.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 8:08 PM David Cole wrote:
> So what happened? Did IBM buy Red Hat and then Red Hat swallowed up IBM?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 10/8/2020 04:18 PM, Knutson, Samuel wrote:
> >You can read the press release, view the charts and
Is your sysplex couple dataset formatted with this option included?
ITEM NAME(SSTATDET) NUMBER(1)
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday,
To the main question, would there be a problem with starting BCPii at any time,
I would say no problem. In our early experience with sysplex, we restarted
BCPii any number of times before we got it right. If the task is missing
something it needs, it will tell you so. You will need some HMC
If the ALET is not invalid, the most likely reason is that the TCB of the
DELETE does not match the TCB of the ADD.
You have two options :
(1) Change the ALESERV ADD/DELETE to use AL=PASN
(2) Do not attempt to ALESERV from the STIMERM exit and indicate (maybe via
rc/rsn or a request added to a
Thanks
> On Oct 9, 2020, at 4:27 AM, Rob Scott wrote:
>
> If the ALET is not invalid, the most likely reason is that the TCB of the
> DELETE does not match the TCB of the ADD.
>
> You have two options :
>
> (1) Change the ALESERV ADD/DELETE to use AL=PASN
> (2) Do not attempt to ALESERV
So what happened? Did IBM buy Red Hat and then Red Hat swallowed up IBM?
At 10/8/2020 04:18 PM, Knutson, Samuel wrote:
You can read the press release, view the charts and listen the
webcast where this was rolled out to Wall Street analysts this morning here
Thanks
I’ll do it in the mainline
> On Oct 9, 2020, at 9:09 AM, Peter Relson wrote:
>
>
>>
>> if there is any restriction on deleting an ALET entry
>> (ALESERV DELETE) from a STIMERM exit
>
> It is not a "restriction", it is a "does not make sense" situation. It
> goes well beyond
One of the MAJOR reasons I hate PCOMM it that I have trouble setting up
CUT/PASTE as
CNTL-C and CNTL-V.
Are there any IBMers that can tell me how KEYBOARD map these functions.
TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
We have V14 and setting it up, as I found out is much, much easier that in the
prior releases
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 9:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: PCOMM
W dniu 09.10.2020 o 15:16, Steve
On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:41:01 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>This is one of major advantages of PCOMM: key mapping.
>
>If you want, I can send you keyboard definition with Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V as
>copy and paste.
>
For a user who spends much time in UNIX shell, those would be bad habits to
form.
Fortunately, Mac
W dniu 09.10.2020 o 15:16, Steve Beaver pisze:
One of the MAJOR reasons I hate PCOMM it that I have trouble setting up
CUT/PASTE as
CNTL-C and CNTL-V.
Are there any IBMers that can tell me how KEYBOARD map these functions.
The file is text and short:
[Profile]
ID=KMP
Version=5
I have a problem with Nexus 3270 emulator and Omegamon 5.5
Scenario:
LOGON APPLID=OMEG1
logon screen appears.
I type user, password, press ENTER
So far, so good. I see message like "What's new". Using TAB I put cursor
on NEXT button and and the screen is broken. Some lines from "ISPF-like"
You know what's better than CNTL-C and CNTL-V?
A checkbox that will automatically copy content to clipboard, when you draw a
bounding box.
Not connected to a work machine right now to tell the actual option.
But it exists in PCOMM..
- KB
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, October 9,
This is one of major advantages of PCOMM: key mapping.
If you want, I can send you keyboard definition with Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V as
copy and paste.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
W dniu 09.10.2020 o 15:16, Steve Beaver pisze:
One of the MAJOR reasons I hate PCOMM it that I have trouble
45 matches
Mail list logo
