t; From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf
>> Of retired mainframer
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 11:12 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: HSM question
>>
>> Look at the VERSIONS operand of the SETSYS command and the ALTERDS command
11:12 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question
>
> Look at the VERSIONS operand of the SETSYS command and the ALTERDS command
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> > Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi
> > Sent: Wedne
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Gadi Ben-Avi
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 4:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question
Thanks
In the Management Class there are to more options I would like to set:
How many backup versions of a deleted dataset are kept.
How long
On Behalf Of
retired mainframer
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 11:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question
Look at the VERSIONS operand of the SETSYS command and the ALTERDS command
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behal
Look at the VERSIONS operand of the SETSYS command and the ALTERDS command
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 12:15 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question
&g
OK,
So how do I tell HSM to keep more than one backup version?
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Gibney, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 10:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question
MGMTCLAS won't matter for Non-SMS
MGMTCLAS won't matter for Non-SMS datasets
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Gadi Ben-Avi
> Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 11:39 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: HSM question
>
> Hi,
> I wanted to restore a PDS backed up by HSM.
>
] Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
Rex,
There are 2 places HSM records the DUPLEX volser 1 in the MCV record while the
Primary volume is still a partial tape and then in the TTOC record. The DUPLEX
tape would be displayed in the LIST TTOC output if the Primary volume still
Rex,
There are 2 places HSM records the DUPLEX volser 1 in the MCV record while the
Primary volume is still a partial tape and then in the TTOC record. The DUPLEX
tape would be displayed in the LIST TTOC output if the Primary volume still
existed. If it doesn't show in the LIST TTOC output
, February 14, 2019 2:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
I get "entry not defined". Unfortunately that doesn't help, because on my
playground I have duplex tapes with their primary ML2 tape still existent, and
I ge
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
Try HSEND DELVOL(XX) PURGE FORCE(?)
I haven't looked up the syntax.
Actually, if they are not in the TTOC you can probably just expire th
associated)
the volume would not go scratch until replaced.
Don't remember the exact details.
Al
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 11:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes
try the TAPEREPL process in a test
environment to see what happens.
Thanks.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 8:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes
Most likely a continuation of a prior volume. Without going into a lot of
detail, if a dataset spans from 1 volume to another the 1st volume in the
sequence "owns it".
Duplex volumes are never referenced by DFHSM directly.
HSEND LIST TTOC will list all primary voulmes. I expect the duplex
13, 2019 9:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question - ML2 tapes no longer avaialble
Two recommendations below
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Allan Staller
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 7:03 AM
&g
Thanks.
Tony Thigpen
Allan Staller wrote on 2/13/19 10:02 AM:
For each affected volser:
HSEND LIST TTOC(volser) ODS(x)
HDEL 'datasetname' for each indicated dataset.
HSEND RECYCLE ALL EXECUTE PERCENTVALID(0)
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
Two recommendations below
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Allan Staller
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 7:03 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question - ML2 tapes no longer avaialble
>
>
For each affected volser:
HSEND LIST TTOC(volser) ODS(x)
HDEL 'datasetname' for each indicated dataset.
HSEND RECYCLE ALL EXECUTE PERCENTVALID(0)
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 9:00 AM
Do the del/def. populate it then issue a HMIG
Sent from my iPhone
Sorry for any grammar problems
> On Sep 22, 2017, at 16:28, Lizette Koehler wrote:
>
> Is there a way for your to create a VSAM dataset with Data and Index component
> and then migrate it to see what
Is there a way for your to create a VSAM dataset with Data and Index component
and then migrate it to see what it looks like?
That might help answer your questions.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of
All three should show MIGRAT and all three will still show up as they are all
in the catalog.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of PINION, RICHARD W.
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 1:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
r 24, 2016 2:39 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question
>
> That's what I thought, but it does not seem to be working. So, I figured I was
> misreading or doing something wrong.
>
> Tony Thigpen
>
> retired mainframer wrote on 11/24/2016 04:42 PM
>> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:30 AM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: HSM question
>>
>> The elapsed time is 10 minutes.
>>
>> Before we get off-track too much, the end result we are looking for is:
>> We want the
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question
The elapsed time is 10 minutes.
Before we get off-track too much, the end result we are looking for is:
We want the HSM backup
Doesn't SETSYS PARTIALTAPE(BAKCUP(MARKFULL)) do what you want?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question
The elapsed
The elapsed time is 10 minutes.
Before we get off-track too much, the end result we are looking for is:
We want the HSM backup process to *always* use a scratch tape. We never
want it to ask for an existing tape to append to.
We will recycle the tapes to combine them at our convenience.
But,
and allow it to move on to the next
task.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:36 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM questi
UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 7:09 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question
>
> Tony Thigpen wrote:
>
> >The remote operator is a human.
> >Tape management system is CA1
> >Still res
Tony Thigpen wrote:
>The remote operator is a human.
>Tape management system is CA1
>Still researching logs.
Thanks. I see that output and logs you gave to Lizette.
I see you have MOUNT WAIT TIME=010 MINUTE(S), but what are the [elapsed] times
for these messages and reply?
*IEC501A M
:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Tony Thigpen
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 6:33 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HSM question
>
> Answers:
> 1) OS/390 2.10
>
> 2) output from Q SETSYS:
>
> QUERY SETSYS COMMAND STARTING ON HOST=1
&g
Elardus,
The remote operator is a human.
Tape management system is CA1
Still researching logs.
Tony Thigpen
Elardus Engelbrecht wrote on 11/23/2016 02:04 AM:
Tony Thigpen wrote:
Once a week, HSM performs an AUTOBACKUP. Until about 3 months ago, if nobody was at the
shop, HSM would ask for
Answers:
1) OS/390 2.10
2) output from Q SETSYS:
QUERY SETSYS COMMAND STARTING ON HOST=1
BUDENSITY=*, BUUNIT=TAPE90, BU RECYCLE 609
(CONT.) PERCENTAGE=033%, MOUNT WAIT TIME=010 MINUTE(S),
(CONT.) TAPESPANSIZE(0100)
SELECTVOLUME=SCRATCH, 610
(CONT.) TAPEDELETION=SCRATCHTAPE,
Tony Thigpen wrote:
>Once a week, HSM performs an AUTOBACKUP. Until about 3 months ago, if nobody
>was at the shop, HSM would ask for an exiting tape, wait 10 minutes, and if no
>tape was mounted, it would ask "Can tape be mounted?". If our remote operator
>replied 'N', then HSM would us a
So some basic questions
1) What version of z/OS?
2) If you do a F dfhsmtaskname,Q SETSYS does it show the same info as the
ARCCMDxx member?
3) What is the specific messages you are seeing during autobackup?
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
You are correct. 'PREPARE' only creates an ABR record. No verification or
data movement occurs.
Glenn Wilcock
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the
35 matches
Mail list logo