I'm pretty sure I got this to work with SPOOL 000E 4248 but I could
not come up with any details for you. I seem to have misplaced my
notes about where I put my notes
It has been quite a while since I tried it, and it was not something I
had to have, since there were two or three other solutio
Hi Anne,
Our DR restores are done under a VM system that is available at the DR
site. We include a spool offload tape (actually 2 of them, one for
spare) with the NSS backups on it and a few PUN files on the same
tape. One of those PUN files is the DSF commands necessary to format
page and spool,
Check your profile exec. The standard message is still to use the long
message, which gives you the time stamp. You must be setting it to
SMSG at logon. This could be done per user via their profile exec, or
in a common exec used by all that is added to all profile execs (like
we do here).
Ron
On
Interesting. We have a lot of execs that do this, written back in the
80's (some by me!) that wuse this all the time.
But they all use different hex strings than you for 'hi' and 'lo':
hi='1de8'x;
lo='1d60'x;
They don't seem to have any problem using the 'hi' and 'lo' in SAY commands.
I can only
There was. Announced in 1985 and EOS was Dec 31 1993. Program Product
5684-011.
It's EOS date was listed in the Licensed Products Migration Matrix for z/VM
5.3 from 2005 on the IBM web site.
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Howard Rifkind wrote:
> A friend of mine stated that CICS can run nat
The MP3000 book says the internal disk emulates a 3990-2 controller.
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
> On Wednesday, 06/30/2010 at 04:28 EDT, Carlos Bodra - Pessoal
> wrote:
>> Hello Listners
>>
>> I have following situation as response of Q DASD DETAILS
>>
>> Q DASD DETAIL
>From the OpenExtension's User Guide:
In addition, the following POSIX users are added, if they are not
already defined:
___ ___ ___
| Userid| UID | Primary |
| | | group |
|___|___|___
| root |
Alain,
Have you looked at making OPERATOR the secondary user (SECUSER) for
RMSMASTR? WIll that not route the RMS messages to OPERATOR?
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Alain Benveniste wrote:
>
> Haha I see... its' look like a patch for my wheel :)
>
> I suppose I should open a enhancement for
You have the answer already, but here's the book with the details:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/hcsk2b30.pdf
It's the Guide for Automated Installation and Service.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Tom Huegel wrote:
> Good morning all.. I am a little rusty still. I am trying to IPL a
Did you try using "SET linkid NOMSG"?
Ron
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Schuh, Richard wrote:
> Having the operator do anything other than a simple START, including "PARM
> anything" requires an approval process. That said, a scan of the config file
> reveals that an id that rarely logs on
There is also the SETDATE EXEC which comes with your VM system. It is
on MAINT 3B2 as SETDATE SAMPEXEC and SETDATE SAMPHELP (the HELPCMS
file). Been there for a long time.
Mike,
zVM 6.1 requires a z10, so you can't go to 6.1 until you have a z10.
5.2 is unsupported, so the decision is "do I run unsupported until I
get a z10?".
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Horlick, Michael
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> We are currently running z/VM 5.2 and have z/VM 5.4 under test in
Technologies
> 1350 Boul. René-Lévesque Ouest
> Montréal, Qc, H3G 1T4
>
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
> Behalf Of Ron Schmiedge
> Sent: August 26, 2010 11:53 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject:
My 5.4 testbed (second level under 5.4) is running at RSU 1002 (5407)
now, no complaints from my testbed and everyone is playing on a z800.
There is also a list of service (the 2098ZVM bucket) required in
addition to RSU 1002 to support a z10.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Austin, Alyce (CIV)
Tom,
Been following this with interest. It sounds like your environment is
a lot different from most of the responders, so it has been
educational looking at what everyone else does.
You have said that you know the volumes addresses of the production VM
volumes. If so, why not code the SYSTEM CON
George,
Not necessary. MAINT usually has full-volume MDISK defined for 540RES,
540W01 and 540W02 (MAINT's 123, 124, and 125 disks). You can DDR those
volumes without touching the CPOWN list. If you aren't doing it from MAINT,
a R/O link to MAINT 123 gives you access to 540RES. Those definitions ar
Robert,
DIRMAINT does come with a "wakeup" table of commands that includes a
BACKUP command to backup your online directory into a source file. It
runs daily and you always have a current backup on DIRMAINT 1DB. Look
at DIRMAINT DATADVH
Sergio,
I've been using DIRMAINT since coming back to VM in 1
Ed,
This list provided the answer a couple of years ago:
'command set pf02 before SOS TABCMDF'
Add to your PROFILE XEDIT and PF2 will tab to the other command line
of a split screen set up by the SCREEN 2 command.
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Edward M Martin wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
>
And by CP SET VMOUT you meant CP SCREEN VMOUT of course...
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Bruce Hayden wrote:
> There are a few options. The easy one is to turn highlighting on and
> off, which will make that part white:
> 'CP SET VMOUT DEFAULT' /* Must be default for this to work */
> hi
It says TCMV1.ZIP when I click on it.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:02 PM, George Henke/NYLIC <
george_he...@newyorklife.com> wrote:
>
> Here is the link Kris.
>
> I think if you click the TCVM.ZIP link in the doc in the link below, you
> will see for yourself in the window it says GZIP compressed
Or if I weren't such a bad typer, "TCVM1.zip"
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Ron Schmiedge wrote:
> It says TCMV1.ZIP when I click on it.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 3:02 PM, George Henke/NYLIC <
> george_he...@newyorklife.com> wrote:
>
>
Hi Mike,
We use CA-VTERM multi-session manager, it changes the nodeid on the
bottom right to the CMS userid, but that's probably not a viable
solution for you, since that is probably more dollars than your client
wants to spend. Don't know how they do it, but there is no CP mod
(since I am in char
Is FAQS the problem? Are the VSE consoles responding when FAQS is not?
How many FAQS users do you have? I have a vague memory (and no books at
hand) of a limit to the number of FAQS users you can have.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Wakser, David <
david.wak...@infocrossing.com> wrote:
> No,
Sergio,
Others have already pointed you at PIPE, I use it myself for
descending sorts. There is no descending option in CMS SORT. There is
a descending option in the XEDIT SORT command.
I don't know if your data is going to span across months, but sorting
the date formatted as DD/MM/YY using colu
The MVS System Codes manual documents a wait state of 00F:
*
00F
Explanation: *For initial program load (IPL), a volume has been loaded that
does not contain IPL text.
*Operator Response: *Correctly identify the correct volume to be loaded.
Verify that the correct volume is mounted. If requeste
Hi Jim,
We run one production VSE guest, runs IDMS/DC (no CICS) all the time.
Batch happens throughout the day, much of it user driven, so day is
usually busier for batch than night.
That guest gets absolute share 50% and LIMITSOFT of 80%.
We have a VSE development guest that gets absolute share
Also risking the wrath of Chuckie, I can tell you what the person on
IBMLink told me when I opened an ETR for this same request:
I added my second stack to SYSTEM DTCPARMS:
:nick.TCPIP2 :type.server
:class.stack
:attach.0C00-0C01
I created a TCPIP2 TCPIP file, whi
Our VSE lock file mdisk belongs to OPERATOR, which runs PROP and is
disconnected shortly after IPL. All VSE guests tests the lock file in
their PROFILE EXEC and if it needs to be initialized, does it. So any
guest can come up first and set up the lock file. All OPERATOR does is
have the mdisk entry
We have run MVS guests under VM, and in LPAR. The answer was the same
for both, and has already been suggested.
Given that the dasd is linked to every z/OS guest correctly (and
having a dasd owner user with all z/OS guests with r/w links to the
dasd is what we used), it is up to the z/OS system to
You can use the Q SYSOPER command to tell who the system operator is.
If it says "you" then this is why you are in this mode.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
> wrote:
>
>> Yes that was it. What normally h
Okay Alan, I'll bite
Is there a "convenient" way to do this?
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
> On Wednesday, 07/29/2009 at 09:13 EDT, "Buettner, Wolfgang"
> wrote:
>> Is there a way to make the HOLD operand default for use with certain
>> LDEV servers?
>> In our case it
Yes, when I found out how VM TELNET behaved and how long I had to wait
for PCOMM to come back, I wrote this exec:
/* add HOLD when on TCPIP */
'EXECIO 1 CP ( STRING Q CONS'
pull cons . . . . . . host tcpip .
parm = ""
if host = "HOST" then if tcpip = "TCPIP" then parm = "HOLD"
'CP LOGOFF' par
Alan,
So you are saying we should NOT be using User_Volume_List statements
in the SYSTEM CONFIG, we should use an AUTOLOG1 process instead?
And I was so greatful not to maintain my old SYSDASD exec on AUTOLOG1 anymore.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
> On Wednesday, 09/02/200
I've been trying to follow the discussion and wondering if the
directory control statement
MAXSTORAGE
would have provided some protection from the finger check problem?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
> On Wednesday, 09/16/2009 at 04:44 EDT, Lee Stewart
> wrote:
>> I gue
sts. So the only practical
> place to put it would be in a profile. But according to usage note #1: A
> maximum storage setting on a USER statement overrides a MAXSTORAGE statement
> in a profile.
>
> So it would have no effect...
>
> Lee
>
> Ron Schmiedge wrote:
>&g
I will email it to you.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Mike Day wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone have a copy of VSE/VSAM FOR VM (GI10-8151-00) (pdf or doc) that
> they could send me?
>
> We are late to the game of installing CMSVSAM on z/VM. Had to beg IBM for a
> tape and now the same for ins
Where is this AR command documented?
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Rich Smrcina wrote:
> Jim's process is solid. On the z/VSE web site there is a page that
> describes what needs to be done during the twice yearly time change (forward
> and backward). Of course, now I can't find it, appare
ailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
> Behalf Of Ron Schmiedge
> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 4:06 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Daylight Saving Time change
>
> Where is this AR command documented?
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Rich Smrcina wrot
I just finished the process of installing 5.4.0 from the internet
files, and like you do not have anything but 3390-3. I do not use SFS,
I had to use the option to install from an FTP server.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Jefferson Davis
wrote:
> I am doing an install of z/VM 5.4.0 second leve
Kris,
We have a z800 with dynamic configuration enabled.
What does the TOK statement in the IOCP look like? I seem to recall
having to fiddle with that to get dynamic part working. Its been a
couple of years but I will see if I can find my notes.
Ron
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Kris Buelens
n with the
current date and time in the source. Once you bring up that IOCP it
sets the VM token and they match the IOCP. Next time you do an IOCP
the message goes away. And you can make dynamic changes once the token
and IOCP match.
Ron
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Ron Schmiedge wrote:
> Kris
We don't have MAXDEV set coded in our IOCP for our z800, and dynamic
configuration is enabled and does work (I have used it once or twice).
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers
wrote:
> Do you have this coded in your IOCP?
>
>
>
> RESOURCE PART=((VM,1),(DUMMY,2)),
If by "latest" you mean 0903, I did that last month. MAINT 500 was not
big enough. Bumped it to 900 cyl and VMDPACK worked.
Here's what the SERVLINK file size is:
Cmd Filename Filetype Fm Format LreclRecords Blocks
RPTF0118 SERVLINK T1 V 4005 92118 81484
On Tue, D
Bob,
I recall doing this a long time ago too. Just tried it again, since my
z/VM 5.4 system is sitting there in a second level guest, waiting for
clients to test.
The ID card format I used is
ID MAINT
and the file was punched to the reader for my second level guest.
I had to fight with the 00C
Frank,
The message you posted says that AILTEST was disconnected from graf
6F07, so this guest must have been logged on at that terminal. Any
problems with that terminal?
What was running in partition J1 that kept going into a wait state?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers
wrot
Billy,
Here's what our OSA2 looked like on our old MP2000:
CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=9009,UNIT=OSA,PATH=(5C)
IODEVICE ADDRESS=(0C00,010),CUNUMBR=(9009),STADET=Y, *
UNITADD=00,UNIT=OSA
IODEVICE ADDRESS=(0C0A,002),CUNUMBR=(9009),STADET=Y, *
If you have the 240W01 volume you probably have the minidisks for
OSASF, OSAMAINT, OSADMIN1/2/3 userids. They were all on the W01 volume
of our old VM/ESA system.
It may be that using 30F as the FE unit is a problem in the IOCP. We
always used an address of CFE as well as the UNITADD=FE. I will se
You might look at UM32894, in the PSP bucket for RSU903. It was the
only thing that came up (resolves two APARs) when I searched IBMLink
for "flashcopy z/VM 5.4"
Ron
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 1:51 PM, C. Lawrence Perkins
wrote:
> Yes, I just went "live" with z/VM 5.4 at RSU 901 and I'm experiencin
Actually,
IBM already did make some significant changes to XEDIT defaults. I
still have the MEMO file sitting on our X disk (from the days when
DTRIPF did more than a NOPAN), dated Dec 12, 1984, wherein we tell our
users that since the new release of VM/SP changed the way XEDIT
behaved, we were go
We have our CF1 and CF2 (and CF3 now that it exists) defined as RR in
the VM directory. This means no messages complaining about the disks
at IPL.
When MAINT needs to update CF1, after doing a "CPREL A", we issue "CP
LINK * CF1 CF1 W" and access it.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:59 AM, David Boyes wr
hat. Although it's one more config change to document
> and maintain, and I'm a lazy man. 8-)
>
>
>
> On 2/3/10 11:21 AM, "Ron Schmiedge" wrote:
>
>> We have our CF1 and CF2 (and CF3 now that it exists) defined as RR in
>> the VM director
Scott,
We don't use VMUTIL (or the WAKEUP command and parms) to run long
running execs. We do have separate userids that are autologged on by
VMUTIL and they run long execs, but they log off at the end, and we
just let VMUTIL control when they start again, with another autolog.
If you are in a wa
Mike,
You could use PROP on the machine that receives the console messages
to handle the response to the messages.
Ron
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Horlick, Michael
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
>
> I would like to trap all the CP console output from a virtual machine from
> its initial XAUTOLOG/
HI Terry,
If by different names, you mean doing something like backing up the files on
530SPL and restoring them to 540SPL, yes, you can do that. I will be doing
that myself this Sunday morning. It worked when I went from z/VM 5.2 to 5.3
and from z/VM 4.4 to 5.2, so I count on it working this week
WAKEUP VERSION on my z/VM 5.4 system says 1.2 (RC=00012)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Wandschneider, Scott
wrote:
> Frank excellent suggestion - My PRAMS file has been carried forward so many
> times, it still says:
>
> * THIS IS THE DEFAULT 'WAKEUP PARMS' FILE THAT IS SUPPLIED WITH *
Got a firewall in the way blocking port 515?
Ron
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 9:33 AM, David Boyes wrote:
>
> Setting up LPR support in RSCS on 5.4. I’ve added the
>
> 515 TCP RSCS ; RSCS
>
> line to PROFILE TCPIP, and recycled TCPIP and RSCS to ensure that they’re
> picking up the up
Hi Tae Min,
Yes, the MDISK statement as you have coded is expects to find a volume with
the label SYSPK. It is called the "volid" in the description of the MDISK
statement, found in the CP Planning and Administration manual, and is the
same as the "volser" you mention.
The same CP Planning and Ad
Richard,
I've a dumb question to ask - why does the CMS file have to be opened
by a spreadsheet program?
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Schuh, Richard wrote:
> Right now, I am creating a csv file using tab (x'05', which is also the
> default field separator in Pipelines) characters as a sep
DMS/CMS is still out there, according to the IBM z/VM web site.
Product is 5684-113. We are still using it.
Ron
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Sergio Lima wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> Here, We don't have some product to design a screen for work with REXX /
> CMS.
> Before, work here, I used TSO / R
Carlos,
IBM's documentation says you need at least z/VM 5.2 to run on a Z10.
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Carlos Bodra wrote:
> Hello
>
> We have a chance to migrate our hardware from MP3000 H50 running vse/esa
> 2.3.1 under z/vm 4.4.0 to a new z10 BC machine.
>
> Since we have a lot of CA t
We had a problem installing RSU0903 for z/VM 5.4. The 500 disk got
full and we had to bump it up. 900 cylinders worked.
But the RC was 2002 and there were some obvious messages (DMSERD107S
Disk T(500) is full)
Ron
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Michael MacIsaac wrote:
>
>> I think MAINT's
Mark,
I haven't done it, but these look like very similar to the mdisks added to
DATAMOVE, part of DIRMAINT. Are you supposed to leave the volume as $$?
In DATAMOVE they are not real mindisks, just an entry used by the product.
No real dasd space or SFS space was ever needed by those entries. B
Terry,
When I moved from 5.3 to 5.4 this past March, I didn't take any NSS with me
- the installation of 5.4 built the 5.4 versions of the NSS. If you are
building the 5.4 system on a z9 that will share DASD with the new z10, then
it should be a matter of shutting down the 5.4 system on the z9 and
I can make a CP disabled wait by IPLing my reader. Its full of stuff
that isn't iplable. Not sure what happens if it empty (my reader is
never empty)
i c
HCPVMJ232E IPL UNIT ERROR; IRB 01404017 0010 020040C1 0080 SNS 8
000
HCPGIR
Peter,
It's been going down steadily. On VM/ESA 2.4 it was 2 bytes. We
skipped ahead to z/VM 4.4 and it went down to 16 bytes. I complained
(ETR) and was told I could try the old VM/ESA FLIST module.
It worked, but the users were okay with 16 characters. Now we are z/VM
5.2 and it is down to 9 cha
Er, that was supposed to be 22 bytes not '2'. (who is this guys editor??)
On 12/13/07, Ron Schmiedge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> It's been going down steadily. On VM/ESA 2.4 it was 2 bytes. We
> skipped ahead to z/VM 4.4 and it went down to 16 bytes.
Nope, never :-)
What I like about FLIST is I can easily set up the PF keys the way I
want (see FLIST $PROFILE). We have used this to give users customized
things they can do. Including removing the ability to edit the files
(ever have a user edit a listing to change the numbers on a report,
rath
cute cursor exec b'
> 'FILELIST' data
>
> B EXEC
> ---
> /* */
> arg data
> 'browse' data
>
>
> Brian Nielsen
>
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:19:02 -0600, Ron Schmiedge
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Nope, never :-)
> >
Thanks Doug. Must be Christmas!
I don't want to sound ungrateful, but am I wrong in still thinking
that entering this line in FLIST $PROFILE:
*PFKEYS 10 BRW BROWSE the file on cursor line
and then updating the last line to include '10 BRW'
is a little simpler and easier?
Ron
On 12/13/07, Dou
Having just moved from a 7060 with internal disk to a z800 and Shark
this spring, that's what I did.
I ran ICKDSF and CPVOL to format then CPVOL to allocate, the spool and
dump volumes, IPLed CLEAN from the DDRed RES volume, and did a SPXTAPE
load of the spool files.
Ron
On 12/19/07, Schuh, Rich
I guess "it depends" (from Bill Bitner, too many times to count).
I had 25,000 spool files which I could dump while the system was
running, We use VM primarily to run VSE guests. DDR from the 7060 to
the Shark took time, and I felt I could minimize the down time by
taking the spool offload before
I wrote an exec to run on a disconnected service machine to dump the
VM spool. It was a while ago, but I see I did a CP SET CPCONIO IUCV
before the "wakeup (iucvmsg" loop. And a CP SET CPCONIO OFF before the
"wakeup (reset" at the end of the loop.
I am sure I read about this technique somewhere, pe
The IBM System z9 announcement dated April 27th 2006 says a z9 BC
model S07 has a processor machine type of 2097.
On 2/13/08, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, but there is a weird post on IBM-MAIN where a person says that the D
> M=CPU on his z9 shows a device type of 2097 (not 2096 o
Jim,
Google found the following announcement presentations:
http://www.baybunch.org/z9062806.pdf
http://www.ibm.com/br/systems/z/events/2006/explorers2006/downloads/ibm_jose_fadel_-_system_z9_business_class.pdf
ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/eserver/zseries/zos/vse/pdf3/techconf2006/G02.pdf
All sh
Try putting the link back together, it was split so the "3.aspx" was
on a new line.
should end /18963p3.aspx
On 2/19/08, Macioce, Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got a 404 when I tired to look
> Mace
>
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Try putting the link back together, it is wrapped.
It should end /18963p3.aspx
On 2/19/08, Macioce, Larry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got a 404 when I tired to look
> Mace
>
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bob Heerdink
Left. Mostly because I only had some MVS folks to help me with VM when
I took over its support again in 1999 (after starting on BSEPP in 1979
and going through VM/XA in 1989). It was an attempt to help them work
without their ISPF blanket/menus by giving them an editor that looked
something like wh
Rob,
As a Scout leader and husband of a Guide leader, your tape rings would
be of use to just about any organization that entertains youth with
things like ring toss games. When my company's 3420's went out the
door, the tape rings came home with me! They have been used at lots of
events and camps
There is a 3590 softcopy manual with installation details. I have one
on my hardware CD which is about 10 years old.
GA32-0329-03 might be what you are looking for.
For 3480, I don't think I ever saw anything online.
On 3/17/08, Peter Carrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am lookin
The IBM web site I searched says the 3590-A60 power is .5 kVA
You do not say what kind of drives. The same chart lists .3 kVA for
B11 and .23 kVA for E11 and H11 in a rack. I suspect the rack draws
some power too?
I am am pretty sure we tossed all our 3480 documentation out with the
drives, sorry
Google finds the following information on an IBM AS/400 (!) web site.
3480-A22 is 1.0 kVA and 3480-B22 is .9 kVA
On 3/17/08, Ron Schmiedge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The IBM web site I searched says the 3590-A60 power is .5 kVA
>
> You do not say what kind of drives. The same cha
No. Ours isn't.
On 3/19/08, Austin, Alyce (CIV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does the MONWRITE userid have to be on the RES volume to collect data?
>
> Thanks,
> Alyce
>
>
We use CONS=cuu in our SAIPL panels and still get VM shutdown messages
on all screens defined as operator consoles in SYSTEM CONFIG? z/VM 5.2
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And do not forget, if you have a "cons=addr" in your IPLPARMS on the
> SAPL scr
The RSCS web site has an announcement that says in part...
"The stand-alone RSCS V3.2.0 (5684-096) product was planned to be
withdrawn from marketing effective September 30, 2007. However, on
June 5, 2007 the planned date for RSCS V3.2.0 on z/VM V5.2 was
extended and is is planned to be withdrawn
Hi Alan,
I would not call myself a newbie, since I became a VM system
programmer in 1979 with BSEPP. But after a VM/XA install in 1986 I
wandered in the MVS wilderness until I returned to VM support for a
VM/VSE shop in 1999. VSE needed much more TLC than VM to get it
wokring well, (previous "owne
My z/VM 5.2 system has 14,766 help files on MAINT 402.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Howard Rifkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what would be on Maint's 402 disk...if anything.
>
> Or could 402 be some minidisk just associated with this installations z/VM
> system.
>
> Thanks
Terry,
LOGONBY has been around for many VM releases. We set all our service
machine accounts and important maintenance ids (MAINT, TCPMAINT, etc)
up with a LOGONBY list. Then we change those ids' passwords to
LBYONLY, which says the userid can only be logged on using LOGONBY. So
if you try and log
RSCS V3.2 at 0201 is as new as you can get under z/VM 5.2. On z/VM 5.3
it becomes a feature but I don't think the code gets any newer, just
the response to the command :-)
Ron
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:12 PM, August Carideo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also thought it was not working because rel
Hi Mike,
Perhaps not too strange - what processor were you using at Sungard?
There may have been service required for that particular machine that
came on 0701 you did not have at 0601.
We had that happen to us at Sungard several years back (I can't recall
the error messages anymore, we were gett
Alain,
Since most of the US is on a holiday today (and probably tomorrow)
perhaps I have an answer for you.
It is possible for a 3380K device to have 3339 cylinders.
On real 3390 devices you could format the 3390 in 3380 Track
Compatibility Mode (TCM) and get 3339 cylinders with 3380 track
forma
Alan,
I think I was the one that mentioned TCM, I haven't seen anything back
from Alain as yet. But that to me is the mostly likely reason he got
3339 cylinders when he was expecting a standard 3380K - the DS8300 had
the volume set up as a 3390 in 3380 TCM. This would not cause him any
problems -
I do. I'll email it to you.
Ron
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Crispin Hugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anybody got a copy of this or know where I can get one ? Can't seem to find
> it anywhere
>
>
>
> Crispin Hugo
> Systems Programmer, Macro 4
>
>
>
Hi Mike,
Do you give the VM VTAM userid any sort of preference? We've given
VTAM a SHARE ABS 3%.
Ron
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Horlick, Michael
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
>
> Here is the situation.
>
>
>
> We are running z/VM 5.2 and 5 z/VSE 4.1.0 guest systems (3 production, 2
> developme
Hi Mike,
We are not using VMRM so I cannot comment.
We have multiple VSEs under VM and once we turned all the knobs we
could in VM to help VSE, surprise, surprise, it took it all. So we put
a limithard on the guest to make it play nicer with the rest of us
all.
I know the VSE performance people
Alan,
Would it at least be possible for the information contained in those
30 IBM manuals recording the various userids included by IBM in z/VM,
be gathered into one manual? Say the Guide for Automated Installation
and Service, which already has "Appendix E: Contents of the z/VM
System" (or wheree
Alan,
Okay. Although this is a manual I am already reading, not GC-YetAnother-09 :-)
In the meantime, who will help me identify what those 91 IBM ids in my
VM directory are for?
Ron
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
> On Tuesday, 02/10/2009 at 01:18 EST, Ron Schmie
Hi Mike,
Many experts have talked about XSTORE and VM using it for paging. All
our defined XSTORE is being used for MDCACHE. It made a noticable
difference to I/O performance for our VSE production guest. We could
have done it all in regular storage but until a recent processor
change, we didn't h
UTILITY exec is on MAINT 193
Ron
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:02 AM, August Carideo wrote:
> I am trying to run
>
> utility utiltape all
>
> from maint's ID , it comes back w/ unknown command
> is there a particular disk that needs to be assessed that maint is not
> already ?
> thanks,
> Augie
>
Dave,
I don't think that merging the two versions of USER DIRECT (which was
the answer you got) will have any affect on the EXTENT CONTROL file.
What you have on the testbed now will not change unless you get the
two EXTENT CONTROL files and merge entries from each. So if you want
your new product
Dave,
The Program Directory for DIRMAINT should have a section called
"Tailor the DIRMAINT Server Machines" (I am still z/VM 5.3, you'll
have to check the 5.4 version).There's a figure containing a list of
supplied sample files. If you've tailored any of them, you'll want to
bring them forward fro
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
