A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 9493
Title: Subject Identifiers for Security Event Tokens
Author: A. Backman, Ed.,
M. Scurtescu,
P. Jain
Status: Standards Track
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Subject Identifiers for Security Event Tokens'
(draft-ietf-secevent-subject-identifiers-18.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Security Events Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Paul Wouters and Roman Danyliw
The IESG has received a request from the Security Events WG (secevent) to
consider the following document: - 'Subject Identifiers for Security Event
Tokens'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send
Please welcome NomCom 2021-2022!
The challenge period has ended with no challenges following the update posted
on July 8, 2021:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/ann/326222/
I'd like to thank the following individuals who have prioritized this service
to the IETF Community.
Voting Members:
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 8813
Title: Clarifications for Elliptic Curve Cryptography
Subject Public Key Information
Author: T. Ito,
S. Turner
Status
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Clarifications for Elliptic Curve Cryptogtaphy Subject Public Key
Information'
(draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-03.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Limited Additional Mechanisms for PKIX
and SMIME Working
The IESG has received a request from the Limited Additional Mechanisms for
PKIX and SMIME WG (lamps) to consider the following document: -
'Clarifications for Elliptic Curve Cryptogtaphy Subject Public Key
Information'
as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few
DRAFT - points with XX need to be updated!
Subject: NomCom 2015-2016 Call for Volunteers
The IETF nomcom appoints folks to fill the open slots on the IAOC, the IAB,
and the IESG.
Ten voting members for the nomcom are selected in a verifiably random
way from a pool of volunteers. The more
Hi Andy,
At 09:26 01-08-2013, Andy Bierman wrote:
I meant that it is difficult to remain anonymous when the
email to the WG has your email address in it.
Agreed.
Perhaps you can point me to the RFC 2026 text (or other RFC)
that says something about protecting the disclosure of the identity
On 30/07/13 16:44, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 7/30/13 4:40 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
Captchas? Recaptchas?
Also, AFAIK WordPress has some good anti-spam add-ons.
the obvious one is simply a requirement to use your ietf tools
credientials to post.
+1. the best current practice so far.
A note from the I2RS Chairs regarding the Interim Meeting being held
April 22-23, 2013 in Sunnyvale, CA:
We've put up a registration page for the I2RS interim meeting at:
http://i2rs-interim.eventbrite.com
You must register in order to be able to attend. The cut off date for
A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.
List address: c...@ietf.org
Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/coma/
To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/coma
Purpose: This list is for the discussion related to the management of
constrained networks
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6495
Title: Subject Key Identifier (SKI) SEcure
Neighbor Discovery (SEND) Name Type Fields
Author: R. Gagliano, S. Krishnan,
A. Kukec
Hi,
Tom you wrote on 3 Dec: I would commend to you the e-mail that Russ posted
here 30Nov2011 ... so claiming what is and is not part of MPLS-TP calls for
some thought.
I would suggest that you also read the following from the same e-mail from Russ
to Malcolm Johnson:
(2) I do not see
previous posting.
Best regards,
yaacov
-Original Message-
From: ext t.petch [mailto:daedu...@btconnect.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2011 8:07 PM
To: Weingarten, Yaacov (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon); ietf@ietf.org;
adr...@olddog.co.uk
Cc: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
Subject: Re
Can I humbly suggest that we create a separate working group to discuss
whether there should be a subject_prefix for emails to ietf@ietf.org?
This is an important issue for many people, and it would be unfortunate -
nay, negligent - to make a decision on the matter without due discussion,
debate
+1 and it should be begin with a reflection of what was then and what
is now.
Nick Hilliard wrote:
Can I humbly suggest that we create a separate working group to discuss
whether there should be a subject_prefix for emails to ietf@ietf.org?
This is an important issue for many people, and it
...@muada.com
4e19c323.7020...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Subject: Re: Spurious MTU in IPv6 RAs Where WAN is PPPoE
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:20:03 +0900.
4e19c323.7020...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
In message 4e19c323.7020...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp, Masataka
--
Terre natale !
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Terre natale !
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
I don't want to be a member
thanks
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
rfc-...@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: Experimental RFC to be: draft-dzis-nwg-nttdm-04.txt
The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'The Network Trouble
Ticket Data Model' draft-dzis-nwg-nttdm-04.txt as an Experimental RFC.
The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Subject Key Identifier (SKI) SEND Name Type fields. '
draft-ietf-csi-send-name-type-registry-06.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Cga Send maIntenance Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Ralph Droms
http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfs6wf29_14jj9n62dh
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
http://EsperanzaBlaszak2931.co.cc
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Dear Sir or Madam,
Is there a working group on converging legacy protocol stacks and mapping
legacy stacks addressing mechanisms into IPv6 addressing? For example, RFC
4291 4038 specifies that :::x.y.z.w represents IPv4 node x.y.z.w -
is there a similar draft concept for specifying a Message
Since the days of the IASA transition team, Marshall Eubanks has acted
as the scribe for the IAOC and IETF Trust. Since he was selected by
the NOMCOM for membership on the IAOC he can no longer serve as
scribe. The IAOC needs new scribes.
Serving as the IAOC scribe is great way to learn
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5480
Title: Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public
Key Information
Author: S. Turner, D. Brown,
K. Yiu, R. Housley
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:31:23 -0800 (PST), The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received an appeal regarding the previously approved
draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-20. The appeal text can be
found here:
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/appeal-otis-2009-02-16.txt
[...]
I am the author of the
I urge you not to pass the 'TLS authorization extension' protocol as a standard
unless the patent threat posed by RedPhone is removed entirely with a
royalty-free license for all users.
best regards,
Mauro Bieg
--
Jetzt 1 Monat kostenlos! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL
für nur 17,95
On 2/8/09 11:22 AM, Jeffrey Hankins jhank...@gmail.com wrote:
Please stand up for software freedom and reject the TLS proposal until
RedPhone Security issues a royalty-free patent for TLS. Thank you.
And the content cracks me way the heck up, too. Otherwise
this is really, really annoying.
Lol :)
Its an interesting attempt, to say the least...
On 2/9/09, mshore msh...@cisco.com wrote:
On 2/8/09 11:22 AM, Jeffrey Hankins jhank...@gmail.com wrote:
Please stand up for software freedom and reject the TLS proposal until
RedPhone Security issues a royalty-free patent for TLS. Thank
;
ietf@ietf.org; campai...@fsf.org
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: I Love this subject header! (was Re: Reject TLS!)
Lol :)
Its an interesting attempt, to say the least...
On 2/9/09, mshore msh...@cisco.com wrote:
On 2/8/09 11:22 AM, Jeffrey Hankins jhank
The IESG has received a request from the Public-Key Infrastructure
(X.509) WG (pkix) to consider the following document:
- 'Elliptic Curve Cryptography Subject Public Key Information '
draft-ietf-pkix-ecc-subpubkeyinfo-10.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision
An interim meeting will be organized on October 1 - 2 in Montreal,
Canada to continue discussions about the IPv4 and IPv6 co-existence,
NAT-PT replacement, and new tunneling or translation solutions to
address needs in this space. This is a meeting that affects work
happening in a number of WGs
comments to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing lists by 2008-03-14. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klensin
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 05:36:17AM +, Greg Skinner wrote:
FWIW, I reread Russ Housley's comments on the outage, and understand
it to be an experiment that is voluntary (but encouraged). Perhaps
this needs to be stated differently (e.g. IPv6 experiment planned for
IETF71 Plenary).
I think
AM Pacific Standard Time
To: Greg Skinner
Cc: Hallam-Baker, Phillip; IETF Discussion
Subject:Re: Change the subject! RE: [IAOC] Re: IPv4 Outage Planned
forIETF71 Plenary
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 05:36:17AM +, Greg Skinner wrote:
FWIW, I reread Russ Housley's comments
To: Greg Skinner
Cc: Hallam-Baker, Phillip; IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Change the subject! RE: [IAOC] Re: IPv4 Outage Planned
forIETF71 Plenary
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 05:36:17AM +, Greg Skinner wrote:
FWIW, I reread Russ Housley's comments on the outage, and understand
Theodore Tso wrote:
I think the real issue here is the difference between what was
originally stated (I think first by Marshall Rose in the Open Book) as
the difference between the ISO, promulgating OSI, and the IETF,
promulgating TCP/IP --- which was that ISO was populated primarily by
from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)
-Original Message-
From: Dave Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 02:12 PM Pacific Standard Time
To: Chris Lonvick
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject:Re: Change the subject! RE: [IAOC] Re: IPv4
Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a question of ambition. At sixteen I was interested in mastering
the computer at its most fundamental level. I wrote arcade games in
6502 and Z80 assembler.
Today the idea of booting linux on a laptop would not make my top ten,
hundred or
(www.good.com)
-Original Message-
From: Greg Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 01:44 PM Pacific Standard Time
To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject:Re: Change the subject! RE: [IAOC] Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for
IETF71 Plenary
Pacific Standard Time
To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Change the subject! RE: [IAOC] Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for
IETF71 Plenary
Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is a question of ambition. At sixteen I was interested in mastering
Hi,
Several people have written on this thread that they might not participate
in this experiment because they either won't have an IPv6 stack or that
they're unwilling to experiment with the network settings on their PCs.
I'll suggest that those people can double their experimental fun in a
Chris Lonvick wrote:
Hi,
Several people have written on this thread that they might not
participate in this experiment because they either won't have an IPv6
stack or that they're unwilling to experiment with the network settings
on their PCs. I'll suggest that those people can double
TS Glassey wrote:
FWIW I have run into many people using down-rev laptop's for whom
Microsoft's v6 implementation isn't ever going to be installed.
See http://research.microsoft.com/msripv6/msripv6.htm - I found
that via Jordi's http://www.ipv6-to-standard.org/ link. Apparently
an
9:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IAOC] Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russ
Congrats. The ripples from this are and will be significant
For products and services that support IPv6, take a look at:
http://www.ipv6-to-standard.org/
Regards,
Jordi
De: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fecha: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:13:21 -0800
Para: ietf@ietf.org
Conversación: Change the subject! RE: [IAOC] Re
-Discussion discussion list ietf@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ralph Droms [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Lightening talks at the plenary
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:58:49 -0400
To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X
I want to post
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
rawad Melhem wrote:
I want to post
Congratulations, you got your wish.
Did you actually have anything to SAY?
--
Dave Aronson
Specialization is for insects. -Heinlein
Work: http://www.davearonson.com/
Play: http://www.davearonson.net/
___
Ietf
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 4985
Title: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Subject Alternative Name for Expression of
Service Name
Author: S. Santesson
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Subject Alternative Name for
expression of service name '
draft-ietf-pkix-srvsan-05.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509)
Working Group
PLEASE
it would be best for all, I think, if people who wish to rehash all the
discussions from the ASRG mailing list take that discussion to the ASRG
mailing list.
But - failing that - could you PLEASE put the word SPAM in the subject
line of your message, so that people who want
.
But - failing that - could you PLEASE put the word SPAM in the
subject
Please don't do that. SPAM is subject line is used by large
number of user filters tht post-process messages sent for
example by SpamAssasin.
Instead use Anti-Spam (note no capilization of spam) in
the subject line
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 4683
Title: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Subject Identification Method (SIM)
Author: J. Park, J. Lee,
H.. Lee, S. Park
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Subject Identification Method (SIM)
'
draft-ietf-pkix-sim-08.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons
The IESG has received a request from the Public-Key Infrastructure (X.509) WG
to consider the following document:
- 'Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Subject Identification Method
(SIM)'
draft-ietf-pkix-sim-07.txt as a Proposed Standard
To distinguish among multiple individuals
[NOTE:
It has come to the attention of the IESG that the original Last Call
message was posted to the IETF announcements mail list while RFC 3683
specifies that it should have been posted to the general IETF discussion list.
To correct for this oversight, this Last Call message is reissued with a
[NOTE:
It has come to the attention of the IESG that the original Last Call
message was posted to the IETF announcements mail list while RFC 3683
specifies that it should have been posted to the general IETF discussion list.
To correct for this oversight, this Last Call message is reissued with a
From: Keith Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree that getting authentication into the email
protocols is a good
thing, but TLS does not achieve much more than
SPF/Sender-ID in that
respect. DKIM is a much better platform.
Not clear. As currently envisioned, DKIM doesn't
I haven't changed the subject. The correct subject is sarcasm and
intimidation. I have just provided specific examples of sarcasm and
intimidation that have happened while working on spam issues for the
IETF. Those specific exmaples fall under the topic of the subject header.
Your complaint about
standards, and not letting lots of whining users who
ccan't figure out how to operate a simple packet filter dictate our work.
What I think is that if you change the subject, you should change
the Subject:, so that people who might be interested in Sarcarm
and intimidation but aren't interested
...
Does this mean that you think the IETF should disband the ASRG, drop all
current I-D's relating to spam, and quit working on spam issues?
What I think is that if you change the subject, you should change
the Subject:, so that people who might be interested in Sarcarm
and intimidation
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 4096
Title: Policy-Mandated Labels Such as Adv: in Email
Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At Best
Author(s): C. Malamud
Status: Informational
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Policy-Mandated Labels Such as Adv: in Email Subject Headers Considered
Ineffective At Best '
draft-malamud-subject-line-05.txt as an Informational RFC
This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
IETF Working
A very simple solution would be to write the documents in French :-)
That would be illegal. ;)
Carl
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
*
* A very simple solution would be to write the documents in French :-)
*
*
* That would be illegal. ;)
*
* Carl
*
Ah, but here is the clever bit. We don't CALL it French, we call
it Freedom Language.
Bob Braden
___
Ietf
At 11:30 25/02/2005, Carl Malamud wrote:
A very simple solution would be to write the documents in French :-)
That would be illegal. ;)
This was a joke, but you make it an issue: illegal for who?
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
Merci bien pour votre suggestions ... JSPF (Je suis pas francais). :))
Regards,
Carl
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
This is an interesting proposal, however I would suggest that
the grammatical mistakes relative to the french language
and the cultural references be fixed.
of the solicitation class keyword. (Needless to say, the
issue of how to define what classes of messages are subject to such a
requirement and how to enforce it are beyond the scope of this
discussion.)
Joe
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1
I read the first draft of this document, and wondered:
Does this propose to change IETF behavior on list management, so that the
name of the list (usually same as working group) is not put in the Subject:
using the feature of mailman that does this?
When it was just a draft, it was just
Hi Brian -
I read the first draft of this document, and wondered:
Does this propose to change IETF behavior on list management, so that the
name of the list (usually same as working group) is not put in the Subject:
using the feature of mailman that does this?
That isn't the specific
Durand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 7:00 AM
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Labels in Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At
Best' to Informational RFC
Merci bien pour votre suggestions ... JSPF (Je suis pas francais). :))
Regards,
Carl
Hi -
http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt says:
Internet-Drafts must be in ASCII. No 8bit chars are currently allowed.
If you need to include codepoints, a suggestion might be to use the
unicode convention: U+, where X is a hexadecimal digit.
So, for the quotes, if retaining
The document does not discuss the type of mailing list subject labels
that you're referring to.
I'm arguing that a better title of the document would be
Legislated Labels in Email Subject Headers Considered
Ineffective At Best
Tony Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carl Malamud
At 00:15 25/02/2005, Carl Malamud wrote:
http://trusted.resource.org/no-solicit/ has the xml source and the
html rendition. In the xml, I use the proper utf-8, which shows up
in full glory in the html. For the ascii version, I concur with
Randy's opinion that it makes the most sense to sacrifice
Carl Malamud wrote:
my repeated apologies to any citizens of Freedonia as well
Maybe you could mention that RfC 3834 with its [Auto] label
is and was no problem, and it doesn't need any solicitation
classes to work. But don't mention Re: unless you REally
plan to REvive some endless threads,
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
following document:
- 'Labels in Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At Best '
draft-malamud-subject-line-02.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final
Hi Folks,
In the process of submitting I-Ds to the new improved specs, I had
reason to look at (and cut-and-paste from) the fine I-D guidelines
document.
I also tried out the XML2RFC 1.26 web service, and can attest that it
adds no pain over
and above that intrinsic in the use of XML (i.e.
hi to all,
I would like to ask if enyone knows how I can simulate the IEEE 802.11e using
the OPNET simulator and if there is a new version that support it. I have the
8.0C... I would really appreciate any help...
thanks in advance...
Despina(deva)
___
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: (no subject)
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:20:17 -0500
Virus: Trojan.JS.RunMe
Trojan.JS.RunMe
±zªº«H¥ó³Q°»´ú¥X§t¦³¯f¬r
«H¥ó¤w³Q¥á±ó
¬ÛÃö¸ê®Æ¦p¤U:
±H¥óªÌ: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
¦¬¥óªÌ: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
¼ÐÃD: (no subject)
¤é´Á: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:20:17 -0500
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 06:40:30 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
--
Warning: Message delivery wasn't performed.
Reason: Our virus scanner detected very suspicious code in
the attachment of a mail addressed to a user of our
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harald Tveit Alvestrand) wrote on 15.07.04 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Short answer:
No.
Long answer:
This item has been discussed to death once every 3 months on this very
list. We have never found a consensus to add these tags.
List-Id: IETF-Discussion ietf.ietf.org
At 17:24 15/07/04, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
This item has been discussed to death once every 3 months on this very
list. We have never found a consensus to add these tags.
It would be illusory to have everyone (consensus) accepting to be
nice/polite to a few/many others and to conform to a
these email subject
lines do not show the WG name...
Request All to include a WG name in the subject line []s like
[manet]. (which includes this email too!!)
I would think IETF moderator should add that, but which WG??
Thanks,
Harsh
Short answer:
No.
Long answer:
This item has been discussed to death once every 3 months on this very
list. We have never found a consensus to add these tags.
Harald
--On 15. juli 2004 10:35 -0400 John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Since I'm the apparent offender...
Not to feed the troll, but, if I remember correctly, the overwhelming
response is always: we don't need it. Procmail can filter fine without
it.
So, since there's no one vehemently opposed to it (that I can remember),
why not just turn it on, to avoid the quarterly request? Not everyone
uses
David Frascone wrote:
[..]
So, since there's no one vehemently opposed to it (that I can remember),
why not just turn it on,
Finally we're a true Standards Organization.
cheers,
gja
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As you probably have already noticed, email delievery from ietf.org has
been reinstated.
If you notice any issues, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you,
Stanley Weilnau
Evening all,
have we completely deprecated 's for A6's or is still considered
bcp?
Scott
sleekfreak pirate broadcast
world tour 2002-3
live from the pirate hideout
http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/
have we completely deprecated 's for A6's or is still considered
bcp?
we're keeping them both as we have moved ipv4 to experimental
/sarcasm
Dean, please can you change the subject line. If you are going to complain to
the IETF about process, I have absolutely no desire to be brought into it, and
it certainly isn't part of anything I conciously wanted to initiate in my
posting.
cheers
-George
On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 01:46:50 EST, Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Who does the real IE work in the Internet world? Is it the IESG or IAB?
That's what working groups are for.
Seems like there's more arguing on this list than anything else.
You haven't been here long, have you? ;)
Who does the real IE work in the Internet world? Is it the IESG or IAB?
Seems like there's more arguing on this list than anything else.
Hi,
I'm Marco from Italy. I'm querying my HP LANswitch by SNMP protocol to get
relevant information about my LAN connections.
I use snmpget, snmpgetnext and snmpwalk commands from a Linux RH 6.2 system.
Is there a way to obtain a list of connected hosts to interfaces of the
switch?? I
Hi,
my name is Marco and I write from Italy.
I have to develop a system to increase the security on my switched LAN.
Switches forward all the broadcast traffic while unicast traffic is
redirected only on the right segment...
My idea is relying on broadcast traffic to map the hosts.to map
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
