[ilugd] Re: The Future of Open Source?

2005-02-14 Thread Tarun Dua
Linux Lingam wrote: 1) does not allow anonymous comments. forces someone to get an account on blogger. bleaaah! This is more to prevent automated comment spam I guess. Nothing wrong in going through the manual process of creating an anonymous sounding name like linuxlingam and commenting on it.

Re: [ilugd] Re: Re: Re: [OT][CrossPost] Creative dot (site down)

2005-02-14 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
I would like to request Sandip to point creative.lug-delhi.org ( since I no longer believe its the community that controls linux-delhi.org domain and Sandip doesn't claim anything official about what is on his domain ) to the original site and can Mairu ( who also happens to moderate the

[ilugd] Re: Re: Re: [OT][CrossPost] Creative dot (site down)

2005-02-14 Thread Tarun Dua
Tarun Dua wrote: I would like to request Sandip to point creative.lug-delhi.org ( since I no longer believe its the community that controls linux-delhi.org domain and Sandip doesn't claim anything official about what is on his domain ) to the original site and can Mairu ( who also happens

[ilugd] Re: Re: Re: Re: [OT][CrossPost] Creative dot (site down)

2005-02-14 Thread Tarun Dua
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: While I have no problem pointing creative.lug-delhi.org to the previous content, my personal wish is that all community interactions happen under the linux-delhi.org domain. lug-delhi.org is supposed to be a passive supplemental(non-overlapping) resource for the LUG.

[ilugd] Re: Creative dot (site down)

2005-02-14 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2005-02-14 14:25:28 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a few things that have come up in the recent discussions. The domainname management. The external URL's implying association with the site. Someone very conviniently sidestepped this issue. The putting up of sponsorship logo's and

Re: [ilugd] Re: Creative dot (site down)

2005-02-14 Thread Sanjeev \ghane\ Gupta
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: Plus the fact that, apart from the half-dozen or so people getting all worked up about the issue, nobody seems to have any idea what the site is/does/wants, or what the fuss is about. I assume it is about the fact that Creative Technologies wishes to have control of the

Re: [ilugd] Re: Re: Re: [OT][CrossPost] Creative dot (site down)

2005-02-14 Thread vivek khurana
--- Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vivek, can you please reconsider and work along with the original team I have infact started working again on creative dot. As for sponsoring issue here is the sequence of eventsreconstructed from the emails on creative in my mail box

[ilugd] Re: Re: Re: Re: [OT][CrossPost] Creative dot (site down)

2005-02-14 Thread Tarun Dua
vivek khurana wrote: You are entitled to your view of sequence of events. clicked on the link it turned out to be a website of a compnay which has nothing to do with web hosting and Well I am not sure why a webhost needs to sponsor in the first place. Now i dont know when did Sudev came into

Re: [ilugd] Re: Creative dot (site down)

2005-02-14 Thread Raj Mathur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ghane == Sanjeev Gupta Sanjeev writes: Ghane [snip] Ghane Creative is a trademark of Creative Technologies Pte Ltd. Ghane Linux is a trademark of Linus Trovalds. ILUG-D is a Ghane trademark of the Society-to-be. Singapore is a

[ilugd] (fwd) [SECURITY] New htdig packages fix cross-site scripting vulnerability

2005-02-14 Thread Raj Mathur
[Please upgrade ht://dig on all distributions -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Subject: [SECURITY] [DSA

[ilugd] (fwd) [SECURITY] [ GLSA 200502-15 ] PowerDNS: Denial of Service vulnerability

2005-02-14 Thread Raj Mathur
[Please upgrade if you have PowerDNS installed on any distribution -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;

[ilugd] Configuring NIS with Active Directory

2005-02-14 Thread ashutosh kaul
  Hi all, I have installed SFU 3.5 on windows 2000 server running Acitve Directory. Started USername Mapping,NIS server and NFS server on the machine.Also mapped corresponding users of active directory with Unix users.At client side I used authconfig to select NIS and authentication Method