Re: AW: [IMail Forum] hacking problem

2007-05-11 Thread Stephan
The failed login is not to mitigate DoS attacks but to avoid accounts being hacked into.I agree that DoS is better handled at the router/firewall server, but this is a separate issue.Also imail is a small business application, with the assumption that is should have automated tools to help with

Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 Technical Preview Program

2007-05-10 Thread Stephan
Great to hear the webmail leak is fixed, hopefully it will now be stable. Has the webmail been updated so that files sent from Apple's mail.app as attachment are handled correctly (is that the handling of inline images fix)? In a lot of cases they can't be viewed or downloaded. This is a very long

Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 Technical Preview Program

2007-05-10 Thread Stephan
It would be nice also to have some guidance as to what settings to use for the imail application pool in iis6. Are these included somewhere that I missed, or anyone from ipswitch or from this list care to share their recommendation?Assuming it is stable in 2006.21 when it is released, we will stop

Re: [IMail Forum] hacking problem

2007-05-10 Thread Stephan
In Imail 8.x there was an admin setting to lock accounts after x failed logins. It's not an option in 2006 as far as I know, which I think is a major security problem. With a failed login lockout (with a timeout for the lockout) hack attemps like this should be a non issue imo.-Original

Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 Technical Preview Program

2007-05-10 Thread Stephan
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephan Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 10:36 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.21 Technical Preview Program It would be nice also to have some guidance as to what settings to use for the imail a

Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2- how unstable is it?

2007-04-20 Thread Stephan
I haven't seen any announcements, so I am just wondering does anyone know when the next version following Imail 2006.2 (2007?) might be coming out and what bug fixes or improvements we can expect to see?-Original Message-From: "John T (lists)" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent 4/3/2007 12:45:59 PMTo:

Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.2- how unstable is it?

2007-04-20 Thread Stephan
There are several issues with 2006.2Some users have login problems with ie (a small number but can't figure out why and there are other ipswitch customers with the same problem)There are the frequent performance problem which have to be resolved with an iis application reset (which logs out any

Re: [IMail Forum] TCP sockets Windows - maybe associated with 2006.2 issues

2007-03-29 Thread Stephan
I've made theses modifications a long time ago, which did fix some other problems with 2006.1, but I am still seeing problems with 2006.2 webmail with these tcp settings enabled.-Original Message-From: "Matt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent 3/28/2007 2:25:35 PMTo:

Re: [IMail Forum] TCP sockets Windows - maybe associated with 2006.2 issues

2007-03-29 Thread Stephan
every hour. John T From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephan Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 7:43 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] TCP sockets Windows - maybe associated with 2006.2 issues I've made theses modifications a lon

Re: [IMail Forum] HTTP Failing on 2006.2?

2007-03-27 Thread Stephan
Yes same here. We're getting multiple complaints from users, seems to slow down to a crawl and start generating xml errors. A recycle of the iis application pool fixes the problem, until the next time it happens.Overall 2006.2's webmail is pretty disapointing imo. Still can't handle attachments

Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.x

2007-02-14 Thread Stephan
I agree check boxes for selecting multiple messages in the webmail would be great.-Original Message-From: "Kevin Gillis" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent 2/14/2007 8:54:17 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 2006.x hibonno, good comments. we'll check into multi

Re: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2

2007-02-14 Thread Stephan
s for some domains that are using a custom ODBCuser.dll. Is this the same as saying 'we are withdrawing the design foroperating with acustom ODBCUser.dll'? - Original Message - From: Stephan To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 1

[IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] ICS 2006.2

2007-02-12 Thread Stephan
Has anyone tested 2006.2 with the custom odbc dll for mysql? Are there any issues?The release notes includes the following:- WGSCVT.exe will not be able to convert contacts for some domains that are using a custom ODBCuser.dll. These users will not have access to contacts from previous versions.

[IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] Thinking about upgrade. Looking for opinions.

2006-12-08 Thread Stephan
Declude works very well for us, has anti-spam and anti-virus built in and is made to work with imail.-Original Message-From: "Eric Geater" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent 12/8/2006 10:53:02 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Thinking about upgrade. Looking for opinions.I have

[IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] Thinking about upgrade. Looking for opinions.

2006-12-08 Thread Stephan
IMHO - better value with mxguard and messagesniffer. Declude folks don't seem too happy these days. That was last week. This week we are happy. ;-)I agree, they've gone through a rough patch, but latest versions have been very good. In fact with the most recent versions they fixed some long

[IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] move users to new server

2006-10-18 Thread Stephan
We did something similar recently.We were running Imail 8.15 on windows 2000 with mysql for our user database.We first upgraded 8.15 to 2006.1 on the windows 2000 server. I recommend doing it this way, if you have problems on the new server this way at least you eliminate one possible source.Once

[IMail Forum] Imailzip antivirus

2005-05-19 Thread Stephan Bertram
Hi, Is there any one out there using Imailzip antivirus and are there any experiences? Thank you Stephan

[IMail Forum] Slow Webmail

2005-05-05 Thread Stephan Bertram
, Stephan To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Re: [IMail Forum] @mail / atmail.com?

2004-11-17 Thread Stephan Moskovic
than closed code like Imail's, as least we can fix problems ourselves when they come up. Stephan. ed, 17 Nov 2004 07:56:08 -0800 Hmmm...looks like it works with IIS 5. The main question is whether or not you are willing to run MySQL. Darin. - Original Message - From: Bill Foresman

Re: [IMail Forum] IMail Server 8.14 HF1 Released

2004-11-17 Thread Stephan Moskovic
Hi Jason, Is 8.0x also vulnerable to this exploit? Stephan. At 02:06 PM 11/17/2004, you wrote: Hi All, Just wanted to let you guys know that 8.14 HF1 is now available on the website. http://www.ipswitch.com/support/imail/releases/imail_professional/index.html Jason H. -Original Message

Re: [IMail Forum] DNSStuff / DNSReport Down

2004-05-17 Thread Stephan Bertram
I can't reach them for about 12 hours... Stephan -- Original Message -- From: Chris Langsenkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 11:19:21 -0500 Am I the only one that can't get there from here? Chris To Unsubscribe

Re: [IMail Forum] mxGuard

2004-05-16 Thread Stephan
this kind of load without problems, so if your server has a heavy load you are probably better off with Declude. Stephan. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im Auftrag von Larry Craddock Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Mai 2004 20:14 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [IMail Forum] mySQL external DB help

2004-05-11 Thread Stephan Moskovic
remember how I fixed my setup Elliott Bujan Network administrator Initial Tropical Plants -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephan Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 5:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] mySQL external DB help Sounds

Re: [IMail Forum] mySQL external DB help

2004-05-11 Thread Stephan
. Stephan. At 01:07 AM 5/11/2004, you wrote: Greetings, I'm using iMail 8.05 with latest hotfixes. I'm trying to create a new virtual host that uses an mySQL database as a backend. I created the database, as well as a user with the proper permissions to do anything it needs to to the DB. I created

[IMail Forum] Problem with Contig defragmentation

2004-05-01 Thread Stephan Bertram
Hi, folks I'm running Imail 8,05 with all patches and I'm using the Contig tool from Sysinternals for defragmentation of the mbx files in all user directories. With a batch job I stop all the Imail services, run Contig and restart the services. The job run every night for about 2 month and the

[IMail Forum] .cpl virus?

2004-05-01 Thread Stephan
Anyone else seen .cpl files as attachments to what looks like your standard virus email? It was an email made to look like some dating site invitation with a girl's photo attached and a .cpl file F-Prot did not pick it up as a virus. Stephan. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support

Re: [IMail Forum] Problem with Contig defragmentation

2004-05-01 Thread Stephan Bertram
Eric, I don't think that there would be such a fragmentation within one day and I have 28 gig free space on that 30 gig mail partition. As I started my initial run of contig 2 month ago it only needed about 1.5 hours caused from real fragmentation. Stephan -- Original Message

Re: [IMail Forum] ntvdm and smtp32 error 0xC0000142

2004-04-30 Thread Stephan
Isn't ntvdm for 16 bit apps? I think there are two fprot executables you can call from declude, the 16 bit and the 32 bit, it's the 32 bit fpcmd.exe you should be running (set it in the declude config file virus.cfg). Works like a charm for us with declude 1.79 At 03:50 PM 4/30/2004, you wrote:

Re: [IMail Forum] ntvdm and smtp32 error 0xC0000142

2004-04-30 Thread Stephan
Message - From: Stephan To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 6:16 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] ntvdm and smtp32 error 0xC142 Isn't ntvdm for 16 bit apps? I think there are two fprot executables you can call from declude, the 16 bit and the 32 bit, it's the 32 bit

RE: [IMail Forum] IMail SMTP Server service terminated unexpected ly

2004-04-22 Thread Stephan
At 08:52 AM 4/22/2004, you wrote: We seem to be experiencing something similar with 8.10 H2 and it may be that we applied the MS Hotfix in question before this installation. Which hotfix might be the problem and which OS does it apply to. Our mail server is running NT 4 SP6a. I should add that

RE: [IMail Forum] Drop in Spam Messages

2004-04-21 Thread Stephan
Same here, we've seen a 30% increase just in the last month. But the weird thing is we had an unexplained 80% drop in spam for about 2 weeks in March, it quickly came back up after. Stephan. At 07:23 PM 4/20/2004, you wrote: Must just be you. I have seen an increase of about 20% over the past

Re: [IMail Forum] Webmail timeout?

2004-04-21 Thread Stephan
This is something you can modify, In Imail administrator ((Imail 8.x), under Services Web Messaging Session Timeout Stephan. \At 11:26 AM 4/21/2004, you wrote: Is anyone aware of a timeout setting in the Webmail? I had a user that spent 20 minutes typing an email in Webmail, and when she

RE: [IMail Forum] Any positive experience with v8.1?

2004-04-15 Thread Stephan
of 700,000 emails per day on our Imail server and delivery usually takes under a minute, actually in most cases it's pretty much instantaneous. Anything above 15 minutes for email delivery in my experience means something is wrong somewhere. Stephan. At 01:17 PM 4/15/2004, you wrote: Disagree all you

Re: [IMail Forum] Service Survery

2004-04-15 Thread Stephan
at least at a 100Gb partition for Imail (separate from your primary c partition obviously.) If you know your 50,000 users will be active then you may need twice that much or more. Hope this helps, Stephan. At 03:07 PM 4/15/2004, you wrote: I work for the Navy. I'm currently developing a new

Re: [IMail Forum] Service Survery

2004-04-15 Thread Stephan
Oops, my number is off by a magnitude of 10, at approx 10Mb per user average with 50,000 users you would need 500Gb not 50Gb. You may see these kinds of number if your users are on IMAP or Webmail, but not if they are using POP3... Stephan. At 03:07 PM 4/15/2004, you wrote: I work for the Navy

Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 8.10 Imail Administrator Problem

2004-04-13 Thread Stephan
fields being grayed out? Any chance this might be put back the way it was (LDAP not required)? Stephan. At 09:03 AM 4/13/2004, you wrote: There are some other things you can try before running the Init, search the archives from last week. But, your best bet is to contact technical support so

Re: [IMail Forum] IMail 8.10 Imail Administrator Problem

2004-04-13 Thread Stephan
to be able to edit the user attributes. But we need to be able to edit the first and last name, which with 8.10 and no LDAP are greyed out. Is the display greyed out in admin considered a bug that will get fixed eventually, at least for the first name and last name fields? Thanks, Stephan. Tripp

Re: [IMail Forum] Service Survery

2004-04-13 Thread Stephan
We don't use them. At 01:37 PM 4/13/2004, you wrote: I want to find out how many people use the Finger or Whois service, or if you know of anyone who uses these services? Tripp Allen IMail Development Manager Ipswitch, Inc. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List

RE: [IMail Forum] Service Survery

2004-04-13 Thread Stephan Bertram
Same here... Regards Stephan Bertram Audio Media Service www.audiomediaservice.de -- Original Message -- From: Randy Armbrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 13:53:33 -0400 We have both of these services turned off

RE: [IMail Forum] IMail 8.10 not ready / working correctly with external databases

2004-04-10 Thread Stephan
Also with 8.1 HF2 the queuemanager is having a very high cpu usage and the smtp service is restarting itself frequently, much more than with 8.05. Anyone else seen this? 8.1 HF2 does fix the problem with the queuemanager quitting, but we're still seeing these problems. Stephan. At 08:36 AM 4/6/2004

RE: [IMail Forum] 8.10 Install Problem

2004-04-08 Thread Stephan
take a little while longer to die after they have been stopped (up to a minute or two). By using this method I can always update/apply hotfixes without a reboot (even when I tested the 8.05 to 8.10 upgrade) Stephan. At 10:41 AM 4/8/2004, you wrote: Sounds like some files were in use when you did

RE: [IMail Forum] 8.10 Install Problem

2004-04-08 Thread Stephan Moskovic
At 10:52 AM 4/8/2004, you wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephan Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 7:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 8.10 Install Problem Not sure if that would help you, but whenever I do

Re: [IMail Forum] MySQL

2004-04-07 Thread Stephan Moskovic
. Usually other mail servers sending email to our server will just try resending again if there is no response (depending on their retry settings.) We always turn the db on first, IMail second and have no problems reconnecting. Stephan. At 12:27 PM 4/7/2004, you wrote: - Original Message

Re: [IMail Forum] Second Guessing my decision??

2004-04-06 Thread Stephan
display or download from the webmail and the smtp webmail services are not 100% reliable) but overall I'd still recommend Imail. Hope this helps, Stephan. At 08:37 AM 4/6/2004, you wrote: I'm the network admin for a company that employs about 130 people and two domains. We've been using our ISP

Re: [IMail Forum] downgrading to 8.05

2004-04-05 Thread Stephan
We downgraded by retrieving a backup of the imail program directory (excluding the spool and any domain directories) that we did just before upgrading. Always a good idea to backup the program directory and also the imail registry before doing any upgrade. Hope this helps, Stephan. At 11:25 AM

RE: [IMail Forum] downgrading to 8.05

2004-04-05 Thread Stephan
in Registry? Names of the Services, number of Services? They differ ... Hermann -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephan Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 6:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] downgrading to 8.05 We

Re: [IMail Forum] 8.1 queuemgr crashing

2004-04-03 Thread Stephan
We are using maximum mailbox size. Would you mind (or someone else from Ipswitch) telling us when we can expect Ipswitch to fix this problem? At 09:17 PM 4/2/2004, you wrote: If you are not using maximum mailbox size settings or full mailbox notifications the deep nesting issue should not effect

[IMail Forum] Upgrade to 8.10 = major smtp/queue problems

2004-04-02 Thread Stephan
a bottleneck for email delivery which snowballs. Anyone else experienced problems with this upgrade? Stephan. To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com

Re: [IMail Forum] Mail stopped again in v8.1 after upggrade

2004-04-02 Thread Stephan Moskovic
That's going to be a riot with our traffic, on average we receive half a million email a day (local deliver). We've seen a lot of fatal error too, and orphaned files while running 8.1. Going back to 8.05 has been the only solution so far. 8.10 is obviously not production ready. At 05:32 PM

Re: [IMail Forum] Mail stopped again in v8.1 after upggrade

2004-04-02 Thread Stephan
. - Original Message - From: Stephan Moskovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 6:39 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Mail stopped again in v8.1 after upggrade That's going to be a riot with our traffic, on average we receive half a million email a day (local

[IMail Forum] Webmail Problem

2004-02-19 Thread Stephan Bertram
address: enabled Enable keep alive: disabled Enable Thread Pooling: disabled Thank you Stephan To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail Problem

2004-02-19 Thread Stephan Bertram
Yes, sure. this occured not only one user. It is reproducible.. Stephan -- Original Message -- From: Travis Rabe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 08:22:10 -0800 Are you sure they aren't double-clicking? Travis

RE: [IMail Forum] Webmail Problem

2004-02-19 Thread Stephan Bertram
Using Imail 8.05 HF2 with latest templates. Stephan Which verison are you using? And Do you the the latest templates for that version? Travis To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com

Re: [IMail Forum] Not to rub it in...

2004-01-29 Thread Stephan Bertram
When [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends email, it avoids distributing to domains that contain various strings. Maybe your domain contains one of them. See http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stephan -- Original Message -- From

[IMail Forum] Hardware Limitation

2002-05-16 Thread Stephan Ryser
Hi all, i'am a reseller.. A ISP want's to Install a new IMail Server (unlimited Users) He asked what Hardware he must use: 100 Domains 10'000 Users with Mailboxen Add. Question. Are there any limitations about Domains? Users on the system? Who has some experience on a big server

[IMail Forum] NAV for Gateways

2001-12-05 Thread Stephan Fix
Has anyone had success installing Norton Anti-Virus for Gateways and Imail on the same box? Is this even possible considering that Imail can only be configured to send and receive SMTP traffic on a single port? Thanks, Stephan Fix Network Administrator CyberShift, Inc. http://www.cybershift.com

RE: [IMail Forum] NAV for Gateways

2001-12-05 Thread Stephan Fix
I understand about the real world, maybe my question wasn't clear. In the instructions you're talking about there is a note saying that the Imail SMTP port will send and receive on the same port, so if I change it to listen on 1125, then it will send on 1125. (if that's incorrect then that

Re: [IMail Forum] [OT] Any way to install IIS4 over NT withSP4??

1999-06-01 Thread Stephan Moskovic
Have you tried nstalling option pack4 (instead of service pack4) first and the service pack4 after? Also make sure all your web services and any other non vital services are stopped (using the services control panel) before you run the service/option pack. Hope this helps... Stephan. At 03:26