[IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Chris Moody
We have a customer that wants to run an inexpensive copy of Windows 2003 Server (Web Edition) as the basis for his Imail server. He isn't going to run AD on this machine and it's only job will be to push Imail. Has anyone done this? Was it successful? Any pitfalls? Thanks... To Unsubscribe:

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread David Moore
and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition We have a customer that wants to run an inexpensive copy of Windows 2003 Server (Web Edition) as the basis for his Imail server. He isn't going to run AD on this machine and it's only job will be to push Imail. Has anyone done this? Was it successful? Any

Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Tom Pepper
#E4D Tom - Original Message - From: Chris Moody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 7:51 AM Subject: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition | We have a customer that wants to run an inexpensive copy of Windows 2003 | Server

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Chris Moody
: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition FWIW, I remember seeing some discussions quite some time ago that a mail server was not allowed to be installed on the web edition. And, here's what MS says: Installations of non-Web serving applications are prohibited. http

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Dan Horne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Pepper Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:19 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition FWIW, I remember seeing

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread David Moore
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition That would beg the question; is email a web serving application? I'd say yes, but that seems open to interpretation. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf

Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread David Gregg
That would beg the question; is email a web serving application? I'd say yes, but that seems open to interpretation. The Microsoft website is pretty clear: Windows Server 2003 Web Edition, can be used solely to deploy Web pages, Web sites, Web applications, and Web services. Customers can

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Dan Horne
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Moore Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:35 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition Imail's web mail is a web serving application. Or is that also stretching the truth

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Dan Horne
The Microsoft website is pretty clear: Windows Server 2003 Web Edition, can be used solely to deploy Web pages, Web sites, Web applications i.e. Imail's web interface , and Web services. i.e. SMTP/POP3/IMAP servers In my own opinion (FWIW), Imail fits. It can be argued forever based on

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread David Moore
BELROSE NSW 2085 AUSTRALIA. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gregg Sent: Friday, 25 August 2006 11:37 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition That would beg

Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Darin Cox
Webmail would be web serving, but POP3, IMAP, and SMTP would not. Darin. - Original Message - From: Chris Moody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:28 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition That would

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Dan Horne
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:55 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition Webmail would be web serving, but POP3, IMAP

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Chris Moody
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Moore Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:43 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition The fine detail is Web applications, and Web services. Imail is a web based application; it doesn't say

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Len Conrad
Technically, there's no such RFC or protocol called (world-wide) web). www is the conventional DNS label for the HTTP service: www.domain.tld. web means Internet, which includes all RFC protocols. Imail is a web (application) server that supports LDAP, IMAP, POP, HTTP, SMTP, etc protocols.

Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Matrosity Hosting
I wouldn't recommend putting in the web addition as you will most likely regret it later on Len Conrad wrote: Technically, there's no such RFC or protocol called "(world-wide) web)". www is the conventional DNS label for the HTTP service: www.domain.tld. web means Internet, which

Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Grant Bainbridge
Having a side business as a VAR, I called my licensing rep about this and they said it was fine to install IMail on 2003 Server Web Edition. I subsequently sold a copy to my "day job" employer. :) Grant Matrosity Hosting wrote: I wouldn't recommend putting in the web addition as

Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Darin Cox
Edition, so you can install Imail. -DH -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 9:55 AM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition Webmail would

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Chris Moody
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition Web commonly means HTTP and FTP, and often can include SMTP. So by my logic, FTP would be fine, as would an SMTP server used by the web services, but POP and IMAP would not. Logically they would be referred to as internet

Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread David Gregg
Yes, POP3, IMAP, and SMTP are part of Internet Information Server 6.0, just not at the same level of funtionality as Imail. IMAP? Are you certain? I thought only SMTP and POP. Regards, David Gregg -- mxGuard for IMail The no-nonsense antispam and antivirus solution. Download a free

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Chris Moody
PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition Yes, POP3, IMAP, and SMTP are part of Internet Information Server 6.0, just not at the same level of funtionality as Imail. IMAP? Are you certain? I thought only SMTP and POP

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Chris Moody
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Gregg Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 12:13 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition Yes, POP3, IMAP, and SMTP are part of Internet Information Server 6.0, just not at the same

RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Dan Horne
@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition Web commonly means HTTP and FTP, and often can include SMTP. So by my logic, FTP would be fine, as would an SMTP server used by the web services, but POP and IMAP would not. Logically they would

Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Darin Cox
Good point, the final word from the vendor trumps all. Darin. - Original Message - From: Dan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:12 PM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition Like I said, this can

Re: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition

2006-08-25 Thread Darin Cox
Interesting, I had never noticed POP3 or IMAP. Thanks for the heads up. Darin. - Original Message - From: Chris Moody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 11:57 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Imail and Microsoft Server 2003 Web Edition Yes