RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update

2004-06-17 Thread Scott Wilkins
rance Phone: 918.299.2345 Direct: 918.296.2913 Fax: 918.296.3346 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Morgan Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update > But

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update

2004-06-17 Thread Mike Barber
ECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 1:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update >Do I understand this correctly? The BitDefender for Windows Free Edition >includes an automatic database updater but the pay for IMa

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update

2004-06-17 Thread R. Scott Perry
Do I understand this correctly? The BitDefender for Windows Free Edition includes an automatic database updater but the pay for IMail Standard Anti-virus which uses the BitDefender engine doesn't include automated database updates? Per http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20040401-DM01.htm IMail Ant

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update

2004-06-17 Thread Brad Morgan
> But, here's one additional tidbit I forgot to add. The bitdefender web > address for updates has been off line a lot lately. So we > continue to miss > updates due to being unable to reach the web site. I just changed by > schedule for grabing updates to occur every 2 hours. A bit > aggressiv

Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update

2004-06-17 Thread R. Scott Perry
> Just a follow-up to everyone on this anti-virus stuff. Unfortunately, we > got plastered this week with a virus that came in through using the #3 test > method from testvirus.org Needless to say, I've been on the phone so much We made the experience, that the guys at bitdefender are quite act

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update

2004-06-17 Thread Scott Wilkins
8.296.2913 Fax: 918.296.3346 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:13 AM To: Scott Wilkins Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update Hi Scott, We made the experience, that the guys

Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update

2004-06-17 Thread Martin Schaible
TED] On Behalf Of Scott Wilkins > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results > Scott, Thanks I contacted IPSwitch on #3 getting through. You are very > right, that one is extremely disconcerning. The others

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update

2004-06-17 Thread R. Scott Perry
Just a follow-up to everyone on this anti-virus stuff. Unfortunately, we got plastered this week with a virus that came in through using the #3 test method from testvirus.org Feel free to contact us for a free 30-day evaluation of Declude Virus. You can even run it in conjunction with your curr

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update

2004-06-17 Thread Scott Wilkins
ord Insurance Phone: 918.299.2345 Direct: 918.296.2913 Fax: 918.296.3346 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Wilkins Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results Scott, T

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-15 Thread Dave Heritage
FYI, only running the barracuda spam firewall (which includes clam a/v and whatever else 'proprietary' they use), 19, 24, 25 got through. * Dave Heritage [EMAIL PROTECTED] 918-406-1975 A flock of sheep led by a lion can win a battle but a pack of lions led by a sheep is likely to l

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
Declude continues to ROCK! Only 12 and 22 got through on my installation. Thanks Scott! If you upgrade to v1.79 and add a line "BANEXT EZIP" to your \IMail\Declude\virus.cfg file, those should get blocked as well. :) -Scott --- Declude JunkMa

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Evans Martin
http://www.martek.net/resume.pdf -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 10:40 AM To: Jamie W. Steenberge Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results Hi, 12,23,24,25 got through with IMail 8.

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Dan Horne
1.0(2476) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Clausen > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results > > Cool, running IMail

Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread A. Clausen
Cool, running IMail 7.07, Declude and F-prot and didn't see a darn thing. -- A. Clausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/sup

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Scott Wilkins
Scott, Thanks I contacted IPSwitch on #3 getting through. You are very right, that one is extremely disconcerning. The others may or may not be, but I'm making sure they are aware of those too. There's no reason we shouldn't expect 100% success rate on viruses, especially known long standing one

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Markus Gufler
> If you can / do open any password protected zip (without the > password) your name is Indiana Jones and you are prepared for > the risks. There must be out several thousand Indianas ;-) Keep in mind, that this test maybe doesn't contain the password in the body. But messages containing real "

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Ian McCutcheon
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Wolf Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 8:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results I tested this on Postini which claims to have very good anti-virus scanning. The following went thru the Postini virus trap: 2,

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
IMAIL 7.07 with declude... 12,16,19 made it through with McAfee picking up 16,19...so 12 made it all the way through...oops... Please contact me off-list, and I'll be happy to see why those are getting through. I'm guessing you need to upgrade your copy of Declude Virus.

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Jeff Lancton
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results Imail 8.10 and Declude Antivirus. None made it through the Declude. -Original Message- From: Christopher Checca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE

Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Martin Schaible
-Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 10:26 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results > I've tested with Imail v7, latest version of declude vi

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Faulkingham, Shawn
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results Imail 8.10 and Declude Antivirus. None made it through the Declude. -Original Message- From: Christopher Checca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail

Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Joe Wolf
to re-think Postini! -Joe - Original Message - From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 6:42 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results > > >Imail (assp/declude/fprot): 4, 5, 11, 14, 16,

Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Scott Erwin
y, June 14, 2004 11:00 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results > WOW ... Imail 8.11 and Symantec AntiVirus for Imail. > > Tests that made it: > > #5 > #12 > #16 > #20 > #21 > #23 > #25 > > Christopher Checca > Packard Transport, Inc. > IT

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Plato, Art
Imail 8.10 and Declude Antivirus. None made it through the Declude. -Original Message- From: Christopher Checca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results WOW ... Imail 8.11 and Symantec

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Christopher Checca
WOW ... Imail 8.11 and Symantec AntiVirus for Imail. Tests that made it: #5 #12 #16 #20 #21 #23 #25 Christopher Checca Packard Transport, Inc. IT Department 24021 South Municipal Dr PO Box 380 Channahon, IL. 60410 815 467 9260 815 467 6939 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.packardtransport.com To

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Jamie W. Steenberge
5, 14, 16, 24, 25 Got through w/Imail v8.11 w/Imail anti-virus. Jamie -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 10:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results I&#x

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Markus Gufler
4, 2004 4:06 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results > > Matthias, > > Thanks, that is a cool test. > > Here's what I got from Imail 8.11 and IPSwitches standard > virus program (bitdefender). > > 3, 12, 16, 23, 24, 25

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
Here's what I got from Imail 8.11 and IPSwitches standard virus program (bitdefender). 3, 12, 16, 23, 24, 25 came through Please, please, please report that to Ipswitch. If it can't catch #3, there is probably a bug in the MIME decoding of IMail AntiVirus Standard. Also, if it can't catch #12,

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Scott Wilkins
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Gruber Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results hello, has someone run the testvirus.org tests against imail too? (http://www.testvirus.org) they have a sui

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
Imail (assp/declude/fprot): 4, 5, 11, 14, 16, 17, 19, 18 Not an expert on virus signatures but Scott will probably chime in soon. There's something seriously wrong there. The only thing that I can think of is that ASSP is trying to "fix up" the headers somehow. If you can contact me off-list, I

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Rick Klinge
> > hello, > > > > has someone run the testvirus.org tests against imail too? > > (http://www.testvirus.org) > > > > they have a suite with 25 virus-tests and we did two test runs: > > > > imail (mxguard/fprot): 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 > > > > imail (viruswall): 5, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25 > >

Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
has someone run the testvirus.org tests against imail too? (http://www.testvirus.org) AFAIK, Declude Virus blocks them all. they have a suite with 25 virus-tests and we did two test runs: imail (mxguard/fprot): 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 imail (viruswall): 5, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25 Interesting. T

RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Rick Klinge
> hello, > > has someone run the testvirus.org tests against imail too? > (http://www.testvirus.org) > > they have a suite with 25 virus-tests and we did two test runs: > > imail (mxguard/fprot): 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 > > imail (viruswall): 5, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25 > > the numbers are sh

[IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results

2004-06-14 Thread Matthias Gruber
hello, has someone run the testvirus.org tests against imail too? (http://www.testvirus.org) they have a suite with 25 virus-tests and we did two test runs: imail (mxguard/fprot): 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 imail (viruswall): 5, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25 the numbers are showing the failed tests.