rance
Phone: 918.299.2345
Direct: 918.296.2913
Fax: 918.296.3346
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Morgan
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update
> But
ECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update
>Do I understand this correctly? The BitDefender for Windows Free Edition
>includes an automatic database updater but the pay for IMa
Do I understand this correctly? The BitDefender for Windows Free Edition
includes an automatic database updater but the pay for IMail Standard
Anti-virus which uses the BitDefender engine doesn't include automated
database updates?
Per http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20040401-DM01.htm IMail Ant
> But, here's one additional tidbit I forgot to add. The bitdefender web
> address for updates has been off line a lot lately. So we
> continue to miss
> updates due to being unable to reach the web site. I just changed by
> schedule for grabing updates to occur every 2 hours. A bit
> aggressiv
> Just a follow-up to everyone on this anti-virus stuff. Unfortunately, we
> got plastered this week with a virus that came in through using the #3 test
> method from testvirus.org Needless to say, I've been on the phone so much
We made the experience, that the guys at bitdefender are quite act
8.296.2913
Fax: 918.296.3346
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Schaible
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:13 AM
To: Scott Wilkins
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results - update
Hi Scott,
We made the experience, that the guys
TED] On Behalf Of Scott Wilkins
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:19 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
> Scott, Thanks I contacted IPSwitch on #3 getting through. You are very
> right, that one is extremely disconcerning. The others
Just a follow-up to everyone on this anti-virus stuff. Unfortunately, we
got plastered this week with a virus that came in through using the #3 test
method from testvirus.org
Feel free to contact us for a free 30-day evaluation of Declude Virus. You
can even run it in conjunction with your curr
ord Insurance
Phone: 918.299.2345
Direct: 918.296.2913
Fax: 918.296.3346
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Wilkins
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
Scott, T
FYI, only running the barracuda spam firewall (which includes clam a/v
and whatever else 'proprietary' they use), 19, 24, 25 got through.
*
Dave Heritage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
918-406-1975
A flock of sheep led by a lion can win a
battle but a pack of lions led by a sheep is
likely to l
Declude continues to ROCK! Only 12 and 22 got through on my
installation. Thanks Scott!
If you upgrade to v1.79 and add a line "BANEXT EZIP" to your
\IMail\Declude\virus.cfg file, those should get blocked as well. :)
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMa
http://www.martek.net/resume.pdf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin
Schaible
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 10:40 AM
To: Jamie W. Steenberge
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
Hi,
12,23,24,25 got through with IMail 8.
1.0(2476)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:IMail_Forum-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A. Clausen
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
>
> Cool, running IMail
Cool, running IMail 7.07, Declude and F-prot and didn't see a darn thing.
--
A. Clausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/sup
Scott, Thanks I contacted IPSwitch on #3 getting through. You are very
right, that one is extremely disconcerning. The others may or may not be,
but I'm making sure they are aware of those too. There's no reason we
shouldn't expect 100% success rate on viruses, especially known long
standing one
> If you can / do open any password protected zip (without the
> password) your name is Indiana Jones and you are prepared for
> the risks.
There must be out several thousand Indianas ;-)
Keep in mind, that this test maybe doesn't contain the password in the body.
But messages containing real "
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Wolf
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
I tested this on Postini which claims to have very good anti-virus
scanning. The following went thru the Postini virus trap: 2,
IMAIL 7.07 with declude...
12,16,19 made it through with McAfee picking up 16,19...so 12 made it all
the way through...oops...
Please contact me off-list, and I'll be happy to see why those are getting
through. I'm guessing you need to upgrade your copy of Declude Virus.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
Imail 8.10 and Declude Antivirus. None made it through the Declude.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Checca
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 10:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
> I've tested with Imail v7, latest version of declude vi
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
Imail 8.10 and Declude Antivirus. None made it through the Declude.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Checca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail
to re-think Postini!
-Joe
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 6:42 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
>
> >Imail (assp/declude/fprot): 4, 5, 11, 14, 16,
y, June 14, 2004 11:00 AM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
> WOW ... Imail 8.11 and Symantec AntiVirus for Imail.
>
> Tests that made it:
>
> #5
> #12
> #16
> #20
> #21
> #23
> #25
>
> Christopher Checca
> Packard Transport, Inc.
> IT
Imail 8.10 and Declude Antivirus. None made it through the Declude.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Checca
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
WOW ... Imail 8.11 and Symantec
WOW ... Imail 8.11 and Symantec AntiVirus for Imail.
Tests that made it:
#5
#12
#16
#20
#21
#23
#25
Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL. 60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com
To
5, 14, 16, 24, 25 Got through w/Imail v8.11 w/Imail anti-virus.
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
I
4, 2004 4:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
>
> Matthias,
>
> Thanks, that is a cool test.
>
> Here's what I got from Imail 8.11 and IPSwitches standard
> virus program (bitdefender).
>
> 3, 12, 16, 23, 24, 25
Here's what I got from Imail 8.11 and IPSwitches standard virus program
(bitdefender).
3, 12, 16, 23, 24, 25 came through
Please, please, please report that to Ipswitch. If it can't catch #3,
there is probably a bug in the MIME decoding of IMail AntiVirus
Standard. Also, if it can't catch #12,
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Gruber
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 2:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IMail Forum] testvirus.org test results
hello,
has someone run the testvirus.org tests against imail too?
(http://www.testvirus.org)
they have a sui
Imail (assp/declude/fprot): 4, 5, 11, 14, 16, 17, 19, 18
Not an expert on virus signatures but Scott will probably chime in soon.
There's something seriously wrong there. The only thing that I can think
of is that ASSP is trying to "fix up" the headers somehow.
If you can contact me off-list, I
> > hello,
> >
> > has someone run the testvirus.org tests against imail too?
> > (http://www.testvirus.org)
> >
> > they have a suite with 25 virus-tests and we did two test runs:
> >
> > imail (mxguard/fprot): 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
> >
> > imail (viruswall): 5, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25
> >
has someone run the testvirus.org tests against imail too?
(http://www.testvirus.org)
AFAIK, Declude Virus blocks them all.
they have a suite with 25 virus-tests and we did two test runs:
imail (mxguard/fprot): 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
imail (viruswall): 5, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25
Interesting. T
> hello,
>
> has someone run the testvirus.org tests against imail too?
> (http://www.testvirus.org)
>
> they have a suite with 25 virus-tests and we did two test runs:
>
> imail (mxguard/fprot): 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
>
> imail (viruswall): 5, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25
>
> the numbers are sh
hello,
has someone run the testvirus.org tests against imail too?
(http://www.testvirus.org)
they have a suite with 25 virus-tests and we did two test runs:
imail (mxguard/fprot): 5, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
imail (viruswall): 5, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25
the numbers are showing the failed tests.
34 matches
Mail list logo