RE: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-16 Thread Richard Bowman
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grant Griffith - IMail Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:23 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006 Is this the consensus from everyone? I have it running on a test machine with a Pent 400 and it is slow

Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Matrosity Hosting
I would say if you're users are NOT using web messaging to go for it. Since the new web messaging was the sole reason we decided to stay with Imail we are VERY disappointed in its performance. It's basically a Lexus with a Yugo engine. Looks good but slow as molasses. Bill Brian Hruska

RE: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Grant Griffith - IMail
. (812)932-1000 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:10 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006 I would say if you're users are NOT using web messaging to go

Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Heimir Eidskrem
Can anyone else confirm this? H. Matrosity Hosting wrote: I would say if you're users are NOT using web messaging to go for it. Since the new web messaging was the sole reason we decided to stay with Imail we are VERY disappointed in its performance. It's basically a Lexus with a Yugo

Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Matrosity Hosting
@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006 I would say if you're users are NOT using web messaging to go for it. Since the new web messaging was the sole reason we decided to stay with Imail we are VERY disappointed in its performance. It's basically a Lexus

Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Matrosity Hosting
Of Matrosity Hosting Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:10 PM To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006 I would say if you're users are NOT using web messaging to go for it. Since the new web messaging was the sole reason we

Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Martin Schaible
Hi, I also think, that the performance of the WebMail must be increased heavily. I compared it to the older versions of IMail and with SmarterMail. The comparison with SmarterMail is surely fair, since this product uses also .net technology. The new WebMail is in fact a IMAP Frontend and

RE: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Kevin Bilbee
al Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Martin SchaibleSent: Monday, February 13, 2006 10:15 AMTo: Grant Griffith - IMailSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006 Hi, I also think, that the performance of the WebMail must be increased

Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Oblio
I'd give you an update, but I can't even get it installed. At 2/13/2006 12:05 PM, you wrote: So what is CURRENT conceusus with the 2006 release? Does it work well enough to upgrade to yet? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive:

Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Heimir Eidskrem
So far its not good news for 2006. Actually I think its a disgrace. Who runs 2006 and are happy with the web performance and overall trouble free install? Brian Hruska wrote: So what is CURRENT conceusus with the 2006 release? Does it work well enough to upgrade to yet? To Unsubscribe:

RE: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Kevin Gillis
@list.ipswitch.com Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006 I'd give you an update, but I can't even get it installed. At 2/13/2006 12:05 PM, you wrote: So what is CURRENT conceusus with the 2006 release? Does it work well enough to upgrade to yet? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support

Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Darin Cox
. Darin. - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:10 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006 I would say if you're users are NOT using web messaging to go for it. Since the new web messaging

Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Matrosity Hosting
with .NET should be able to take a stab at it as well. Darin. - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:10 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006 I would say if you're

Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Darin Cox
contained in them, add the following attribute the the asp:... /asp:... code EnableViewState="False" Darin. - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 6:10 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2

RE: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Kevin Bilbee
ake a stab at it as well. Darin. - Original Message - From: Matrosity Hosting To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 12:10 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006 I would say if you'r

RE: [IMail Forum] Latest Consensus on 2006

2006-02-13 Thread Oblio Leitch
I suspect my earlier post got buried as soon as this 'consensus' one came along. I got a 'IMailServerObject' error while installing the help files. I don't know how much availability I'll have in the next few days; who should I talk to? At 2/13/2006 05:55 PM, you wrote: Hello Oblio, What