Uros Nedic wrote:
As I have heard Apple didn't drop ZFS, but it is unknown when whole
ZFS features will be integrated into new version of Mac OS X.
They had plan to port everything already, but it looks like it'll
not happen.
Regards,
Uros Nedic
-Original Message-
From:
On 5/3/2009 2:40 AM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
There is not much visible information in the public
description text for 6834260...
I'm getting the following panic under VirtualBox 2.2.2 when
I press a key during a build 111a happyface boot; is that the
same problem?
::status
debugging
On 4/26/2009 10:21 AM, Jim Nissen wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Jim Nissen wrote:
I'm currently running development build 110. I tried installing a java
1.5, but hit Motif library issues.
On build 110 and later you should be able to pkg install SUNWmfrun
to resolve Motif
A physical amp meter was the only way I could tell thanks to the bug. Draw
on my laptop was 30w (Its runtime is 65w advertised assuming half to full
load with only slight or no frequency control)
- James
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Matt Ingenthron ingen...@cep.net wrote:
Aubrey Li wrote:
On 4/25/2009 9:03 PM, andrew wrote:
Just a quick note to say that I retested my original build 111a VM (which is
running under VMware Workstation 6.5.2 on Windows XP SP3+) and I cannot make
it crash during happyface boot by pressing the ESC key.
Andrew.
I remember having this happen
On 4/20/2009 12:41 PM, dick hoogendijk wrote:
Will it be possible to develop / support OpenSolaris any further now
SUN's been bought by Oracle? I surely hope this OS will survive. But
what are the chances?
They didn't kill Sleepycat's software even though it's not copyleft, so
it could
It's a snapshot consolidation of all packages updated since the last point
in time (Which is a build). It is a differential approximation of software
installed current and similar to liveupgrade, contents are upgraded and this
varies between systems, but you can install specific software from a
I haven't heard of Compiz working on such a system, let alone OpenSolaris.
- James
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Jonathan Edwards
jonathan.edwa...@sun.comwrote:
odd - this seemed to work the first time or so on b109, but now whenever i
try and enable compiz i just get a blank screen with
On 4/7/2009 9:09 AM, jan damborsky wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 04/07/09 12:37, Andrew Gaylard wrote:
Hi,
I have an Ultra-60 (2x400MHz CPUs, 2 GiB RAM, elite-3D graphics)
It is very likely that your graphic card would not work
on OpenSolaris, as only XVR-100, XVR-300, XVR-2500
are supported on
You sure you did pkg set-authority -P -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/
dev dev then installing SUNWipkg before doing pkg image-update?
Should be at least a few thousand files involved and about 440mb of
downloads.
- James
On Mar 26, 2009, at 8:16 AM, solarg wrote:
hello all,
i have
I don't think you can ask it what files it grabbed after the fact... and
wouldn't there be inherent dependencies on the runtime needing to be
most current to use anything from the dev branch?
- James
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 15:11 +0100, solarg wrote:
James Cornell wrote:
You sure you did pkg
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Hi,
First of all thanks to all who've helped me get past the issues in
installing opensolaris on sparc. I now have a working opensolaris
installation which I want to clone to another sparc machine on the
same network, currently running Solaris 10. I have sc access,
alan mcclellan wrote:
Ever since we switched to DST, the time display (in top menu bar and in
the System - Administration - Time and Date Settings) is always wrong.
Usually 30 - 45 minutes fast. I correct the time via the Time and Date
Settings dialog, but next time I start up OSOL, the time
przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
I don't understand this approach - the slowest PC-like tower/desktop box
can also have OpenSolaris installed on it but will be much, much faster then
the old Sun workstations.
Regards
Przemyslaw Bak (przemol)
It has to do with culture and knowledge of being
Rand All wrote:
I'm not quite sure where to post this, but oh well.
I have some really old Sun workstations, like a SparkStation 5 and an Ultra
1. I understand that OpenSolaris requires SPARCv9, so I see why the SS5 will
never work with OS. But what about the Ultra 1?
At the moment, it
I hit a pkg bug, which is fixed by doing pfexec pkg install SUNWipkg before
trying to do image-update after switching to B107+. I'm currently upgrading
to B108.
- James
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Stephen Hahn s...@sun.com wrote:
I suspect you hit a separate issue but, if this failure is
Ghee Teo wrote:
Yu Xiangning wrote:
Fuyuki Hasegawa - Sun Microsystems wrote:
Hi Aubrey,
Yap, I agree the feedbacks might not be enough, but we never can
meet all users's need... you know. :(
All locales except English (en_XX.UTF-8) still show iiim-panel by
default.
I don't understand
Fuyuki Hasegawa - Sun Microsystems wrote:
It was based on the feedbacks we received.
We assumed majority of English users won't switch keyboard layout
and don't need to know/see the current IM status. Without iiim-panel
and IM trigger key, users can input Latin characters by Compose key
Stephen Hahn wrote:
* SHOUJIN WANG autumn.w...@webex.com [2009-02-23 07:52]:
The rsync method introduced in the formal method /usr/bin/rsync -a
pkg.opensolaris.org::osol_dev_files /export/pkg/file does not work.
In my side, there is no respond from the pkg.opensolaris.org server.
George Koutras wrote:
Hi community,
I would appreciate any information regarding support of AMD SB 750
sata controller on opensolaris.
Thnx,
George
___
indiana-discuss
George Koutras wrote:
Hi James,
Tried it on my quad phenom pc but opensolaris live cd failed to detect
any disks.
Have you got any feedback from ppl that had it working?
Thnx
*From:* James Cornell spar...@gmail.com
*To:* George Koutras koutra...@yahoo.com
*Cc:* indiana-discuss
Jan Hlodan wrote:
Hello,
I have one disk with 3 partitions:
1. Windows - ntfs
2. OpenSolaris - zfs
3. Linux - ext3
sh-3.2# format -e
Searching for disks...done
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c9d0 DEFAULT cyl 7830 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63
/p...@0,0/pci-...@1f,2/i...@0/c...@0,0
Jan Hlodan wrote:
Hi James,
thanks for the reply!
Actually, my point was how to figure out what ID has Linux partition.
The format command doesn't show ID. So I didn't know how to create zpool.
Finally I solved my problem. I installed FSWpart and FSWfsmisc.
Then I run:
prtpart (find out
Paul Fisher wrote:
I apologize, as I'm not yet completely familiar with using zones, and
have a simple question: Can I run Solaris 10U6 in a zone on an
OpenSolaris machine? (2008.11 or /dev repo would be fine)
--
paul
___
indiana-discuss
solarg wrote:
James Cornell wrote:
Paul Fisher wrote:
I apologize, as I'm not yet completely familiar with using zones, and
have a simple question: Can I run Solaris 10U6 in a zone on an
OpenSolaris machine? (2008.11 or /dev repo would be fine)
No, you cannot. The syscall translation
Teresa Tian wrote:
Dear all,
I get a chance to give computer class to a middle school's students.
The platform is opensolaris.
And in my teaching plan, I want to teach them to make static webpages.
So, the question is
what are your most useful web page tool on opensolaris?
Maybe some
I agree about this. it is a quality concern, and is not by any means
professional to simply ignore the problem as such an action just
simply degrades the image of the maintainers and those who adopt and
support it blindly.
James
On Feb 11, 2009, at 5:50 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The
You're completely right, it does not make sense. For a project I'm
migrating in part to subversion, there is considerable overhead to bulk
content files, think art and q3 bsp files as an example to where I'm going,
and the issues just start at the latent overhead of the link, but it doesn't
stop
Shawn Walker wrote:
Now what I do think is missing is instructions on how to validate it
using the checksums.
openssl md5 file (I'm sure you know this)
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
SV wrote:
I appreciate you want to make it easy, that unlike 'Solaris Express Community
Edition', Opensolaris
* dlc.sun.com
* genunix.org
both offer direct-to-the-iso download links, but how do I know I got a valid
file at the end of the transaction? You should at least post the
Basant Kumar kukreja wrote:
Any suggestion or workaround?
Regards,
Basant.
Make sure you have Solaris as a primary partition located at #3 or #4.
Remove your Linux swap to make room and use a file-backend instead. You
may need to reinstall GRUB after installing OpenSolaris from the
andrew wrote:
I notice from http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4887#c6 that
this bug has been fixed in Nevada build 105. Is it possible to apply this fix
to 2008.11 without recompiling any binaries? If so - what is the fix?
Thanks
Andrew.
Wasn't this a setuid bit problem
Basant Kumar kukreja wrote:
Thanks James, all 3 OSs now just boot fine. All partitions were primary
partitions. I probably won't need linux so I will wipe it out. I hope if I
create extended partitions now, I would be able to mount from
opensolaris/MacOS.
Regards,
Basant.
Yes, you
Torrey McMahon wrote:
Amber Roadwait.we used that one already.
UltraSock(TM) Puppet(SM) 2008.12(R) (c) 2008.11 Sun Microsystems, Inc.!
James
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:51:43AM -0600, Paul Fisher wrote:
This command exists on solaris, but not opensolaris, and pkg search
Does it? Where? What pkg delivers it? I cannot find a dnsdomainname
command in either Solaris Nevada nor OpenSolaris.
dnsdomainname
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:18:20AM -0600, James Cornell wrote:
Isn't that part of NIS or bind?
Methinks you're referring to domainname(1M), not 'dnsdomainname'.
And domainname(1M) is in both, Solaris and OpenSolaris.
Nico
I said bind, as I remembered that there's
Detlef Drewanz (sent by E61) wrote:
James,
thanks for this comments. Frankly said I use use solaris and opensolaris now
for years on my laptop (all also with some issues)
Now I finally have managed through the weekend to install Nevada and
OpenSolaris into one solaris partition/slice and
Detlef Drewanz wrote:
If I compare the OpenSolaris2008.11 prebuild installation with an actual
Nevada Installation:
Why is in OpenSolaris2008.11 no Dump- and Swap Device configured ? Is
this just a limitation of the installer or what's the reason ?
Detlef
Detlef Drewanz wrote:
Thanks James,
Hmm interestingly. I just installed OpenSolaris on a new systems and yes
there I have dump and swap. I have to find out why in my vbox
installation dump and swap has not been created. Maybe the image was
with 6 GB too small ...
Detlef
Since Indiana needs
Since I already had b101a (rc1) i did pkg update then image-update and that
worked. No genunix isos yet, and the torrents take 24 hours or more to work
sometimes.
James
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Lyndsay Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been getting the following error from the
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU
PROCESS/NLWP
3461 root 1917M 1849M cpu1300 0:32:26 51% packagemanager/82
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/release
OpenSolaris 2008.11 snv_101a_rc1b X86
Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems,
Michal Pryc wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
James Cornell wrote:
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU
PROCESS/NLWP
3461 root 1917M 1849M cpu1300 0:32:26 51%
packagemanager/82
...
Anything else you want?
A bug report at defect.opensolaris.org along
Gilles Gravier wrote:
Hello!
Anybody know where I can look in my logs to see what the address of
the DHCP server that gave my machine its network information is?
Thanks in advance,
Gilles.
--
*Gilles Gravier, CISSP
*Government Industry Solutions Architect
mailto:[EMAIL
Gilles Gravier wrote:
James Cornell wrote:
Anybody know where I can look in my logs to see what the address of
the DHCP server that gave my machine its network information is?
opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
You mean a reverse assignment log? (DHCP server lease
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
The cool thing is that with iiim disabled (from gnome sessions as well as
via .profile) gnome starts considerably faster for me.
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/post!reply.jspa?messageID=308935
It's a shame that we have to include this sh*t in the OpenSolaris LiveCD,
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
We need input method one way or another for
international users.
Agreed that we need to include input method in the OpenSolaris LiveCD, as,
until the philosophy changes, this is intended as a multi-lingual OS (kudos
from me).
However, do we really need
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
I think the job No. 1 is for those involved to explain why we have to use
IIIM? Why Sun is the only company on earth who is still sticking with IIIMf?
Have the decision-makers considered other options, such as SCIM, which has
become the default IM in Linux? Has
the executables and libraries, and
starting some necessary services that only need to be launched in the
1st login, like gconf.
Regards,
James Cornell wrote:
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
The cool thing is that with iiim disabled (from gnome sessions as
well as via .profile) gnome starts
Shawn Walker wrote:
The GUI performance issues have nothing to do with dependency
resolution. The packagemanager GUI team is working to resolve
performance issues that are found as quickly as possible. If you have
specific feedback about the latest build that isn't recorded at
Sébastien Stormacq wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed we are distributing binaries like os200811-global.usb
I guess this is to be installed on USB memory stick to boot from there
Any wiki, web site with instruction on how to install the beast ?
Run file against the file? Maybe you dd or untar
, Christian Thalinger wrote:
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 07:27 -0600, James Cornell wrote:
don't let such a thing change purchasing decisions. Webcams don't
make
a difference; don't expect them to work.
It was really cool to see that the iSight of my Apple MacBook Pro
worked
out-of-the-box. I
Luca Morettoni wrote:
On 11/04/08 13:07, Calum Benson wrote:
I really don't think anyone needs to vote. It's already a high
priority issue that's actively being worked on, as acknowledged on the
second post in that thread. And in any case, the underlying cause is
a Solaris bug,
Henry Jen wrote:
Hi,
I have been troubled by unresponsive system with non-stop disk
activities, my guess is the system do paging like crazy. As many
times, this comes along with some failed to fork or out of memory
problem.
This time, trying to open a pdf file, and started with following
rEFI should work for you, though I don't have access to such hardware
so I can't give you definitive certainty regarding it. Check their
documentation first.
James
On Nov 3, 2008, at 8:04 AM, Mark Olliver wrote:
Hi,
May be i should clarify, this is the newer version i think the only
andrew wrote:
i've tried OSS before and it didn't work, but I'll give them another go.
I await the final release of 2008.11 with interest! It looks like it will be
a really nice looking release. The only major question mark for me at the
moment is the minimum memory requirement.
Cheers
Ché Kristo wrote:
Hi Stephen,
A few questions:
* Wouldn't there be issues in the circumstance where a user was using
2008.11 and wanted to stay on that release but 2009.04 was released into that
repository forcing them to upgrade. Will there be sub repository for each
release for those
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James, If you'd like to blog on these topics, that's be great. Send me
the URL
to your blog, and I'll add it as a cross-reference in the Getting
Started Guide for 2008.11.
Barbara
On 10/25/08 11:48, James Cornell wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Docs
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Oops, forgot to mention this. Most if not all
of
the contact persons in
the copyright page (for porting the Chewing IME
to
Solaris) are no
longer with Sun. For sake of showing at least
some
sincerity,
Upgrading twice a year should be a reasonable compromise with many
benefits. Solaris 10 U6 isn't going to cover issues such as power
management, newer gstreamer framework (Needed for some modern
software), and device drivers, merely a subset of the work that could
be reasonably
I'm glad... works great on bare metal (You'd be in love if you had
modest needs) :)
James
On Oct 17, 2008, at 4:14 PM, Gilles Gravier wrote:
OK... So... I just did a CLEAN install of the OSol build 99 DVD on
my VirtualBox... 16GB static disk, 1024MB RAM.
Then I downloaded the OOo file :
98 - 99 (Indiana via image update) worked fine for me, I was on B90
for a while and couldn't ever get it updated to B91 (LU on SXCE), so
there's apparently a few releases that are not going to be friendly to
upgrade.
James
On Oct 17, 2008, at 5:01 PM, Karl Hakimian wrote:
Upon further
Giacomo Tufano wrote:
Il giorno 16/ott/08, alle ore 04:34, W. Wayne Liauh ha scritto:
James Cornell wrote:
Only hardcore engineers are using Solaris, all of
the front-ends use
Windows and all of the hr and pr people use Mac
laptops. Part
At least someone agrees with me about it being an issue... The
current spin is targeted at single point PC installations, no
question about it, but it's incomplete unless you want to break laws,
some people would gladly do this, but hopefully their employer is more
forgiving than the
Shawn Walker wrote:
James Cornell wrote:
Only hardcore engineers are using Solaris, all of the front-ends use
Windows and all of the hr and pr people use Mac laptops. Part of the
Sorry, but that also isn't true. There are many non-engineering folks
that are running Solaris or using
Just simple X11 is good enough for me; Fluxbox and *maybe*
Enlightenment are the pinnacle of what is needed for local SPARC
workstations IMHO. Just getting X.org in a state where it'll work
with common FFB graphics (No 3D or anything fancy) would be enough for
this first release. I agree
Paul Harper wrote:
Could there be a minimal install cd in time for OpenSolaris 2008.11 for
people setting up servers, older PC's, installing on the eeepc, etc and
otherwise have space requirements?
I have seen a few requests on Help and I have suggested Milax Server. But
Milax is not
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Those working on the cheap may well be using the same box as a workstation and
a local/workgroup server. So getting some of Martin's ports of BSD drivers up
to integration level quality might be really helpful. Systems that only have
PCI (not PCI-X or PCIe) but
John Sonnenschein wrote:
I would think that a good target would be machines that are cheap and
plentiful on the used market
That is, U10, U5 ( maybe ), B100/150
my 0.02CAD , Desktop support would be a must
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Hi Israel,
It is possible that one of Masayuki Murayama's excellent ethernet
drivers will work for you:
http://homepage2.nifty.com/mrym3/taiyodo/eng/
However that needs building from source and is a trouble. I'd suggest
you to try the BeleniX distro of OpenSolaris
ZFS doesn't work this way. It's based on storage pools based on a ZFS
slice and only through a clone can encompass the rest of the disk now
that it's done and over with.
James
On Oct 3, 2008, at 3:25 PM, George Koutras wrote:
Hi all,
I am running 2008.11 snv 98 on a dual boot laptop with
Richard Elling wrote:
James Cornell wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: My experience is with SXCE (Solaris Express Community Edition) not
Indiana on this hardware, and I find Indiana to be lacking in
extensibility which this type of setup would most likely depend on.
Could you
You should clarify what you mean by this. Do you mean running it on a
VM of OpenSolaris, a native install, and have you checked legal
precautions with regards to switching to a different platform? From my
experience with Oracle, like VMware, they tend to charge you per
platform, as seems to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: My experience is with SXCE (Solaris Express Community Edition) not
Indiana on this hardware, and I find Indiana to be lacking in
extensibility which this type of setup would most likely depend on.
Could you provide more details on this lack of extensibility?
I've done it natively, but no it's not really nice to initially get on
there as only part of the partition problems caused by EFI assumptions
have been fixed. Making it work requires you to pre-partition the
system before installing Leopard by using the Disk Utility program or by
using the
C. Bergström wrote:
Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:28 AM, James Cornell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Cater wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:30:07AM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Peter Tribble wrote
Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:28 AM, James Cornell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Cater wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:30:07AM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Peter Tribble wrote:
...
Having a CD as a constraint is also
Andy Cater wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:30:07AM -0500, Eric Boutilier wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Peter Tribble wrote:
...
Having a CD as a constraint is also going to act as an encouragement
to avoid bloat and keep things tight. I think it will impose discipline.
Good
Eric Forgeot wrote:
with the latest indiana it boots properly, but it seems the network interface
is not recognised.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
indiana-discuss mailing list
indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello pkg-discuss,
What's the status on b96 release?
Is testing/buidling/... done in public? If not can it be more
transparent?
B97 is out on mirrors (SXCE) linked from OpenSolaris download page as
Single Image. Until both trees can merge
Yeah been that way the whole time across the board. First thing I do
after logging in is just that... the only program that needs crypt is
smc, and smc is dead, and opensolaris is unsupported until they have
something to replace SXDE, hopefully Indiana 2008.11 fits that bill.
Suffice to say some
I personally think nano is still a good editor, but I'll see how well
joe works if this is the case.
Elvis is a good vi clone, which doubles as a hex editor, and has been
the default on Slackware Linux for half a decade or longer. There are a
few features in vim that people desire. I'm not sure
Try disabling ACPI on boot. There's another thread with T60 owners
who had to do this to get it to boot and it sounds like it's panicing.
James
On Aug 17, 2008, at 7:50 AM, Henry Nelson wrote:
First time to try OpenSolaris, but I can't seem to get the install
CD to boot up.
From the
Have you tried to `find / -name libmysqlclient_r.so.15`?
A change may be needed so it explicitly links with that library.
James
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 10:42 -0400, Tom Georgoulias wrote:
Tom Georgoulias wrote:
I want to repeat some sysbench tests that I've run with Mysql 5 and Red
Hat
Sven Herzing wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about installing updates to the stable version of
opensolaris 200805.
When I use pkg image-update, I would get the packages of the latest release
installed (update from snv_86 - snv_9X). But that's not what I want to do.
On this site:
Sven Herzing wrote:
For me, it's the question, if I would need to buy support only to get some
updates, so why not use directly Solaris 10. Yes, I know there are features
in OpenSolaris which are not (yet) in Solaris 10, but at least I would have a
stable version and I would get security
Which laptop?
James
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 17:21 -0700, Praveen Kumar wrote:
I have upgraded to snv_95. I don't have to turn off the ACPI support
anymore (to avoid the kernel panic). However I notice that my battery
status applet is still not working. Does anyone run snv_95 on bare metal
Are you running the latest BIOS revision?
James
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 18:07 -0700, Praveen Kumar wrote:
James Cornell wrote:
Which laptop?
Lenovo Thinkpad T60
James
On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 17:21 -0700, Praveen Kumar wrote:
I have upgraded to snv_95. I don't have to turn off
to redundancy you can't have the whole cake, and usually the
whole cake just annoys users and makes them confused anyway.
Cheers,
James
On Aug 10, 2008, at 3:56 AM, Chris Ridd wrote:
On 9 Aug 2008, at 19:49, James Cornell wrote:
It meshes better with GNOME, and it has exchange 2000/2003 connectors
It meshes better with GNOME, and it has exchange 2000/2003 connectors
with current versions, 2007 very soon. Theoretically it uses less
resources since it shares GNOME components, and I find it to be more
accessible from a business-minded workflow, as the contacts, calendar
and memos are better
That's fine Wayne. I believe you would want to poke around /usr/share
for a firefox bookmarks.html file which copies itself when the browser
is launched. I just deducted that there's a file of the like somewhere
there because the .firefox directory in a user's home directory stores
the bookmarks
sanjay nadkarni (Laptop) wrote:
Luca Morettoni wrote:
Hi, I have installed and used OpenSolaris on a single installation for a
long time. Now on my laptop I buy a new big HD (320G) to be shared with
WinXP and OpenSolaris.
First I have installed WinXP on a 60G partition, then I installed
Glynn Foster wrote:
On 2/08/2008, at 11:09 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
In the finding CIFS shares section, wouldn't it be better to call it
the
Nautilus file browser instead of the Sun Java(TM) Desktop System
file
browser? I thought most JDS branding was gone in 2008.05.
Julian Wiesener wrote:
Hello Stephen,
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 15:16 -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote:
I didn't know that beadm required GNOME. When does GNOME get called
in beadm?
i too don't think that beadm will call any gnome components, but beadm
is part of the package
Reminds me of my friend who uses ratpoison, basically GNU screen for
X11. Another friend of mine used to have blackbox with bbkeys to move
things around on his Toshiba Libretto. (166MHz one)
James
On Jul 21, 2008, at 8:08 AM, Kevin Monceaux wrote:
Gnome Fans,
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Calum
Richard Elling wrote:
James Cornell wrote:
Hi Kevin. There's a long document regarding root zfs that I vaguely
remember which was before it was integrated saying that you'd create a
bootstrap ufs partition to house grub and boot the rpool from there,
using 99% of the rest of the space
Kevin Monceaux wrote:
James, and other Indiana Fans,
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, James Cornell wrote:
Hi Kevin. There's a long document regarding root zfs that I vaguely
remember which was before it was integrated saying that you'd create a
bootstrap ufs partition to house grub and boot
Kevin Monceaux wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, James Cornell wrote:
Hi Kevin. There's a long document regarding root zfs that I vaguely
remember which was before it was integrated saying that you'd create a
bootstrap ufs partition to house grub and boot the rpool from there,
using 99
Hi Kevin. There's a long document regarding root zfs that I vaguely
remember which was before it was integrated saying that you'd create a
bootstrap ufs partition to house grub and boot the rpool from there,
using 99% of the rest of the space on the pool. Maybe someone here
knows what I'm,
Abraham Tehrani wrote:
Why are we limiting ourselves to a CD then if we're having so many issues
with bits not being available out-of-the-box? Is having a DVD ISO that
large of an issue? Has that limited the usage of SXCE/DE? We are living in
the BITtorrent age where a 1 - 2 GIG download is
Richard Elling wrote:
Glynn Foster wrote:
On 8/07/2008, at 11:53 AM, MC wrote:
OpenSolaris 2008.5 is downright broken as a development platform
If someone outside this list is saying that (they are) then people
here should be listening.
I suggest a package
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
