snip
If so, is that moving to an existing zanata instance that is being
run for us? Or is that talking about fedora infrastructure creating
such an instance?
I've added this item in the list [1], and will keep you in the loop.
ok.
Kevin,
I had the meetup with zanata team. The instance is
Hi,
Maybe it was mentioned before but are we really going to migrate to Zanata
before F21 release?
I saw the high level schedule on Wiki[1].
As a lot of new things and changes coming to F21, I'm kind of hoping not
rushing migration before F21.
Just play safe, we can start migration afterwards.
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:23:00 +1000
Noriko Mizumoto nor...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
(2014年07月12日 03:20), Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000
Noriko Mizumoto nor...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
...snip...
Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for
Hi Miroslav,
The data we have is that very few people used (and use) the open-source
version of Transifex. Some of those who did, were using an even older
version of Transifex (0.9) which we weren't actively maintaining. We have
asked around and carefully reviewed whether a move like this will
(2014年07月12日 03:20), Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000
Noriko Mizumoto nor...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
...snip...
Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for
some maintenance reason, can we discuss at trans list only as many of
translators have not
Hi all,
On 07/11/2014 10:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000
Noriko Mizumotonor...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
...snip...
Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for
some maintenance reason, can we discuss at trans list only as many of
List tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 2:48:42 PM
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
(2014年07月11日 13:41), Marcelo Barbosa wrote:
Guys,
We may collect the Transifex all Coordinators, Reviewers and
Translators through the API, for example:
$ curl -i -L
...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Fedora Infrastructure infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 1:41:13 PM
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
Guys,
We may collect the Transifex all Coordinators, Reviewers and Translators
through the API, for example:
$ curl -i -L
: Friday, July 11, 2014 2:48:42 PM
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
(2014年07月11日 13:41), Marcelo Barbosa wrote:
Guys,
We may collect the Transifex all Coordinators, Reviewers and
Translators through the API, for example:
$ curl -i -L --user username:password -X GET
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000
Noriko Mizumoto nor...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
...snip...
Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for
some maintenance reason, can we discuss at trans list only as many of
translators have not subscribed infrastructure list?
Thats
Kevin,
I believe that migration will occur was created a plan [1], but I
believe the others in CC's will provide you with more precise information
about where this running this current instance of Zanata [2], I only
realized in the production url he suffered an update to its latest version.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:53:48 AM
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03
Message -
From: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:53:48 AM
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:25
Zoltan,
I believe we can do some tests with the Zanata in order to validate the
tool and look for little impact as possible. I came in with my account at
FAS and I realized the error quoted here on the list, after adopting my FAS
been redirected to this address:
As Marcelo just stated, we have had our struggles with Transifex. A while
ago, we came up as the coordinators of the localization team in Brazil,
having a wider understanding of what Transifex meant from above. It is
really sad that we depend on it, for it is non-free software, but being
really
, Robyn Bergeron rberg...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:53:48 AM
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200
Pierre-Yves
@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:53:48 AM
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:25:41AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM
...@scrye.com
To: infrastructure@lists.__fedoraproject.org
mailto:infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:53:48 AM
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200
Pierre-Yves
I support moving away from TX if it prevents us from obeying our 4Fs.
But as a long term translator and a team coordinator, please allow me to
say something that I'm concerning about:
1. If we decide to move, what platform should we move to?
Which is a better place to move?
I haven't use Zanata
On 07/03/2014 04:20 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
It's a good thing that this came up, it'd be nice to have a clear decision from
the Fedora part. I explained in detail
the log reasoning behind the decision to stop maintaining the open-source
branch in the GitHub issue Rahul provided.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/07/14 02:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon
pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:25:41AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves ChibonA
Il 04/lug/2014 10:12 Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr ha scritto:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:25:41AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves ChibonA wrote:
What are they?
I haven't spent a lot of time looking up alternatives
)
From: infrastructure-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:infrastructure-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Dimitris
Glezos
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 12:09 AM
To: Fedora Infrastructure
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
Oliver, Transifex is already offering
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:25:41AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves ChibonA wrote:
What are they?
I haven't spent a lot of time looking up alternatives but I am aware of
the following:
http://zanata.org/ developed by
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:09:05AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
Unfortunately it looks like Transifex has become proprietary and Fedora
moving to using Transifex.com has been cited as one of the reasons why it
wasn't important anymore for them to maintain a open source
It's a good thing that this came up, it'd be nice to have a clear decision
from the Fedora part. I explained in detail the log reasoning behind the
decision to stop maintaining the open-source branch in the GitHub issue
Rahul provided.
In the meantime, the Transifex team is happy to be donating
2014-07-03 18:09 GMT+04:00 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com:
Hi
Unfortunately it looks like Transifex has become proprietary and Fedora
moving to using Transifex.com has been cited as one of the reasons why it
wasn't important anymore for them to maintain a open source version.
,
Oliver
From: infrastructure-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:infrastructure-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Dimitris
Glezos
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 4:21 PM
To: Fedora Infrastructure
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
It's a good thing
Hi,
On 07/03/2014 07:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
What are they?
I haven't spent a lot of time looking up alternatives but I am aware
of the following:
http://zanata.org/ developed by Red Hat
If we are looking for
, 2014 4:21 PM
*To:* Fedora Infrastructure
*Subject:* Re: Transifex has become proprietary
It's a good thing that this came up, it'd be nice to have a clear decision
from the Fedora part. I explained in detail the log reasoning behind the
decision to stop maintaining the open-source branch
30 matches
Mail list logo
