Adding that button is quite trivial, a new button after
https://pagure.io/pagure/blob/master/f/pagure/themes/srcfpo/templates/repo_info.html#_338
and is done.
On September 13, 2019 5:50:43 PM GMT+02:00, Adam Williamson
wrote:
>On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 13:40 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> On Fri, Se
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:51 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 13:40 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 09:23:44 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > > Yeah the packages app is really useful and used by many, this is the main
> > > reason it was not included in the ap
On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 13:40 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 09:23:44 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Yeah the packages app is really useful and used by many, this is the main
> > reason it was not included in the application we are currently working on
> > giving away / retiring. B
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 14:51, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 09:23:44 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Yeah the packages app is really useful and used by many, this is the main
> > reason it was not included in the application we are currently working on
> > giving away / retiring. But
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 09:23:44 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> Yeah the packages app is really useful and used by many, this is the main
> reason it was not included in the application we are currently working on
> giving away / retiring. But to be honest I think the priority of the packages
> app is
Yeah the packages app is really useful and used by many, this is the main
reason it was not included in the application we are currently working on
giving away / retiring. But to be honest I think the priority of the
packages app is quite low. Following are some of the work we have in our
Backlog :
On 9/12/19 3:00 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> I also used 'pkgwat releases packagename' a lot. (pkgwat was the
>> packages command line app, but it's python2 only, so it went away I
>> fear.
>
>
> Except it did not :) , it's also using
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:17 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I also used 'pkgwat releases packagename' a lot. (pkgwat was the
> packages command line app, but it's python2 only, so it went away I
> fear.
Except it did not :) , it's also using Python 3.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pkgwat/blob/m
On 9/12/19 4:16 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 9/12/19 1:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 02:32 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:28 AM Clement Verna
>>> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:06, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wa
On 9/12/19 1:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 02:32 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:28 AM Clement Verna
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:06, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hello,
I was looking for information on the future of the packa
On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 02:32 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:28 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:06, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I was looking for information on the future of the packages
> > > application[1]. I didn't see it
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 03:14:04PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 14:56, Neal Gompa <[1]ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> Is it OK for us to link to the packages application in
> documentation, or
> >> >> should we just link to src.fp.o already (in the Ne
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 14:56, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:20 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 08:41, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:28 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:06, An
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:20 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 08:41, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:28 AM Clement Verna
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:06, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> I was looking for infor
On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 at 08:41, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:28 AM Clement Verna
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:06, Ankur Sinha
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was looking for information on the future of the packages
> >> application[1]. I didn't see it
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 2:28 AM Clement Verna wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:06, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was looking for information on the future of the packages
>> application[1]. I didn't see it mentioned in the commblog post[2].
>
>
> Currently the application is in
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 15:06, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was looking for information on the future of the packages
> application[1]. I didn't see it mentioned in the commblog post[2].
>
Currently the application is in a kind of maintenance mode (in reality I
don't have much time to look a
Hello,
I was looking for information on the future of the packages
application[1]. I didn't see it mentioned in the commblog post[2].
Is it OK for us to link to the packages application in documentation, or
should we just link to src.fp.o already (in the NeuroFedora
documentation[3]) for example?
18 matches
Mail list logo
