On 07/15/2014 10:41 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
The data we have is that very few people used (and use) the open-source version
of Transifex. Some of those who did,
were using an even older version of Transifex (0.9) which we weren't actively
maintaining. We have asked around and
carefully revie
If so, is that moving to an existing zanata instance that is being
run for us? Or is that talking about fedora infrastructure creating
such an instance?
I've added this item in the list [1], and will keep you in the loop.
ok.
Kevin,
I had the meetup with zanata team. The instance is creat
Hi Miroslav,
The data we have is that very few people used (and use) the open-source
version of Transifex. Some of those who did, were using an even older
version of Transifex (0.9) which we weren't actively maintaining. We have
asked around and carefully reviewed whether a move like this will hav
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:23:00 +1000
Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
> (2014年07月12日 03:20), Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000
> > Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
> >
> > ...snip...
> >
> >> Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for
> >> some maintenance reason, can w
Hi,
Maybe it was mentioned before but are we really going to migrate to Zanata
before F21 release?
I saw the high level schedule on Wiki[1].
As a lot of new things and changes coming to F21, I'm kind of hoping not
rushing migration before F21.
Just play safe, we can start migration afterwards.
H
(2014年07月12日 03:20), Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000
Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
...snip...
Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for
some maintenance reason, can we discuss at trans list only as many of
translators have not subscribed infrastructure
Hi all,
On 07/11/2014 10:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000
Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
...snip...
Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for
some maintenance reason, can we discuss at trans list only as many of
translators have not subscribed inf
Kevin,
I believe that migration will occur was created a plan [1], but I
believe the others in CC's will provide you with more precise information
about where this running this current instance of Zanata [2], I only
realized in the production url he suffered an update to its latest version.
[1
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:48:42 +1000
Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
...snip...
> Btw, unless Infrastructure team needs to track this discussion for
> some maintenance reason, can we discuss at trans list only as many of
> translators have not subscribed infrastructure list?
Thats fine with me for the mo
t;
> Carlos A. Munoz
> Software Engineering Supervisor
> Engineering - Internationalization
> Red Hat
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Noriko Mizumoto"
> To: "Marcelo Barbosa"
> Cc: "Fedora Infrastructure" ,
> "Fedora Trans
t;Fedora Infrastructure"
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2014 1:41:13 PM
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
Guys,
We may collect the Transifex all Coordinators, Reviewers and Translators
through the API, for example:
$ curl -i -L --user username:password -X GET
https://www.transifex.com/
Regards,
Carlos A. Munoz
Software Engineering Supervisor
Engineering - Internationalization
Red Hat
- Original Message -
From: "Noriko Mizumoto"
To: "Marcelo Barbosa"
Cc: "Fedora Infrastructure" , "Fedora
Translation Project List"
Sent: Friday
inal Message -
From: "Kevin Fenzi" mailto:ke...@scrye.com>>
To: infrastructure@lists.__fedoraproject.org
<mailto:infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:53:48 AM
Subject: Re: Transife
gt;
>
>
> (2014年07月10日 22:01), Robyn Bergeron wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -----
>>
>>> From: "Kevin Fenzi"
>>> To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:53:48 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Transi
Bergeron wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Kevin Fenzi"
To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:53:48 AM
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:25:41AM -0400, Rahu
presents a
> small improvement will be very welcome.
>
> Best regards.
>
> firemanxbr
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -----
>> > From: "Kevin Fenzi"
>> > To:
As Marcelo just stated, we have had our struggles with Transifex. A while
ago, we came up as the coordinators of the localization team in Brazil,
having a wider understanding of what Transifex meant from above. It is
really sad that we depend on it, for it is non-free software, but being
really hon
Zoltan,
I believe we can do some tests with the Zanata in order to validate the
tool and look for little impact as possible. I came in with my account at
FAS and I realized the error quoted here on the list, after adopting my FAS
been redirected to this address:
https://translate.zanata.org/zanat
-- Original Message -
> > From: "Kevin Fenzi"
> > To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:53:48 AM
> > Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200
> > Pierre-
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Fenzi"
> To: infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, July 4, 2014 9:53:48 AM
> Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
>
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
>
On 07/03/2014 04:20 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
It's a good thing that this came up, it'd be nice to have a clear decision from
the Fedora part. I explained in detail
the log & reasoning behind the decision to stop maintaining the open-source
branch in the GitHub issue Rahul provided.
Dimitris
I support moving away from TX if it prevents us from obeying our 4Fs.
But as a long term translator and a team coordinator, please allow me to
say something that I'm concerning about:
1. If we decide to move, what platform should we move to?
Which is a better place to move?
I haven't use Zanata b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/07/14 02:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200 Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:25:41AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves ChibonA wrote:
Il 04/lug/2014 10:12 "Pierre-Yves Chibon" ha scritto:
>
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:25:41AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves ChibonA wrote:
> >
> > What are they?
> >
> >I haven't spent a lot of time looking up alternatives b
Le jeudi 03 juillet 2014 à 18:22 +0400, Peter Lemenkov a écrit :
> 2014-07-03 18:09 GMT+04:00 Rahul Sundaram :
> > Hi
> >
> > Unfortunately it looks like Transifex has become proprietary and Fedora
> > moving to using Transifex.com has been cited as one of the reasons
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 10:11:45 +0200
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:25:41AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves ChibonA wrote:
> >
> > What are they?
> >
> >I haven't spent a lot of time looking up altern
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:25:41AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>Hi
>
>On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves ChibonA wrote:
>
> What are they?
>
>I haven't spent a lot of time looking up alternatives but I am aware of
>the following:
>
>http://zanata.org/ develo
obile)
From: infrastructure-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:infrastructure-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Dimitris
Glezos
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 12:09 AM
To: Fedora Infrastructure
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
Oliver, Transifex is already offer
infrastructure-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] *On Behalf Of *Dimitris
> Glezos
> *Sent:* Thursday, July 03, 2014 4:21 PM
> *To:* Fedora Infrastructure
> *Subject:* Re: Transifex has become proprietary
>
>
>
>
>
> It's a good thing that this came up, it'd
Hi,
On 07/03/2014 07:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
What are they?
I haven't spent a lot of time looking up alternatives but I am aware
of the following:
http://zanata.org/ developed by Red Hat
If we are looking for alter
,
Oliver
From: infrastructure-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:infrastructure-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Dimitris
Glezos
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 4:21 PM
To: Fedora Infrastructure
Subject: Re: Transifex has become proprietary
It's a good thing that
Hi
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> What are they?
>
I haven't spent a lot of time looking up alternatives but I am aware of the
following:
http://zanata.org/ developed by Red Hat
Translatewiki which is apparently what MediaGoblin is considering
https://issues.me
>> Should we consider alternatives?
>
> Why should we? A vast majority of us are happy GitHub / Facebook /
> Twitter / Google users and it's a happy marriage so far (at least for
> GitHub). We should clearly distinguish between a service / API and a
> data - an openness of a service is entirely dif
2014-07-03 18:09 GMT+04:00 Rahul Sundaram :
> Hi
>
> Unfortunately it looks like Transifex has become proprietary and Fedora
> moving to using Transifex.com has been cited as one of the reasons why it
> wasn't important anymore for them to maintain a open source version.
&g
to be donating one of the
bigger plans to Fedora for free (which supports sharing of teams, Transl.
Memory and glossary between teams), and we'll continue to do so.
-d
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Unfortunately it looks like Transifex has b
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:09:05AM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>Hi
>
>Unfortunately it looks like Transifex has become proprietary and Fedora
>moving to using Transifex.com has been cited as one of the reasons why it
>wasn't important anymore for them to ma
Hi
Unfortunately it looks like Transifex has become proprietary and Fedora
moving to using Transifex.com has been cited as one of the reasons why it
wasn't important anymore for them to maintain a open source version.
https://github.com/transifex/transifex/issues/206#issuecomment-152
37 matches
Mail list logo
