Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [release] Switching default build node to centos8-builder-4c-4g

, 2022 at 9:14 AM Robert Varga <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: Hello everyone, we are currently defaulting to centos7-builder-4c-4g here: https://github.com/opendaylight/releng-builder/blob/master/jjb/defaults.yaml#L19= <https://github.com/opendaylight/releng-builder/blo

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Switching default build node to centos8-builder-4c-4g

Hello everyone, we are currently defaulting to centos7-builder-4c-4g here: https://github.com/opendaylight/releng-builder/blob/master/jjb/defaults.yaml#L19= CentOS7 is ancient and cannot support our releases going forward, as it lacks JDK17 -- which is scheduled to be required for Chlorine.

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [release] [integration-dev] [it-infrastructure-alerts][notice] ODL maintenance window (12:00p Wed, Nov 3 to 8:30p Wed, Nov 3 UTC)

On 03/11/2021 20:48, Daniel de la Rosa wrote: Hi Anil and all it looks like all services are still down.. any ETA? Hmm, just got a message about maintenance being complete, wiki/gerrit/jira work, but jenkins is reporting a 502. Regards, Robert OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] IT-23000 Gerrit history is damaged

 --- —-—-—-— Hello Robert Varga, Thank you for contacting the IT Project Support Team. This is an automated message confirming that we got your request. We will get back to you as soon as possible. For your reference, your ticket number is IT-23000 You may also view your request(s) by visiting: [1]My Requests

Re: [OpenDaylight TSC] [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] IT-22529 Vexxhost stack instantiation failed

;https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/autorelease/job/autorelease-release-aluminium-mvn35-openjdk11/> Might make sense, then again we are about 5 weeks from desupporting Aluminium completely... > > BR/Luis > > >> On Jul 21, 2021, at 3:46 PM, Robert Varga > <

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] IT-22529 Vexxhost stack instantiation failed

10 hours, i.e. no new data during morning CET. On 21/07/2021 22:22, Project Services wrote: > —-—-—-— > —-—-—-— > Reply above this line. > > Hello *Robert Varga*, > > *Eric Ball* has added a comment on your request *IT-22529* > <https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/servicedesk/

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [integration-dev] global-jjb vs. packer vs. Jenkins jobs

On 05/02/2021 10:16, Robert Varga wrote: > On 03/02/2021 00:03, Anil Belur wrote: >> Greetings Robert: > > Hello Anil, Hello again, sorry, for self-reply, but as it happens ... [snip] >> 2. All releng/global-jjb (templates) scripts do not require all of the

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [integration-dev] global-jjb vs. packer vs. Jenkins jobs

opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/aaa-maven-verify-master-mvn35-openjdk11/3/console-timestamp.log.gz did: Total job runtime: 9m56s Useful build time: 7m16s Setup/teardown time: 2m40s That's **27%** of the time spent on infra, amounting to **37%** overhead. > > Thanks, &g

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] IRC reminderbot?

Hey everyone, with gerritbot being AWOL these days(*) it feels lonesome on #opendaylight. Could we have a reminderbot which will advertize stuff? - upcoming release milestones - upcoming community calls - upcoming events etc. Obviously once we have a bot, IRC is not the only medium. Is this

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] global-jjb vs. packer vs. Jenkins jobs

Hello everyone, as the (still current) failure to start Jenkins jobs shows, our current way of integrating with external dependencies (global-jjb) is beyond fragile. The way our jobs work is that: 1) we have a base image, created by builder-packer-* jobs on a regular basis and roll up distro

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Jenkins jobs failing

Hello everyone, all of jenkins has been failing for the last two days. https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/plugins/servlet/theme/portal/2/IT-21406 is going unanswered for more than 24 hours. I don't what more can I do to get things unblocked. If anybody knows how to get things fixed in at least

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Specialized release-merge jobs?

Hello, I have been using infrautils-release-merge and its ilk for some time. Overall they work just fine, but they are annoying to use. Everytime you need to release something, you have to fill out a bunch of branch-related parameters -- like STREAM/GERRIT_BRANCH/GERRIT_REFSPEC plus

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Jenkins in shutdown mode

Hello everyone, Jenkins is in shutdown mode for 2.5+ hours, with jobs being blocked. I have tried to have this remediated, via a comment to IT-20154, which is why LF staff did this, as well as on IRC, as well as escalating that issue. Finally I have given up and filed IT-20291 to have the

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] INFO.yaml documentation?

Hello everyone, does anybody know where I can find documentation to INFO.yaml files? I specifically need the know: 1) what are the values for lifecycle_state (is it Bootstrap,Incubation,Mature and ... ?) 2) how do I record graduation review (which most projects passed)? Thanks, Robert

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org unavailable

Hello, it seems fedora infra is having issues (https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9051), which is affecting at least our maven-stage jobs (https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/odlparent-maven-stage-5.0.x/34/console.log.gz). Bye, Robert signature.asc

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Sigul not available

Hello, Sigul seems to be currently broken, which means any job which requires signed artifacts (for example stage and autorelease jobs) cannot succeed. I have raised https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/2/IT-19917 to have current unavailability resolved. I have raised

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Centos 8 support?

Hello everyone, CentOS 8 cloud images have been available for quite some time (https://cloud.centos.org/centos/8/x86_64/images/). What is the plan for adopting these? Whom should I bug? Thanks, Robert signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Packer/centos upgrades?

Hello, a quick question: do packer jobs (https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/builder/job/builder-packer-merge-centos-7-builder/) pick up minor upgrades (i.e. centos-7.7 vs. centos-7.8)? Thanks, Robert signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links:

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [OpenDaylight TSC] Moving from sonar.opendaylight.org to Sonarcloud.io

On 29/04/2020 08:35, Anil Belur wrote: > > Okay, I do have a prototype here: > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/odlparent/+/88440 > > Can somebody test it, please? > > > Hello Robert: > > Sorry, for the delay on getting back on this. As mentioned on the IRC, > I've tested the

Re: [releng] [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] logs links missing in jeknins

On 25/04/2020 03:29, Anil Belur wrote: > Greetings Robert:  > > This issue has been fixed with the latest version of global-jjb v0.53.2, > while the change on releng/builder needs to be merged.  > > https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/89367 Unfortunately, that is not the

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] git.opendaylight.org is down

Hello, gerrit seems to be down (i.e. reports a 504), filed https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/2/IT-19523 for that. Bye, Robert signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [OpenDaylight TSC] Moving from sonar.opendaylight.org to Sonarcloud.io

On 24/01/2020 08:16, Robert Varga wrote: > On 14/01/2020 23:09, Anil Belur wrote: >> Greetings Robert: > > Hey Anil, > > sorry for the late reply. > >> Trying to catch up on where we are with the sonarcloud migrations. I >> think another issue

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [OpenDaylight TSC] Moving from sonar.opendaylight.org to Sonarcloud.io

On 14/01/2020 23:09, Anil Belur wrote: > Greetings Robert: Hey Anil, sorry for the late reply. > Trying to catch up on where we are with the sonarcloud migrations. I > think another issue has been identified with 0% coverage, that is caused > by an update on the Java analyzer. Ah, good thing

Re: [release] [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] SFT et al. failing across the board

On 17/01/2020 16:50, Luis Gomez wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 2:06 AM Robert Varga <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: > > On 16/01/2020 22:03, Luis Gomez wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > Hello Luis, > > > Do you have more detai

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] SFT et al. failing across the board

back from infrastructure. Regards, Robert > > BR/Luis > >> On Jan 15, 2020, at 10:03 AM, Robert Varga wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> our SFTs are currently failing across all release trains, thanks to >> https://support.sonatype.com/hc/en-us/article

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] SFT et al. failing across the board

Hello everyone, our SFTs are currently failing across all release trains, thanks to https://support.sonatype.com/hc/en-us/articles/360041287334-Central-501-HTTPS-Required Can we arrange for HTTP requests from our infra to be served a redirect while I sort out the mess, please? Thanks, Robert

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Patches proposed by jenkins

Hey everyone, there is a number of patches in Gerrit proposed by production jenkins: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/owner:jenkins-releng%2540opendaylight.org and by sandbox jenkins: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/q/owner:jenkins-sandbox%2540opendaylight.org The problem with the

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [integration-dev] Builder image content?

On 12/12/2019 14:50, Thanh Ha wrote: > On Thu, 12 Dec 2019 at 03:56, Robert Varga <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: > > Hello, > > is there a simple way to know what is the content of a built image? > > I mean > > https://jenkins.opendaylight

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Builder image content?

Hello, is there a simple way to know what is the content of a built image? I mean https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/builder/job/builder-packer-merge-centos-7-builder/78/ does tell me there is a new image, but there is nothing in the logs which would tell me what the actual content is.

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [OpenDaylight TSC] Moving from sonar.opendaylight.org to Sonarcloud.io

On 09/12/2019 22:36, Eric Ball wrote: > Ok, I've recreated the "ODL way" Java quality profile (59 of 60 rules; > one was deprecated) in Sonarcloud, and set it as the default. Future > runs should reflect only those rules that were chosen. I still think > this should probably be updated, as it has

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [OpenDaylight TSC] Moving from sonar.opendaylight.org to Sonarcloud.io

On 06/11/2019 23:53, Andrew Grimberg wrote: > On 11/6/19 2:40 PM, Eric Ball wrote: >> All: I'm going to abandon the previously-linked patch request, and >> break it out into separate commits by project. >> >> Robert: I've updated the Sonarcloud user permissions to match >> SonarQube, where all

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [OpenDaylight TSC] Moving from sonar.opendaylight.org to Sonarcloud.io

On 13/11/2019 01:28, Anil Belur wrote: > Hi Abhijit:  > > Please add this thread to the week's TSC call agenda and possibly take a > vote on this.  > > 1. ODL Projects needs to vote (+1) before each of these change can be > merged on releng/builder. >    

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [OpenDaylight TSC] Moving from sonar.opendaylight.org to Sonarcloud.io

On 06/11/2019 23:01, Eric Ball wrote: > > You can view the OpenDaylight Sonarcloud page > here: https://sonarcloud.io/organizations/opendaylight/projects > Currently, the only projects showing results are those that have run and > passed on the sandbox. Once the change is merged, all projects

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Moving from sonar.opendaylight.org to Sonarcloud.io

On 06/11/2019 23:01, Eric Ball wrote: > Hello all, > > We here at the LF Release Engineering team are working on a move from > hosted SonarQube instances to the cloud-based Sonarcloud service. To > that end, there is currently a proposed change to all Sonar jobs that > would move them to >

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Netvirt master builds failing in Windows env due to issue in odlparent v6.0.0

On 21/10/2019 12:24, Abhinav Gupta wrote: > Hi Robert, > >   > > Netvirt builds are consistently failing on Windows env with Maven 3.6.0+ > with the following error: > >   > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.opendaylight.odlparent:karaf-plugin:6.0.0:populate-local-repo >

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] rtd-verify job failing

Hello, FYI, I opened https://jira.linuxfoundation.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/2/IT-17699 to have rtd-verify jobs fixed at least for odlparent. Regards, Robert -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#1121):

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Message Approval Needed - jenkins-dontre...@opendaylight.org posted to netconf-...@lists.opendaylight.org

Hey guys, this looks like there's some configuration needed -- jenkins should be allowed to post ... Regards, Robert --- Begin Message --- Hello, A message was sent to the group https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/netconf-dev from jenkins-dontre...@opendaylight.org that needs to be approved.

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] odlparent-rtd-verify failing

Hello, https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/odlparent-rtd-verify-master/6/console.log.gz failed with: + cd /w/workspace/odlparent-rtd-verify-master + tox -edocs ERROR: unknown environment 'docs' Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure Any idea what is that

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] tox build borken (again!)

Hello, it seems we need yet another pin of dependencies: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/builder-tox-verify-master/3959/consoleFull#-853622487db85ee0b-83ce-4606-9c91-00fd56eff5c2 At this point, I strongly believe there should be an ongoing effort to move off of python-2.7 to at

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Multipatch build with new gerrit?

Hello, https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/integration/job/integration-multipatch-test-sodium/62/console just failed with: > 00:04:25.679 Patches to build: >

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] JDK12/13?

Hello, what is our situation for JDK12/13 support on slaves? Can we get at least 12 supported? Thanks, Robert signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.opendaylight.org

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Tox failures?

On 13/05/2019 20:54, Robert Varga wrote: > On 13/05/2019 20:31, Andrew Grimberg wrote: >> On 5/11/19 1:40 AM, Robert Varga wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/netvirt-tox-verify-sodium/132/console.log.gz >

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Tox failures?

On 13/05/2019 20:31, Andrew Grimberg wrote: > On 5/11/19 1:40 AM, Robert Varga wrote: >> Hello, >> >> https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/netvirt-tox-verify-sodium/132/console.log.gz >> failed for reasons I can only blame on infra: > > It's

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Tox failures?

Hello, https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/netvirt-tox-verify-sodium/132/console.log.gz failed for reasons I can only blame on infra: > coala installdeps: coala==0.11.0, coala-bears==0.11.0 > ERROR: invocation failed (exit code 1), logfile: >

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [release] [netvirt-dev] Autorelease fluorine-mvn35-openjdk8 failed to build elanmanager-impl from netvirt

On 26/04/2019 09:06, Manojna Vijayakrishna wrote: > Hi all, > > This test failure is an intermittent timing issue. To investigate further, we > would require the surefire reports. > Can someone provide us with the surefire reports of this build? Hmm... those reports are supposed to be archived,

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] verify-javadoc jobs are unstable

Hello, it seems verify-javadoc jobs are hitting some infra-related issue, and are resulting in unstable builds, with jenkins voting CR -1: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/openflowplugin-maven-javadoc-verify-sodium-openjdk8/142/ This seems to have started happening overnight ...

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [opendaylight.org #69767] [linuxfoundation.org #69767] Re: ODL Jenkins/nexus outage

On 13/03/2019 13:01, Robert Varga wrote: > Hello, > > it seems our cloud is experiencing issues: > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/bgpcep-maven-verify-sodium-mvn35-openjdk8/30/console.log.gz: > >> [WARNING] Cou

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] ODL Jenkins/nexus outage

On 13/03/2019 13:01, Robert Varga wrote: > Hello, > > it seems our cloud is experiencing issues: > > https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/bgpcep-maven-verify-sodium-mvn35-openjdk8/30/console.log.gz: > >> [WARNING] Cou

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Jenkins broken?

Hello, it seems our build infra is in a bad shape. About an hour ago we had build queue @200 jobs, with no reaction to the additional load: https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/label/centos7-builder-8c-8g/load-statistics While the load went down a bit, the jobs are effectively dead:

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [opendaylight.org #67157] Re: javadoc job failure since openjdk11 is enabled on verify jobs

On 17/01/2019 15:03, Lori Jakab via RT wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:20 PM Anil Belur via RT > wrote: >> On Thu Jan 17 01:13:50 2019, askb wrote: >>> On Wed Jan 16 13:31:24 2019, lorand.ja...@gmail.com wrote: Adding helpdesk. I suppose SET_JDK_VERSION should not be an array.

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [opendaylight.org #67157] Re: javadoc job failure since openjdk11 is enabled on verify jobs

On 17/01/2019 15:03, Lori Jakab via RT wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:20 PM Anil Belur via RT > wrote: >> On Thu Jan 17 01:13:50 2019, askb wrote: >>> On Wed Jan 16 13:31:24 2019, lorand.ja...@gmail.com wrote: Adding helpdesk. I suppose SET_JDK_VERSION should not be an array.

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [opendaylight.org #67157] Re: javadoc job failure since openjdk11 is enabled on verify jobs

On 17/01/2019 16:11, Thanh Ha wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:04 AM Robert Varga <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: > > On 17/01/2019 07:13, Anil Belur via RT wrote: > > On Wed Jan 16 13:31:24 2019, lorand.ja...@gmail.com > <mailto:lorand.ja...@gmail.com>

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [opendaylight.org #67157] Re: javadoc job failure since openjdk11 is enabled on verify jobs

On 17/01/2019 07:13, Anil Belur via RT wrote: > On Wed Jan 16 13:31:24 2019, lorand.ja...@gmail.com wrote: >> Adding helpdesk. >> >> I suppose SET_JDK_VERSION should not be an array. >> >> -Lori > > Greetings Lori: > > This approach for passing multiple java-versions (openjdk8 and openjdk11) >

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [opendaylight.org #67157] Re: javadoc job failure since openjdk11 is enabled on verify jobs

On 17/01/2019 07:13, Anil Belur via RT wrote: > On Wed Jan 16 13:31:24 2019, lorand.ja...@gmail.com wrote: >> Adding helpdesk. >> >> I suppose SET_JDK_VERSION should not be an array. >> >> -Lori > > Greetings Lori: > > This approach for passing multiple java-versions (openjdk8 and openjdk11) >

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [release] [OpenDaylight Discuss] CI infra issues

On 19/11/2018 15:30, Michael Vorburger wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:24 PM Faseela K > wrote: > > Are these issues resolved? > I am still getting some job timeouts intermittently. > Sometimes merge jobs, sometimes CSIT jobs. > > > same here,

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [release] Autorelease oxygen failed to build dlux-web from dlux

On 29/10/2018 03:09, Jenkins wrote: > Attention dlux-devs, > > Autorelease oxygen failed to build dlux-web from dlux in build > 467. Attached is a snippet of the error message related to the > failure that we were able to automatically parse as well as console logs. > > > Console Logs: >

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [release] Autorelease oxygen failed to build daexim-impl from daexim

On 21/08/18 18:24, Thanh Ha wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 4:13 AM Robert Varga <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: > > On 21/08/18 07:35, Ariel Adam wrote: > > Shaleen, any idea what this problem is? > > > > [ERROR] Failed to execut

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [release] Autorelease oxygen failed to build daexim-impl from daexim

On 21/08/18 07:35, Ariel Adam wrote: > Shaleen, any idea what this problem is? > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project daexim-impl: Could not resolve > dependencies for project > org.opendaylight.daexim:daexim-impl:bundle:1.3.4: Failed to collect > dependencies at

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [opendaylight-dev] Embedding JIRA filter results in wiki?

On 14/08/18 16:25, Andrew Grimberg wrote: > On 08/14/2018 03:11 AM, Robert Varga wrote: >> On 14/08/18 12:07, Ariel Adam wrote: >>> You could try creating an iframe and embedding the JIRA web page into it >>> however I don't think it's going to be convenient to

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [opendaylight-dev] Embedding JIRA filter results in wiki?

On 14/08/18 12:07, Ariel Adam wrote: > You could try creating an iframe and embedding the JIRA web page into it > however I don't think it's going to be convenient to use. > The other approach is create a TWS Jira project and then just mange the > weekly meetings as sprints so you can assign

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] https://opendaylight.biterg.io config?

On 13/08/18 15:12, Thanh Ha wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:11 AM Robert Varga <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: > > On 07/08/18 17:08, Robert Varga wrote: > > On 07/08/18 16:57, Thanh Ha wrote: > >> I get an error when I try to load it anonymo

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Embedding JIRA filter results in wiki?

Hey, I am not sure where to ask -- is there a way to embed the results of a JIRA filter in wiki.opendaylight.org? This would be super useful for planning out agenda (for TWS specifically, but also others) and keep it update. Thanks, Robert signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] https://opendaylight.biterg.io config?

On 07/08/18 17:08, Robert Varga wrote: > On 07/08/18 16:57, Thanh Ha wrote: >> I get an error when I try to load it anonymously but it works when I am >> logged in. > The reason for that probably is that you are listed as a Developer in > https://gitlab.com/Bitergia/c

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] https://opendaylight.biterg.io config?

On 07/08/18 16:57, Thanh Ha wrote: > > I get an error when I try to load it anonymously but it works when I am > logged in. The reason for that probably is that you are listed as a Developer in https://gitlab.com/Bitergia/c/OpenDayLight/support/project_members. Regards, Robert signature.asc

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] https://opendaylight.biterg.io config?

On 07/08/18 16:57, Thanh Ha wrote: > > Hi Robert, > > > > Requests should be directed to Bitergia via their GitLab project here: > > > > https://gitlab.com/Bitergia/c/OpenDayLight > > > > I believe the "identities" sub-project is about mapping emails and > >

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] https://opendaylight.biterg.io config?

Hello everyone, I am not sure where to direct this, as I cannot find any documentation around it. I just looked at https://opendaylight.biterg.io and it looks like there is some amount of tweaking of affiliation to be done. Where can I find the current affilation table and really any sort of

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [integration-dev] Restarting Nexus

On 28/06/18 19:29, Robert Varga wrote: > On 28/06/18 18:06, Faseela K wrote: >> Hi Thanh, >> >>    I am still getting some random failures in the distribution checks. >> >>   >> >>    >> https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/j

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [integration-dev] Restarting Nexus

On 28/06/18 18:06, Faseela K wrote: > Hi Thanh, > >    I am still getting some random failures in the distribution checks. > >   > >    > https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/netvirt-distribution-check-fluorine/1748/console > >   > >    Recheck would help? > It looks like the Eclipse

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [OpenDaylight TSC] lispflowmapping build failure in proposed topic:binding-tlc-rpc ("Weather Item" TSC-99)

On 03/05/18 18:35, Michael Vorburger wrote: > Dear maintainers of project lispflowmapping, > > While verifying the proposed cross-projects changes on managed > topic:binding-tlc-rpc together, your project failed to build; please see > the build log extract at the end for the first failure (there

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] lftools install failing?

Hello, we are facing verification issues, for example https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/controller-maven-verify-carbon-mvn33-openjdk8/40/consoleFull > 01:26:44.382 [controller-maven-verify-carbon-mvn33-openjdk8] $ /bin/bash > /tmp/jenkins678105200638964727.sh > 01:26:44.387 --->

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [release] Autorelease carbon failed to build packetcable-policy-karaf from packetcable

On 05/04/18 11:26, Stephen Kitt wrote: > On Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:16:08 +1000 > Anil Belur wrote: According to https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/vex-yul-odl-jenkins-1/ >>> autorelease-release-carbon/552/_sys-info.log.gz we are maxing out the 150

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [release] Autorelease carbon failed to build concepts from releng/autorelease

On 15/02/18 03:51, Jenkins wrote: > Attention releng/autorelease-devs, > > Autorelease carbon failed to build concepts from releng/autorelease in build > 543. Attached is a snippet of the error message related to the > failure that we were able to automatically parse as well as console logs. >

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [release] Autorelease oxygen failed to build bgp-cli from bgpcep

On 11/02/18 03:43, Jenkins wrote: > Attention bgpcep-devs, > > Autorelease oxygen failed to build bgp-cli from bgpcep in build > 145. Attached is a snippet of the error message related to the > failure that we were able to automatically parse as well as console logs. > > > Console Logs: >

[OpenDaylight Infrastructure] Java 9 available?

Hello, it seems we are ready to start nailing down our Java 9 compatibility -- which requires us running parallel JDK8/JDK9 verify jobs. Do we have JDK9 available on the build slaves? Thanks, Robert signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] javadoc links

On 10/12/17 00:47, Andrew Grimberg wrote: > The bailing wire and bubble gum that is making javadocs.opendaylight.org > function properly does not make it possible to have a domain name per > project. Plus it would be an extra amount of administrative overhead on > us to do this as it would require

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [Bug 9006] Sporadic cluster failure when member is restarted in OF cluster test

On 24/08/17 22:07, bugzilla-dae...@bugs.opendaylight.org wrote: > *Comment # 14 > on bug 9006 from > Luis Gomez * > > OK, I think as next step I can try to see

Re: [OpenDaylight Infrastructure] [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Certificate changes

On 28/03/17 05:32, Ed Warnicke wrote: > Anil, > > Thats nice... but at the end of the day, here's the net-net... a large > subset of the world's first experience trying to do ODL development is > going to be that we are inexplicably broken in a cryptic way. I > strongly recommend we get a cert