Le 16/03/2015 18:04, Marcio Almada a écrit :
I had no time to reply all emails since yesterday, but right now we are
having a voting with 2 yes votes vs 16 no votes.
I think we all agree that the RFC won't pass and I'm withdrawing the RFC
Hi,
Even though it's a bit too late: thanks for your
Hi, all
At first, Thanks for all your work put in here, Marcio. It gave me a new
hint for a possible code-failure.
FYI: PhpStorm lately added an inspector for that. Glad to see that move
after I heard that the RFC won't pass.
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/WI-14692
Bye,
Simon
On Mon, Mar
Hi,
I had no time to reply all emails since yesterday, but right now we are
having a voting with 2 yes votes vs 16 no votes.
I think we all agree that the RFC won't pass and I'm withdrawing the RFC
for the following reasons:
1. The sooner we end the voting period the better for the PHP time
On 15 March 2015 at 19:19, Marcio Almada marcio.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
It's also going to be impossible for people to try the patch out, or
to measure it for performance hit.
Performance has never been an issue with this RFC. You probably meant bc
break not performance hit, and the
Hi,
I received some requests to update the RFC with more information about BC
breaks + possible minor adjustments regarding dynamic function calls. So I
decided to drop the current voting, while it's still on the beginning, to
properly update the RFC. We had 7 votes computed - 4 yes and 3 no
On 15 March 2015 at 06:59, Marcio Almada marcio.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I received some requests to update the RFC with more information about BC
breaks + possible minor adjustments regarding dynamic function calls.
Please can you stop abusing the RFC process?
This RFC is attempting to
Hi
2015-03-15 8:33 GMT-03:00 Dan Ackroyd dan...@basereality.com:
On 15 March 2015 at 06:59, Marcio Almada marcio.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I received some requests to update the RFC with more information about BC
breaks + possible minor adjustments regarding dynamic function calls.
