The problem is that you only realize about the DMARC problem is you "verify"
your own emails when they come back from the list and you have configured the
list to also send back the emails to you ...
Otherwise it passes unadvertised, but some people don't get emails from people
that uses DMARC
El 1/4/20 10:55, "Tore Anderson"
escribió:
* JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> I don't know it by memory
Huh. In that case, what do you base your claims about what the GDPR
requires on, exactly?
> 1) Before 25 May 2018, every EU citizen or r
01. 10:33, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Hi Tore,
I've taken a quick look, because I don't know it by memory, but:
1) Before 25 May 2018, every EU citizen or resident must get a confirmation
from any database holder with his personal data, to re-confirm the
authorization. I'm not sure if tha
.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 1/4/20 10:43, "Bjørn Mork"
escribió:
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ writes:
> 2) Right to object. Art. 59, but also many others. It is not probably
clear=
> ly said that it must be in a footer but it must be clear
for the host of the
list to comply with GDPR, to avoid any DPA fine.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 1/4/20 10:11, "Tore Anderson"
escribió:
* JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> It is true however, that this list must follow GDPR, and this means
having an explicit unsubs
that footer, some people is not
"able" to read it).
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 1/4/20 9:46, "Daniel Roesen"
escribió:
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 09:29:45AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> If you’re receiving the messages is because YOU
If you’re receiving the messages is because YOU subscribed to the list.
If you subscribed to the list, you know how to unsubscribe.
If you don’t know it, you should be smart enough to look into the email header
and you will find how to do it.
Just in case you don’t know how to do it,
Hi all,
The next AFRINIC meeting, middle of June, in Uganda, will host a 2-days
hackathon to add IPv6 support to some apps.
We are trying to compile a list of Open Source applications that could be
subject for this exercise.
I think a possible priority could be apps used by operators which
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 05:50:52PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> I don???t agree. There are many users with tunnel brokers that use 6in4.
If you filter 6to4 as a protocol, you???re also filtering all those users???
traffic.
6in4 is not 6to4.
6to4 with 200
wouldn’t like to restrict what is left from p2p apps.
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 May 2019, at 18:50, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
wrote:
Hi Marc,
I don’t agree. There are many users with tunnel brokers that use 6in4. If you
filter 6to4 as a protocol, you’re also filtering all those user
Hi Marc,
I don’t agree. There are many users with tunnel brokers that use 6in4. If you
filter 6to4 as a protocol, you’re also filtering all those users’ traffic.
Not everybody is lucky enough to have native IPv6 support from its ISP.
Saludos,
Jordi
El 14/5/19 17:46, "Marc
perfectly
permissible to filter it, if that is the policy a network operator wishes to
enforce.
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:30 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
wrote:
6to4 is still a valid protocol. IT SHOULD NOT be filtered. 6to4 uses the same
protocol as other tunnels such as 6in4 (protocol 41).
6to4 is still a valid protocol. IT SHOULD NOT be filtered. 6to4 uses the same
protocol as other tunnels such as 6in4 (protocol 41).
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3056.txt
It works fine for peer to peer applications.
What the IETF deprecated is anycast for 6to4 relays:
I guess the point here is to compare if they also have IPv4 firewall on by
default.
However, I believe the point here is to understand if a user having a
“standard” distribution of any BSD/Linux, is the one that don’t double check
all the security of that OS. Maybe we need to look into those
nder a: <swm...@swm.pp.se>
Fecha: miércoles, 1 de marzo de 2017, 9:13
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
CC: <ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de>
Asunto: Re: question regarding over the counter devices
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> IPv6 firewall
What I’ve seen, yes is on by default, but I also heard the same complain, but
actually never seen a device not-on by default … so I’m not really convinced is
very real.
However, I believe that all the IPv6 OSs for hosts and servers, have the IPv6
firewall on by default, so this should not be a
art <p...@paulstewart.org>
Responder a: <p...@paulstewart.org>
Fecha: viernes, 14 de octubre de 2016, 14:09
Para: Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se>
CC: <ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
<jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
Asunto: Re: contact with One &
tel...@lists.cluenet.de> en nombre de
Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org>
Responder a: <p...@paulstewart.org>
Fecha: viernes, 14 de octubre de 2016, 13:52
Para: Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se>
CC: <ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
<jordi.pa...@co
I don’t think it will help …
I’ve got several of their customers, several *months* ago, which opened a
ticket, and they didn’t get a solution/response …
It may happen that the folks in the ticketing system don’t understand the
problem or don’t scale it or whatever …
I think is time to retire
gt; en nombre de
Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se>
Organización: People's Front Against WWW
Responder a: <swm...@swm.pp.se>
Fecha: viernes, 14 de octubre de 2016, 12:32
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
CC: <ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de>
Asun
Hi,
I’ve discovered, several months ago already, that all the 1&1 web sites with
IPv6 support enabled are broken, because they filter PMTUD, so any residential
customer with has a reduced MTU because PPP or any other encapsulation/tunnel,
etc., is not reaching them.
I tried to contact someone
nice to have a survey report document online for anyone to
read, to complement various powerpoint decks you’ve used.
Amazing to get such a large response - well done :)
Tim
> On 20 Sep 2016, at 14:49, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
<jordi.pa...@consulintel.es> wrote:
&g
Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
Asunto: Re: push apps failing in Android until you disable IPv6
>WhAt DNS servers are ipv6 DNS servers assigned reply to list
>On May 13, 2016 11:57 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
>wrote:
>>
>>
pv6-ops-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel...@lists.cluenet.de> en nombre de
Erik Kline <e...@google.com>
Responder a: <e...@google.com>
Fecha: martes, 10 de mayo de 2016, 15:34
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
CC: IPv6 Ops list <ipv6-ops@lists.cluene
ops-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel...@lists.cluenet.de> en nombre de
Phil Mayers <p.may...@imperial.ac.uk>
Responder a: <p.may...@imperial.ac.uk>
Fecha: martes, 10 de mayo de 2016, 15:01
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>,
<ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de>
data).
Regards,
Jordi
-Mensaje original-
De: <ipv6-ops-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel...@lists.cluenet.de> en nombre de
Erik Kline <e...@google.com>
Responder a: <e...@google.com>
Fecha: martes, 10 de mayo de 2016, 14:57
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.pa.
e mayo de 2016, 14:08
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
CC: <twarw...@gmail.com>, <ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de>
Asunto: Re: push apps failing in Android until you disable IPv6
>On Tue, 10 May 2016, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>
>> But that will not e
ops-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel...@lists.cluenet.de> en nombre de
Trevor Warwick <twarw...@gmail.com>
Responder a: <twarw...@gmail.com>
Fecha: martes, 10 de mayo de 2016, 12:45
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
CC: <ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de>
the push ?
By the way, anyone got rdisc6 working in Mac OS X El Capitan ?
Regards,
Jordi
-Mensaje original-
De: Erik Kline <e...@google.com>
Responder a: <e...@google.com>
Fecha: martes, 10 de mayo de 2016, 4:41
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.pa...@consulintel.
by default).
Regards,
Jordi
-Mensaje original-
De: <ipv6-ops-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel...@lists.cluenet.de> en nombre de
Tim Chown <tim.ch...@jisc.ac.uk>
Responder a: <tim.ch...@jisc.ac.uk>
Fecha: lunes, 9 de mayo de 2016, 16:14
Para: Jordi Palet
gt; en nombre de
Lorenzo Colitti <lore...@google.com>
Responder a: <lore...@google.com>
Fecha: lunes, 9 de mayo de 2016, 10:41
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.pa...@consulintel.es>
CC: IPv6 Ops list <ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de>
Asunto: Re: push apps failing in Android until y
well ?
Saludos,
Jordi
-Mensaje original-
De: <ipv6-ops-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel...@lists.cluenet.de> en nombre de
Erik Nygren <e...@nygren.org>
Responder a: <e...@nygren.org>
Fecha: sábado, 30 de abril de 2016, 17:33
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.pa.
Hi,
I’m not an Android user, but while doing and IPv6 training, many folks in the
meeting room told me that they needed to disable IPv6 in the router/Android
devices, otherwise they aren’t getting the notifications from WhatsApp,
Facebook, and many other apps.
We have tried disabling energy
33 matches
Mail list logo
