chenqin commented on pull request #15442:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15442#issuecomment-812803257
@AHeise can you take a look again?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15484:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15484#issuecomment-812771848
## CI report:
* 35826f519cf9b91ca759b4e13dcc7af811e8d0a8 Azure:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17314161#comment-17314161
]
Xintong Song commented on FLINK-11838:
--
Thanks for the update, [~galenwarren].
Either updating the
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15484:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15484#issuecomment-812771848
## CI report:
* 35826f519cf9b91ca759b4e13dcc7af811e8d0a8 Azure:
flinkbot commented on pull request #15484:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15484#issuecomment-812771848
## CI report:
* 35826f519cf9b91ca759b4e13dcc7af811e8d0a8 UNKNOWN
Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
- `@flinkbot
flinkbot commented on pull request #15484:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15484#issuecomment-812765923
Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the
@flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-21999:
---
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> The logic about whether Checkpoint is enabled.
>
est08zw opened a new pull request #15484:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15484
## What is the purpose of the change
Make the logic about whether Checkpoint is enabled consistent in
DefaultExecutionGraphBuilder, CheckpointConfig and JobGraph. Fix some typo in
est08zw commented on pull request #15399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15399#issuecomment-812728024
It is ok to leave it as before if the method mainly used for tests and feel
free to close this pr then.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17314079#comment-17314079
]
Galen Warren edited comment on FLINK-11838 at 4/2/21, 8:54 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17314079#comment-17314079
]
Galen Warren commented on FLINK-11838:
--
[~xintongsong] – actually, is that the right thing to do,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-18071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17314074#comment-17314074
]
Kezhu Wang commented on FLINK-18071:
Hi all, I dug and thought some time about this. I want to share
Kezhu Wang created FLINK-22108:
--
Summary: Ephemeral socket address was checkpointed to state and
restored back in CollectSinkOperatorCoordinator
Key: FLINK-22108
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17314067#comment-17314067
]
Galen Warren commented on FLINK-11838:
--
Hi [~xintongsong] – sorry for the long delay. I plan to
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-803592550
## CI report:
* 2ef40343abecf693b39b7b7fcb9f6d0d26bf82cd UNKNOWN
* 4ea2496e67e1b5da116eac2058d51296e5b14edc Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-803592550
## CI report:
* 2ef40343abecf693b39b7b7fcb9f6d0d26bf82cd UNKNOWN
* b5e4eb916a93c6c81cd2cc6a133838e26ac062f9 Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15483#issuecomment-812520117
## CI report:
* 4aba800848a69d11dbbddf7afe2b3a87e95f8f87 Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15441:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15441#issuecomment-810695518
## CI report:
* a4daf4b2b785878d576c7f759c5126d6e195a0c3 Azure:
YuvalItzchakov commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812640029
@fsk119 Added `FilterableSourceTest` and `FilterableSourceITCase`, waiting
for your review.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15466#issuecomment-811978896
## CI report:
* ad1b080091b48a82188261ef9fab9c4229af4c9a Azure:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17313938#comment-17313938
]
WeiNan Zhao commented on FLINK-17957:
-
[~fsk119]，please assgin this issue to to me , i will fix it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roman Khachatryan reassigned FLINK-22003:
-
Assignee: Roman Khachatryan
> UnalignedCheckpointITCase fail
>
zzfukai edited a comment on pull request #15054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15054#issuecomment-812486880
Thank you Arvid! It works.
By the way, I detected a bug that the popover content like
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15482:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15482#issuecomment-812447703
## CI report:
* 2d9cd4f63f2e806f0a9a0466e4e6b6cbba02bd89 Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15441:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15441#issuecomment-810695518
## CI report:
* 5f75c7d27817bd8e0822708aacab720ed1e2e394 Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-803592550
## CI report:
* 2ef40343abecf693b39b7b7fcb9f6d0d26bf82cd UNKNOWN
* b5e4eb916a93c6c81cd2cc6a133838e26ac062f9 Azure:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17313879#comment-17313879
]
Jark Wu commented on FLINK-21247:
-
Thanks [~openinx], I changed the type to BUG, and fix version to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jark Wu updated FLINK-21247:
Issue Type: Bug (was: New Feature)
> flink iceberg table map cannot convert to datastream
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jark Wu updated FLINK-21247:
Fix Version/s: 1.13.0
> flink iceberg table map cannot convert to datastream
>
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15483#issuecomment-812520117
## CI report:
* 4aba800848a69d11dbbddf7afe2b3a87e95f8f87 Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15441:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15441#issuecomment-810695518
## CI report:
* 5f75c7d27817bd8e0822708aacab720ed1e2e394 Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15425:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15425#issuecomment-809890369
## CI report:
* 1b248e49e4695b3ac7d21320a377fb74ff460687 Azure:
flinkbot commented on pull request #15483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15483#issuecomment-812520117
## CI report:
* 4aba800848a69d11dbbddf7afe2b3a87e95f8f87 UNKNOWN
Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
- `@flinkbot
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-803592550
## CI report:
* 2ef40343abecf693b39b7b7fcb9f6d0d26bf82cd UNKNOWN
* dcfc0b3d5083c0b2eaf95b0c5ea0e11baeeb4eed Azure:
fsk119 commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812514484
Please take a look at #13449
I think SourceWatermarkTest and SourceWatermarkITCase are good example.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
flinkbot commented on pull request #15483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15483#issuecomment-812514496
Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the
@flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the
Rui Li created FLINK-22107:
--
Summary: Include antlr into hive connector uber jars
Key: FLINK-22107
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22107
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-22092:
---
Labels: pull-request-available (was: )
> Prevent HiveCatalog from reading hive-site in
lirui-apache opened a new pull request #15483:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15483
## What is the purpose of the change
`HiveConf` automatically detects hive-site from classpath and stores the URL
into static variable `hiveSiteURL`. This can cause problems if a
YuvalItzchakov edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812512544
@fsk119 I'm looking at
`org.apache.flink.table.planner.plan.stream.sql.CalcTest` and all I see is
basic tests there over table source, what do you think should be
YuvalItzchakov commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812512544
@fsk119 I'm looking at
`org.apache.flink.table.planner.plan.stream.sql.CalcTest` and all I see is
basic tests there over table source, what do you think should be tested
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17313853#comment-17313853
]
Rui Li commented on FLINK-22092:
Put more thoughts into this and I guess it's not a good idea to stop
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-803592550
## CI report:
* f4e94916e5c597341059d98bbff2b37d23cc4203 Azure:
YuvalItzchakov commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812509449
> > OK, I see what you're saying. Is there a reason though that the
`FlinkLogicalCalc` is being generated twice?
>
> In optimization, we alway build a new node
fsk119 commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812507579
>
> OK, I see what you're saying. Is there a reason though that the
`FlinkLogicalCalc` is being generated twice?
In optimization, we alway build a new node rather than
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-803592550
## CI report:
* f4e94916e5c597341059d98bbff2b37d23cc4203 Azure:
YuvalItzchakov commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812504803
> > @YuvalItzchakov . I think the added test is not enough to cover all.
> > I think you should also need to add end to end Tests in the
YuvalItzchakov edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812503994
> > @YuvalItzchakov . I think the added test is not enough to cover all.
> > I think you should also need to add end to end Tests in the
YuvalItzchakov commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812503994
> > @YuvalItzchakov . I think the added test is not enough to cover all.
> > I think you should also need to add end to end Tests in the
fsk119 commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812503759
> @YuvalItzchakov . I think the added test is not enough to cover all.
>
> I think you should also need to add end to end Tests in the
fsk119 commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812502909
> @fsk119 After the change, my partial predicate match no longer works:
>
> ```java
> @Test
> public void testPushdownAcrossWatermarkPartialPredicateMatch() {
fsk119 commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812502234
> @fsk119 Pushed the changes after your comments. Can you take a look?
Sure. I will take a look tomorrow.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
YuvalItzchakov edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812499504
@fsk119 After the change, my partial predicate match no longer works:
```java
@Test
public void
YuvalItzchakov commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812499504
@fsk119 After the change, my partial predicate match no longer works:
```java
@Test
public void testPushdownAcrossWatermarkPartialPredicateMatch() {
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15480:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15480#issuecomment-812378052
## CI report:
* 8c7eca17544f157b58f4100af3527e346a63bbcb Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15466#issuecomment-811978896
## CI report:
* f013abdc90d9b504720c1c94c1d847e144d38a7c Azure:
YuvalItzchakov commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812497261
@fsk119 Pushed the changes after your comments. Can you take a look?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
fsk119 edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812484309
> @fsk119 I'm confused with all the suggestions. Should I keep working off
this branch but have this as a logical rewrite instead? Are all the comments
you left above
fsk119 edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812492176
> > > @fsk119 I see you also added a test for partition pushdown, are those
related?
> >
> >
> > Not related. I just try to find why the change breaks the test.
fsk119 commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812492176
> > > @fsk119 I see you also added a test for partition pushdown, are those
related?
> >
> >
> > Not related. I just try to find why the change breaks the test.
> >
YuvalItzchakov edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812490603
> > @fsk119 I see you also added a test for partition pushdown, are those
related?
>
> Not related. I just try to find why the change breaks the test.
>
YuvalItzchakov commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812490603
> > @fsk119 I see you also added a test for partition pushdown, are those
related?
>
> Not related. I just try to find why the change breaks the test.
>
>
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15466#issuecomment-811978896
## CI report:
* f013abdc90d9b504720c1c94c1d847e144d38a7c Azure:
fsk119 commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812488407
> @fsk119 I see you also added a test for partition pushdown, are those
related?
Not related. I just try to find why the change breaks the test.
It will try to
zzfukai commented on pull request #15054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15054#issuecomment-812486880
Thank you Arvid! It works.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
YuvalItzchakov commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812485639
@fsk119 Awesome, OK. Fixes coming in a bit.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
fsk119 edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812484309
> @fsk119 I'm confused with all the suggestions. Should I keep working off
this branch but have this as a logical rewrite instead? Are all the comments
you left above
fsk119 edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812484309
> @fsk119 I'm confused with all the suggestions. Should I keep working off
this branch but have this as a logical rewrite instead? Are all the comments
you left above
fsk119 commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812484309
> @fsk119 I'm confused with all the suggestions. Should I keep working off
this branch but have this as a logical rewrite instead? Are all the comments
you left above still
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15479:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15479#issuecomment-812344008
## CI report:
* 93b9b3d8dac2c3ecd13e3e3ede46f4a73263e34d Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15477:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15477#issuecomment-812337208
## CI report:
* 68bacb55c3c718eddba8cf5596bf94c3e4931d40 Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15396:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15396#issuecomment-808861897
## CI report:
* 5e152ddd93611a57bf3659bd1c46967e46a9e4c2 Azure:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Huang Xingbo resolved FLINK-22083.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Python tests fail on azure
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Huang Xingbo resolved FLINK-22101.
--
Resolution: Fixed
This issue should have been addressed in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22083?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17313795#comment-17313795
]
Huang Xingbo commented on FLINK-22083:
--
This issue should have been addressed in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Huang Xingbo updated FLINK-22076:
-
Fix Version/s: 1.13.0
> Python Test failed with "OSError: [Errno 12] Cannot allocate memory"
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Huang Xingbo resolved FLINK-22076.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Merged into master via 000c69dcfb9632c152a45a7971bdef7e3ef0556e
> Python
HuangXingBo closed pull request #15481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15481
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
rkhachatryan commented on pull request #15466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15466#issuecomment-812478658
Thanks @gaoyunhaii , I think you are right, I'll update the test.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
YuvalItzchakov commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812478187
@fsk119 I see you also added a test for partition pushdown, are those
related?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Piotr Nowojski reassigned FLINK-20103:
--
Assignee: Piotr Nowojski (was: Roman Khachatryan)
> Improve test coverage for
YuvalItzchakov commented on a change in pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#discussion_r606178436
##
File path:
flink-table/flink-table-planner-blink/src/test/java/org/apache/flink/table/planner/factories/TestValuesTableFactory.java
##
@@
YuvalItzchakov commented on a change in pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#discussion_r606178294
##
File path:
YuvalItzchakov commented on a change in pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#discussion_r606177935
##
File path:
YuvalItzchakov edited a comment on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812471049
@fsk119 I'm confused with all the suggestions. Should I keep working off
this branch but have this as a logical rewrite instead? Are all the comments
you left
YuvalItzchakov commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812471049
@fsk119 I'm confused with all the suggestions. Should I keep working off
this branch but have this as a logical rewrite instead? Are all the comments
you left above
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17313779#comment-17313779
]
Zheng Hu commented on FLINK-21247:
--
I think this will need to get merged in flink 1.13.0, otherwise
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15280:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15280#issuecomment-802654466
## CI report:
* 3b4b5fcd9d8108b51e0bf62a0bee888b4fdb5186 UNKNOWN
* 621905dc52204133a9d610a2d0c9a5f1aeaafd53 Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15247:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15247#issuecomment-800773807
## CI report:
* a30faa8be8081f0037cd56e24396ad292fe49de7 Azure:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Piotr Nowojski updated FLINK-22088:
---
Affects Version/s: 1.13.0
1.12.2
> CheckpointCoordinator might not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-22088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Piotr Nowojski updated FLINK-22088:
---
Component/s: Runtime / Checkpointing
> CheckpointCoordinator might not be able to abort
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15482:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15482#issuecomment-812447703
## CI report:
* 2d9cd4f63f2e806f0a9a0466e4e6b6cbba02bd89 Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15425:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15425#issuecomment-809890369
## CI report:
* 1b248e49e4695b3ac7d21320a377fb74ff460687 Azure:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Metzger closed FLINK-21963.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved in
rmetzger closed pull request #15417:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15417
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
flinkbot commented on pull request #15482:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15482#issuecomment-812447703
## CI report:
* 2d9cd4f63f2e806f0a9a0466e4e6b6cbba02bd89 UNKNOWN
Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
- `@flinkbot
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15481#issuecomment-812435755
## CI report:
* e05738d21a61981ede35c8a3e6e6676f03d7d470 Azure:
flinkbot edited a comment on pull request #15425:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15425#issuecomment-809890369
## CI report:
* 1b248e49e4695b3ac7d21320a377fb74ff460687 Azure:
fsk119 commented on pull request #15307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15307#issuecomment-812446500
Please also rebase to the latest branch...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
rmetzger commented on pull request #15417:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15417#issuecomment-812446102
Thanks a lot for your review! I'll merge this change now with your comments
addressed!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
1 - 100 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
