[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764431#action_12764431
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1946:
---
+1 from me too. The patch needs some more w
+1
Mike
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering what our 3.0 release target date is? I think the outstanding
> issues are removal of the deprecated APIs and more Java 1.5 updates
> (especially adding generics to public APIs). Should we try to get it ou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Basem Narmok updated LUCENE-1966:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1966.patch
Robert, you are correct, to solve the problem we have two options:
+1. Adding generics internally should be left for later work. Especially
some big Eclipse/IDEA-related code refactoring (see other thread) as
proposed by Earwin and Timo Nentwig should be left for later code to get 3.0
out as early as posible.
For users, generification of public APIs should be rea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764449#action_12764449
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1966:
-
Basem, thanks. I like the new list.
I have one
Simon, so I don't forget, we also have a custom WordListLoader in
org.apache.lucene.analysis.nl that we can delete for 3.0 (it is deprecated)
For your question though, maybe one idea is to return HashSet/HashMap but
with a comment saying the return value will change to Set/Map in 3.1?
If the user
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Simon, so I don't forget, we also have a custom WordListLoader in
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.nl that we can delete for 3.0 (it is deprecated)
Saw that already -- thanks for pointing it out again
>
> For your question though, maybe one idea is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764456#action_12764456
]
Basem Narmok commented on LUCENE-1966:
--
Hi Robert,
Regarding ايضا / أيضا ...
No, no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764462#action_12764462
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1966:
-
Basem, I meant: there are two entries for أيضا
Hi Michael,
this patch leads to failures in contrib/queries. We should first also remove
the methods in DocIdSetIterator and make the new ones abstract. Because of
this we get no compile errors, instead UnsupportedOperationExceptions at
some places. When the deprecated methods are removed everywhe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764462#action_12764462
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-1966 at 10/11/09 8:10 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764465#action_12764465
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1966:
-
Basem I can simply remove 123 & 124 if this is
Repaired test in contrib and committed. The source of the problem is still
on the TODO list.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Sunday, October
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1946:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1946.patch
Here the patch with all contrib's fixed:
- PrecedenceQueryParser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764467#action_12764467
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1946:
-
{quote}
There is one question: I removed IsoLat
Waiting till 4 might not be a bad idea.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Oct 11, 2009, at 11:44 AM, "Robert Muir (JIRA)"
wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764472#action_12764472
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1946:
---
This is correct. But e.g. NumberTools and D
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764473#action_12764473
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1946:
-
Uwe, well this class already uses new tokenstre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764473#action_12764473
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-1946 at 10/11/09 8:56 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764474#action_12764474
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1946:
---
Cool idea. I move it to contrib/analyzers/c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764476#action_12764476
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1946:
-
bq. Cool idea. I move it to contrib/analyzers/c
Remove deprecated DocIdSetIterator methods
--
Key: LUCENE-1970
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1970
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Michael Busch
Thanks for the fix, Uwe! Removing the DocIdSetIterator methods is still
on my Todo list, I just opened LUCENE-1970.
Michael
On 10/11/09 8:06 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi Michael,
this patch leads to failures in contrib/queries. We should first also remove
the methods in DocIdSetIterator and m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1970:
--
Attachment: lucene-1970.patch
All core & contrib tests pass.
> Remove deprecated DocIdSetIter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764490#action_12764490
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1970:
---
looks good!
> Remove deprecated DocIdSetIt
Cool. So I guess we need a 3.0 release manager. Any volunteers? ;)
Michael
On 10/11/09 2:57 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
+1. Adding generics internally should be left for later work. Especially
some big Eclipse/IDEA-related code refactoring (see other thread) as
proposed by Earwin and Timo Nentwig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764491#action_12764491
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1970:
---
Thanks for reviewing! I'll commit soon...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-1970.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 824111.
> Remove deprecated DocIdSetIterator methods
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764493#action_12764493
]
Basem Narmok commented on LUCENE-1966:
--
Oh, my mistake, sorry, yes please remove the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1946:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1946.patch
Patch with ISOLatin1Filter deprecated with a hint to 4.0 and add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764495#action_12764495
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1966:
-
Basem, ok! Thanks a lot for your help here. I w
As Mark was the one for 2.9 and I am the only new core committer, I will be
the next one... :-)
I only need a certificate and key to sign the artifacts. Maybe we can do a
meeting in Oakland for a face-to-face meeting!
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetap
Awesome, thanks Uwe!
There should be a key signing session at the ApacheCon.
Michael
On 10/11/09 10:26 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
As Mark was the one for 2.9 and I am the only new core committer, I will be
the next one... :-)
I only need a certificate and key to sign the artifacts. Maybe we ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1946.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 824116
> Remove deprecated TokenStream API
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1753.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
Committed revision: 824116
> Make not yet f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764501#action_12764501
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1966:
-
before I commit this, I want to solicit any com
Remove deprecated RangeQuery classes
Key: LUCENE-1971
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1971
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
Assigne
Remove (deprecated) ExtendedFieldCache and Auto/Custom caches and sort
--
Key: LUCENE-1972
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1972
Project: Lucene - Java
Issu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1971:
--
Component/s: Search
> Remove deprecated RangeQuery classes
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1971:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1971.patch
Patch.
Will commit when tests passed.
> Remove deprecated Rang
Remove deprecated query components
--
Key: LUCENE-1973
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: Search
Reporter: Uwe Schi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1932.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Uwe Schindler (was: Adriano Crestani)
I have done this du
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764512#action_12764512
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
Sorry, I forgot this one, will check tomorr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1971.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 824175
> Remove deprecated RangeQuery classes
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764515#action_12764515
]
Basem Narmok commented on LUCENE-1966:
--
Seems good.
BTW with FAST ESP we never used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1756:
Attachment: LUCENE-1756.patch
improved unit test for this analyzer
> contrib/memory: PatternAnaly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764518#action_12764518
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1756:
-
I think this test was complex because it was tr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764519#action_12764519
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1966:
-
Basem, yes I think the improvements are good.
Hi, all:
I came up to a very confused problem about BooleanQuery , maybe I can
describe it use the output of my code:
query: (name:tang*)
doc=5137 score=1.0 doc:Document>
doc=11377 score=1.0 doc:Document>
query: name:tang* name:notexistnames
doc=5137 score=0.048133932 doc:Document>
It is tw
BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition
--
Key: LUCENE-1974
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
tangfulin updated LUCENE-1974:
--
Attachment: BooleanQueryTest.java
> BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764531#action_12764531
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
Okay, after all that poking around in the dark,
Hi guys:
The new FieldComparator api looks really scary :)
But after some perf testing with numbers I'd like to share, I guess it
is worth it:
HW: Mac Pro with 16G memory
jvm: 1.6.0_13"
jvm arg: -Xms1g -Xmx1g -server
setup
index:
1M docs even split into 8 segments (to make sure the test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764563#action_12764563
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
I created an index with some compressed bin
54 matches
Mail list logo
