On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 03:30:23PM -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Christopher Smith wrote:
> > Ooops. Sorry for being confusing. I mean that MS has treated
> > Transvirtual quite nicely while Sun appears to have shunned
> > Transvirtual.
>
> Interesting observation. I'm not sure I'd expect or want
Christopher Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 08:48:13AM -0700, Larry Sanderson wrote:
> > > with their own proprietary extensions. Despite the evil that MS
> > > represents I have to say that they've treated Transvirtual MUCH better
> > > than Sun.
> >
> > Do you mean Microsoft treated Tran
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 08:48:13AM -0700, Larry Sanderson wrote:
> > with their own proprietary extensions. Despite the evil that MS
> > represents I have to say that they've treated Transvirtual MUCH better
> > than Sun.
>
> Do you mean Microsoft treated Transvirtual better than Microsoft treate
See below...
> I have to say, I'm impressed with he power of the rumour
> mill. Microsoft didn't buy out Transvirtual, they merely payed for the
> development of some elements of the KaffeVM which made it compatible
> with their own proprietary extensions. Despite the evil that MS
> represents I
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 06:52:16PM -0400, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> > The current implementation is almost 1.1-complaint and has parts of 1.2.
> > The Java spec is huge, of course, and getting the rest of the way to
> > a full implementation isn't a quick job. But, as far as I can tell,
> > Kaffe
I played again with Suse6.4:
java -classic
works (of course then without hotspot).
It seems that the VM dies after reading (or trying to read) .hotspotrc.
Creating an empty File makes no difference.
But I can't imagine what this file should contain.
Anything (for example blabla) entered ther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 06, Peter Pilgrim wrote:
>
> > > > What glibc version do you need? Does it work with SuSE6.4 Linux for example?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > >
> > > I was unable to use jdk 1.3 with Suse 6.4
> > >
> > > Segmentation fault
> > >
> > > This is the answer :)
On Tue, 6 Jun 2000, Rob Saul wrote:
> Oktay Akbal wrote:
> >
> > I would like to know if it works on rh6.2.
>
> So far it works just fine on my rh6.2 system.
That means the segfault on SuSe6.4 is not just the glibc-Version.
I claim to remember that both are using 2.1.3.
Strange.
Oktay Akba
Oktay Akbal wrote:
>
> I would like to know if it works on rh6.2.
So far it works just fine on my rh6.2 system.
--
Rob Saul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Tue, Jun 06, Peter Pilgrim wrote:
> > > What glibc version do you need? Does it work with SuSE6.4 Linux for example?
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > I was unable to use jdk 1.3 with Suse 6.4
> >
> > Segmentation fault
> >
> > This is the answer :)
> >
>
> What kind of segmentation fault?
> I c
> >
> > What do you mean: Which kind of segmentation fault ?
> > strace: --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
> >
> > I would like to know if it works on rh6.2.
>
> I guess one of us will have to sock it and see.
> Try both IBM's and Sun. In my dreams I can see Blackdowns 1.3
> floating in the
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 01:10:25PM +0200, Oktay Akbal wrote:
>
> > What kind of segmentation fault?
> > I could not find no information what glibc version is required
> > on the Sun web pages?
>
> They say 2.1 or higher the rpm states 2.1.2.
>
> What do you mean: Which kind of segmentation fau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > What kind of segmentation fault?
> > I could not find no information what glibc version is required
> > on the Sun web pages?
>
> They say 2.1 or higher the rpm states 2.1.2.
>
> What do you mean: Which kind of segmentation fault ?
> strace: --- SIGSEGV (Segmentat
> What kind of segmentation fault?
> I could not find no information what glibc version is required
> on the Sun web pages?
They say 2.1 or higher the rpm states 2.1.2.
What do you mean: Which kind of segmentation fault ?
strace: --- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) ---
I would like to know if it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:20:44PM +0100, Peter Pilgrim wrote:
> > >
> > > What glibc version do you need? Does it work with SuSE6.4 Linux for example?
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > I was unable to use jdk 1.3 with Suse 6.4
> >
> > Segm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:20:44PM +0100, Peter Pilgrim wrote:
> >
> > What glibc version do you need? Does it work with SuSE6.4 Linux for example?
> >
> > --
>
> I was unable to use jdk 1.3 with Suse 6.4
>
> Segmentation fault
>
> This is the answer :)
>
W
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 10:49:35AM -0700, Nelson Minar wrote:
> > What would be *really* great is if there were an open source Java
> > implementation that we could all contribute to and avoid all these
> > politics. My impression is the Java design is stable enough that
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 10:49:35AM -0700, Nelson Minar wrote:
> What would be *really* great is if there were an open source Java
> implementation that we could all contribute to and avoid all these
> politics. My impression is the Java design is stable enough that this
> is reasonable to do, but
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Nelson Minar wrote:
> What would be *really* great is if there were an open source Java
> implementation that we could all contribute to and avoid all these
> politics. My impression is the Java design is stable enough that this
What's wrong with kaffe?
gcj + classpath?
(
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 03:20:44PM +0100, Peter Pilgrim wrote:
>
> What glibc version do you need? Does it work with SuSE6.4 Linux for example?
>
> --
I was unable to use jdk 1.3 with Suse 6.4
Segmentation fault
This is the answer :)
Great news about Sun's release. Anyone know more about its
disposition? Was it done inside Sun, or by Inprise, or Blackdown
people?
>I'm not sure that this is a good thing; who will us mere programmers
>determine which sdk is more stable and faster under linux?
The marketplace will decide that s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> A Beta is available at
>
> http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/j2sdk13/download-linux.html
What glibc version do you need? Does it work with SuSE6.4 Linux for example?
--
mfg
Peter
=
Whose port is it? I looked at Blackdown and they don't have it.
Jacob Nikom
Peter Schuller wrote:
>
> A Beta is available at
>
> http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/j2sdk13/download-linux.html
>
> --
> / Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
>
> PGP userID: 0x5584BD98 or '
> I'm not sure that this is a good thing; who will us mere programmers determine
> which sdk is more stable and faster under linux?
Well I sure know it's a good thing; we finally have a JVM with a generational and
incremental garbage collector in Linux.
IBM's JDK 1.3 was fast in terms of raw exe
What does this mean with regards to Blackdown's effort for a JDK 1.3 on
Linux? Will Blackdown still port JDK 1.3 to Linux x86, or will the
effort be on non-x86 Linux platforms?
Peter Schuller wrote:
>
> A Beta is available at
>
> http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/j2sdk13/down
The race is on.
I'm not sure that this is a good thing; who will us mere programmers determine
which sdk is more stable and faster under linux?
I've already been told by Togethersoft that they won't support 1.3 - it (the IBM
version) is causing problems with their newest product. Well, when a de
A Beta is available at
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/j2sdk13/download-linux.html
--
/ Peter Schuller, InfiDyne Technologies HB
PGP userID: 0x5584BD98 or 'Peter Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
Key retrival: Send an E-Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: h
27 matches
Mail list logo
