> Nash'at Ahmad writes:
Nash'at> What does this error mean and how can I get rid of it?
Nash'at> [vonkarman]/home/nashat/jdbc> java Client
Nash'at> Looking up: rmi://149.8.95.60:2001/Server
Nash'at> /usr/local/blackdown_jdk1.2/jre/lib/rt.jar: Bad file descriptor
Nash'at>
1. Where to obtain JDK 1.2 for Linux?
http://www.blackdown.org/
2. Go to "Download the JDK for Linux" link
3. Find appropriate ftp site
3. Go to the JDK1.2/i386/pre-v2/glibc2.1 directory
4. Middle click on jdk1.2pre-v2-debug.tar.bz2 file
5. Menu opens - download the file
6. Unzip the file with b
first bunzip2
then tar xvv
tarfile
-Original
Message-·¢¼þÈË:
Pramila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ÊÕ¼þÈË:
java-linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>ÈÕÆÚ:
2000Äê1ÔÂ4ÈÕ
22:21Ö÷Ìâ: JDK1.2 installation on
Linux...
Hi! ,
I just downloaded the
file jdk
d W. Rouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 27, 1999 5:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: jdk1.2
I thought the readme for blackdown 1.2 specified glibc2.1.2 and specifically
said not to use 2.1.2?
Ed.
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> me wrote:
> >
&
I thought the readme for blackdown 1.2 specified glibc2.1.2 and specifically
said not to use 2.1.2?
Ed.
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> me wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've downloaded jdk1.2, and installed it, but when I tried to run it
> > says "can't find libjava.so". I'm using Mandrake 6.5 and glibc 2.
me wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've downloaded jdk1.2, and installed it, but when I tried to run it
> says "can't find libjava.so". I'm using Mandrake 6.5 and glibc 2.1.1.
> Where can I get this libjava.so library? Thanks.
It's in the JDK. Usually this error means a mismatch with the glibc
version. Did
t problems are you seeing?
Nathan
>
> --michael
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: nathanm [mailto:nathanm]On Behalf Of Nathan Meyers
>> Sent: Sunday, October 31, 1999 2:01 PM
>> To: Michael Moores (@synthsoft)
>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
To: Michael Moores (@synthsoft)
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: jdk1.2 working with glibc2.1.2
>
>
> "Michael Moores (@synthsoft)" wrote:
> >
> > i just upgraded to redhat6.1 and slackware7.0 which
> > bring glibc up to 2.1.2.
> >
>
"Michael Moores (@synthsoft)" wrote:
>
> i just upgraded to redhat6.1 and slackware7.0 which
> bring glibc up to 2.1.2.
>
> does blackdown have a version for the new glibc2.1.2?
> damn version troubles.
> if not, then when??
I'm using JDK1.2 successfully with RH6.1... the same glibc2.1 JDK that
On 16-Sep-99 Surjan Singh wrote:
> You need to get the dingbats font from the link on blackdown. I think
> it points to the GIMP fonts page. No need to change font.properties.
I installed the dingbat fonts, but I got segfaults anyway. Seems that it is
working only when it complains about missi
You need to get the dingbats font from the link on blackdown. I think
it points to the GIMP fonts page. No need to change font.properties.
By the way (you may know already), but the problem I had was because I
was using 24bits. JDK1.2pre-v2 works fine in 16bit.
Kontorotsui wrote:
>
> On 15-Se
On 15-Sep-99 Surjan Singh wrote:
> Console based programs seem to work fine. Swing & AWT programs
> seg-fault. Any ideas? The error I get is:
>
>
> SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
> stackpointer=0x41812b80
I had the same troubles after installing the accursed dingbats fonts!
Wh
Thanks many, many, many times! I've been trying to figure this one out
for days.
By the way, how did you know that 24bit is a problem? I've searched
nearly 100% of all docs/faqs/newsgroups and found nothing.
Calvin Austin wrote:
>
> 24bit? Thats a known issue that isn't completely fixed yet
>
"½ÅÇöÀÏ" wrote:
>
> HI..
> I'm a Korean student..
> I installed JDK1.2 on linux..
> run java classfile
> then I meet "Warning JIT compiler "symcjit" not found. Will use
> interpreter" message.
> but 'root' don't meet this message.
> normal users meet this message.
> any idea?
Seems to be
Tom Whitcomb wrote:
>
> Well, just after a few trials and tribs I got the JDK1.2 to run with X under
> RH6.0. I had to do the following:
>
> 1) create symbolic link for libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2 from
> libstdc++-libc6.1-1.s0.2
> 2) LD_PRELOAD=libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2;export LD_PRELOAD
You need
Sergio Antoy wrote:
>
> Juergen thanks for following up on this:
>
> > > Sergio Antoy writes:
> >
> > Sergio> Here is a trace of what happens on my machine
> >
> > Sergio> gray:/tmp[501] export PATH=/home/antoy/java2/jdk1.2/bin:$PATH
> > Sergio> gray:/tmp[502] export LD_LIBRA
Juergen thanks for following up on this:
> > Sergio Antoy writes:
>
> Sergio> Here is a trace of what happens on my machine
>
> Sergio> gray:/tmp[501] export PATH=/home/antoy/java2/jdk1.2/bin:$PATH
> Sergio> gray:/tmp[502] export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> Sergio Antoy wrote:
> >
> > You write:
> >
> > > I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44) loaded on
> > > 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2 (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this
> > > Linux machine. When I execute any JAVA commands (java,javac etc) it is
> > >
> Sergio Antoy writes:
Sergio> Here is a trace of what happens on my machine
Sergio> gray:/tmp[501] export PATH=/home/antoy/java2/jdk1.2/bin:$PATH
Sergio> gray:/tmp[502] export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Sergio> gray:/tmp[503] ls -lt /usr/lib/libc.so.6
Juergen, thanks for the suggestion:
Juergen> > Nagaraj S B writes:
Juergen>
Juergen> Nagaraj> I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44)
Juergen> Nagaraj> loaded on 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2
Juergen> Nagaraj> (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this Linux machine.
> Nagaraj S B writes:
Nagaraj> I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44)
Nagaraj> loaded on 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2
Nagaraj> (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this Linux machine.
The JDK 1.2 requires glibc 2.x.
Nagaraj> /nagaraj/jdk1.2/jre/bin/realpath :
Nathan writes:
>
> Sergio Antoy wrote:
> >
> > You write:
> >
> > > I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44) loaded on
> > > 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2 (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this
> > > Linux machine. When I execute any JAVA commands (java,javac etc) it is
> > > givi
Sergio Antoy wrote:
>
> You write:
>
> > I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44) loaded on
> > 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2 (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this
> > Linux machine. When I execute any JAVA commands (java,javac etc) it is
> > giving following error : for 'java' :
You write:
> I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44) loaded on
> 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2 (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this
> Linux machine. When I execute any JAVA commands (java,javac etc) it is
> giving following error : for 'java' :
>
On 15-Jun-99 Vlad Beffa wrote:
> I see libhpi.so in both /usr/local/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/green_threads and
> .../native_threads, and libjava.so in /usr/local/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/. Is
> there something else I need to do? I have jdk1.1.7 installed as well, and
> I think the system has glibc on it.
>
I think I had this problems too when I've installed my java
I found some errors in .java_wrapper
try to corect them.
On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Stefan Proels wrote:
>
> > I had a couple of questions about installing the jdk1.2 (pre-v2) on i386.
> > First, what is the .diffs file for and ho
> I had a couple of questions about installing the jdk1.2 (pre-v2) on i386.
> First, what is the .diffs file for and how do I use it if I need it? (Is
> this what the patch-o-matic script is for? How do I run the script?).
The .diffs file contains the changes made to Sun's code. You don't
need
you don't read any mail from this list ?
set your DEFAULT_THREADS_FLAG=green
in your .java_wrapper
it seems that RH6.0 doesn't support native_threads
On Mon, 31 May 1999, Edmund Mergl US/EA4 60/2/146 #44006 wrote:
>
> a fresh install of jdk1.2 on a RedHat 6.0 system gives the follwing
Thanks -- I guess I'll poke around some more. Or maybe
try another download from a different i386 mirror.
- Glenn
--- Emilian URSU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't tell you what the error is, yet
> but on my system the compile was ok.
> I put it at www.lspvs.sorosis.ro/~emilian
>
_
I can't tell you what the error is, yet
but on my system the compile was ok.
I put it at
www.lspvs.sorosis.ro/~emilian
On Sun, 23 May 1999, Glenn Wiens wrote:
> The following code compiles with only a "deprecated"
> warning under jdk1.2 for Windows98:
>
> #
> Could someone please tell me how to create the libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2
> link? I need it because java 1.2 fails with an error message for this
> specific library.
> I am a bit confused because neither ldconfig nor a file system search
> for this shows me a file like "libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2" o
I have JDK1.2 for WinNT (work) and Blackdown's port (Linux) working
with NetBeans on both machines. I also have Simplicity working on
both machines. Although Simplicity (at least my version) is just a demo
and won't let you save files.
NetBeans installed right from the download on both machine
On Thu, 13 May 1999, ALLEON Guillaume wrote:
> "Alexander V. Konstantinou" wrote:
>
> > I have not tried it, but if I recall correctly from the conversations
> > I read, JDK1.2 pre1 will work with glibc2.1 if you turn the JIT off
> > and select green threads.
> /usr/local/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/lib
> Andreas Windt writes:
Andreas> That's the point when the uncanny things begin to
Andreas> appear: the window disappears and java throws the
Andreas> following:
Andreas> SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
Andreas>stackpointer=0xbf1ff3f4
Hello Juergen
> Try to use a different color depth, e.g. 'startx -- -bpp 32'. Does
> it work then?
Hum, unfortunately it doesn't work (I'm in 24 bpp by default and I
already tried the values above and below, 32, 16, 8 ...).
... but thank you!! -=<[Trotzdem Danke ;-) ]>=-
> --
"Alexander V. Konstantinou" wrote:
> I have not tried it, but if I recall correctly from the conversations
> I read, JDK1.2 pre1 will work with glibc2.1 if you turn the JIT off
> and select green threads.
>
> Alexander
>
That is what I was thinking but then I get this with one of my applicatio
Hi,
i have the same problem too.
After asking to people in the list i can say that we have to write that some
holy people recompile jdk12 with glibc 2.x. At the moment only jdk117v2
works on rh6.
Bye
- Original Message -
From: ALLEON Guillaume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 12 May 1999 14:46:23 +, Armen Yampolsky wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>Riyad Kalla wrote:
>
>> I just commented out those zaph dingbats lines.. or you can download the
>> correpsonding fonts and install them as outline in Blackdown's solution to that
>> problem. I personally haven't noticed
Hi everyone,
Riyad Kalla wrote:
> I just commented out those zaph dingbats lines.. or you can download the
> correpsonding fonts and install them as outline in Blackdown's solution to that
> problem. I personally haven't noticed ANYTHING wrong with just commented them out.
I don't need to comme
Armen,
I had a similar problem. After handling all of the
"know bugs", Swing applications would fail but
awt was ok. It was suggested to me that the configuration
of my Xserver may be a problem. The suggestion was to
move to 16 bit color (not 24 or 32) on the XFree86. It was also
pointed out th
Thanks to everyone for the tip -- indeed, it was a color depth problem. In fact,
I did have it at 16bpp in my XF86Config file, but when I changed it to 15 all the
exceptions went away!
On another note, I mucked around a bit with the fonts.properties -- basically
changing the zapf dingbats lines t
Hi,
Ozer Irfan wrote:
> Hello
> Include jdk1.2 the swing libraries ?
> If no where can I download it ?
>
> I have compilation error :
>
> for example : JFrame not found
>
> I do
>
> import com.sun.java.swing.*;
I think you should do:
import javax.swing.*;
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Irfan
>
> --
Ozer Irfan wrote:
>
> Hello
> Include jdk1.2 the swing libraries ?
> If no where can I download it ?
>
> I have compilation error :
>
> for example : JFrame not found
>
> I do
>
> import com.sun.java.swing.*;
>
> Thanks
>
> Irfan
>
>
Hasan Mahmood wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> I am facing a problem with jdk1.2. It seems that jdk runs just fine
> remotely in X, but on the console it crashes with the following messages:
>
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.Error: can't load
> javax.swing.plaf.metal.MetalLookAndFeel
>
Sounds like y
howeee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just ran across something from jdk1.2 concerning
> InetAddress.getLocalHost()
>
> This is always returning 127.0.0.1. I looked at the bug reports from
> previous jdk releases and it appears that this was a bug and was corrected,
> but it appears to have "cropped up" ag
You need to add swingall.jar to your classpath. After doing that double
check to see that it can find the class by running.
javap javax.swing.Jpanel
You should see the public API printed to the screen.
later
mo
On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Hasan Mahmood wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I downloaded the new previe
I believe your using the link command incorrectly. I could be wrong in
regards to Linux usage, but I believe the proper way would be;
ln {args} source target
the "->" shouldn't be there. And you can link file to file, so I'd have to
look at this in Linux myself. But I'd try it w/out
> I'm using Red Hat 5.2 with kernel 2.0.36-1
>
> Where can i find the kernel 2.0.37 (what is the problem if i use jdk1.2
> with kernel 2.0.36).
http://www.kernel.org should help.
Oliver
___
Oliver Fels| e-mail:
Neurot
On Fri, 26 Mar 1999 23:16:47 +0100, DESROC Christian wrote:
>I'm using Red Hat 5.2 with kernel 2.0.36-1
>
>Where can i find the kernel 2.0.37 (what is the problem if i use jdk1.2
>with kernel 2.0.36).
Well, the versions before 2.0.37pre9 have some multicast socket problems.
This generally will
> Michel Ruff suggested I run the Visigenic OSAgent through Wine; that
> sounds interesting, but I think I don't like having to depend on such a
> hack because a vendor didn't want to provide something that is not Win*
> specific. That said, Bryce McKinlay says that I don't need to run
Visigenic
http://www.fr.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/alan/2.0.37pre/2.0.37/
At 11:16 PM 3/26/99 +0100, you wrote:
>I'm using Red Hat 5.2 with kernel 2.0.36-1
>
>Where can i find the kernel 2.0.37 (what is the problem if i use jdk1.2
>with kernel 2.0.36).
>
>Excuse me english (i'm frensh).
>
>
>
>-
Hey, I am learning a lot thank to you guys!
Michel Ruff suggested I run the Visigenic OSAgent through Wine; that
sounds interesting, but I think I don't like having to depend on such a
hack because a vendor didn't want to provide something that is not Win*
specific. That said, Bryce McKinlay says
Actually, you do not need to be running the osagent for Visibroker to work - the
osagent simply supports Visibroker's proprietry object location/binding
mechanism. As long as you stick to the CORBA-standard (and interoperable)
IOR/nameservice-based object binding, the osagent is not required.
Inc
Hi
> ...
> with the bind() methods, I think). Anyway, I decided not to use
> Visibroker because (if I am not mistaken) you need to use their
> OS agent
> (a Win* exe file).
The osagent runs very fine under Linux, if you use the 'wine' Windows
emulator.
http://www.winehq.com/download.html (ju
Michael Nielsen wrote:
> There is a strange problem, which I don't know if it is a problem
> with the Linux port of jdk1.2 or a problem in general with the
> org.omg classes.
>
> The IOR's generated from the JDK1.2 default java implementation
> seem to be deriving their localhost name from the fi
I must say that I found all the messages in response to my question
quite interesting. Thanks a lot! After I sent my original mail I tried
several things and none has yet quite worked (but I haven't finished my
last set of experiments :-). One thing, though: so much for
standards! In the book `Cli
> I have one question: I know JDK1.2 adds support for CORBA, and Sun
> distributes its own Java CORBA implementation. However (as always!), it
> distributes it for Solaris and Windows (ugh!). The Java classes are no
and the implementation is far from beeing standard and complete...
i am using jac
ORBacus works great with both JDK1.1 and 1.2. The major problem with
using it on JDK1.2 is the CORBA classes from Sun fit the OMG CORBA 2.2
standard which introduced the POA. ORBacus 3.x.x uses the CORBA 2.0
standard and the BOA.
To use ORBacus with JDK1.2, you can either set some parameters on
I'm not having a problem, really. The situation is that the output of
idltojava compiler of CDK-A doesn't compile with CORBA classes of
CDK-B (Corba Development Kit, that is =). Only runtime object
instances are interoperable; not their source.
*.java files generated by IDL compiled with JDK's
> Conversely, jidl (Orbacus' IDL compiler for Java) compiled class files
> won't run with the JDK runtime.
What's the problem exactly? Did you try setting the primary bootclasspath to the
ORBacus classes? (Personnaly, I do not have any
experience on Linux, but with earlier versions of Visibroker
I downloaded the Solaris version from Sun and installed the .class file
(InstallShield) from Linux Java 2, it failed at the end while trying to
install some java extension libraries. Another nameserv I already had
working wouldn't work anymore after that. I had to reinstall Java 2.
If you do get
In case anyone's keeping track, I'm sending my thanks for the Java2
port. =) You guys are way cool
We're using CORBA as distributed with Java2, and it's working
perfectly. We have a rather large application using Swing (JFC),
CORBA, JDBC, and multi-threading, and we're running servers (servan
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, David Thompson wrote:
>
> Urban
>
> I am not using these flags. However, I am setting
> the environment variable THREADS_FLAG to "green".
>
Right. And according to the README.linux (you did read it didn't you? ;)
you need to add a '-Djava.compiler=' when using green threa
Urban
I am not using these flags. However, I am setting
the environment variable THREADS_FLAG to "green".
dt
_
David R.Thompson
Los Alamos National Laboratory
TSA 5
wk.ph:505.665.5572
email: [E
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999, David Thompson wrote:
>
> colleagues,
>
> When starting my GUI based programs they
> flash the window on the screen, then the
> window disappears and exits. There is
> no error message, the GUI thread just
> seems to die. I have made a simple program
Are you running gree
colleagues,
When starting my GUI based programs they
flash the window on the screen, then the
window disappears and exits. There is
no error message, the GUI thread just
seems to die. I have made a simple program
(in case the problem is something complex with my
other programs) that just make
At 16:48 11/03/99 -0800, Gabriel Montenegro wrote:
>in case you're interested, we tested (briefly) the jdk1.2-pre-v1
>release on the following platform:
>
> redhat 5.2
> linux kernel 2.2.3
>
>In order to get it to work we had to add the following symbolic link:
>
> cd /usr/lib
>
Hi !
see : http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/download-docs.html
Thierry.
--
Kormann Thierry
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.inria.fr/koala/thierry/
Koala/Dyade/Bull @ INRIA - Sophia Antipolis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
> On Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:36:01 -, James D. Carr wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >the class and source files (like I assume a lot of people do). My main
> >problem is a slow and sometimes unstable link to the Internet, so
> >downloading a 24MB file might take several attempts.
>
I think u need to
Hi, Jeff, did you use
"java -green -Djava.compiler=xxx" ? What is the "XXX"?
I use "java -green" and it seems to work, but when it
comes to Swing application, it still fails with
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError:
/usr/
"James D. Carr" wrote:
> I already have all
> the class and source files (like I assume a lot of people do). My
Do you mean you have the Java 2 class and source files? Classes from
earlier versions probably won't work quite the same, since some packages
were renamed (com.sun.java.swing to javax.s
I had the same problem - use 'java -green -Djava.compiler= ' (green
threads VM, no JIT) until this is resolved. It works quite well on my
system (linux 2.2.1, glibc 2.1). The reason is that there is a problem
with native threads together with glibc 2.1.
"David A. Guthrie" wrote:
>
> You don't n
On Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:36:01 -, James D. Carr wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Would it be possible to release a version of the JDK1.2 port without all the
>files which are common to the Windows (or Sparc) release. I already have all
>the class and source files (like I assume a lot of people do). My main
>prob
> James D Carr writes:
James> Hi, Would it be possible to release a version of the JDK1.2
James> port without all the files which are common to the Windows
James> (or Sparc) release. I already have all the class and source
James> files (like I assume a lot of people do). My ma
> inkle c writes:
inkle> I am having linux2.2.3, egcs1.1.1 on my x86 together with JDK1.2-pre1,
inkle> any java command I execute, there is always same error:
inkle> ===
inkle> *** panic: GC: getStickySystemClass failed: java/l
You don't need to put the jdk source jars in your classpath in 1.2.
inkle c wrote:
> I am having linux2.2.3, egcs1.1.1 on my x86 together with JDK1.2-pre1,
> any java command I execute, there is always same error:
>
> ===
>
> *** panic: GC: getStick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anand Palaniswamy) writes:
> It is possible to unmap memory and return it to the OS on Linux. I am
> sure Emacs does that. The classic VM garbage collector can not do
> that. It wants to keep the memory mapped (so it can always be sure
> that the heap is contiguous -- unmmap
Anand Palaniswamy writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph H. Buehler) writes:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anand Palaniswamy) writes:
> >
> > > Another bad side effect of this limitation is that the famous "return
> > > memory to OS" bug can not be implemented on Linux (ie, there is no
> > > heap
Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
>
> Peter Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > The reason for this is that the default -Xmx value is 64MB.
> >
> > But that's the *maximum* heap size; why does JDK 2.0 consume, in one
> > particular case, 50 megs of RAM when JDK 1.1 consumed 15 megs, just
> > bec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph H. Buehler) writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anand Palaniswamy) writes:
>
> > Another bad side effect of this limitation is that the famous "return
> > memory to OS" bug can not be implemented on Linux (ie, there is no
> > heap "shrinking").
>
> Are you sure about that? I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anand Palaniswamy) writes:
> Another bad side effect of this limitation is that the famous "return
> memory to OS" bug can not be implemented on Linux (ie, there is no
> heap "shrinking").
Are you sure about that? I use GNU emacs a lot and just tried an
experiment on a machin
Peter Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The reason for this is that the default -Xmx value is 64MB.
>
> But that's the *maximum* heap size; why does JDK 2.0 consume, in one
> particular case, 50 megs of RAM when JDK 1.1 consumed 15 megs, just
> because the *maximum* heap size is higher?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> The reason for this is that the default -Xmx value is 64MB.
But that's the *maximum* heap size; why does JDK 2.0 consume, in one particular
case, 50 megs of RAM when JDK 1.1 consumed 15 megs, just because the *maximum*
heap size is higher? Does th
The reason for this is that the default -Xmx value is 64MB. On Linux
you can not treat
(1) reserving part your addresss space and
(2) comitting swap to it
as two different ops. You get both at one shot. (This is my
understanding, I could be wrong, please correct me if you are better
inform
> Are there any efforts? Whom can I contact?
Aarg! One more of these and I'm going to crack! This is not
funny anymore, these people are turning the list into a spamming exercise.
(Not that I'm helping by relying, but I just had to...)
*sigh*
-- jaco greeff
The Internet Solutio
At 12:07 AM +0100 2/8/99, Logi Ragnarsson wrote:
>in the short term all I really need is the collections API.
There is a version for java 1.1:
http://www.javasoft.com/beans/infobus/index.html#COLLECTIONS
Cheers,
Paul
Logi Ragnarsson wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm one of those eagerly awaiting the arrival of jdk1.2 for linux, but
> in the short term all I really need is the collections API. (I'm going
> to write abstract algebra/group theory classes and subclassing Set
> seems like a good idea.) Does anyone know if i
You can use the collections API in JDK1.1. Just download the binary .jar
files that sun has up on the java beans website. If you can not find it
I can email you the copy I have.
Mo DeJong
dejong at cs.umn.edu
On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Logi Ragnarsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm one of those eagerly awaitin
No idea, when you have, please tell me
-Mensagem original-
De: Sylvain Brökling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Data: Terça-feira, 19 de Janeiro de 1999 12:08
Assunto: JDK1.2
>Hi there,
>
>any idea when JDK1.2 for Linux on Intel platform will be available?
On 13-Jan-99 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Don't ask ???
>
> Why? Don't you think it is a relevant question to
> ask for JDK1.2 for Linux on this mailing list ???
>
Yes, the question is in topic, but it's a FAQ. Since there is FAQ, every
user is supposed to read it before asking.
---
Andrea "Kon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Don't ask ???
>
> Why? Don't you think it is a relevant question to
> ask for JDK1.2 for Linux on this mailing list ???
>
> /Dan
It seems that everyone who has joined this list for the past several
weeks has, without bothering to check the list archives, asked the
Don't ask ???
Why? Don't you think it is a relevant question to
ask for JDK1.2 for Linux on this mailing list ???
/Dan
>DAMMIT!!! Why don't we just make a join message that says
>"The damn JDK1.2 (Java 2) isn't. Don't ask."
>
>
>
>
>--
DAMMIT!!! Why don't we just make a join message that says
"The damn JDK1.2 (Java 2) isn't. Don't ask."
-
On Tue, 12 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Just wondering about the status of JDK1.2 (a.k.a
I recently tried to create a C app that created a JVM, started a simple
Java class, and passed messages from C (or C++) to Java. After running
successfully on NT, I noticed that it core dumped when it was created from
within another C executable on Solaris. When I used Purify on it, EVERY call
t
Is there any way we can send you some code so that you can test it out
in the 1.2 release? I have some native threads + JNI code that works under
Solaris and Windows JDK but breaks with the 1.1.7 Native threads release.
I know for a fact that the code is correct but there is some kind of
problem w
Trevor Harmon writes:
> Gabe Hamilton wrote:
>
> > If you need people to test jdk 1.2, I would be happy to help out.
>
> Me too... It would be great if the Blackdown team could put out a
> pre-release of 1.2, since their web page claims that the port is at
> least "running". Anyone know i
Gabe Hamilton wrote:
> If you need people to test jdk 1.2, I would be happy to help out.
Me too... It would be great if the Blackdown team could put out a
pre-release of 1.2, since their web page claims that the port is at
least "running". Anyone know if this is a possibility?
The page also say
A month from???
When was this written?
>From faq:
JDK 1.2
The system is running on x86 and PowerPC, with ports underway to
SparcLinux and some other processors. Currently it's native threads
only.
Before we can release, we have to make sure that it passes the tests in
the
Java Compatibility Ki
f you've gone long enough without
> seeing it. Talk to you later.
>
>
> -Andy
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: John Summerfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 1999 6:23 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Cc:
esday, January 06, 1999 6:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Java-Linux Mailing List
> Subject: RE: Jdk1.2 status ???
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Harold G. Andrews II wrote:
>
> > Check out
> >
> > http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/ports.html#jdk1.2
> &g
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
