For anyone interested: j-Interop implements DCOM wire protocol (MSRPC) to enable development of Pure Bi-Directional, Non-Native Java applications which can interoperate with any COM component.The implementation itself is purely in Java and does not use JNI to provide native access,thus being truly
/showfiles.php?group_id=174727
View this message in context: j-Interop: Open Source, DCOM Access without JNI.
Sent from the Java Linux General forum at Nabble.com.
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 07:06, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> Gerald Bauer wrote:
> > Tom writes:
> >
> > Sun invariably says that they can't think of what
> > problems open source Java would solve that aren't
> > already solved. Of course that's ridicu
Gerald Bauer wrote:
Hello,
Allow me to highlight the blog story by Tom Tromey -
Here's another good take on the issue:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/5135
--
Glenn Holmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmer/Analyst
Charles Forsythe wrote:
Quoting Diego Pons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Think about it, perhaps we would have already JVM's on silicon on the
cheap instead of needing these gigaherz machines to run java properly.
JVMs on silicon? Like, maybe, the Ajile AJ-100?
I'd be interested in comments on the ARM-926
Quoting Diego Pons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Think about it, perhaps we would have already JVM's on silicon on the
> cheap instead of needing these gigaherz machines to run java properly.
JVMs on silicon? Like, maybe, the Ajile AJ-100?
http://www.ajile.com/downloads/aj100.pdf
--
Breaking t
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:20:11 -0500
Glenn Holmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think anybody consciously wants to break compatibility,
> but I think it would simply be too tempting to add Just One Cool
> Feature(tm). That's the way Open Source works: when a progr
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:20:11 -0500
Glenn Holmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think anybody consciously wants to break compatibility,
> but I think it would simply be too tempting to add Just One Cool
> Feature(tm). That's the way Open Source works: when a progr
Glenn Holmer wrote:
I don't think anybody consciously wants to break compatibility,
but I think it would simply be too tempting to add Just One Cool
Feature(tm). That's the way Open Source works: when a programmer
feels an itch, he codes. And that's OK for the kernel, or maybe
X
Gerald Bauer wrote:
unfree.
On top of this, non-free core software is something
to be avoided in the community. This overly-controlled
approach on Sun's part is losing the Linux desktop to
.NET.
.NET is freerer than java?
--
To
Glenn Holmer wrote:
Gerald Bauer wrote:
Tom writes:
Sun invariably says that they can't think of what
problems open source Java would solve that aren't
already solved. Of course that's ridiculous.
Why?
It is
pretty hard for Linux vendors to ship a working JRE on
their platform i
Glenn Holmer wrote:
Gerald Bauer wrote:
Tom writes:
Sun invariably says that they can't think of what
problems open source Java would solve that aren't
already solved. Of course that's ridiculous.
Why?
It is
pretty hard for Linux vendors to ship a working JRE on
their platform i
Hello,
Allow me to highlight the blog story by Tom Tromey -
of GNU Compiler for Java (gcj) fame - that points out
some questions to ask if you attend the Java Open
Source Debate at Sun's JavaOne conference. True to
style Sun has - of course - not invited any actual
Free Java hacker t
Hello,
Allow me to highlight the blog story by Tom Tromey -
of GNU Compiler for Java (gcj) fame - that points out
some questions to ask if you attend the Java Open
Source Debate at Sun's JavaOne conference. True to
style Sun has - of course - not invited any actual
Free Java hacker t
Hello,
allow me to hightlight a new online poll on the DevX
Developer site front page that asks: "Should Sun
distribute an open source version of Java with IBM, as
Big Blue suggested in its open letter?"
Answers include:
* No way. It'll just fragment Java even more.
*
anyone for the diff file?
-Original Message-
From: Cedric Bompart
Sent: 24 February 2004 10:00
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: source patch for 1.3.1
Hello,
I've tested the java 1.3.1 for the ARM platform but it's a bit too slow for my Sharp
Zaurus SL5600 (Xscale
Thanks but I've got it already and it works on the SL5600. I would like a full j2se
implementation.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 February 2004 12:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: source patch for 1.3.1
Hi Cedric,
> I've tested the java 1.3.1 for the ARM platform but it's a bit too slow for my Sharp
> Zaurus SL5600 (Xscale PXA-250 400Mhz, 32M of RAM).
Sun has released a J2ME runtime for Zaurus SL-C700:
J2ME[tm] Personal Profile for Zaurus
http://java.sun.com/developer/earlyAccess/pp4zaurus
reen threads will be less resource intensive for this embedded device. same
assumption for the jit.
I've downloaded the java 1.3.1 source from Sun. I've followed this readme ->
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/docs/faq/README/1.2/README.linux.src but I can't
find the diff fil
Hi,
I've put together a site dedicated to open source
Java called Viva.
Viva aims to give you a quick overview of the state
of open source Java and uncover and clarify Sun's open
source Java stand.
For now the Viva site includes:
* a directory listing open source Jav
makes java really faster on Linux
ppc !
Franck
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 10:50, Michael Franz wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure if my previous request made it.
I am looking for the PPC source for Java. The Sun
version only has intel. Since there are binaries for
ppc the source must be somewhere.
Any
I have not found JDK-1.4 for PPC yet. You can get PPC for 1.3.1...
ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/JDK-1.3.1/
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 10:50, Michael Franz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure if my previous request made it.
>
> I am looking for the PPC
My stupid! I did not read your email thoroughly!
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 10:50, Michael Franz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure if my previous request made it.
>
> I am looking for the PPC source for Java. The Sun
> version only has intel. Since there are binaries for
> p
Hi,
I am not sure if my previous request made it.
I am looking for the PPC source for Java. The Sun
version only has intel. Since there are binaries for
ppc the source must be somewhere.
Any pointers are welcome.
Thanks
Michael
__
Do you
Is the source code for the Blackdown JMF shared libraries available
for download?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone tell me where i can find the source patches for 1.4.0. I'm
interested in the PowerPC release. The don't seem to be included with
the JDK release
Thanks in advance !
Allan
=
---
Allan Havemose, Ph.D.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
Sun's Java Web site recently posted its own spin on the Microsoft/Open
Source debate at the O'Reilly Open Source conference. Among the more
provocative assertions from Sun's "Open Source Diva", Danese Cooper,
is this:
Sun doesn't claim Sun's Commun
Forgot to mention the URL:
http://java.sun.com/features/2001/07/oscon01.html
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 09:49:30AM -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Sun's Java Web site recently posted its own spin on the Microsoft/Open
> Source debate at the O'Reilly Open Source conference
; Hello all,
> First, I have no budget for this... :)
> Having said that - I need to come up with an app server that handles message
> driven beans and is open source, and is enterprise capable (we're expecting
> massive traffic) . I have narrowed things down to Enhydra or Jboss. W
> I've never used JBoss, but one thing that's noteworthy about Enhydra in your
> situation is that it supports load balancing out-of-the-box through the use
> of Enhydra Director (an apache module).
Unfortunately, I am not using apache. I am using Zeus.
> First, I have no budget for this... :)
> Having said that - I need to come up with an app server that handles message
> driven beans and is open source, and is enterprise capable (we're expecting
> massive traffic) . I have narrowed things down to Enhydra or Jboss. We
Hello all,
First, I have no budget for this... :)
Having said that - I need to come up with an app server that handles message
driven beans and is open source, and is enterprise capable (we're expecting
massive traffic) . I have narrowed things down to Enhydra or Jboss. We
Otra vez yo,
Alguien conoce donde se puede encontrar el codigo (.java) de la librería
Servlet.jar
-
Click here for Free Video!!
http://www.gohip.com/free_video/
--
To UNSUBSCR
Hi everybody,
I'm searching for JMF-Linux Sources. Where can I find them ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, John R. MacMillan wrote:
> Where can I find the 1.3.0 source diffs? I've poked around the
> website and ftp mirrors, and the mailing list archive but haven't
> found anything.
There are no 1.3.0 diffs currently. I'll make a diff against the SCSL
c
Where can I find the 1.3.0 source diffs? I've poked around the website
and ftp mirrors, and the mailing list archive but haven't found
anything.
Thanks,
John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Pramila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: den 24 november 2000 05:09
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: compiler for C source to Java bytecode
>
> Hi!,
>
>Could u please let me know where I can find
>
> - Converters: from Java sourc
: Re: compiler for C source to Java bytecode
Hi!,
Could u please let me know where I can find
- Converters: from Java source to C source &
- Decompilers: from Java bytecodes to C source .
Thanks in advance.
--Regards
Pramila
Suru Dissanayake wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I
Hi!,
Could u please let me know where I can find
- Converters: from Java source to C source &
- Decompilers: from Java bytecodes to C source .
Thanks in advance.
--Regards
Pramila
Suru Dissanayake wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have found a couple of:
> Decomp
Suru Dissanayake wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have found a couple of:
> Decompilers: from Java bytecodes to C source
> Converters: from Java source to C source
> Decompilers (to Java): from Java bytecodes to Java source
>
> But does anyone know anything about a compiler for C s
Hi!
I have found a couple of:
Decompilers: from Java bytecodes to C source
Converters: from Java source to C source
Decompilers (to Java): from Java bytecodes to Java source
But does anyone know anything about a compiler for C source to Java
bytecode?
(Preferably for Linux)
I would like to
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Gita Sukthankar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know where I can download the jdk1.3 source for Linux? I
> was able to get the binary from the Sun site, but the only 1.3 source
> I saw was for Windows.
src.jar is included in the standard distribution, and a
Hello,
Does anyone know where I can download the jdk1.3 source for Linux? I
was able to get the binary from the Sun site, but the only 1.3 source
I saw was for Windows.
Thanks,
-Gita
---
Gita Sukthankar
Compaq
Hi,
Can we have the patch for JDK 1.2.2 FCS ?
What I can find now is only the patch for 1.2 pre-v2.
Or, doesn't Sun allow Blackdown team to release it?
Kazuyuki SHUDO Happy Hacking!
Muraoka Lab., Grad. School of Sci. & Eng., Waseda Univ.
-
other mailing lists so that we could get
a better statistical sample I would appreciate it.
Kevin
--
** Should SUN Open Source Java? Please Vote:
http://relativity.yi.org/java **
Kevin A Burton (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], UIN: 73488596, ZKey:
burtonator)
http://relativity.yi.org
Message to SUN
The GCC Java frontend is designed to do the following:
* generate Java bytecode from Java source
* generate platform specific executables from Java source
* generate platform specific executables from Java bytecode
Check out GCJ: http://sources.redhat.com/java/
Peace.
Tom
"J.
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > IBM has just released two fairly interesting Open Source project.
> >
> > IBM developerWorks released Open Source Jikes compiler
> >
>-
I thought that java bytecode was cross platform by definition. Does
jikes allow compiling java source to platform-dependent executables now?
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> IBM has just released two fairly interesting Open Source project.
>
> IBM develope
IBM has just released two fairly interesting Open Source project.
IBM developerWorks released Open Source Jikes compiler
--
The Jikes Compiler has just been released as an open source download from
IBM
developerWorks Open Source Home Page
(http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/?open&l=258,t=gr,t=oshp)
Bean Scripting Framework (BSF) Open Source
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/bsf/?dwzone=opensource?open&l=258,t=gr,p=bsfos
ExcelAccessor Be
Yes, I need the source code for my MSc research.
I would like to modify the JDK for real-time in some aspects.
I have the binary version of the JDK downloaded from www.blackdown.org. (JDK 1.2.2.
RC4)
I also have the source code version of the JDK downloaded from www.sun.com, but I
cannot
Hi
I am new to J2SE 1.2.2 for Linux (Blackdown).
I have downloaded jdk1.2.2 source codes form www.sun.com. However, as mentioned
in the jdk1.2.2 RC4 README document ( " The stock JDK source distribution
from Sun won't build on Linux" ), I could not re-build the source code.
> GE Harris Energy Control Systems
>
> --------
>
> Subject: [java3d] Java Media source licensing to Linux
> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 14:18:29 -0800 (PST)
> From: Subra Mohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Hi
There's the source for Netscape/Mozilla available from www.mozilla.org
and from the same URL you can get the source an approach to create an
entire webbrowser in Java that Netscape abandoned but it still being
developed by volunteers.
You schould not underestimate the platform indepen
How about mozilla.org ( AKA Netscape ). The Source code is available
via GPL and there is a linux version.
Cheers
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
Is there any source code of a Web browser for Linux available somewhere?
It's even better if it's pure Java source code, so we can
Opps , I made a mistake , ( Should not touch the keyboard before I've
had at least one cup of coffee) . Mozilla ( AKA Netscape navigator ) is
an opens-source browser available for
download form www.mozilla.org. And yes Linux is a supported platform.
Cheers
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any source code of a Web browser for Linux available somewhere?
> It's even better if it's pure Java source code, so we can use it on
> different platform to get a consistent interface?
Look at http://home.earthlink.net/~hheister/
or
www.jazilla.org a M
Have you looked at, say, javaworld's tool guide or freshmeat.net or IBM's
jCentral? Some that come to mind are mozilla, javazilla (or whatever it's
called, I'm sure there's a link at www.mozilla.org), sun's hot java (don't
know if source is available), lynx (dit
Hi:
Is there any source code of a Web browser for Linux available somewhere?
It's even better if it's pure Java source code, so we can use it on
different platform to get a consistent interface?
Thanks.
Lee
---
My response to this email is pre-sorting out of the blackdown
licensing. The issue at hand here is not general access to the J2SE
source but specifically cvs access to the blackdown port. I will take
this up directly with Jørn in order to get him setup with the
blackdown porting group.
Thanks
(sorry for the spam)
I drew up a proposal that asks for SUN to Open Source Javadoc, a basic
tool from the JDK. This would be a big help to the entire Java
community and an excellent sign of good faith from SUN.
http://relativity.yi.org/WebSite/opensource-javadoc/
Kevin
--
Kevin A Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Ziff-Davis' Jesse Berst has a column today pushing Open Source as Java's
> most likely salvation:
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/story/story_4306.html
>
> A particularly memorable excerpt:
>
> "Sun could revive
Ziff-Davis' Jesse Berst has a column today pushing Open Source as Java's
most likely salvation:
http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/story/story_4306.html
A particularly memorable excerpt:
"Sun could revive the Java dream by making it an open source product.
Unhappily, askin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Perhaps what people have been hearing is that IBM will make their Jikes
| compiler open source?Apparently it will be in the developerWorks Open
| Source arena.
The jikes is already available with full sourcecode.
--
Jo Uthus| e-mail
Perhaps what people have been hearing is that IBM will make their Jikes
compiler open source?Apparently it will be in the developerWorks Open
Source arena.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
This is to announce the release of the Colt V1.0 Beta 4 distribution.
Check out the online documentation and/or download at
http://nicewww.cern.ch/~hoschek/colt/index.htm
Scope
=
The Colt distribution provides an open source infrastructure for
scalable scientific and technical computing in
I've downloaded for installation on
an i386 machine running Red Hat Linux 6.0.
The readme says "All Java-Linux ports share a common set of source
patches. These are located in the 'common' directory for each major
JDK revision." For the revision I've downloaded
Hi,
I'm wondering if anybody else on the list has been successful in
compiling the JDK from source with the patch bundle provided on the
blackdown ftp sites. There's a patch-o-matic script there as well, but
doesn't work for me. I've modified the variables at the top
Hi,
I would like to apply the patches for jdk pre 2 but the only
sun reference source I can get is JDK 1.2.2 which doesn't
really cooperate with the diffs of the linux porting team.
Who knows how I can get the original source jdk 1.2 from sun?
y and
the mobile code world in general.
We are asking for your help in convincing IBM that Aglets should live on, as an
Open Source project. It is ideal for this, with the community already developing
and releasing OSS updates and packages for the framework.
You can help us by signing our pet
Hi,
I have the Java Sun source distribution for the jdk 1.1.8 and I would
like to built it on my Linux box. I already have the Linux jdk 1.1.7-v3
binaries installed. What diffs must I apply?
Thanks for your help
Virginie Galtier
>Alright. In order to gain a good understand of the issues that have
>arisen during the port of Java2 on Linux, I have read over the past
>messages regarding technical difficulties in the port.
You mostly quoted back my own speculation. Please understand, it was
only speculation - I have no knowl
o
>be several main ones:
>
>- Linux threads are screwy and the Java2 source (J2S) uses Solaris threads
> rather than pthreads. The two don't mix well.
>
>- J2S is written for 64-bit Solaris.
>
>- J2S uses system calls that are incompatible with Linux.
>
>- Memory ma
swers are to be found in the diffs:
ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/JDK-1.2/common/jdk-1.2-pre-v2.diffs.gz
(or similar locations at other mirrors). It uncompresses to a bit over
.5M.
You can even get the source from Sun under SCL, apply the diffs, and fix
those trivial problems the Blackdown crew
Hi all.
Alright. In order to gain a good understand of the issues that have
arisen during the port of Java2 on Linux, I have read over the past
messages regarding technical difficulties in the port. There seem to
be several main ones:
- Linux threads are screwy and the Java2 source (J2S) uses
I followed this URL
http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/download-solaris.html and
downloaded source_license.pdf. Faxed it and got the old source. It turns
out the form is only for 1.1.x.
How do I get 1.2.1 source?
--
Peter Ziobrzynski, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:17:37 -0700
> > From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > > How many of their patches have gone back into the Java tree?
> > >
> > > Many of them are going into 1.3.
> >
> > People are talking about 1.3? Not 1.2.3?
>
> Yes, 1.3.
T
> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:17:37 -0700
> From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > How many of their patches have gone back into the Java tree?
> >
> > Many of them are going into 1.3.
>
> People are talking about 1.3? Not 1.2.3?
Yes, 1.3.
If you were at JavaOne, the Java 2 SE roadmap
> Steve Byrne writes:
Steve> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nelson Minar) writes:
>> Java hits threads very hard. In particular, the native threads port of
>> Java stresses the glibc threading framework (and the kernel!) more
>> than most systems. So you have to contend not just with portability
>> prob
road?
If the kernel team were to work with you on fixing these
issues, how much easier would the port be to do?
That's it for now, take care!
-Riyad
Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nelson Minar) writes:
>
> >
> > >Why has it been so difficult to por
Steve Byrne wrote:
> > The Blackdown folks seem to be adding a lot of value back to the Java
> > port. How many of their patches have gone back into the Java tree?
>
> All told (from the 1.1.x days), a lot. Many of them are going into 1.3.
People are talking about 1.3? Not 1.2.3?
Does this imp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nelson Minar) writes:
>
> >Why has it been so difficult to port Sun's Java2 source to Linux?
>
> I have no specific knowledge - I'm not part of the Blackdown team,
> have never seen the JDK sources, etc. But I can guess :-)
>
>
> The
>Why has it been so difficult to port Sun's Java2 source to Linux?
I have no specific knowledge - I'm not part of the Blackdown team,
have never seen the JDK sources, etc. But I can guess :-)
The port is a spare-time effort with non-open source.
Java2 is a hell of a lot of code.
Gerald wrote:
>
> Why has it been so difficult to port Sun's Java2 source to Linux? I
> was under the impression that
>
> a) Sun isolated their platform-dependent parts,
> b) all the rest of the code is in portable, standard C, and
> c) the source code is fairly we
First, no I haven't read the source; my views are based on my
thoughts.
Why has it been so difficult to port Sun's Java2 source to Linux? I
was under the impression that
a) Sun isolated their platform-dependent parts,
b) all the rest of the code is in portable, standard C, and
c)
Does anyone know of an Java applet IRC client implementation whose source is
also available? I want to see how others have skinned this cat before trying
it myself.
Thanks,
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Intland announced the availability of Intland Source Explorer 1.0
for Windows and UNIX operating systems.
Intland Source Explorer is a Source Code Engineering tool suited for C,
C++ and Java developer, project manager, and quality assurance engineer.
Source Explorer reaches far beyond
Intland announced today the availability of Intland Source Explorer 1.0
for Windows and UNIX (Linux, Solaris) operating systems.
Intland Source Explorer is a Source Code Engineering tool suited for C,
C++ and Java developer, project manager, and quality assurance engineer.
For downloading of
Offtopic, but very cool.
This article in LinuxResources shows how you you can make money when
writing OpenSource software:
* http://www.linuxresources.com/articles/conversations/001.html
BTW: Please, flame me! :-)
GreetinX++, Ernst
--
Ernst de Haan
Chief Technical Officer
Tector i.o.
"C
Eric House writes:
> Hi:
>
> The blackdown.org web site used to suggest that the patches necessary
> to build the JDK on Linux were available. Are they still? Where?
Where does it say that? That's certainly not the case currently. We plan to
make the diffs available with the NEXT release
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Eric House wrote:
> The blackdown.org web site used to suggest that the patches necessary
> to build the JDK on Linux were available. Are they still? Where?
I only know what I've seen from other replies on this list, but it seems
that the patches to JDK 1.2 won't be made av
Hi:
The blackdown.org web site used to suggest that the patches necessary
to build the JDK on Linux were available. Are they still? Where?
Thanks,
--Eric House
Sun Microsystems' Java Software Division
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Hi Java-Linux team,
I'm interested in porting jdk 1.2 to OpenBSD. Since you've got a very
functional port for Linux already (it passed JCK!), it would be great to
see your changes for we're going to use similar tools for builds.
And OpenBSD is much closer to Linux than Solaris. Well, may be I jus
Hey folks,
Is there any chance of getting the source diffs for JDK 1.2? I'm running a
glibc-2.1.1 based system which does not cope well with the current pre-release
(libc5-based). The previous ports do not run on glibc-2.1 as you are probably
aware, and no new versions have since arrived.
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Danno Ferrin wrote:
> When is source code going to be released? Dose the whole chart have to
> go green before sun will let you do that?
I think Steve is planning to release the source diffs once the final
binary release is ready. Remember that only a pre-rele
When is source code going to be released? Dose the whole chart have to
go green before sun will let you do that?
--Danno
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My setup:
>
> jikes compiler, Blackdown JDK 117a, Blackdown JDK 1.2pre,
Code generated by Jikes is different from the code
generated by javac. Code generation method of Jikes is
more straightforward and less sophisticated than one of javac.
But, I suppose that kind of
tell that the Solaris JDK (1.2?)
uses a better implementation of System.arraycopy().
Has anyone figures from Linux or other environments?
The benchmarks copied all elements from one large array into another
large array (array.length=10^6).
Like this:
byte[] source = new byte[size];
byte[] dest
Apologies if this is a repeat mailing.
I'm trying to finish of my PhD thesis by integrating a Linux Threads
package I've written with the JDK. Unfortunately I don't have the time
(or, to be honest, the inclination) to port my package to
Win32/Solaris/Solaris x86. I also cannot get hold of the o
On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Dariusz Dziuda wrote:
> OK! And what about sources for building jdk1.2 (java 2). Java 2
> follows new Sun's licensing model. Does Blackdown make Jdk1.2 building
> source available?
I don't think the license allows it. You'd still have to get the sou
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
