Re: [JBoss-dev] Build system source organization improvements

2001-04-24 Thread David Jencks
Hi, I am not a committer but I was about to say this too. I especially dislike the copies of ant, junit, in every modules src/lib directory. Personally I'm not so worried about admin and manual, but maybe that's because I haven't worked much with them yet. I think essentially all

Re: [JBoss-dev] Coding standards

2001-04-24 Thread Toby Allsopp
I tried this a while back and ended up starting a flame war. The outcome was basically that if you code something, code it how you like. If you're maintaining something, leave it as it is unless you really hate it. While it's possible to get into indenting wars with this, I don't really

Re: [JBoss-dev] Distributed Transaction Manager support (coming up)

2001-04-24 Thread Toby Allsopp
Anatoly Akkerman wrote: Hi, For the past couple of weeks I've been integrating Tyrex DTM (tyrex.exolab.org) into JBoss. Things are coming along and in a few days I'll probably have a basic support for transaction propagation across 2 JBoss instances. I was wondering, how should I make my

[JBoss-dev] Fw: [JBoss-user] Tomcat-JBoss ClassNotFoundException (again)

2001-04-24 Thread Dewayne McNair
I'm back to thinking there is definitely a bug in the Tomcat integration. My understanding is that all of the ClassLoaders are supposed to be chained together, right? When Tomcat runs a servlet, it should have a CL chain of: The default JBoss ClassLoader -- URLClassLoader (jars

RE: [JBoss-dev] Distributed Transaction Manager support (coming up)

2001-04-24 Thread Bordet, Simone
Hey, Anatoly Akkerman wrote: Hi, For the past couple of weeks I've been integrating Tyrex DTM (tyrex.exolab.org) into JBoss. Things are coming along and in a few days I'll probably have a basic support for transaction propagation across 2 JBoss instances. I was wondering, how

Re: [JBoss-dev] Rule Engine Improvements

2001-04-24 Thread Dan OConnor
On 24 Apr 01, at 2:12, David Jencks wrote: I'm still hoping for more good, specific, real world examples of rule engine use. Hi David, I haven't had a chance to try your rule engine yet but I'm excited about this type of addition to JBoss. Check out

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/etc/conf/default jboss.conf log4j.properties

2001-04-24 Thread starksm
User: starksm Date: 01/04/24 16:22:45 Modified:src/etc/conf/default jboss.conf log4j.properties Log: Make the Log4jService the default logging service Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +3 -17 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/jboss.conf Index: jboss.conf

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/logging LogToCategory.java Log.java Logger.java

2001-04-24 Thread starksm
User: starksm Date: 01/04/24 16:24:24 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/logging Log.java Logger.java Added: src/main/org/jboss/logging LogToCategory.java Log: Deprecate the Log and Logger classes. Add LogToCategory to allow users of a Log instance to easily switch to log4j

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-418685 ] Made log4j the default logging framework

2001-04-24 Thread noreply
Change Notes item #418685, was updated on 2001-04-24 16:43 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=418685group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v2.4 Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)

RE: [JBoss-dev] Rule Engine Improvements

2001-04-24 Thread Micheal J
I suspect Marc means an integrated inference engine a la CLIPS or JESS (not freely available/usable). It is better to use a Rete-based engine just to stave off performance problems like the ones that you reported with JEOPS (which I think is otherwise a good idea). The community process will

[JBoss-dev] jboss daily test results

2001-04-24 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests

R: [JBoss-dev] Distributed Transaction Manager support (coming u p)

2001-04-24 Thread Bordet, Simone
Hey, I had an e-mail message exchange with Ole about a month ago. He recommended me using org.jboss.tm.plugins.tyrex for my stuff. This is exactly what I did. But, as I mentioned, there are 2 files (the transaction interceptors) that need to be changed to support a generic

[JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Configuring Jboss to use Log4j ?

2001-04-24 Thread David Jencks
Hi, Well I see you already fixed this, I am very glad, thanks. How about making Log.createLog return LogToCategory instances by default? Wouldn't this make all of jboss work with the new class automatically? Or did you find another way to do this? Thanks David Jencks On 2001.04.24 22:43:08

RE: [JBoss-dev] Rule Engine Improvements

2001-04-24 Thread David Jencks
Hi, Jeops _is_ a freely available RETE based rule engine. It is unusual in that it operates on java objects rather than data tuples. This has some advantages, which I won't go into here, but appears to have some problems when working directly with ejb's, where the getXXX methods can take a

Re: [JBoss-dev] Fw: [JBoss-user] Tomcat-JBoss ClassNotFoundException (again)

2001-04-24 Thread Scott M Stark
You don't have to put the EJB classes into the WEB-INF/classes directory for servlets to be able access them. They have to be there for jsp pages that access the beans because the jasper compiler was is only given the WEB-INF/classes directory. Do you have a non-jsp example that requires

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/logging Log.java LogToCategory.java

2001-04-24 Thread starksm
User: starksm Date: 01/04/24 21:09:21 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/logging Log.java LogToCategory.java Log: Use the LogToCategory as the default implementation of the Log type in createLog rather than DefaultLog Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +2 -2

[JBoss-dev] Adopting log4j over org.jboss.logging.Log

2001-04-24 Thread Scott M Stark
The main branch has been updated to use the org.apache.log4j framework as the default logging implementation. One question is why not adopt the log4j framework as the JBoss logging interface as well? I don't see any downside to this and there are many benefits. Are there any objections to

Re: [JBoss-dev] Adopting log4j over org.jboss.logging.Log

2001-04-24 Thread Jason Dillon
I think this probably makes a lot of sense. I personally don't like the Category interface too much, but its usage seems to be gaining lots of speed. My guess is that is will probably fall into the shadows once the JDK logging api is available... but then again, I don't really like there