the container/bean story does not sound right
why does the CMP engine START a new transaction? that is not it's place what
persistence engine are you using?
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vesco
|Claudio
|Sent: Friday,
Message-
From: marc fleury [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Vesco Claudio; Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica)
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
the container/bean story does not sound right
why does the CMP engine START
Before I disconnect...
|The container have a transaction active because, I think, I have deployed
|the entity with MEJB SSB and the method invoke of this ejb have a
|transaction defined in the transaction assembly part of ejb-jar.xml, more
|there is not definitions and so the defaults are
Dev (Posta elettronica)
|Cc: 'marc fleury'
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|I remember you that my English is very bad :-)
|
|In org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStartCommand at line 143 there is
|
|manager.getContainer().getTransactionManager().begin
-
|From: Vesco Claudio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 5:36 AM
|To: Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica)
|Cc: 'marc fleury'
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|I remember you that my English is very bad
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vesco
|Claudio
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:52 AM
|To: 'marc fleury'
|Cc: Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica)
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|Ehm...
|
|when I wrote, I
The JDBCStartCommand executes the create table statements, and some
database have problems when you execute ddl in the same transactions
normal sql. Why would jsr-77 care if I start a new transaction?
I plan I using a private transaction in an autonumber generator when I
implement the
|To: 'marc fleury'
|Cc: Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica)
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|Ehm...
|
|when I wrote, I think to the current jboss 3.0 rabbit hole HEAD CVS.
|
|CMP - new CMP 2.0
77 is just a proxy to the JMX base, THERE SHOULD NOT BE PERSISTENCE.
Try
that jboss works equally
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:26 PM
To: Vesco Claudio
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
I think this is inappropriate use of bean managed
Hi Vasco
When I try to deploy an ear (better, an CMP entity) with MEJB I have an
exception in org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStartCommand because this
class try to start a new transaction.
What does this mean ? How you are going to deploy a CMP entity bean with
MEJB ??
Andy
PROBLEM.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: Vesco Claudio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'David Jencks' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
Uhm... I am checking EJB 2.0 spec, topic 17, in particular
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of
Vesco
|Claudio
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:52 AM
|To: 'marc fleury'
|Cc: Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica)
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|Ehm...
|
|when I wrote, I think
22, 2002 6:56 PM
To: Vesco Claudio
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
Hi Vasco
When I try to deploy an ear (better, an CMP entity) with MEJB I have an
exception in org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStartCommand because
this
class
You @#!
MEJB is not to be used this way
!!
Don't ever use MEJB to access the MBeanServer. Use the EJB-Adaptor/Connector
for this but don't spoil our time with this fucking miss-use of services !
mejb.invoke(new
To: Vesco Claudio
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
You @#!
MEJB is not to be used this way
!!
Don't ever use MEJB to access the MBeanServer. Use the
EJB-Adaptor/Connector
Hi Vesco
Sorry for this, but I have thought that the MEJB can be a SECURE way to
manage jboss.
JSR-77 is here to manage JBoss but not to configure or deploy components.
When you have a look at the specification you never see JMX mentioned
(except for the MEJB implementation but there it is
marcf
|
| Claudio
|
| -Original Message-
| From:David Jencks [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent:Friday, March 22, 2002 5:55 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
| I think the tx attributes on MEJB need
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
|Jencks
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:26 AM
|To: Vesco Claudio
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|I think this is inappropriate use of bean managed transactions. As far as
|I know the MEJB is not in fact starting any
|I will add NotSupported transaction attribute to the MEJB
|to increase performance but I DON'T SEE YOUR PROBLEM.
DO NOT DO THAT IN FACT I WANT MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS TO BE TRANSACTIONAL,
afaict he has another problem in his configuration, he is talking to another
bean it seems, with the
in my mind
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
|Jencks
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:13 AM
|To: Vesco Claudio
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|in my opinion, both
Hi
DO NOT DO THAT IN FACT I WANT MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS TO BE TRANSACTIONAL,
Ok, then I will set it to Required.
Andy
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vesco
|Claudio
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:11 AM
|To: 'Andreas Schaefer'
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|Yes!
|
|I want to deploy a ear
|Sorry for this, but I have thought that the MEJB can be a SECURE way to
|manage jboss.
Actually you are right :)
But the straight EJB connector is good as well.
Look bottom line is that you are right on using the MEJB for that and there
is a bug in the CMP initialization, not the MEJB.
|If
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Andreas Schaefer
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:49 AM
|To: Vesco Claudio
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|Hi Vesco
|
| Sorry for this, but I have thought that the MEJB can be a SECURE way to
| manage jboss.
|
|JSR-77 is here
]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 7:56 PM
To: Vesco Claudio; 'Andreas Schaefer'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vesco
|Claudio
|Sent: Friday
| DO NOT DO THAT IN FACT I WANT MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS TO BE TRANSACTIONAL,
|
|Ok, then I will set it to Required.
|
|Andy
SUPPORTS is good enough, if you need transactional operations you code a
facade bean that updates the 3 beans at once (datasource and a service and a
connector all at once)
|I'll send the patch to Dain...
Appreciate it,
thanks
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Hi Marc
actually (ok you are right he was looking in the wrong place) I think that
using the MEJB for JMX access... well... why not?
Yes, you can but I don't think it is a good idea. I am currently talking
with
Hirom about the JBoss management tool and somehow we figured out
that with JSR-77
]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|Hi Marc
|
| actually (ok you are right he was looking in the wrong place) I
|think that
| using the MEJB for JMX access... well... why not?
|
|Yes, you can but I don't think it is a good idea. I am currently talking
|with
|Hirom about
Hopefully I won't be throwing more fuel on any firesand maybe not for
today...
Wouldn't an even better solution than patching the cmp2 start command to
look for an existing tx be to run the call to the pm through a tx
interceptor?
btw... I am having to do something like this (a pm
marc fleury wrote:
OK what you want to do is have the initialization of the Bean in the CMP
engine (the deploy) CHECK for the presence of a transaction. SO if the
deployment is transactional (as done with a Required in MEJB) then you need
to check for that transaction and only start if not
On 2002.03.22 16:51:47 -0500 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
marc fleury wrote:
OK what you want to do is have the initialization of the Bean in the
CMP
engine (the deploy) CHECK for the presence of a transaction. SO if the
deployment is transactional (as done with a Required in MEJB) then you
PM
|To: marc fleury
|Cc: Vesco Claudio; 'Andreas Schaefer';
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|marc fleury wrote:
|
| OK what you want to do is have the initialization of the Bean in the CMP
| engine (the deploy) CHECK for the presence
33 matches
Mail list logo
