[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Eclipse IDE (dev)] - JBossIDE 1.4.1 and JBossIDE 1.5 Preview released

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The JBossIDE Team is happy to announce the release of both JBossIDE 1.4.1 and 
JBossIDE 1.5 Preview!

JBossIDE 1.4.1

Release Notes: 
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=300969

Install Doc:
HTML:
http://docs.jboss.org/jbosside/install/build/en/html/index.html

PDF:
http://docs.jboss.org/jbosside/install/build/en/pdf/JBossIDE-Installation-1.4.1.pdf

Tutorial:
HTML:
http://docs.jboss.org/jbosside/tutorial/build/en/html/index.html

PDF:
http://docs.jboss.org/jbosside/tutorial/build/en/pdf/JBossIDE-Tutorial-1.4.1.pdf


JBossIDE 1.5 Preview

Release Notes:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=300998

See the homepage for links to docs, demos, and what's new with JBossIDE 1.5 
Preview.
http://www.jboss.com/products/jbosside





View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864262#3864262

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864262


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-1359) Remove the castor dependency for the snmp adapter, use jbossxb

2005-01-30 Thread Dimitris Andreadis (JIRA)
Remove the castor dependency for the snmp adapter, use jbossxb
--

 Key: JBAS-1359
 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1359
 Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Task
 Environment: varia, snmp adaptor
Reporter: Dimitris Andreadis
 Assigned to: Dimitris Andreadis 
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: JBossAS-5.0 Alpha, JBossAS-4.0.2 Final


The snmp-adaptor uses castor for generating POJO metadata classes, and for 
parsing its configuration xml files.

Replacing this with JBossXB will make it a lot lighter and remove the 
unecessary castor dependency.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Admin Console] - Re: New approach for updating Datasource/Drivers via Admin C

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we fall back to the traditional jboss view, then:

1) Invoking on a template for copying static libs into ./lib is not the best 
way. It'd be more straightforward to have on the DeploymentService something 
like:

  | String[] listStaticLibs();
  | boolean uploadStaticLib(URL url);
  | 

(This doesn't solve the modifications issue, i.e. remove/update a lib)

2) From a design point of view, I believe it's much more clear to the admin to 
provide him an exact view of the system, it's restrictions and the ability to 
change it. In this sense you admit that the ./lib directory contains static 
libs that can only be changed with a reboot. So maybe a better interface is 
something like:

  |boolean scheduleLibUpdate(URL url);
  |boolean scheduleLibRemoval(String libname);
  | 
The 2 schedule methods will store the new lib/info for removal somewhere, then 
the server upon boot will have to make those changes.

The thing is, the changes need to take place *before* ./conf/jboss-service.xml 
is loaded, because this is where the libs are loaded.

Maybe we could pass a new arg at command line, e.g. --update-libs to triger 
this behaviour.

In any case we could proceed with (1) and optionally do (2).


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864265#3864265

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864265


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0 build.346 Build Successful

2005-01-30 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050130112331Lbuild.346
BUILD COMPLETE-build.346Date of build:01/30/2005 11:23:31Time to build:19 minutes 7 secondsLast changed:01/30/2005 11:13:45Last log entry:- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.




   Unit Tests: (0)   Total Errors and Failures: (0)
Modifications since last build:(4)1.355.2.20modifiedremmbuild/build.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.1.2.1modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service-all.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.3.2.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.3.2.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/server.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.



[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.750 Build Successful

2005-01-30 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050130114905Lbuild.750
BUILD COMPLETE-build.750Date of build:01/30/2005 11:49:05Time to build:26 minutes 34 secondsLast changed:01/30/2005 11:21:32Last log entry:tests for metadata driven object model factory and xsd binder




   Unit Tests: (0)   Total Errors and Failures: (0)
Modifications since last build:(16)1.4modifiedloubyanskytestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/xml/MiscUnitTestCase.javatests for metadata driven object model factory and xsd binder1.4modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/AbstractBasicElementBinding.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.1addedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/AttributeBinding.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.3modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/BasicElementBinding.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.2modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/BindingCursor.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.3modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/DocumentBindingFactory.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.3modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/RuntimeDocumentBinding.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.1addedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/XsdBinder.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.1addedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/MetadataDrivenObjectModelFactory.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.5modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/SimpleTypeBindings.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.24modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/Unmarshaller.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.4modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/UnmarshallerImpl.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.384modifiedremmbuild/build.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service-all.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.4modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.4modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/server.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.



[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1112731 ] MEMBER OF Bug in SQL92 Compiler

2005-01-30 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1112731, was opened at 2005-01-30 20:00
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1112731group_id=22866

Category: JBossCMP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jens Bräuer (jensbr)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: MEMBER OF Bug in SQL92 Compiler

Initial Comment:
Hi there !

I was experimenting with dynamic created
JBossQL-Queries, when i found what i expect to be a bug.
Ok, here some facts about the app i am writing:

2 (for this post relevant) Entity-Beans:

- Publication with a 1:M CMR to Author
- Author with fields firstName and lastName

Writing a method that creates queries on the fly, i
found that using the EJBToSQL92Compiler delivers
incorrect results.
I am searching a Publication written by 2 Authors i
know the firstName of. So i expected the query

SELECT p.id FROM Publication AS p, Author AS a1, Author
AS a2 WHERE (a1.firstName = 'Timo') AND (a1 MEMBER OF
p.author) AND ( a2.firstName = 'Jens' ) AND ( a2 MEMBER
OF p.author )

to deliver the id of this Publication.
This is true for the default compiler, but using the
SQL92 one also delivers another Publication in the
result. As i do only tests, there are only two entries
in the db. I double-checked the database and returning
only one Publication would definately be correct.

Ok: here is a test-run with the default EJBQL-Compiler:
---
[PublicationLocalHome] queryString: SELECT p.id FROM
Publication AS p, Author AS a1, Author AS a2 WHERE
(a1.firstName = 'Timo') AND (a1 MEMBER OF p.author) AND
( a2.firstName = 'Jens' ) AND ( a2 MEMBER OF p.author )

org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCDynamicQLQuery.Publication#ejbSelectGeneric
null - Executing SQL: 
SELECT t0_p.id FROM PUBLICATION t0_p, AUTHOR t1_a1,
AUTHOR t4_a2 WHERE ((t1_a1.firstName = 'Timo') AND
(EXISTS (SELECT t3_p_author_RELATION_TABLE.authorId
FROM PUBLICATIONAUTHORS t3_p_author_RELATION_TABLE
WHERE t0_p.id=t3_p_author_RELATION_TABLE.publicationId
AND t1_a1.id=t3_p_author_RELATION_TABLE.authorId)) AND
(t4_a2.firstName = 'Jens') AND (EXISTS (SELECT
t3_p_author_RELATION_TABLE.authorId FROM
PUBLICATIONAUTHORS t3_p_author_RELATION_TABLE WHERE
t0_p.id=t3_p_author_RELATION_TABLE.publicationId AND
t4_a2.id=t3_p_author_RELATION_TABLE.authorId)))

20:29:44,215 WARN  [PublicationLocalHome] result was : [1]
20:29:44,216 WARN  [PublicationLocalHome] result class:
java.util.ArrayList

And here a run using the EJBQLToSQL92Compiler:
--

[PublicationLocalHome] queryString: SELECT p.id FROM
Publication AS p, Author AS a1, Author AS a2 WHERE
(a1.firstName = 'Timo') AND (a1 MEMBER OF p.author) AND
( a2.firstName = 'Jens' ) AND ( a2 MEMBER OF p.author )

org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCDynamicQLQuery.Publication#ejbSelectGeneric
null - Executing SQL: SELECT t0_p.id FROM AUTHOR t5_a2,
AUTHOR t1_a1, PUBLICATION t0_p WHERE (t1_a1.firstName =
'Timo') AND (EXISTS (SELECT t2_p_local.id FROM
PUBLICATION t2_p_local INNER JOIN PUBLICATIONAUTHORS
t4_p_author_local_RELATION_TABLE ON
t2_p_local.id=t4_p_author_local_RELATION_TABLE.publicationId
INNER JOIN AUTHOR t3_p_author_local ON
t3_p_author_local.id=t4_p_author_local_RELATION_TABLE.authorId
WHERE t1_a1.id=t3_p_author_local.id)) AND
(t5_a2.firstName = 'Jens') AND (EXISTS (SELECT
t2_p_local.id FROM PUBLICATION t2_p_local INNER JOIN
PUBLICATIONAUTHORS t4_p_author_local_RELATION_TABLE ON
t2_p_local.id=t4_p_author_local_RELATION_TABLE.publicationId
INNER JOIN AUTHOR t3_p_author_local ON
t3_p_author_local.id=t4_p_author_local_RELATION_TABLE.authorId
WHERE t5_a2.id=t3_p_author_local.id))

20:35:44,763 WARN  [PublicationLocalHome] result was :
[1, 2]
20:35:44,766 WARN  [PublicationLocalHome] result class:
java.util.ArrayList

The query is exactly the same in both test-runs, but
the result is different. I will supply any
descriptors/source/etc needed.

Environment is:
- JBoss 4.0.1
- included Hypersonic
- Java 1.4.2 

regards, Jens Braeuer

--

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1112731group_id=22866


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Refactor the SARDeployer xml parsing

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are limited in our ability to extend the service creation capabilities by 
the hard coded xml processing of the SARDeployer/ServiceCreator. With the 
jbossxb framework this can be externalized such that multiple formats of the 
jboss-service.xml descriptor can be supported and more sophisticated 
configuration can be applied at every level: attributes, interceptors, ctors, 
etc.

One context to which this applies is the prototype for adding interceptors to 
subdeployers discussed here:
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=57296

The solution promoted there requires every deployer to declare an xmbean 
deployment with custom interceptors for the deployment interceptors. There 
should be some deployer specific format which allows for references to a shared 
interceptor stack along with a jbossxb schema that allows for more extensive 
configuration of the interceptors and deployers.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864275#3864275

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864275


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - Re: Dynamically Attaching Interceptors to any (X)MBean

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are two problems with this.

1. The LoginConfigInterceptor is not considering operation in an aggregate 
deployment like an ear that can have multiple login-config.xml descriptors. It 
would just work if very login-config.xml was distinct, but it will fail if 
there are overlapping application-policy definitions. One possible mode of 
operation in the aggregate case would be to merge all login-config.xml 
descriptors with any conflicts being resolved by taking the application-policy 
first defined in a breadth-first traversal of the deployment heirarchy.

2. There is no support for a global specification of inteceptor(s) which should 
be applied to all deployers. This is an aspect of the more general 
configuration issue raised here:

http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864275#3864275


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864276#3864276

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864276


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Admin Console] - Re: New approach for updating Datasource/Drivers via Admin C

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A view of the static libs is not an admin view. An admin may not even know that 
a datasource has a jdbc driver jar. You have to make a distinction between a 
package and the installation of that package. A package is a self contained 
collection of descriptors, jars, os libs, etc. that needs to be installed into 
the server with version and duplication concerns resolved.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864277#3864277

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864277


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBAS-604) housekeeping in ServerImpl and ServerConfigLocator

2005-01-30 Thread Juha Lindfors (JIRA)
 [ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-604?page=history ]
 
Juha Lindfors closed JBAS-604:
--

Resolution: Out of Date

 housekeeping in ServerImpl and ServerConfigLocator
 --

  Key: JBAS-604
  URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-604
  Project: JBoss Application Server
 Type: Bug
 Versions: JBossAS-3.2.6 Final
 Reporter: SourceForge User
 Assignee: Juha Lindfors



 SourceForge Submitter: rodburgett .
 This patch addresses housekeeping deficiencies in the 
 org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl and 
 ServerConfigLocator classes.
 The ServerConfigLocator class has no shutdown method 
 but it does hold a static reference to an 
 MBeanProxyExt.  This reference becomes invalid when 
 the MBeanServer is shutdown.  This patch adds a static 
 shutdown method to null out the reference.  Code to 
 invoke this new method is added to the shutdown 
 processing in ServerImpl.
 Several updates are made to the ServerImpl class, some 
 making use of updates to other classes from this and 
 another patch.  The dependency on another patch is 
 noted in the change descriptions below.
 There are two changes to the ServerImpl.shutdown() 
 method: the shutdown hook that was registered with 
 the system runtime during startup is removed, and a null 
 check is added before invoking accessors on the 
 ServerConfig.
 It makes sense to unregister the shutdown hook when 
 JBoss is shutdown manually.  In the situation where 
 JBoss startup/shutdown is controlled by an outside 
 class, this shutdown hook will attempt to repeat the 
 process when the VM exits.
 Since the init() method will throw an 
 IllegalStateException if it finds a non-null config field, 
 the shutdown process needs to null out this field.  That 
 makes it prudent to check for a null value prior to 
 attempting to access methods.  Default values for 
 local 'exitOnShutdown' and 'blockingShutdown' flags are 
 taken from ServerConfig when config == null.
 A few lines of cleanup are added to the 
 ShutdownHook.run() method to null out some ServerImpl 
 fields and to encourage the GC to run.  This shutdown() 
 method needs a (config == null) before attempting to 
 find and delete the tmp/deploy directory.
 A few comments and error literals from the 
 ShutdownHook.shutdownDeployments() and 
 shutdownServices() methods suffered from cut-n-paste 
 lapse, they are corrected in this patch.
 The ShutdownHook.removeMBeans() method is updated 
 to include a check for non-null mbean server reference.  
 Also, the previous request that the MBeanServerFactory 
 release the current mbean server is replaced with a 
 request to shutdown the mbean registry.  The registry 
 shutdown() method is added by JBoss patch #763378, 
 which includes addition of a shutdown method to the 
 MBeanServerImpl.  The mbean server shutdown process 
 includes a call to the 
 MBeanSercverFactory.releaseMBeanServer() method.  
 Note that the current patch will cause a run time error - 
 probably UnsupportedMethod - if patch #763378 is not 
 applied before the current patch.
 Prior to shutting down the registry, a new 
 ShutdownHook method is called to remove any leftover 
 service mbeans.  This new method, 
 removeLeftoverMBeans(), queries the mbean server for 
 all registered mbeans and attempts to remove most.  
 This server impl lacks permission to remove mbeans from 
 the 'implementation' domain, so these are skipped, they 
 must be removed by the mbean server.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Convenience or use case configurations

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clarify what you mean by the advanced config option here please:


  | But this could be worked around by allowing an advanced config option
  | List beans = EJBDeployment.getBeans();
  | //process beans to add config;
  | EJBDeployment.setBeans(beans); 
  | 

This convenience config topic is too wide open to grok effectively because its 
mixing several different layers. Its a variation of the *-ds.xml vs the 
underlying jboss-service.xml mbeans for the datasource layer, and as such its 
really intersecting with the admin ui layer. Turing around and discussing how 
this impacts the type interfaces showing up at the object based kernel 
metamodel is making a huge leap without any usecases to justify it.

Due to the historical tight coupling of xml configuration views with xml 
parsing showing up in the codebase, I want to be clear that when we discuss 
configuration using xml fragments that this implies the existence of a jbossxb 
layer which is handling the actual xml to object transformation. As such, a 
convience configuration further impiles another layer on top of the jbossxb 
layer. The layer could just be an xml transformation to the full schema, or it 
could be another namespace that maps to jbossxb factories that extend the full 
schema factories.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864279#3864279

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864279


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-testsuite build.59 Build Fixed

2005-01-30 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20050130145402Lbuild.59
BUILD COMPLETE-build.59Date of build:01/30/2005 14:54:02Time to build:74 minutes 10 secondsLast changed:01/28/2005 20:44:16Last log entry:Create a ServiceContext in the RUNNING state in the preRegister callback so that the ServiceController can be used as a depends target. Resolves [JBAS-1354] Dependency on the ServiceController is broken.




   Unit Tests: (1936)   Total Errors and Failures: (23)testNoClassDefFoundErrororg.jboss.test.classloader.test.BasicLoaderUnitTestCaseunknownorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.LargeMessageUnitTestCaseunknownorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILConnectionUnitTestCasetestQueueMessageOrderorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestRequestReplyQueueorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestTemporaryQueueDeleteorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestTemporaryTopicDeleteorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestInvalidDestinationQueueSendorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestInvalidDestinationQueueBrowseorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestInvalidDestinationTopicPublishorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestErrorsTopicSubscribeorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestCreateQueueorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestMessageListenerorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestApplicationServerStufforg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestTopicsorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestTopicNoLocalorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestTopicNoLocalBounceorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestTopicSelectorChangeorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestTopicSelectorNullOrEmptyorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestSendReceiveOutdatedorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestSendReceiveExpiredorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestSendListenOutdatedorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILJBossMQUnitTestCasetestSRPLoginWithAuxChallengeorg.jboss.test.security.test.SRPLoginModuleUnitTestCase
Modifications since last build:(2)1.18.2.20modifiedstarksmsystem/src/main/org/jboss/system/ServiceController.javaCreate a ServiceContext in the RUNNING state in the preRegister callback so that the ServiceController can be used as a depends target. Resolves [JBAS-1354] Dependency on the ServiceController is broken.1.1.2.6modifiedstarksmserver/src/main/org/jboss/proxy/GenericProxyFactory.javaCreate a ClientContainerEx if the proxy interceptor list includes the org.jboss.proxy.IClientContainer so that the proxy handler has an implementation for the IClientContainer methods. Resolves [JBAS-1352] Generalized detached invoker proxy factory handling of IClientContainer.



[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBCACHE-37) Stack Overflow when using Collection classes in TreeCacheAop

2005-01-30 Thread Ben Wang (JIRA)
 [ 
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-37?page=comments#action_12315062 ]
 
Ben Wang commented on JBCACHE-37:
-

Andrew,

I have checked in a CacheObjectMBeanUnitTestCase under 
jboss-head/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/aop directory. I have a 
bind method and do a look up of MBeanServer like you did (in cache/bean 
directory).

However, I can't reproduce the error! Did you ever try your test case under 
jboss-head build? You can wait for 24 hours to check out the source and see for 
yourself.

Let me know what you find. Meanwhile, I will ask Aop team to see if they see 
anything wrong on the aop lib.

-Ben

 Stack Overflow when using Collection classes in TreeCacheAop
 

  Key: JBCACHE-37
  URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-37
  Project: JBoss Cache
 Type: Bug
 Versions: 1.2
  Environment: JBoss 4.0.1, JDK 1.5 (and also 1.4.2), Linux (Mandrake 10.0)
 Reporter: Andrew May
 Assignee: Ben Wang
  Fix For: 1.2.1
  Attachments: cachetest.jar, cachetest.zip, jboss-aop.xml, project.zip, 
 treeCacheAop-service.xml


 Stack overflow when calling TreeCacheAop.putObject(Fqn, Object) for an 
 aspectized object that contains a Collection class (tested with HashSet, 
 ArrayList and HashMap):
 Thread [http-0.0.0.0-7001-Processor25] (Suspended (exception 
 java.lang.StackOverflowError))
   
 org.jboss.aop.deployment.JBossClassPool(javassist.ClassPool).toClass(javassist.CtClass)
  line: 713
 ...
   org.jboss.aop.deployment.JBossClassPool.toClass(javassist.CtClass, 
 java.lang.ClassLoader) line: 50
   
 org.jboss.aop.deployment.JBossClassPool(javassist.ClassPool).toClass(javassist.CtClass)
  line: 713
   org.jboss.aop.deployment.JBossClassPool.toClass(javassist.CtClass, 
 java.lang.ClassLoader) line: 50
   
 org.jboss.aop.deployment.JBossClassPool(javassist.ClassPool).toClass(javassist.CtClass)
  line: 713
   org.jboss.aop.deployment.JBossClassPool.toClass(javassist.CtClass, 
 java.lang.ClassLoader) line: 50
   javassist.CtNewClass(javassist.CtClass).toClass() line: 1000
   org.jboss.aop.proxy.ClassProxyFactory.generateProxy(java.lang.Class) 
 line: 138
   org.jboss.aop.proxy.ClassProxyFactory.newInstance(java.lang.Class) 
 line: 52
   
 org.jboss.cache.aop.CollectionInterceptorUtil.getMethodMap(java.lang.Class) 
 line: 50
   
 org.jboss.cache.aop.CachedSetInterceptor.init(org.jboss.cache.aop.TreeCacheAop,
  org.jboss.cache.Fqn, java.lang.Class) line: 41
   org.jboss.cache.aop.TreeCacheAop._putObject(org.jboss.cache.Fqn, 
 java.lang.Object) line: 372
   org.jboss.cache.aop.TreeCacheAop._putObject(org.jboss.cache.Fqn, 
 java.lang.Object) line: 265
   org.jboss.cache.aop.TreeCacheAop.putObject(org.jboss.cache.Fqn, 
 java.lang.Object) line: 130
 Originally this was happening within our application, but I've managed to 
 write a simple test bean that demonstrates the problem.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Deployers overview

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the common behavior mode when there is aggregation:
anonymous wrote : 
  | The use case I can think of where coupling of metadata is required is when 
the classloader metadata is constructed. Each subdeployment can add metadata 
(urls) to the top level metadata that creates the classloader.
  | 
  | This is probably the more common pattern. i.e. Each subdeployment builds up 
metadata (e.g. urls) at the top level which is processed last and adds global 
policy (e.g. classloader isolation, java2 delegation, etc.)
  | 

A given deployment is likely to have configuration of an aspect that needs to 
be merged into the aggregate view when the deployment is joined to other 
deployments. In addition to class loading, logging and security are two more 
examples of aspects that should have an aggregate metadata and behavior. Its 
also non-deterministic as to what the aggregate behavior should be. In the case 
of logging it may be that the independent logging configurations should be left 
as is. An equally valid view is that the logging configuration seen at the root 
most level takes precedence.

Likewise how the merged security aspect should behave is arbitrary. It can be 
anything from independent untrusted domains to a global override from the root, 
to federated domains that have to arrange migration of security contexts based 
on trust relationships that are described by metadata that has no meaning in 
absence of aggregation.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864280#3864280

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864280


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: VDFComponent

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Another attribute missing in the VDFComponent is the notion of attributes. The 
current LastModified is a read-only attribute and Context is a read-write 
attribute. A generic DirContext like notion of attributes should be available.

The DeploymentContext is missing an arbitrary context map that existed in the 
DeploymentInfo. This is something that is used by the current deployers for 
shared state.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864282#3864282

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864282


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: JARDeployer

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't see that the JARDeployer has any reason for existence. If there is 
referenced content that has no associated deployer it should not just be added 
to some classpath. The configuration of the class and resource paths is an 
aspect of some deployment.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864283#3864283

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864283


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBIDE-115) Differentiate icons for fork/join

2005-01-30 Thread Juha Lindfors (JIRA)
Differentiate icons for fork/join
-

 Key: JBIDE-115
 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-115
 Project: JBoss IDE
Type: Feature Request
  Components: jBPM Designer plugin  
Versions: 1.5 alpha
 Environment: JBossIDE 1.5 Preview JRE 1.5
Reporter: Juha Lindfors
 Assigned to: Koen Aers 
Priority: Minor


The fork and join nodes should have visually slightly different icons.

I was shifting some nodes around in the designer and ended up placing a join 
node where I wanted a fork node. Designer correctly did not allow me to add 
more than one outgoing transition from a join which was very confusing since I 
thought I was handling a fork node (since there was no visual cue as to which 
is which as the icons are identical -- very perplexing).

A simple +/- signs or similar to match fork/join node pairs would be sufficient 
to avoid such mix-ups with the designer icons.



-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Keep STARTUP notification

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The more generic issue here is that there is often the desire to have a 
dependency on a collection of services with some quality. Examples include:


Services with network endpoints
Services which interact with the filesystem access
Services which write to the filesystem


Its not always that there should be a true start/stop type of dependency on the 
services.

If there was a snapshot service which periodically backedup the contents of 
serveral directories when the filesystem had no active writers, its not that 
the services which wrote to the filesystem need to be stopped. They simply need 
to be in a state that has no writers. Its more of a lock the snapshot service 
wishes to acquire and will wait until its notified that its the sole holder of 
the lock.

The problem with trying to introduce this notion is that services are not 
generally written with sufficient granularity to allow facets of their behavior 
to be micromanged. The existing JNDI service and a desire to control when 
network interfaces are established is an example. The JNDI service can 
operation fine without an external interface, but the way its coded today, if 
it were to depend on a network interface barrier service to delay the creation 
of its remote JNDI access endpoint, the local operation mode would also be 
unavailable and the server startup would fail horribly as numerous services 
failed to access JNDI via the default InitialContext.


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864284#3864284

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864284


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.751 Build Successful

2005-01-30 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050130165452Lbuild.751
BUILD COMPLETE-build.751Date of build:01/30/2005 16:54:52Time to build:18 minutes 14 secondsLast changed:01/30/2005 16:28:21Last log entry:Used different JGroups ports




   Unit Tests: (0)   Total Errors and Failures: (0)
Modifications since last build:(9)1.3modifiedbwang00testsuite/src/resources/cache/META-INF/tree-aop-service.xmlUsed different JGroups ports1.7modifiedbwang00testsuite/src/resources/cache/META-INF/tree-service.xmlUsed different JGroups ports1.1addedbwang00testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/aop/CacheObjectMBeanUnitTestCase.javaRenamed CacheObjectUnitAopTest to CacheObjectMBeanUnitTestCase1.2deletedbwang00testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/aop/CacheObjectUnitAopTest.javaRenamed CacheObjectUnitAopTest to CacheObjectMBeanUnitTestCase1.1addedbwang00testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/standAloneAop/CacheObject.javaAdded a new test case1.1addedbwang00testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/aop/CacheObjectUnitAopTest.javaAdded a new test case1.1addedbwang00testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/bean/CacheObjectMeanTesterBean.javaAdded a new test case1.9modifiedbwang00testsuite/src/resources/cache/standalone/META-INF/jboss-aop.xmlUpdated1.8modifiedbwang00testsuite/src/resources/cache/standalone/META-INF/jboss-aop.xmlAdded ObjectCach



[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (EJBTHREE-60) Write plugin interface for persistence manager

2005-01-30 Thread Bill Burke (JIRA)
 [ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-60?page=history ]

Bill Burke updated EJBTHREE-60:
---

Description: Abstract out persistence so that a thirdparty persistence 
manager can be plugged into JBoss' EJB3 implementation  (was: )

 Write plugin interface for persistence manager
 --

  Key: EJBTHREE-60
  URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-60
  Project: EJB 3.0
 Type: Feature Request
 Versions: Preview 5
 Reporter: Bill Burke
 Assignee: Bill Burke
  Fix For: Preview 5



 Abstract out persistence so that a thirdparty persistence manager can be 
 plugged into JBoss' EJB3 implementation

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (EJBTHREE-60) Write plugin interface for persistence manager

2005-01-30 Thread Bill Burke (JIRA)
Write plugin interface for persistence manager
--

 Key: EJBTHREE-60
 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-60
 Project: EJB 3.0
Type: Feature Request
Versions: Preview 5
Reporter: Bill Burke
 Assigned to: Bill Burke 
 Fix For: Preview 5




-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: timed expiry

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our design of eviction policy is not based on per-node basis. Rather it is 
per-region.

Nonetheless to create *roughly* what you want to achieve, it still can be done 
through the current eviction policy framework.

Couple things need to happen though:

1. Region parameters will need to be configure dynamically. So you work with a 
Region still. Now it is still through configured thorugh xml. But we do have 
plan to add it later. See 
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
 for the roadmap.

2. Write an eviction policy that ignores any node modification event and evict 
based on time. If you want to contribute this piece of code, let me know.

-Ben

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864285#3864285

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864285


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Session Replication using JBossCache

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, you can. But keep in mind that Tomcat seems to have its own persistency 
framework. I haven't looked into it fully yet.

-Ben

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864286#3864286

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864286


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: NullPointerException: TreeCache.put

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will need to supply the JBossCache version. There is little information in 
your posting to see what's going on.

-Ben

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864287#3864287

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864287


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Cache deadlock problem when using TreeCache as 2LC for h

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you enable this in Hibernate to see if that solves the problem:

hibernate.cache.use_minimal_puts

Gavin and I have had a discussion on the potential problem. That, when using 
query cache, Hibernate will do a put on the JBossCache while retrieving from 
db. This can cause a long lock that resulting in TimeoutException.

If this were the case, we will need to provide a way to get around this.

-Ben

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864288#3864288

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864288


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix build.43 Build Successful

2005-01-30 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix?log=log20050130174537Lbuild.43
BUILD COMPLETE-build.43Date of build:01/30/2005 17:45:37Time to build:48 minutes 43 seconds




   Unit Tests: (0)   Total Errors and Failures: (0)
Modifications since last build:(0)



[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Admin Console] - Re: New approach for updating Datasource/Drivers via Admin C

2005-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : If we fall back to the traditional jboss view, 
then:
  | 
  | 1) Invoking on a template for copying static libs into ./lib is not the 
best way. It'd be more straightforward to have on the DeploymentService 
something like:
  | 
  |   | String[] listStaticLibs();
  |   | boolean uploadStaticLib(URL url);
  |   | 
  | 
  | (This doesn't solve the modifications issue, i.e. remove/update a lib)
  | 
I am fine with which either implementing this as a template or new API on 
DeploymentSerivce, as long as the functionality requirements are met


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : 2) From a design point of view, I believe it's much 
more clear to the admin to provide him an exact view of the system, it's 
restrictions and the ability to change it. In this sense you admit that the 
./lib directory contains static libs that can only be changed with a reboot. So 
maybe a better interface is something like:
  | 
  |   |boolean scheduleLibUpdate(URL url);
  |   |boolean scheduleLibRemoval(String libname);
  |   | 
  | The 2 schedule methods will store the new lib/info for removal somewhere, 
then the server upon boot will have to make those changes.
  | 
  | The thing is, the changes need to take place *before* 
./conf/jboss-service.xml is loaded, because this is where the libs are loaded.
  | 
  | Maybe we could pass a new arg at command line, e.g. --update-libs to triger 
this behaviour.
  | 
  | In any case we could proceed with (1) and optionally do (2).
  | 
Agreed lets do (1). For the first phase we will not be requiring any removal or 
update of jars from /lib, so let's not do (2).

Overall the datasource component of the admin console will attempt to abstract 
away some of the details of the implementation. An administrator will 
optionally specify a driver jar to upload and some datasource properties, 
without having to know precisely what we are going to do with that jar. In 
future versions I hope that we will be able to move away from copying the 
driver jars into /lib, without affecting how administrators use the console.

Thanks

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864289#3864289

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864289


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-testsuite Build Failed

2005-01-30 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-testsuite?log=log20050130190046
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:66: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:37: Exit code: 1 See tests.log in Build Artifacts for details. JAVA_HOME=/opt/j2sdk1.4.2_05/Date of build:01/30/2005 19:00:46Time to build:92 minutes 25 secondsLast changed:01/30/2005 11:13:45Last log entry:- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.




   Unit Tests: (0)   Total Errors and Failures: (0)
Modifications since last build:(86)1.355.2.20modifiedremmbuild/build.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.1.2.1modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service-all.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.3.2.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.3.2.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/server.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.3.2.6modifiedvietjtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/JBossCacheManager.javabug fix : JBAS-1358 - Tomcat session replication breaks if there is already an active transaction1.8.6.1modifiedstarksmconsole/src/main/org/jboss/console/plugins/helpers/AbstractPluginWrapper.javaGuard against NPE during shutdown when the plugin manager was not initialized1.45.2.3modifiedstarksmsystem/src/main/org/jboss/system/ServiceController.javaCreate a ServiceContext in the RUNNING state in the preRegister callback so that the ServiceController can be used as a depends target. Resolves [JBAS-1354] Dependency on the ServiceController is broken.1.25.2.2modifiedejortconnector/src/main/org/jboss/resource/connectionmanager/TxConnectionManager.javaPort delist fix from 3.2.x1.64.2.4modifiedejortserver/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jms/JMSContainerInvoker.java[JBAS-1356] Fix typo in activation config parsing subscriptionDurablity - subscriptionDurability1.35.2.1modifiedejortjboss.net/.classpathFix the eclipse build1.8.4.1modifiedejorttomcat/.classpathFix the eclipse build1.10.6.2modifiedejortsecurity/src/main/org/jboss/security/srp/SRPRemoteServer.javaThis exception can no longer be thrown.1.1.2.1modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/context.xml- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.1.1.1.16.1deletedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-mbeans.xml- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.14.2.3deletedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service-50.xml- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.3.2.1modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service.xml- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.16.2.3deletedremmtomcat/src/resources/server-50.xml- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.3.2.1modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/server.xml- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.1.1.1.16.1deletedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/Log4jLogger.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.1.6.1deletedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/mbean-descriptors.xml- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.2.2.3modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/tc5-cluster-service.xml- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.4.2.1modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/web.xml- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.4.2.1modifiedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/sso/ClusteredSingleSignOn.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.3.2.3modifiedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/AttributeBasedClusteredSession.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.5.2.3modifiedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/ClusteredSession.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.1.2.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/ClusteredSessionCMP.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.4.2.1modifiedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/ClusteredSessionValve.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.4.2.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/InstantSnapshotManager.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.4.2.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/IntervalSnapshotManager.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.3.2.5modifiedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/JBossCacheManager.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.3.2.3modifiedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/JBossCacheService.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.5.2.4modifiedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/JBossManager.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 5.5.7.1.1.2.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/JBossManagerCMP.java- Update JBoss 4.0 branch to Tomcat 

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix build.76 Build Successful

2005-01-30 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20050130212643Lbuild.76
BUILD COMPLETE-build.76Date of build:01/30/2005 21:26:43Time to build:23 minutes 45 secondsLast changed:01/30/2005 11:13:45Last log entry:- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.




   Unit Tests: (0)   Total Errors and Failures: (0)
Modifications since last build:(5)1.355.2.20modifiedremmbuild/build.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.1.2.1modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service-all.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.3.2.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.3.2.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/server.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.3.2.6modifiedvietjtomcat/src/main/org/jboss/web/tomcat/tc5/session/JBossCacheManager.javabug fix : JBAS-1358 - Tomcat session replication breaks if there is already an active transaction



[JBoss-dev] jboss-head-testsuite build.11 Build Successful

2005-01-30 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-testsuite?log=log20050130222507Lbuild.11
BUILD COMPLETE-build.11Date of build:01/30/2005 22:25:07Time to build:93 minutes 6 secondsLast changed:01/30/2005 16:28:21Last log entry:Used different JGroups ports




   Unit Tests: (2394)   Total Errors and Failures: (60)unknownorg.jboss.test.bank.test.BankEJB20StressTestCasetestAllTx_RWLockorg.jboss.test.cache.stress.EvictionLocalStressTestCasetestBindingorg.jboss.test.cache.test.aop.CacheObjectMBeanUnitTestCasetestEntityIdentityorg.jboss.test.cts.test.LocalEjbTestCase(UnifiedInvoker)testAllCompleteOrFailCMRorg.jboss.test.deadlock.test.BeanStressTestCasetestEjbInterceptionorg.jboss.test.hibernate.test.HibernateIntgUnitTestCasetestClientContainerorg.jboss.test.invokers.test.MultiInvokersUnitTestCasetestStatefulCreateCallerorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestGetCallerPrincipalorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestPrincipalPropagationorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestMethodAccessorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestDomainMethodAccessorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestMethodAccess2org.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestLocalMethodAccessorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestUncheckedRemoteorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestRemoteUncheckedorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestUncheckedorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestUncheckedWithLoginorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestExcludedorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestRunAsorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestDeepRunAsorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestHandleorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestStatefulHandleorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestClientLoginServletorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCasetestSecureEJBAccessorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCasetestUnsecureAnonEJBAccessorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCasetestUnsecureRunAsServletorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCasetestUnsecureRunAsServletWithPrincipalNameorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCasetestUnsecureRunAsServletWithPrincipalNameAndRolesorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCasetestOIL2MutliSessionOneConnectionorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.perf.OIL2InvocationLayerStressTestCaseunknownorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.LargeMessageUnitTestCaseunknownorg.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.OILConnectionUnitTestCasetestUnsharedConnectionorg.jboss.test.jca.test.UnsharedConnectionUnitTestCasetestCreateSubcontextorg.jboss.test.naming.test.PooledInvokerUnitTestCasetestLookupFailuresorg.jboss.test.naming.test.PooledInvokerUnitTestCasetestClientSessionorg.jboss.test.perf.test.PerfStressTestCasetestClientSessionorg.jboss.test.perf.test.SecurePerfStressTestCasetestOldProxyorg.jboss.test.pooled.test.BeanStressTestCasetestUnsecureRunAsServletorg.jboss.test.securitymgr.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCasetestUnsecureRunAsServletorg.jboss.test.web.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCasetestHttpRedirectorg.jboss.test.web.test.ssl.SSLUnitTestCasetestHttpsorg.jboss.test.web.test.ssl.SSLUnitTestCasewarningorg.jboss.test.cts.test.ClientCallbackImpl(UnifiedInvoker)warningorg.jboss.test.cts.test.MDBInvoker(UnifiedInvoker)testPoolingorg.jboss.test.cts.test.MDBUnitTestCase(UnifiedInvoker)testPoolingorg.jboss.test.cts.test.MDBUnitTestCasewarningorg.jboss.test.cts.test.SessionInvoker(UnifiedInvoker)testMDBRunAsorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestRunAsWithRolesorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestStressorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestStressNoJaasCacheorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.EJBSpecUnitTestCasetestUserInRoleServletorg.jboss.test.jacc.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCasetestSRPLoginWithAuxChallengeorg.jboss.test.security.test.SRPLoginModuleUnitTestCasetestPoolingorg.jboss.test.securitymgr.test.MDBUnitTestCasetestUserInRoleServletorg.jboss.test.securitymgr.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCasetestMDBTimerorg.jboss.test.timer.test.BasicTimerUnitTestCasetestJBossEditorsorg.jboss.test.util.test.PropertyEditorsUnitTestCasetestFormAuthSingleSignOnorg.jboss.test.web.test.ClusteredSingleSignOnUnitTestCase(tomcat-sso-cluster)testFormAuthSingleSignOnorg.jboss.test.web.test.SingleSignOnUnitTestCasetestUserInRoleServletorg.jboss.test.web.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCase
Modifications since last build:(25)1.3modifiedbwang00testsuite/src/resources/cache/META-INF/tree-aop-service.xmlUsed different JGroups ports1.7modifiedbwang00testsuite/src/resources/cache/META-INF/tree-service.xmlUsed different JGroups ports1.1addedbwang00testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/aop/CacheObjectMBeanUnitTestCase.javaRenamed CacheObjectUnitAopTest to 

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head-jdk-matrix build.70 Build Successful

2005-01-30 Thread qa

View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20050131002031Lbuild.70
BUILD COMPLETE-build.70Date of build:01/31/2005 00:20:31Time to build:21 minutes 29 secondsLast changed:01/30/2005 16:28:21Last log entry:Used different JGroups ports




   Unit Tests: (0)   Total Errors and Failures: (0)
Modifications since last build:(25)1.3modifiedbwang00testsuite/src/resources/cache/META-INF/tree-aop-service.xmlUsed different JGroups ports1.7modifiedbwang00testsuite/src/resources/cache/META-INF/tree-service.xmlUsed different JGroups ports1.1addedbwang00testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/aop/CacheObjectMBeanUnitTestCase.javaRenamed CacheObjectUnitAopTest to CacheObjectMBeanUnitTestCase1.2deletedbwang00testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/aop/CacheObjectUnitAopTest.javaRenamed CacheObjectUnitAopTest to CacheObjectMBeanUnitTestCase1.1addedbwang00testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/standAloneAop/CacheObject.javaAdded a new test case1.1addedbwang00testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/test/aop/CacheObjectUnitAopTest.javaAdded a new test case1.1addedbwang00testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/bean/CacheObjectMeanTesterBean.javaAdded a new test case1.9modifiedbwang00testsuite/src/resources/cache/standalone/META-INF/jboss-aop.xmlUpdated1.8modifiedbwang00testsuite/src/resources/cache/standalone/META-INF/jboss-aop.xmlAdded ObjectCach1.4modifiedloubyanskytestsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/xml/MiscUnitTestCase.javatests for metadata driven object model factory and xsd binder1.4modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/AbstractBasicElementBinding.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.1addedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/AttributeBinding.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.3modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/BasicElementBinding.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.2modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/BindingCursor.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.3modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/DocumentBindingFactory.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.3modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/RuntimeDocumentBinding.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.1addedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/metadata/unmarshalling/XsdBinder.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.1addedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/MetadataDrivenObjectModelFactory.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.5modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/SimpleTypeBindings.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.24modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/Unmarshaller.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.4modifiedloubyanskycommon/src/main/org/jboss/xml/binding/UnmarshallerImpl.javaadded AttributeBinding metadata, metadata driven ObjectModelFactory impl, xsd binder that reads xsd and creates binding metadata1.384modifiedremmbuild/build.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.2modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service-all.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.4modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/jboss-service.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.1.4modifiedremmtomcat/src/resources/server.xml- Improve the default configuration so that clustering works in all.



[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: Postgresql setup

2005-01-30 Thread scean_1
I have the same problem as you have. And I want to know the reason too.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864290#3864290

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864290


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-1358) Tomcat session replication breaks if there is already an active transaction

2005-01-30 Thread Ben Wang (JIRA)
 [ 
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1358?page=comments#action_12315067 ]
 
Ben Wang commented on JBAS-1358:


Julien,

Thanks for fixing this clustering related bug. Just curious though. How did you 
discover this bug? I thought when httprequest is called by the container, it 
will have no associated active tx since this is web that we are talking about?

BTW, have you applied change to head as well?

-Ben

 Tomcat session replication breaks if there is already an active transaction
 ---

  Key: JBAS-1358
  URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1358
  Project: JBoss Application Server
 Type: Bug
   Components: Clustering
 Versions:  JBossAS-4.0.2RC1, JBossAS-4.0.2 Final
  Environment: the all configuration
 Reporter: Julien Viet
 Assignee: Julien Viet
  Fix For:  JBossAS-4.0.2RC1, JBossAS-4.0.2 Final


 Original Estimate: 4 hours
 Remaining: 4 hours

 When an active transaction is running the session replication breaks.
 It uses javax.transaction.UserTransaction to begin/commit to wrap the jboss 
 cache replication.
 This breaks when a transaction is already active.
 The solution is to use the transaction manager instead of user transaction 
 and suspend/resume
 any incoming transaction before/after the session replication occurs.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-1360) session unbound event not fired

2005-01-30 Thread Ben Wang (JIRA)
session unbound event not fired
---

 Key: JBAS-1360
 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1360
 Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Bug
  Components: Clustering  
Versions: JBossAS-3.2.6 Final
Reporter: Ben Wang
 Assigned to: Ben Wang 
 Fix For:  JBossAS-3.2.8 Final


When using http session replication, session attribute unbound event is not 
fired.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.jboss.com/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - new release already old?

2005-01-30 Thread elkner
Hi,

I just wanna start to evaluate the Portal, but unfortunately there is no way, to
get it compiled and thus to test :(. Digging around, I saw, that the build 
system enforces 
target 1.2 and source 1.3 ! 

Why?  I thought, this is a new major release ? Are there any reasons, why you 
force
people and yourself to outdated (antique) Java versions? 

IMHO since it is (at least according to announcements) a complete rewrite of 
Nukes,
why are you not using all the nice features comming with tiger aka JDK 1.5 and
really get rid of the old limitations ?

Even JBoss AS compiles with 1.5 without any problems (ok, sometimes target 1.4
is used - I guess because of unfixed thirdparty software - however, that's 
still better
than the other ancient stuff) 

BTW2: Is there any reason to force people to use the outdated version of ant ? 
Or is
 this just introduced due to the  scary/limited build system used ?

Regards,
jens.

View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864295#3864295

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864295


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - exceptions when tried to List of all the users

2005-01-30 Thread clownfish
there was an exception when i login as admin and tried to do List of all the 
users 

Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check 
the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax 
to use near '? '%'  limit ?' at line 1

How can i solve this prob? thanks!

btw, i'm using JBoss 4.0.1 with portal 2.0 alpha, thanx!


View the original post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3864297#3864297

Reply to the post : 
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3864297


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag--drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development