Re: theming jenkins

Hi Kayn, I'm John Snow about web design, but any improvements about web interface & custom themes may be useful. If you want to customize appearance of your own Jenkins instance: - There is a UI Themes plugin from Tom Fennely (in Cc) -

Re: theming jenkins

So so others know - this thread was continued here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/jenkinsci-dev/Kayn/jenkinsci-dev/zDaX4yiWLLw/A5sSRsa6CQAJ (also, I LOLed over the Jhon Snow reference about java, thanks for the chuckle;) On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 11:56:26 PM UTC+11, Kayn Ty

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 4:13:55 PM UTC+11, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > > Well, might be because I'm french and don't hear English accent subtleties > but I hear "Git" like in "guy" here > > https://youtu.be/4XpnKHJAok8 > > (Please note that this is NOT to support the tone Jesse's

Re: theming jenkins

On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 6:32:13 AM UTC+1, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > Hi Kayn, > > I'm John Snow about web design, but any improvements about web interface & > custom themes may be useful. > > If you want to customize appearance of your own Jenkins instance: > >- There is a UI Themes

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

Le 7 oct. 2015 7:16 AM, "Michael Neale" a écrit : > > > > On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 4:13:55 PM UTC+11, Baptiste Mathus wrote: >> >> Well, might be because I'm french and don't hear English accent subtleties but I hear "Git" like in "guy" here >> >>

Re: Refreshing the Jenkins UI

I also think it would be great for those who are less into java to be able to focus on the UI (as Kayn mentioned on another thread), a worthy goal. On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 4:27:36 AM UTC+11, Gus Reiber wrote: > > Hey Kayn! >Awesome. > Unfortunately, theming has died on the vine

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 2:32:03 PM UTC+11, Jesse Farinacci wrote: > > > > > > just because he can not pronounce the word 'git'. > Linus says it is pronounced "jit". > > >> > >> > >> Look at Bamboo, or Travis. These CI engines are about 9000 light years > >> ahead of us from a

Re: Refreshing the Jenkins UI

On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 6:09:17 AM UTC+1, Michael Neale wrote: > > I also think it would be great for those who are less into java to be able > to focus on the UI (as Kayn mentioned on another thread), a worthy goal. > Right, using more modern JS frameworks + being able to upgrade them

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

So in re: backend storage - a possible pilot suggestion - unit test results. That's something that'd be really handy to be able to query/report on outside of Jenkins, and is fairly self contained... A. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Daniel Beck wrote: > > On 06.10.2015, at

Re: Improvement proposal for jenkinsci/jenkins repo review process

If the comment is detailed enough then it doesn't add any value See for sample answer I got for a PR on docker, which was rejected. Kind message and reference to project guidelines, but no :-1: or anything comparable -> https://github.com/docker/docker/pull/16794#issuecomment-145849500 2015-10-06

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

Remarkable. On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 at 1:50 PM, Surya Gaddipati wrote: > >Surya, in your case has being DB backed helped load times? (If you can >> say) >> > > Yes, definitely. That was the original impetus behind moving stuff into > the database. We went from > 45 mins

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

My $0.02 is that you're totally on the wrong track entirely. In the redesign. In the claim that the website is shit. I don't think I've ever disagreed more with a single person not working at Oracle. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Gus Reiber wrote: > Hey all, >So a

Re: performance labs

Agree on all counts, as long as it is sufficiently large/complicated enough to exercise enough code that it represents what people are observing. Certainly the result would have to be a trend of some meaningful statistic over time, with permutations of versions. I think sticking to launch time

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

Well I guess I wouldn't have said it was 'shit'. Hopefully I did not. But, I am saying it isn't very good. What about it do you think is particularly good? That it exists is good. Very good. ...but otherwise, what is your favorite part? On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 8:10:28 PM UTC-7,

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

Do you have any specific feedback other than disagreement with an assertion? On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 2:10:28 PM UTC+11, Jesse Farinacci wrote: > > My $0.02 is that you're totally on the wrong track entirely. In the > redesign. In the claim that the website is shit. I don't think I've

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

Frankly speaking, and I'm sorry to be so honest, but your ideas are quite simply retrograde. If you're going to redesign the site, can you please not make it look like it was invented back in 2000? Seriously. Make it responsive by default. Use font icons. Get rid of stapler, use servlet 3.0. Can

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

Aside from what I've already said: * mobile first; responsive * servlet 3.0/ jax-rs 1.1 * pretend stapler never existed * pretend our icon system never existed; use font-awesome * make keyboard shortcuts (see my plugin) part of the base * make the entire UI based on jax-rs so we can re-skin it

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

Amen to getting rid of Stapler and Jelly, responsive layouts and fonts for icons. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Michael Neale wrote: > (replies inline) > > On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 2:22:47 PM UTC+11, Jesse Farinacci wrote: >> >> Frankly speaking, and I'm sorry

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

(replies inline) On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Michael Neale wrote: > (replies inline) > > On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 2:22:47 PM UTC+11, Jesse Farinacci wrote: >> >> Frankly speaking, and I'm sorry to be so honest, but your ideas are >> quite simply retrograde.

Re: [2.0] Website rebump

Seriously, this idea is so obvious I almost hate to mention it. Make the site a repository and accept pull requests. How hard is that? I bet the site would improve drastically with small and simple pull requests, but also large changes which let users really go wild. Jenkins was made great by

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

This thread is about jenkins-ci.org the website and content, mailing lists. Not jenkins the web-ui - not sure if that is clear. On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 2:32:03 PM UTC+11, Jesse Farinacci wrote: > > (replies inline) > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Michael Neale

Re: Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

Ok, sorry. I really don't like anything that certain people are putting out. If I misread this, I apologize. I haven't had time to respond in all the 454 threads about redesign. I don't like the direction any of this is going and I finally have time to type. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:34 PM,

Re: [2.0] Website rebump

Show me the beef. Where's the repo? On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Gus Reiber wrote: > Fair enough. > Let's see the pull requests, then. It has been a long time and they haven't > come. > > ...10 years as you point out for the product GUI. I am not sure when the >

Re: [2.0] Website rebump

Fair enough. Let's see the pull requests, then. It has been a long time and they haven't come. ...10 years as you point out for the product GUI. I am not sure when the Jenkins-ci.org website was last overhauled, but I am guessing at least 5 years ago. On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:34 PM, jieryn

Deleting a renamed wiki page for Phabricator Plugin

Greetings, I renamed the "Phabricator Plugin" to "Phabricator Differential Plugin" to provide more clarity around what the plugin does. There are now two wiki pages, which is confusing: https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Phabricator+Plugin

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

Regarding backend solution. We use DotCi and store all builds/logs in mongodb.( Still experimenting how to properly store logs in the db, but we have it working on staging). The only things on disks are plugins and folder config.xml ( because of this issue

Re: Throttle Concurrent Builds Plugin Question

Hi Dmitry, Added jenkinsci-dev mailing list to Cc. It's a right place to discuss particular improvements (especially if you add plugin owners to Cc). I am trying to set up a multi-configuration matrix build, that will have > 250 to 500 builds. However, we only have 100 nodes to run at the time,

Re: Deleting a renamed wiki page for Phabricator Plugin

There's a caching layer in front of Confluence. Just give it a bit of time. On 06.10.2015, at 19:47, Aiden Scandella wrote: > Greetings, > > I renamed the "Phabricator Plugin" to "Phabricator Differential Plugin" to > provide more clarity around what the plugin

Re: Adopting a few plugins

Oleg, gentle bump. On Saturday, October 3, 2015 at 12:16:26 PM UTC-4, Arcadiy Ivanov wrote: > > Hi Oleg, > > I am aware of the common practices, thanks. :) My question was of a more > practical nature: how would I get credentials to upload a release of a > plugin I've been granted a

Re: Adopting a few plugins

Sorry, I completely lost the spin today. I’ll try to check the current status of requests tomorrow. If there is a hurry, probably somebody else could review the request. > On 06 Oct 2015, at 22:06, Arcadiy Ivanov wrote: > > Great! What about getting committer access to the

Re: Deleting a renamed wiki page for Phabricator Plugin

I renamed a month ago or so and it's still there. On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 11:03:42 AM UTC-7, Daniel Beck wrote: > > There's a caching layer in front of Confluence. Just give it a bit of > time. > > On 06.10.2015, at 19:47, Aiden Scandella > wrote: > > >

Re: Adopting a few plugins

Hi Arcadiy, Push permissions and Jenkins JIRA account should be enough. Best regards, Oleg > On 06 Oct 2015, at 22:00, Arcadiy Ivanov wrote: > > Oleg, gentle bump. > > On Saturday, October 3, 2015 at 12:16:26 PM UTC-4, Arcadiy Ivanov wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > I am aware of

Re: Improvement proposal for jenkinsci/jenkins repo review process

I like the labels but dislike the +1 / -1 approach imho a reviewer can make comments on the proposed changes, some can be pure enthusiasm but most of them will be to discuss some constructs or API use that looks incorrect, and just putting such a comment with explanation why this should be

Re: Adopting a few plugins

No worries, it can wait till tomorrow. On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 3:28:17 PM UTC-4, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > Sorry, I completely lost the spin today. > I’ll try to check the current status of requests tomorrow. If there is a > hurry, probably somebody else could review the request. > > On 06

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

That would be a good compromise on the whole discussion. Unless someone has an issue with aligning us as a build system? :) Richard. On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 at 01:31 Nigel Magnay wrote: > >> Personally still trying to decide if it's visionnary or weird ;-). >> But indeed,

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

Surya, in your case has being DB backed helped load times? (If you can say) On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 at 9:25 AM, Michael Neale wrote: > On "controversy", I think it may be due to the longevity of stuff in > Jenkins being far beyond what most popular JavaScript frameworks

Re: [2.0] Website rebump

That's fair. Moderating a sight can get to be a lot of work. ...although, at the point at which you have so much externally contributed content that the task of moderating the site becomes a big burden, the site is almost by definition a big success. The current website doesn't generate a lot

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

On "controversy", I think it may be due to the longevity of stuff in Jenkins being far beyond what most popular JavaScript frameworks lifetime appears to be (slight exaggeration). Jquery is a notable exception. Perhaps react will be another (I know lots of people do get really good results with

Re: performance labs

Yes that would be quite interesting. A stand alone tool could be useful. There are lots of things to measure but generating a lot of noise and jobs would be a great start. When you say "job upload" what were you measuring? On Fri, 2 Oct 2015 at 9:59 PM, Vojtech Juranek wrote:

Re: Adopting a few plugins

Great! What about getting committer access to the plugins below? On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 3:02:07 PM UTC-4, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > Hi Arcadiy, > > Push permissions and Jenkins JIRA account should be enough. > > Best regards, > Oleg > > On 06 Oct 2015, at 22:00, Arcadiy Ivanov

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

> > >Surya, in your case has being DB backed helped load times? (If you can > say) > Yes, definitely. That was the original impetus behind moving stuff into the database. We went from > 45 mins load time to < 1 min. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Deleting a renamed wiki page for Phabricator Plugin

Yeah, sorry, this is a known issue with the wiki caching: https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/INFRA-301 On 06/10/15 20:50, Aiden Scandella wrote: > I renamed a month ago or so and it's still there. > > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 11:03:42 AM UTC-7, Daniel Beck wrote: > > There's a

jenkins.ci library releases.

Hi all I've reconfigured the template for the Jenkins™ libraries on https://jenkins.ci.cloudbees.com so that the m2release plugin is enabled so you can perform releases directly from Jenkins™ (just as you can with the plugins). Apologies for those that haven't got a login - (which is probably

[ANN] Oleg Nenashev to lead remoting

Hello, fellow Jenkins developers, In an continuing effort to remove/reduce SPoF and bottlenecks, I'm announcing that I'm handing over the crown of the remoting lead to Oleg Nenashev. I've originally wrote this part of Jenkins in Chrismas of 2006, which

Jenkins-ci.org v.2 (for love or money!)

Hey all, So a related thread exists here , but I have a couple of bits I didn't want lost in a thread. They are: - *We are hiring! *I am looking for a contract based web designer with a nice portfolio to show to help

Jenkins auth does not work (LDAP issue?)

Hi INFRA team, Seems LDAP auth is dead again. I cannot login to JIRA and Confluence for last 6 hours. IRC Bot also returns error 401. Could you fix it? Thanks in advance, Oleg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

On 06.10.2015, at 14:19, martinda wrote: > Definitely not fixed in LTS 1.609.3. It is so bad my browser becomes > inoperative as soon as I click "More..." in the build history, and I have to > restart it. My users are complaining loud about this. Build history >

theming jenkins

hi folks, i am mainly a front end developper, so i wondered how i could make my own theme (to publish it on github) so that anyone can use other themes for their jenkins. I am Jhon Snow about java ( i know nothing, but i achieved to set up my own jenkins and some jobs at my server ) so i would

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

> > Personally still trying to decide if it's visionnary or weird ;-). > But indeed, jenkins.cd is also growing on me. Maybe others system will > just follow The Jenkins Way like they all struggle to do currently ;-). > > ​Until continuous-X becomes the 'new hotness'. http://jenkins.build ? (see

Re: Improvement proposal for jenkinsci/jenkins repo review process

+1 for the labels too. Well, Nicolas, IMO -1 can just be a summary of the comment (but not the only thing, granted), not necessarily offensive (though I can see where you're coming...). 2015-10-06 8:53 GMT+02:00 nicolas de loof : > I like the labels but dislike the +1 /

Re: Adopt-a-plugin!

https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Plugin+Report+Card I wrote a backend job that produces a report of plugins which "probably" are neglected. Neglected in this context being a plugin with required core that is very old. On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Oleg Nenashev

Re: [Jenkins-infra] Jenkins auth does not work (LDAP issue?)

Appears to work again. On 06.10.2015, at 12:42, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi INFRA team, > > Seems LDAP auth is dead again. I cannot login to JIRA and Confluence for last > 6 hours. IRC Bot also returns error 401. > > Could you fix it? > > Thanks in advance, > Oleg >

Re: [Jenkins-infra] Jenkins auth does not work (LDAP issue?)

I restarted LDAP It probably stopped and not started in its restart process like it happens sometimes I see nothing wrong in logs cheers > On 06 Oct 2015, at 13:50, Daniel Beck wrote: > > Appears to work again. > > On 06.10.2015, at 12:42, Oleg Nenashev

Re: Refreshing the Jenkins UI

hi folks, i would love to contribute to this UI refresh. i am looking for ressources to understand how it is organised and how to test my new theme locally. (i know nothing about java, i am a front end dev) i can't find docs about theming, can you show me please ? Le lundi 26 mai 2014 15:54:21

Re: Jenkins 2.0 proposal

> > >Oh that is quite interesting. By react you mean react from facebook? > Yep. Found it really easy to do server side rendering with Nashorn. >We purposely stayed away from using the likes of React/Polymer etc in the install wizard. We feel it would be too "controversial" to use in

Re: Refreshing the Jenkins UI

Hey Kayn! Awesome. Unfortunately, theming has died on the vine here a little bit. My friend and co-worker, Tom Fennelly had/has queued up some some core changes for Jenkins geared toward enabling LESS driven CSS to manipulate a significant portion of the Jenkins GUI, but that PR died in