Re: Using JDK 11 instead of JDK 8 in default docker images

own to defaults I think. > > We’ve seen the numbers rise as we changed the website and helm chart to > use Java 11 by default > > On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 17:08, Daniel Beck wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 1:42 AM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > I am in favor of maki

Re: Stapler IntelliJ Plugin JetBrains Marketplace listing

pecific features, >> I actually had the same though. I even put it in writing :) >> https://github.com/stapler/idea-stapler-plugin/issues/43 >> >> On Wednesday, 5 May 2021 at 16:51:12 UTC+10 Oleg Nenashev wrote: >> >>> I went ahead and created >>> ht

Re: Stapler IntelliJ Plugin JetBrains Marketplace listing

enkins > > Is that an expected contact point? Would it be better to set the dev > mailing list or infra? > > On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 08:41, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> Added Tim and Kohsuke to the org. Everyone is admin for now. >> We can figure out permissions later if ne

Proposal: "Friend Of Jenkins" Revamp

plugin and somehow allowing to verify the “Friend of Jenkins” status. Although I proposed it, now I do not think it is really needed. We can discuss it for future iterations. Would appreciate any feedback, and I suggest discussing that at the next Governance meeting. Best regards, Oleg Nenash

Re: Jenkins Governance Meeting on May 05, 2021

on the proposed action plan. > > As much as I would obviously love to move forward sooner than later, I > think asking for a decision already would be a bit too early and > disingenuous from me. 🙂 > > > Le mar. 4 mai 2021 à 23:16, Oleg Nenashev a écrit : > >> Hu Baptiste.

Re: Adoption of plugin Google Container Registry Auth

Thanks for your interest Vincent! The plugin is not marked for adoption, so we will need to ping the maintainers even after 5 years of inactivity (pending plugin EOL/adoption policy discussion ). I will do it. I have also reviewed the pull

Re: Adoption of plugin Google Container Registry Auth

CCed Wei Z who is currently listed as the plugin maintainer. According to the plugin adoption policy , we will wait for 2 weeks for a response. An earlier response will be appreciated! -- You received this message because you

Re: Plugin end-of-life (EOL) policy

ns the same. > > Thank you Oleg for triggering the discussion. > > On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 7:08 PM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> I tentatively put the topic to the tomorrow's governance meeting agenda: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/11Nr8QpqYgBiZjORplL_3Zkwys2q

Re: Online Meetup Submission - From local installation to scalable Jenkins on Kubernetes

Hi, thanks for the proposal! We should definitely do this meetup, Jenkins Operator for Kubernetes is a hot topic. Created a Doodle Poll for the final timeslot: https://doodle.com/poll/a8w4r86q29rgdt42?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 2:21:15 PM UTC+2 bant...@virtus

Re: Online Meetup Submission - From local installation to scalable Jenkins on Kubernetes

// CC Advocacy&Outreach SIG On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:59 PM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi, thanks for the proposal! > We should definitely do this meetup, Jenkins Operator for Kubernetes is a > hot topic. > Created a Doodle Poll for the final timeslot: > https://doodle.com/po

Re: Jenkins SDLC Security: LFX Security/Snyk adoption status updates

ce we are allowed to have a second Github Organization, I would be very >> interested to experiment with it for the jenkins-infra organization. >> >> On Monday, 3 May 2021 at 22:24:44 UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the interest Daniel! >>>

Re: Hosting Team

Hi all, We did not have a meeting today, because there were no participants except Alex Earl and Daniel Beck. It was a nice chat though. For the original topic, we plan to restart the Doodle poll and reconvene after we find more interested contributors. If you are interested to start contribu

Re: [Heads-up] Removing commons-digester from Jenkins Core (and the link with our plugins EOL policy discussion :-))

the goal to improve Jenkins and reduce maintenance overheads On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 7:13:42 PM UTC+2 Baptiste Mathus wrote: > > Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 19:08, Jesse Glick a écrit : > >> On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 10:58 PM Oleg Nenashev >> wrote: >> >>> What a

Re: JEPs & BDFL ~ KK

I suggest landing the already agreed changes first. I see merits in some redesign, but I would not like to block other changes by that On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 8:53 PM Jesse Glick wrote: > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:44 PM Liam Newman wrote: > >> Instead of having proposed JEPs sit as PRs until

Re: Jenkins SDLC Security: LFX Security/Snyk adoption status updates

g > > On Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 9:30:06 AM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> Hi Olivier, >> >> For experiments, it might make sense to register Jenkins Infrastructure >> as the second organization. I do not anticipate major overlap between >> configs taking

Re: LTS 2.277.4 RC

Thanks everyone for your efforts! Next stop is the new LTS baseline in June On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 9:16:28 PM UTC+2 Mark Waite wrote: > Jenkins 2.277.4 has been released today. > >- Changelog - https://www.jenkins.io/changelog-stable/#v2.277.4 >- Upgrade guide - > > https://w

Re: CDF Technical Oversight Committee - Jenkins project representative nominations

Dear all, Thanks to everyone who have provided feedback in this thread and in the governance board channels. We have discussed the nomination at the governance meeting yesterday. There was only one candidate nominated: Oleg Nenashev (yes, me), and we decided no not extend the candidate search

Re: Jenkins Governance Meeting on May 05, 2021

since the Jenkins 2.0 release. After that we confirmed Oleg Nenashev as the candidate for CDF TOC project representatives from Jenkins. Then we discussed removing Commons Digester from the Jenkins core and agreed on the next steps. We also voted on terminology and finalized some terms like

Re: Jenkins Terminology cleanup continued - sub-terms for controllers

ised https://github.com/jenkinsci/kubernetes-operator/issues/561 in the Jenkins operator project to track the change on its side once we agree on the term. If anyone is interested, I can create a global "terminology cleanup" project in the jenkinsci organization. It will allow tracking

Re: JEPs & BDFL ~ KK

eedback will be appreciated. Best regards, Oleg Nenashev On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 9:00:20 PM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I suggest landing the already agreed changes first. I see merits in some > redesign, but I would not like to block other changes by that > > On Wed, May 5,

Re: [jenkins-infra] Should we bring back wiki.jenkins.io?

I am -1 for recovering Wiki as it was. -0 if we are talking about creating a new Wiki from scratch on Atlassian Cloud, just for Jenkins GitHub organization members. No Jenkins LDAP would be needed there if we chose such a way. IMHO Wiki can be largely replaced by Documentation-as-Code in repositor

Re: [jenkins-infra] Should we bring back wiki.jenkins.io?

dozens of Google Docs we have in the community. > > > To me, they are throw away documentation. Ideally, I would like to easily > find old information especially when we organize events like Fosdem or to > review past contributor summit notes. > > > > On Thu, May 6, 2021, a

Re: Looking for release lead for 2.289.1

If there are no other volunteers, I will find time to coordinate the release if it is not a security one. But it would be really great if somebody else steps up. Maybe James Nord, Raihaan, Basil or Ramon would be interested. On Friday, May 7, 2021 at 10:32:49 AM UTC+2 timja...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: Stapler IntelliJ Plugin JetBrains Marketplace listing

or Rider on a daily basis, so was only a matter of time > I suppose. > > On Wed, 5 May 2021 at 09:46, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> Good question. I added the board, because I do not know which kind of >> traffic we will get. >> Changing to Infra is reasonable. >>

Re: Looking for release lead for 2.289.1

Hello Oleg > > There is a way to be a release shadow and learn all the process before be > a release lead? > > Thanks > Carlos > > On Sat 8. May 2021 at 00:04 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> If there are no other volunteers, I will find time to coordinate the >>

Re: Saturday May 29th - Hack, commit, push event

lugin could benefit from new metrics as well () - Terminology cleanup, especially for French localizations - French localization? Please add your ideas here. Since it is an online event, any French speaking contributors in EMEA-compatible timezones should be able to participate. Best re

Re: Deprecating ruby-runtime

Hi Gavin, Did you have a chance to review https://github.com/jenkinsci/jep/pull/356 ? I think the change is stuck, and it would be great to get it over the line Best regards, Oleg On Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 11:10:43 AM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > JEP update is ready for review: ht

Re: Using JDK 11 instead of JDK 8 in default docker images

ing specifically need refreshing there? > > The upgrade step could possibly be removed as java 11 has been supported > for a long time at this point > > On Sun, 9 May 2021 at 09:49, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> Before we communicate anything to users, I think we should refresh &g

Re: Backporting has started and the RC is scheduled for 19th May

Thanks to Raihaan for stepping up as the release lead for 2.289.1! So far the changes look good. We might have a few extra backports to do before the deadline, and everyone is welcome to expedite potential backports into the tomorrow's weekly. I wonder whether we should also create a Remoting 4.

Re: HTMLUnit DefaultCssErrorHandler

+1 for silencing them by default. Would be nice to have a method in WebClient for those methods which really check the web layouts and hence care bout CSS On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 11:44:19 AM UTC+2 jn...@cloudbees.com wrote: > Hi all, > > The jenkins-test-harness uses the default HTMLUnit CSS

Re: Proposal: "Friend Of Jenkins" Revamp

Would appreciate any feedback in this thread from the community On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 9:58:50 AM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Dear all, > > We’ve recently had a few discussions with the board and Daniel Beck about > the “Friend of Jenkins” plugin. This is a plugin ref

Proposal: Evaluating Twitter as code with @memkins

pull requests to the repository via a chat command or a GitHUb App form. Then we will be able to apply the same to the main @jenkinsci or other accounts if all goes well. Best regards, Oleg Nenashev -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Devel

Re: Backporting has started and the RC is scheduled for 19th May

Then let's postpone it until .2 at least On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 4:44 PM Basil Crow wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:35 AM Oleg Nenashev > wrote: > > > > I wonder whether we should also create a Remoting 4.8 backport this > time: https://github.com/jenkinsci/remo

Proposal: Adopting Stapler as official Jenkins project

m the community members and Stapler maintainers. Best regards, Oleg Nenashev -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@g

Re: Stapler IntelliJ Plugin JetBrains Marketplace listing

FTR I started https://groups.google.com/g/jenkinsci-dev/c/1T3yDHl1nEQ . I have a partially-completed proposal for Stapler in my drafts, so I went ahead and started the discussion On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 2:16:38 PM UTC+2 Jesse Glick wrote: > On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 7:13 PM Oleg Nenas

Re: External logs storage for Pipeline/FreeStyle jobs

Yes, JEP-207 was abandoned after, ehm some reorg at my company. Great to see my former teammates commenting in this thread :D JEP-207 was indeed abandoned, but there were pull requests submitted to the Jenkins core and reference implementations (see the JEP for links). We had some disagreements

Re: Proposal: Adopting Stapler as official Jenkins project

nent is actually needed. On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 6:41:36 PM UTC+2 Jesse Glick wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 12:06 PM Oleg Nenashev > wrote: > >> >>- Stapler is adopted as a Jenkins sub-project, with explicit >>expectation that we do not encourage e

Re: Proposal: Evaluating Twitter as code with @memkins

I will go ahead and setup a PoC tomorrow if no negative feedback On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 2:37:27 PM UTC+2 Mark Waite wrote: > +1 from me as well. Thanks for doing it > > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 5:20 AM Tim Jacomb wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, 10 May 2021

Re: Proposal: "Friend Of Jenkins" Revamp

I have submitted https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/pull/4343 with text updates On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 1:20:02 PM UTC+2 timja...@gmail.com wrote: > +1 to proposal > > On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 11:08, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> Would appreciate any feedback in th

Re: Jenkins SDLC Security: LFX Security/Snyk adoption status updates

maintainers are welcome! On Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 10:25:50 PM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > UPD: The Jenkins Governance meeting approved official participation in the > Pilot project. > Approved by: Ulli Hafner, Gavin Mogan, Ewelina Wilkosz, Daniel Beck, > Baptiste Mathus, Mark Wait

Re: Proposal: "Friend Of Jenkins" Revamp

> wrote: > >> +1 from me on the proposal as well >> >> On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 5:20:02 AM UTC-6 timja...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> +1 to proposal >>> >>> On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 11:08, Oleg Nenashev wrote: >>> >>>> Wou

Re: CDF Technical Oversight Committee - Jenkins project representative nominations

open software and hardware foundations, i.e Linux Foundation, Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), RISC-V Foundation, CHIPS Alliance, etc.* Best regards, Oleg Nenashev On Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 6:43:05 AM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Dear

Re: Proposal: "Friend Of Jenkins" Revamp

explore it more if someone is interested. Badges for financial donations are probably not the biggest use-case though. Best regards, Oleg Nenashev On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 1:29 AM Zbynek Konecny wrote: > Hi, > > > recognizing donations through Jenkins social media > > sounds like

Re: Saturday May 29th - Hack, commit, push event

Should we go agead and formally apply as a participant project? On Sat, May 8, 2021, 18:28 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi all, > > I will likely be available on May 29 since it is Saturday. I will no > bandwidth to organize the event, but I am ready to help with whatever > technica

Re: Adoption of plugin Google Container Registry Auth

maintain it. > > Thanks. > > > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 1:52 AM Oleg Nenashev > wrote: > >> CCed Wei Z who is currently listed as the plugin maintainer. According to >> the plugin adoption policy >> <https://www.jenkins.io/doc/developer/plugin-governance/adopt-

Re: XTrigger-Lib needs maintenance/release

thub.com/jenkinsci/scripttrigger-plugin >>>- BuildResultTrigger Plugin >>><https://wiki.jenkins.io/display/JENKINS/BuildResultTrigger+Plugin> >>> (a.k.a >>>JobTrigger) - https://github.com/jenkinsci/buildresult-trigger-plugin >>> >&g

Re: XTrigger-Lib needs maintenance/release

an cope with two different things pointing to the same > repo? > > Tony > > On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 6:12 AM Oleg Nenashev > wrote: > >> Hi Tony, >> >> Thanks a lot for working on it! In this case I would be happy to just >> create a repo for you. Befor

Re: XTrigger-Lib needs maintenance/release

ndent on that. > > I didn't plan to have the new repo require the old one, merely to leave > the old one mothballed as a reference. I suppose that suggests a rename is > the best option - if you could sort that, it would be much appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Tony > >

Re: Proposal: "Friend Of Jenkins" Revamp

to take that action item Best regards, Oleg On Wednesday, May 12, 2021 at 7:07:52 AM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi Zbynek! I was also thinking about a badges-alike approach in the > future. The Linux Foundation supports open badges on its platform, and we > could somehow get acc

Re: Jenkins Terminology cleanup continued - sub-terms for controllers

Do we have any terms we'd like to finalize during the next meeting? I have also created https://github.com/orgs/jenkinsci/projects/5 to track the related pull requests and to see where any help is needed On Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 10:12:31 AM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi all, >

Proposal: Open Governance - Tracking key action items/requests in GitHub Issues

epresented there. What do you think? Best regards, Oleg Nenashev -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegrou

Re: Request for GSoC proposal reviews: Jenkins Remoting Monitoring

er is welcome to join if you are interested in the project! https://doodle.com/poll/a9rm699d7qpb878u?utm_source=poll&utm_medium=link Best regards, Oleg Nenashev On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 3:08 PM Akihiro Kiuchi wrote: > Hi, everyone! > I would like you to review my draft proposal for

GSoC 2021 - Please welcome Jenkins students!

ntors: Mark Waite, Justin Harringa, Rishabh Budhouliya - Akihrio Kiuchi, "Jenkins Remoting Monitoring", Mentors: Oleg Nenashev, Sumit Sarin, Darshan Kansagara - Pulkit Sharma, "Security Validator for Jenkins Kubernetes Operator", Mentors: Bartek Antoniak, Sylwia Brant, Jaku

Re: Proposal: Open Governance - Tracking key action items/requests in GitHub Issues

UTC+2 Mark Waite wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 3:59 PM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to follow-up on a Jenkins governance help offer from Rick in >> this >> thread <https://groups.google.com/g/jenkinsci-dev/c/N0stgWNmPhg>. >

Re: Proposal: Open Governance - Tracking key action items/requests in GitHub Issues

7;ll also then get for free linking between PRs and issues (like the > release lead checklist, the backporting PR etc.) > > I'm slightly concerned it may reduce our discussions here but there's no > silver bullet. > > -- Baptiste > > Le lun. 17 mai 2021 à 23:59, Oleg Ne

Re: Jenkins Terminology cleanup continued - sub-terms for controllers

27;t have a strong opinion, I would say "why not". Does anyone has some > opinion on that ? > > (@Oleg: I love that board by the way :D ) > > On Monday, May 17, 2021 at 11:51:06 PM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> Do we have any terms we'd like to finali

Re: Proposal: Adopting Stapler as official Jenkins project

Thanks to everyone for the feedback! Added the final sign-off to the today's governance meeting agenda On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 9:48:11 PM UTC+2 Jesse Glick wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:04 PM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> Other Stapler related personal repositories can be

Re: Proposal: Open Governance - Tracking key action items/requests in GitHub Issues

e that is a little interested is > going to do. > > In GitHub it’s 2 clicks > > +1 for the governance repo at least as a trial > > On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 09:02, Daniel Beck wrote: > >> >> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:59 PM Oleg Nenashev >> wrote: &

Jenkins Governance Meeting, May 19, 2021, 7PM UTC

governance projects/backlog Best regards, Oleg Nenashev -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

Re: Jenkins Governance Meeting, May 19, 2021, 7PM UTC

There have been multiple updates to the agenda, please refer to the Google doc for the actual version. Gonna be hot! On Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 6:36:51 AM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Dear all, > > Today we will have the regular Jenkins Governance meeting. This meeting is

Re: External logs storage for Pipeline/FreeStyle jobs

It can also forward logs of Freestyle jobs. > > The plugin also provides eventing for pipeline steps and transfers much > less data than the logstash plugin. > > > > Am 10.05.2021 um 18:43 schrieb Oleg Nenashev: > > Yes, JEP-207 was abandoned after, ehm some reorg at

Re: Saturday May 29th - Hack, commit, push event

13, 2021 at 12:20:02 PM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Should we go agead and formally apply as a participant project? > > On Sat, May 8, 2021, 18:28 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I will likely be available on May 29 since it is Saturday. I will no >>

Re: GSoC 2021 - Please welcome Jenkins students!

bonding steps and expectations, please watch it! On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 1:06 AM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Dear all, > > The GSoC 2021 projects have been announced by Google today. The Continuous > Delivery Foundation will have 6 projects this year, and five of them will > be focused on J

Re: Jenkins Governance Meeting, May 19, 2021, 7PM UTC

+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > There have been multiple updates to the agenda, please refer to the Google > doc for the actual version. Gonna be hot! > > > On Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 6:36:51 AM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Today we will have th

Re: Proposal: Adopting Stapler as official Jenkins project

AM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Thanks to everyone for the feedback! > Added the final sign-off to the today's governance meeting agenda > > On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 9:48:11 PM UTC+2 Jesse Glick wrote: > >> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 2:04 PM Oleg Nenashev >> wrote:

Re: External logs storage for Pipeline/FreeStyle jobs

t; El miércoles, 19 de mayo de 2021 a las 19:12:46 UTC+2, Oleg Nenashev > escribió: > >> > The logstash plugin can forward logs to for both pipeline and >> freestyle to elastic search and others. But it doesn't support to read the >> logs from there to display in J

Re: Release/Presentation of Pull Request Monitoring Plugin

integration, and IIUC it would not require much effort to implement. Best regards, Oleg Nenashev On Thursday, May 20, 2021 at 4:58:05 PM UTC+2 po...@simon-symhoven.de wrote: > Dear Jenkins Developer Group, > > my name is Simon, I am a student of business informatics at the univers

Re: Discourse as the default communication channel?

ities. If technically feasible, this would be my preference. Best regards, Oleg Nenashev P.S: My personal experience with forums is very limited. Fun fact about me: I was moderating a Lineage clan forum for a year or so. No, no further comments :P On Tuesday, May 25, 2021 at 11:38:58 AM UTC+2

Re: Proposal: Jenkins funding page on LFX Crowdfunding

embers Best regards, Oleg Nenashev On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:30 PM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Publishing the process as preview was approved at the governance meeting: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/11Nr8QpqYgBiZjORplL_3Zkwys2qK1vEvK-NYyYa4rzg/edit#bookmark=id.dw06l1rks3oi > I will

Re: CVS Plugin Adpotion

Hi Moritz, Thanks for the updates! There are less and less CVS instances around the world, but let's see whether anyone would be interested in adopting it. Thanks a lot for all your contributions! Best regards, Oleg On Monday, May 24, 2021 at 10:13:30 PM UTC+2 moritz...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi

Re: [jenkins-infra] Migrate chat channels from freenode to libera.chat

d, we can create #jenkins-governance later Best regards, Oleg Nenashev On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 12:56 PM Tim Jacomb wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose moving the following channels that currently live > on freenode to libera.chat: > >- #jenkins >- #jenki

Re: [jenkins-infra] Migrate chat channels from freenode to libera.chat

On Wednesday, May 26, 2021 at 1:28:26 PM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi all, > > I definitely support such a move. For the record we've had a discussion > about the migration among the Jenkins governance board and infra/security > members. I believe we have a consensus

Re: [jenkins-infra] Migrate chat channels from freenode to libera.chat

> > FYI see the project registration instructions here: > https://libera.chat/chanreg#project-registration > AFAICT from the Governance Board discussion, Gavin and Olivier have already submitted a registration request. It just takes time to process On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 4:57 PM Basil Crow wro

Re: Proposal: Adopting Stapler as official Jenkins project

Thanks to Kohsuke for your approval! And thanks to Kohsuke and Jesse for feedback! I do feel, however, that "not encourag[ing] external use" is an > unnecessarily negative way of framing the mission of the new sub-project. > Stapler is an unique web framework that enables the extensibility of > Je

Re: [jenkins-infra] Elastic Sponsorship for OpenTelemetry usage for community Jenkins instances

Connecting ci.jenkins.io looks perfectly fine to me. There is no sensitive data on this instance. For other Jenkins instances (infra, release, trusted-ci, cert, ...) a sign-off from the Jenkins Security Officer is required IMHO On Fri, May 28, 2021, 10:40 Tim Jacomb wrote: > Sounds great > > On

Re: Discourse as the default communication channel?

a > form/mailing list type thing. Discord is realtime communication. Sounds > like your describing discord. > > > > > > > > On Tue., May 25, 2021, 6:52 a.m. Matt Sicker, > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> I’ve never used Discourse outside of video games, but

Re: Discourse as the default communication channel?

ls > > > experiment user outreach tools > Do you have something in mind? > > On Fri, May 28, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > I would be interested to particupate as the Events officer. I would like > to experiment with language community channels and user o

Re: [jenkins-infra] Migrate chat channels from freenode to libera.chat

>> >>> Jenkins group members: >>> Primary (can claim. Can manage group member lists) >>> halkeye (me) >>> Olblak >>> >>> Secondary (primary plus requesting cloaks for users) >>> Nobody yet >>> >>> >>> Cloaks:

Re: Stapler IntelliJ Plugin JetBrains Marketplace listing

FTR the plugin was moved to the jenkinsci GitHub organization: https://github.com/jenkinsci/idea-stapler-plugin Denys will be an admin there once he accepts the invitation to the GitHub org On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 6:33:22 PM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > FTR I started ht

Re: Proposal: Evaluating Twitter as code with @memkins

regards, Oleg On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 8:06:34 PM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > I will go ahead and setup a PoC tomorrow if no negative feedback > > On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 2:37:27 PM UTC+2 Mark Waite wrote: > >> +1 from me as well. Thanks for doing it >> >> O

Re: Updating Plugin framework to support Java11?

For the Plugin POM, https://github.com/jenkinsci/plugin-pom/pull/133 needs to be finalized and landed. I did not proceed with it 2 years ago, because Java 11 only plugins sounded very undesirable for the Jenkins ecosystem at that point. In 2021 I do not have objections about finalizing and land

[ANN] CDF TOC - Oleg Nenashev will represent Jenkins

ciate any opinions and suggestions. And again, thanks to everyone for your support! Looking forward to make a difference in the CDF. Best regards, Oleg Nenashev *My public statement (LinkedIn post <https://www.linkedin.com/posts/onenashev_cdfoundationtoc-activity-6804399697592123392-

Re: Reduced availability for Mark Waite

re contributors to jenkins.io copy-editing and social media management. Mark has been doing a lot of work there, and without him the team's capacity will be quite strained. Best regards, Oleg Nenashev Jenkins Governance Board On Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 2:17:05 AM UTC+2 Mark Waite wrote:

Re: ANN - Online Jenkins Contributor Summit on June 25

Hi all, As an experiment, I created a discussion in the Jenkins Discourse PoC: https://community.jenkins.io/t/jenkins-contributor-summit-on-june-25-2021-call-for-topics-and-ideas/46 Best regards, Oleg On Thursday, April 8, 2021 at 5:11:14 PM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi all, >

Re: [jenkins-infra] Elastic Sponsorship for OpenTelemetry usage for community Jenkins instances

Hi all, I have added this topic to the next Governance Meeting agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11Nr8QpqYgBiZjORplL_3Zkwys2qK1vEvK-NYyYa4rzg/edit#heading=h.1gtco63t6ztr Casting explicit +1 for proceeding with sponsorship and evaluation Best regards, Oleg Nenashev On Friday, May 28

Re: [Heads-up] Removing commons-digester from Jenkins Core (and the link with our plugins EOL policy discussion :-))

ci/vs-code-metrics-plugin/pull/5/ . Would it make sense to create a new API plugin instead? Otherwise we risk running into compatibility concerns at some point. Creating an API plugin is not discussed in the JEP at all. Best regards, Oleg Nenashev P.S: Sorry for being a bit late to comment O

Re: Proposal: Jenkins funding page on LFX Crowdfunding

Hi all! Any feedback about the proposed plan and the treasurer role. I would like to unblock it, because SPI is waiting for action from our side. Best regards, Oleg On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:14 PM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Dear all, > > Quick updates on LFX Crowdfunding and

Re: [jenkinsci-board] Re: Proposal: Jenkins funding page on LFX Crowdfunding

e board members - Signing off (aka rubber stamping) the expense report after the reviews. According to the LFX Support, it has to be an individual doing this assignment, but this individual does not have to be Oleg Nenashev If other board members are willing to commit some time, we can bala

Re: [Heads-up] Removing commons-digester from Jenkins Core (and the link with our plugins EOL policy discussion :-))

iners do not want to wait, I am ready to accept this decision. And I definitely do not want the PR to miss the LTS merge window. On Sunday, May 30, 2021 at 11:19:25 PM UTC+2 Baptiste Mathus wrote: > Le dim. 30 mai 2021 à 20:55, Oleg Nenashev a écrit : > >> Hi all, >>

Re: [jenkinsci-board] Proposal: Jenkins funding page on LFX Crowdfunding

reimbursement requesters if/when something goes wrong in payments. Best regards, Oleg Nenashev On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 11:30 PM Ullrich Hafner wrote: > The process in total looks good to me! > > Seems that the bureaucracy is starting to increase in several areas of > Jenkins now,

Re: [Heads-up] Removing commons-digester from Jenkins Core (and the link with our plugins EOL policy discussion :-))

pgrades. Stale plugins and plugins waiting for adoption for years should not be a blocker for changes we need as the community. On Monday, May 31, 2021 at 11:57:12 PM UTC+2 m...@basilcrow.com wrote: > Dear Oleg, > > On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 11:55 AM Oleg Nenashev > wrote: >

Re: Jenkins 3.x

to all community members who contributed by providing feedback and reviews for some of my ideas in other channels.I might have some time to drive this effort in the future, but I cannot do it now. Thanks for understanding, Oleg Nenashev Engineer, CloudBees On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 8:09:46 PM

Re: I would like to become committer/maintainer on a plugin

Hi Roland, Thanks for your contributions! Indeed it does not look that the Calendar View plugin is actively maintained. It has not been put for adoption either, so we will need to ping the maintainer and wait for a 2 weeks timeout if no response. I will help with that Best regards, Oleg

Re: I would like to become committer/maintainer on a plugin

Added Sven Schönung, the current Calendar View Plugin maintainer, to Cc. If we get approval for the plugin adoption, we can transfer the permissions quickly On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:26 PM Oleg Nenashev wrote: > Hi Roland, > > Thanks for your contributions! Indeed it does not look

Re: [Digester] Adopt plugins emma & cloverphp

I am definitely +1 for adoption though the pull requests were merged too early IMHO. We usually have a 2-weeks response timeout, and we are yet to approve the Plugin EOL policy from Basil. On Monday, May 31, 2021 at 11:24:24 PM UTC+2 Baptiste Mathus wrote: > PR > https://github.com/jenkins-inf

Re: [Heads-up] Removing commons-digester from Jenkins Core (and the link with our plugins EOL policy discussion :-))

ed background. Ask >>> Daniel or Jesse how often they do a facepalm after hearing about my >>> use-cases and hacks :) >>> >>> Speaking seriously, we could definitely think about defining our >>> criteria about what we care during such upgrades. Stale plugin

Jenkins Governance Meeting, Jun 02, 2021

r roadmap updates to the jenkins.io repo so that we review them: https://github.com/jenkins-infra/jenkins.io/labels/roadmap . Best regards, Oleg Nenashev -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this g

Re: Discourse as the default communication channel?

https://community.jenkins.io/ looks really good so far. Thanks all! On Friday, May 28, 2021 at 4:25:05 PM UTC+2 Oleg Nenashev wrote: > experiment with language community channels > > Creating sub-categories, e.g. for francophone, Spanish speaking or Russian > speaking

Jenkins governance process overview (for Ortelius et al.)

/ - Jenkins elections process: https://www.jenkins.io/project/board-election-process/ Maybe it is a good topic for an online meetup, what do you think? We could also discuss any questions in this thread. Best regards, Oleg Nenashev -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: LTS 2.289.1 RC

Thanks to everyone for the release! I updated my local setup, looks pretty good. We will need to update icons in plugins for better look&feel, but even the initial release looks pretty good. One major issue I noticed is that the SSH unbundling patch has no upgrade guideline. IMHO it is important

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >