Re: [jug-discussion] OT -- SaveXP.com

2008-05-09 Thread Art Gramlich
To me, 6 seems kind of "blah". 7 looks like it will be interesting. Art Gramlich Chief Application Architect HealthTrio, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] On May 9, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Warner Onstine wrote: 6 is available now (and has been for the past few months as a beta). I really don&#x

Re: [jug-discussion] next language to learn?

2007-06-19 Thread Art Gramlich
, you wrote: >On 6/19/07, Art Gramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Erlang - You should at least work through the tutorial for it (and if >>you haven't seen it watch the video where they do live updates to the >>system). > >I think you mean

Re: [jug-discussion] next language to learn?

2007-06-19 Thread Art Gramlich
Yup. That's it. On Jun 19, 2007, at 10:08 AM, Chad Woolley wrote: On 6/19/07, Art Gramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Erlang - You should at least work through the tutorial for it (and if you haven't seen it watch the video where they do live updates to the system). I thi

Re: [jug-discussion] next language to learn?

2007-06-19 Thread Art Gramlich
So I'll pick up a few that no one has really mentioned yet. Erlang - You should at least work through the tutorial for it (and if you haven't seen it watch the video where they do live updates to the system). The concurrency model is truly amazing, and I haven't seen anything like it. It

Re: [jug-discussion] build tools...

2006-12-26 Thread Art Gramlich
Where's Hatcher to plug ant? :-) For us, ant has worked well and pretty much stayed out of the way (like a build tool should). Additionally, because of the widespread use, almost every tool has an ant task (e.g. sablecc). It looks like there are several scripting tasks now available for the

Re: [jug-discussion] open laslo

2006-11-10 Thread Art Gramlich
d On 11/10/06, Art Gramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, I'd say sun is endoring jruby more since they have hired the two main developers to work on it. Kinda funny since Groovy seems like a better java integration choice. Now if they would just fix the major bugs and get a 1.

Re: [jug-discussion] open laslo

2006-11-10 Thread Art Gramlich
Actually, I'd say sun is endoring jruby more since they have hired the two main developers to work on it. Kinda funny since Groovy seems like a better java integration choice. Now if they would just fix the major bugs and get a 1.0 out. On Nov 9, 2006, at 8:38 PM, Warner Onstine wrote: On

[jug-discussion] I'm not sure if it's allowed

2006-11-07 Thread Art Gramlich
So I won't post an "ad", but we are looking for Java people over at HealthTrio. If you're interested send me or Keith Fisher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) an email. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [jug-discussion] Strongtalk

2006-09-21 Thread Art Gramlich
Was my first thought too. I haven't look to much into the source but there are people already talking about ports, etc. On Sep 21, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Warner Onstine wrote: Hmm, interesting, wonder if they can get Seaside 2 running on it yet. -warner On Sep 21, 2006, at 10:54 AM

Re: [jug-discussion] Tim, just curious, who 'owns' a thread?

2006-09-21 Thread Art Gramlich
Hitler. Can it please stop now. On Sep 21, 2006, at 2:13 PM, josh zeidner wrote: Great, all this discussion needs is a reference to Hitler and my life will be complete. Good times people, time to get some work done. jmz --- Art Gramlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is this a

Re: [jug-discussion] Tim, just curious, who 'owns' a thread?

2006-09-21 Thread Art Gramlich
Is this a troll? On Sep 21, 2006, at 1:32 PM, josh zeidner wrote: --- "Tim Colson (tcolson)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Josh -- if you are sincere about starting a discussion on the topic of JCP and JUG Goverance, then by all means walk your own talk and start a new thread with a relevant

Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo

2006-09-21 Thread Art Gramlich
We're calling it Society 3.0 now. On Sep 21, 2006, at 1:19 PM, josh zeidner wrote: --- Michael Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok since any sort of frivolity is frowned upon by some, let's get serious. Call it "govern themselves" or "sensorship" or "standards" or "regulations", etc. but

Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo

2006-09-21 Thread Art Gramlich
Thanks for a sane reply. On Sep 21, 2006, at 11:41 AM, Michael Oliver wrote: Ok since any sort of frivolity is frowned upon by some, let's get serious. Call it "govern themselves" or "sensorship" or "standards" or "regulations", etc. but the problem with that is who decides? If a discuss

[jug-discussion] Strongtalk

2006-09-21 Thread Art Gramlich
Did anyone else see that Sun did a new BSD style license release of all of Strongtalk earlier in the month? It's windows only right now and really not complete (development stopped when Sun bought the team to do HotSpot). In case anyone is interested, it's at http://strongtalk.org/ and discus

Re: [jug-discussion] OT: Google and Yahoo

2006-09-21 Thread Art Gramlich
Sorry Mr. Zeidner, informal developer-related commentary is indeed inappropriate content for a USERS GROUP. In fact, I have seen on this list that at certain JUG meetings, discussion on non-Java technologies have been discussed. Everyone needs to get back to working on corporate project #101

Re: [jug-discussion] Mac check

2006-09-20 Thread Art Gramlich
You know I'm an updater (well will be once I get more money saved again). Right now I've got the dual G5 and a core duo imac. I did get rid of the G4 800 since it really was getting a little too slow for my use. In my experience the intels hold up to or beat the ppc machines (my imac seems

Re: [jug-discussion] MS Access / Filemaker like front-end for MySQL/Oracle?

2006-07-28 Thread Art Gramlich
Dabbledb is pretty slick. If you haven't watched the demo check it out. It's written in smalltalk too (squeak). On Jul 28, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Chad Woolley wrote: Just out of curiosity, why isn't dabbledb a contender? On 7/27/06, Tim Colson (tcolson) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You guessed i

Re: [jug-discussion] MS Access / Filemaker like front-end for MySQL/Oracle?

2006-07-28 Thread Art Gramlich
thought they were using derby now and not hsqldb? On Jul 28, 2006, at 7:18 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: Jumping into this conversation. a little late, but... :) I'm not sure how much detail, etc. you need, but open office v2 includes "Openoffice Base", which is an MS Access-ish program. I have

Re: [jug-discussion] os x users/programmers in tucson?

2005-06-16 Thread Art Gramlich
guys. -warner - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Art Gramlich Lead Technologist HealthTrio, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsu

Re: [jug-discussion] Bookstore

2005-05-18 Thread Art Gramlich
I'd agree with the Broadway BN. Horrible. The one at foothills is much better and the borders on oracle is pretty good. Was up at the Fry's in Tempe over the weekend and their selection seems to have gotten much better lately (even three books on smalltalk). Art On May 18, 2005, at 9:06 A

[jug-discussion] Josh Block moves to Google

2004-07-07 Thread Art Gramlich
Thought this might be of interest. http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=27163 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[jug-discussion] Not sure if it is appropriate or not

2004-06-17 Thread Art Gramlich
but I'll go ahead anyway. I've upgraded to a G5 and I'm selling my G4. Its the last QuickSilver 800 with 1GB of ram and a newer drive. Otherwise original and even have the box it came in. If you are interested shoot me an email. Art Gramlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] -O

RE: [jug-discussion] portable.net released

2002-11-24 Thread Art Gramlich
vb.net is a little to wordy and ugly for my tastes (this is only from looking at examples). BTW, while J# is kind of cool from an academic standpoint, I probably wouldn't use it for real code. Also forgot a pitfall on my last email: In c# all exceptions are unchecked. This takes some getting us

RE: [jug-discussion] ok this may be taking the whole mac thing a little far.

2002-11-21 Thread Art Gramlich
: Thursday, November 21, 2002 8:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] ok this may be taking the whole mac thing a little far. Art Gramlich wrote: >I was going to talk to you today. It's still really buggy and I've gone >back to 2.0.1 for now. 2.1 is going to b

RE: [jug-discussion] ok this may be taking the whole mac thing a little far.

2002-11-20 Thread Art Gramlich
I was going to talk to you today. It's still really buggy and I've gone back to 2.0.1 for now. 2.1 is going to be fantastic when it's more stable. Art -Original Message- From: Simon Ritchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 4:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subjec

RE: [jug-discussion] SWT ... the scoop?

2002-11-12 Thread Art Gramlich
-Original Message- From: Matt Sponer [mailto:matt.sponer@;healthtrio.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 4:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] SWT ... the scoop? Whoa, awesome. Thanks for posting that. I've been curious for a long time why Swing is so unusable

RE: [jug-discussion] Help needed with trivial Java -> VB6 and/or VB.NET rewrite

2002-11-06 Thread Art Gramlich
I'd do a c# version :) -Original Message- From: William H. Mitchell [mailto:whm@;mse.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:41 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [jug-discussion] Help needed with trivial Java -> VB6 and/or VB.NET rewrite I'm teaching a class on object-oriented analys

RE: [jug-discussion] J2EE vs. .Net: Lies, Damn Lies and Benchmarks

2002-10-31 Thread Art Gramlich
Actually, my own testing shows that for many, many things they are right about equal on the same machine (.net usually having a slight prerformance advantage). Any decision should probably come down to other issues. -Original Message- From: Rick Hightower [mailto:rhightower@;learningpatt

RE: [jug-discussion] jdk 1.4 on OS X

2002-10-28 Thread Art Gramlich
Thanks Warner! -Original Message- From: Warner Onstine [mailto:warner@;warneronstine.com] Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002 9:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [jug-discussion] jdk 1.4 on OS X For those of you who have been waiting to get into OS X due to the JDK issue, it is now availa

RE: [jug-discussion] Mac question

2002-10-18 Thread Art Gramlich
The think with macs is that just after you buy one they will release something better :-). As long as the one you get works for what you need, it's not really a problem. Right Jon? -Original Message- From: Warner Onstine [mailto:warner@;warneronstine.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Tips and Tricks

2002-09-11 Thread Art Gramlich
This is a good thread and we should keep it up (thanks Vincent for the tips). I think that those using eclipse should check out these two pages: http://mmoebius.gmxhome.de/eclipse/basics.htm http://eclipsewiki.swiki.net/1 - T

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Tips and Tricks

2002-09-11 Thread Art Gramlich
- All of the cvs functions - especially the way it displays differences between you code and the repository. In the same vein, you can use the local history to revert or recover deleted classes (even if they aren't in the source control system). Saved me once already. --

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Tips and Tricks

2002-09-11 Thread Art Gramlich
- Ctrl-Space for syntax assist. This is another one of those magic keys. If you use it after a class name where a field name would be allowed, it will give you some suggestions for naming the field. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Tips and Tricks

2002-09-11 Thread Art Gramlich
Ctrl-1 Smart fixing (when something has a red underline is pretty cools too. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Tips and Tricks

2002-09-11 Thread Art Gramlich
To do what you want to do, put the cursor at the end of the class name and press ctrl-space and pick the class. There are some options also to control how the imports are handled (sorting and spacing) which also work for reformatting. -Original Message- From: Ray Ramos [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse-weirdness OSX shared

2002-07-25 Thread Art Gramlich
Title: Eclipse-weirdness OSX shared Shouldn't you move this to the Tucson mac users group list? :-)   -Original Message- From: J t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 12:19 AM To: Tucson JUG Subject: [jug-discussion] Eclipse-weirdness OSX shared   The Shad

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse on OSX--where's that gzip

2002-07-25 Thread Art Gramlich
Just curious, have you been keeping this current? http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/platform-swt-home/de v.html -Original Message- From: Warner Onstine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discuss

RE: [jug-discussion] eclipse and web app deployment

2002-07-22 Thread Art Gramlich
Easie works well. Lomboz has a lot of buzz. -Original Message- From: Warner Onstine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2002 7:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] eclipse and web app deployment I guess the main question is, 'Has anyone used these?'

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Art Gramlich
I think a lot of this just comes from what you are used to or comfortable with. Actually, I never noticed about the ant integration not letting you click on compilation problems. Must be that with incremental compilation, I know the source will compile before I run ant :-). -Original Me

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Art Gramlich
Just a few things... Very smart code completion (no refreshing the database like Netbeans) and autofixes. If you have used VAJ, it's just the same. Incremental compilation - at save, the class is compiled. You can see all errors in a project in the task view. No more edit/compile/debug cycle.

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Art Gramlich
Actually around here the opinions are about 50/50 on which is better. IntelliJ seems to do nice refactoring and is very speedy for a swing application. On the other hand, Eclipse is really starting to get there now. Some of the plug-ins are really amazing. I'd say that by the end of the year, t

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse Stupidity Continues!

2002-07-18 Thread Art Gramlich
The trick is to get the correct things into the eclipse/plug-ins directory. I've noticed that some archives already have the plug-ins directory and others don't. Just open the zip and take a look. Also make sure that you follow any instructions as some plug-ins aren't immediately visible. Hope

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse on OS X

2002-07-11 Thread Art Gramlich
I thought the biggest problem was the lack of drag-and-drop support. -Original Message- From: Simon Ritchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] Eclipse on OS X We're interested. Where do you plan to put it

RE: [jug-discussion] new idea

2002-06-26 Thread Art Gramlich
Diapers and beer It must be working since this describes my shopping habits. -Original Message- From: Vincent Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] new idea We have a project in the works to implemen

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse - was RE: [jug-discussion] Second time a charm

2002-06-25 Thread Art Gramlich
Oh one last thing on eclipse. The 2.0 release is scheduled for Friday. -Original Message- From: Art Gramlich Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:15 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse - was RE: [jug-discussion] Second time a charm Here some more... N

RE: [jug-discussion] Eclipse - was RE: [jug-discussion] Second time a charm

2002-06-25 Thread Art Gramlich
-File Associations) mapping *.htm and *.html to the XML editor to get colorized HTML source. Art Gramlich wrote: > Simon, > > Good call on http://sourceforge.net/projects/solareclipse/. I missed it. > > I'm not sure if anyone else has mentioned this site, but it tries to make a >

[jug-discussion] Eclipse - was RE: [jug-discussion] Second time a charm

2002-06-25 Thread Art Gramlich
Simon, Good call on http://sourceforge.net/projects/solareclipse/. I missed it. I'm not sure if anyone else has mentioned this site, but it tries to make a list of available plug-ins. http://eclipse-plugins.2y.net/eclipse/index.jsp Another cool plug-in is Slime (a uml tool). It's not really

RE: [jug-discussion] eclipse on win2k

2002-06-24 Thread Art Gramlich
I've had the motif version working with real motif (openmotif.org). It's got the nasty motif feel though. -Original Message- From: Randolph S. Kahle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] eclipse on win2k On M

RE: [jug-discussion] drive recovery software os x

2002-06-21 Thread Art Gramlich
Oh, yeah. Have you checked versiontracker.com? -Original Message- From: Warner Onstine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 7:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jug-discussion] drive recovery software os x - Original Message - From: "Paul Scott" <[EMAI

RE: [jug-discussion] drive recovery software os x

2002-06-21 Thread Art Gramlich
If it helps, most installations will use HFS+ (apple's filesystem - data/resource fork, etc). It is possible to create ufs/ffs bsd filesystems but it would be rare that this is done (performance is terrible, classic doesn't work, some carbon apps don't work, etc). -Original Message- Fr

RE: [jug-discussion] new Mac questions

2002-06-03 Thread Art Gramlich
k out frys or comp-usa for previous models - I think one of the compusas in Phoenix metro area had some good deals less than $2000 for pretty good machines. -Original Message- From: Jon Thomas Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 9:26 AM To: Art Gramlich; ''[EMAIL PROTECTED]' 

RE: [jug-discussion] new Mac questions

2002-06-03 Thread Art Gramlich
Jon, I would avoid any g3 now. -Original Message- From: Jon Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:26 PM To: 'Tucson-Jug ' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [jug-discussion] new Mac questions Ok. I really want to start playing with OSX but haven't touched a m