Re: [ANN] juju-core 1.13.2 has been released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 25/08/13 13:17, David Cheney wrote: Thanks John. James -- I have uploaded the release tarball now, sorry about the delay, I was in an airplane. No problem; juju-core 1.13.2 also uploaded to Saucy. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu

Re: Sharing a DB user password among units of the app

a unpriviledged SSH account and unison. Unless, of course, Juju grows a feature to allow peers to share data in a way which is more consistent that trying todo it via the peer relation. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: JuJu, LXC, OpenStack charm problem w/Nova Quantum

terminology makes me wonder whether this code has just not been updated lately? It has - we just lack a good way to rename a charm and facilitate a switch to the new charm name for existing deployments. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org

Re: Openstack and Juju not working

/html I think this error message indicates that swift backend behind apache is not working correctly - could you confirm that swift is functional using the openstack-dashboard? - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: nova-cloud-controller not installing nova-network

--bridge_interface=eth1 --multi_host=T This makes the compute nodes use eth1 for private networking in multihost mode. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http

Re: nova-cloud-controller not installing nova-network

couple of weeks. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTYjZlAAoJEL/srsug59jDFq4P/3SJAtFq3oMyZmAfYqdryGBq N2t3CvUKtNsZwA

Re: nova-cloud-controller not installing nova-network

with and or review the wip? I'm hoping to have this deployment in service in a couple weeks and I'm sure the information in the guide would be quite valuable to me, even if it's not yet perfect. Not sure - I'll let Nick answer this question. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p

Re: ~charmers Application - David Britton

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Required +1 count met (and exceeded!). Welcome to the team! - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJT7coaAAoJEL/srsug59jDpuYP/j

Re: Swift middleware subordinate charms?

something later if anything becomes of my charm. That sounds like the best approach - we did something similar for cinder backends - see the cinder and cinder-ceph or cinder-vmware charms. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE

Re: Updated Openstack charms broke our HA

this - my team will work on landing fixes into /next branches with updates to the stable charms in the charm store this week. Apologies for the break... Regards James - -- - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version

Re: Updated Openstack charms broke our HA

- they have been neglected. Regards James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUYzCNAAoJEL/srsug59jDePAP/RrMJr+B9ky3u6sd/1yhD8Db nJ/QKUlo3hgKSg

Re: Updated Openstack charms broke our HA

into your cloud from the Internet Any thoughts? - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUYzJUAAoJEL/srsug59jDK+UQAMrKsIeE7hkkA8K6SFI8lS18

MySQL Charm maintainership

://javacruft.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/openstack-charms-1501-release/ - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUzwz3AAoJEL/srsug59jDiaIQAJ8fapTO2/M0AxquTOyEtNo9

Re: Using distributed router in neutron

Hi Pshem You need to make use of the neutron-openvswitch charm - this is a subordinate charm that's deployed with nova-compute, and manages the neutron configuration and agents on compute nodes. In the same way that you provide ext-port to neutron-gateway, you'll need todo the same with

Review Queue - midonet-api

Hi Folks I spent my morning reviewing the Midonet charms proposed under: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1453678 I set myself a challenge of managing to run the amulet tests in our egress limited QA cloud; managed to get most of that working with local mirrors of datastax and midonet

Re: Ceph deployment

hat >> carries all the other functions. >> >> kind regards >> Pshem >> >> >> >> On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 at 11:14 James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Pshem >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Psh

Re: Ceph deployment

Hi Pshem On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Pshem Kowalczyk wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to deploy ceph and ceph-osd, however with this config: > > ceph: > source: cloud:trusty-liberty > fsid: 015cc90c-8f06-11e5-be28-0050569a > monitor-secret:

Re: [Ecosystem-engineering] The future of Charm Helpers

Hi Marco On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Marco Ceppi wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I'm rebooting this conversation because it never fully came to a > resolution and since this topic was discussed a lot has happened in the > Charm Ecosystem. I still hold firm, and a

Re: The future of Charm Helpers

charms.hookenv should be reactive aware, but should also be functional without the reactive framework - does that make things clearer? > > 2015-11-23 10:40 GMT+01:00 James Page <james.p...@canonical.com>: > >> Hi Merlijn >> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:32 A

Review Queue: midonet-api, midonet-agent, neutron-agents-midonet

Hi All I've spent most of the last two days working with Toni from Midonet to review and test their proposed charms to support deployment of the Midonet SDN as part of the OpenStack charms. Alongside reviewing the actual charm code (they are all services framework integrated with puppet modules

Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

Hi All I've been using Juju 2.0 (built from source with an in-flight patch for LXD 2.0 right now - but that should be resolved soon) with the local LXD provider on Ubuntu Xenial development to test some work we've been doing to get OpenStack running on-top of LXD in a single machine. That's now

Re: Upgrading charms to 16.01 - Ceph

On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 at 15:04 Darryl Weaver wrote: > I've seen that bug too and just tested a kilo to liberty upgrade in my lab. > So, I've submitted a bug report here: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/ceph/+bug/1540376 > Currently the behaviour of changing the

Re: Juju 2.0~ Local LXD provider workflows are awesome!

On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 at 13:23 Mark Shuttleworth <m...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > On 03/02/16 12:09, James Page wrote: > > juju create-model midonet-review > > juju switch midonet-review > > Thanks for the feedback James, it's great to see these bits coming > toget

Migration of OpenStack Charm development to OpenStack git/gerrit

Hi All As you may or may not be aware, the OpenStack team have been working towards migration of the development process around the OpenStack charms to the OpenStack project. This means we will be moving away from current the bzr/launchpad workflow to a git/gerrit workflow inline with most other

Re: Migration of OpenStack Charm development to OpenStack git/gerrit

ing in place soon-ish to auto-comment on proposed merges redirecting people to use the new development workflow. Regards James On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 at 07:59 James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > After some poking of the infratructure team this morning, migration is > currently u

Re: rabbitmq-server hook "config-changed" failed (dns resolver)

Hi Khairul On Mon, 23 May 2016 at 21:00 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > Hi Khairul > > Thanks for the mail, let's see if Adam cc'd has any insight to share with > the list. > > > Mark > > > On 23/05/16 22:38, Khairul Aizat Kamarudzzaman wrote: > > Hi all, > Im getting error while

Re: Neutron, openvswitch jumbo packets

Hi Ed On Sat, 7 May 2016 at 10:30 ed bond wrote: > Anyone have experience with the charms to be able to set the MTU to jumbo > packets? > > Right now in testing to see if it would work we had to do this: > > for i in `ip a | grep mtu| egrep -ve >

Bug tracking for the OpenStack Charms

Hi All As of yesterdays OpenStack charm release, we'll be tracking bugs for these charms under the OpenStack Charms project group: https://launchpad.net/openstack-charms rather than as part of the charms distro on Launchpad; each charm now has its own project, which is part of the group so we

Re: cinder and ceilometer metrics architecture question

Hi Drew On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 at 16:03 Drew Freiberger wrote: [...] > Unfortunately, nothing in ceilometer is picking up the > oslo_message_notifications on the unit where cinder is running. I went > to add the ceilometer-agent-charm to the unit, but found it's only

OpenStack Telemetry Refresh (was Re: new ceilometer)

Hi Dmitrii On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 at 12:10 Dmitrii Shcherbakov < dmitrii.shcherba...@canonical.com> wrote: Hi Giuseppe, > > First of all, thank you for looking into writing a gnocchi charm! > > There is already an ongoing effort from James Page on charming gnocchi: > https:/

charmhelpers migration to github

Hi All Managed to find some time to test the bzr->git migration more, including some tidy of committers and other general hygiene. https://github.com/juju/charm-helpers I think we're in a good position to plan for a switch - I appreciate there are a number of open reviews against the bzr

Proposing Alex Kavanagh for ~charmers

Hi Charmers I'd like to propose Alex (tinwood) for membership of charmers; he's worked extensively across the OpenStack charms, providing valuable reviews to the rest of the team, has been reviewing charm-helpers updates and has been instrumental in the OpenStack charms use of reactive and layers

Re: juju deployed openstack nova-lxd cannot start instances

HI Patrizio On Fri, 12 May 2017 at 10:52 Patrizio Bassi wrote: > Dear James, All > > i opened a bug, hope you can give it some love. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1690345 > Apologies for response lag - last week was busy due to the OpenStack summit! Looking

Re: database-relation-join not invoked

Hi Giuseppe On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 18:00 Giuseppe Attardi wrote: > I have written a charm for OpenStack Gnocchi. > Firstly its great that you've started work on a Gnocchi charm; this is on the TODO list for the OpenStack Charms project for the current development

Migrating charmhelpers to github

Hi Charmers There has been a bubbling undercurrent of desire to move charmhelpers code hosting out of bazaar on Launchpad to git on github,com alongside other charm ecosystem development tooling. I'd like to get the code migrated over ASAP and then we can start enabling automatic PR testing and

Re: openstack-telemetry blocked: memcached requires ipv6

Hi Patrizio and Mark On Wed, 3 May 2017 at 06:14 Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 03/05/17 03:25, Patrizio Bassi wrote: > > in MAAS i added ipv6.disable = 1 to cmd line params for my machines > > and this makes all ceilometer-agent/XXX units to be stuck as blocked > > due to

Re: juju deployed openstack nova-lxd cannot start instances

Hi Patrizio On Mon, 8 May 2017 at 11:53 Patrizio Bassi wrote: [...] > 1) [minor] accessing horizon in the hypervisor list it is seen as hostname > without fqdn while other 4 hosts has fqdn. > Yes there is a minor diff between LXD and KVM hypervisors:

Re: charmhelpers migration to github

Resurrecting this thread; I think its a good time to push on with this work - anyone have any objections to targeting this week to complete the migration? On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 at 19:55 David Ames <david.a...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:46 AM, James Page

Re: charmhelpers migration to github

new github.com location as part of the migration. On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 at 14:15 Alex Kavanagh <alex.kavan...@canonical.com> wrote: > I'm a +1 on this too. Let the good times roll. > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:22 AM, James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com> > wrote: > >> R

Re: charmhelpers migration to github

If you're a part of the charmers team on Launchpad you should now either have access to approve pull requests + merge or you should have an invite to join the team that can do this :-) If you don't have one PM me on freenode IRC with your github username. On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 at 11:57 James Page

Re: charmhelpers migration to github

up as a mirror from git? >> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:37 AM James Page <james.p...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> >>> OK - step 1 completed; I've pushed fresh bzr->git migrated code to >>> >>>https://github.com/juju/charm-helpers >>> >

Re: FW: [PIKE] juju based OpenStack --Query

Hi Akshay I think you've tripped over: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-keystone/+bug/1722909 which I did as well last night - this only impacts the development version of the charm which you are using with the bundle. I have a fix up for this, should land in the next couple of hours (we've

Re: Juju Charmer application

+1 On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 11:15 Frode Nordahl wrote: > Dear Juju community, > > I would like to officially apply for membership of the Juju ~charmers team. > > Through the course of the past year I have made contributions to the > OpenStack Charms and other Charm

Re: Juju Openstack - Blocked

Hi James On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 at 20:22 James Beedy wrote: > Hello, > > I am experiencing some issues with a base-openstack deploy. > > I can get a base-openstack to deploy legitimately using MAAS with no > apparent errors from Juju's perspective. Following some init ops and

Re: ceilometer

Hi Giuseppe On Wed, 21 Feb 2018 at 11:15 Giuseppe Attardi wrote: > The latest Ceilometer non longer uses a DB to store its data, but rather > it sends it in a pipeline to Gnocchi. > In order to use Ceilometer with Gnocchi, I had to patch the ceilometer > bundle not to

Re: [ANN] juju-core 1.13.2 has been released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 25/08/13 13:17, David Cheney wrote: Thanks John. James -- I have uploaded the release tarball now, sorry about the delay, I was in an airplane. No problem; juju-core 1.13.2 also uploaded to Saucy. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu

New juju-mongodb package

-core/+bug/1208430 I'm pretty sure that running mongodb not as root will be part of the security team signoff on the MIR review. Cheers James - -- James Page Technical Lead Ubuntu Server Team james.p...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using

Re: New juju-mongodb package

. Cheers William On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:38 PM, James Page james.p...@canonical.comwrote: * *BEGIN ENCRYPTED or SIGNED PART* * On 28/11/13 14:18, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: It would be good to have the mongo binary available and working as well, also under that juju

Re: New juju-mongodb package

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/12/13 09:10, John Arbash Meinel wrote: On 2013-12-02 13:01, James Page wrote: Morning folks so far I have requests for: mongo (default shell) mongoexport (used in new juju backup plugin) mongodump/mongorestore (useful) I'm

Re: New juju-mongodb package

in this context please :-). It costs time for every server that's provisioned. - -- James Page Technical Lead Ubuntu Server Team james.p...@canonical.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net

Re: KVM provisioning now in trunk

the local provider? I can think of one use case where this would be useful. Cheers James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http

Re: Juju 1.17.0 on trusty means no production work

it in the stable ppa so that some people have a choice to respond to production situations. If the situation is that bad, then I can revert the 1.17.0 upload to trusty and switch back to 1.16.5. Regards James - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org

Re: 1.17.6

. Yes please! If .6 restores the juju-mongodb support I'm happy to push for the FFe I'll need to upload. - -- James Page Ubuntu and Debian Developer james.p...@ubuntu.com jamesp...@debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http

Re: Automatic retries of hooks

On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 20:31 William Reade wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Dean Henrichsmeyer > wrote: >> >> You realize James was complaining and not celebrating the "success" ? The >> fact that we can have a discussion trying to

Re: Charmers application - David Ames

+1 On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 at 15:37 Chris Glass wrote: > Big +1 for thedac here as well. > > I'm actually surprised he's not a charmer already! > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Liam Young > wrote: > > tl;dr +1 for thedac > > > > I've

Application names starting with digits

Hi All Is there a specific rationale for application names being limited to not starting with a digit? I get why they can't end with one but I don't see why juju should place the same restriction on the start of an app name? Example (where we tripped over this): juju deploy ubuntu

Re: Juju Openstack - Blocked

Hi James On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 at 20:22 James Beedy wrote: > Hello, > > I am experiencing some issues with a base-openstack deploy. > > I can get a base-openstack to deploy legitimately using MAAS with no > apparent errors from Juju's perspective. Following some init ops and