Re: [j-nsp] Flowspec not filtering traffic.

BTW, As I see Kentik in the name of the BGP group The default Kentik DDoS policie "UDP Fragments Attack" match udp port 0 and the flowspec rule attached to it match is-fragment and first-fragment So I don't understand why it send filter that match udp port 0 ? Did you change the default one ?

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN IRB / gateway selection

Maybe this can help you https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/evpn-vxlan/topics/concept/evpn-routing-policies.html It is not exactly what you want but it will help Please test it as I hit a bug when I test it long time ago Nitzan On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 1:12 PM Nathan Ward

Re: [j-nsp] MX VRRP on VXLAN enviroment

Take a look on this KB https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content=KB35676=EX9208=LIST The default duplicate-mac-detection settings are far to high Nitzan On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 4:50 PM Cathal Mooney via juniper-nsp < juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> wrote: > In theory when the VRRP

Re: [j-nsp] QFX CRB

> > > An example of configuring the interfaces follows, all follow this > pattern with more or less IP's. > > show configuration interfaces irb.810 > proxy-macip-advertisement; > virtual-gateway-accept-data; > family inet { > mtu 9000; > address 10.19.11.253/22 { >

Re: [j-nsp] QFX CRB

Can you show your irb and protocols evpn configuration please Nitzan On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 3:26 PM Cristian Cardoso < cristian.cardos...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone use EVPN-VXLAN in the Centrally-Routed and Bridging topology? > I have two spine switches and two leaf switches, when I use

Re: [j-nsp] Centrally-Routed Bridging

You didn't include protocols evpn Do you have ? protocols evpn default-gateway no-gateway-community Nitzan On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 5:52 PM Cristian Cardoso < cristian.cardos...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > My 4 switches are model QFX-5120 48Y-8C and are in version 18.4R3-S4.2. > > follow spines and

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240??

Does any body know if the LC CPU on the MX204 has less power than the one in MPC7 or in MX10003 LC I saw some scaling numbers for subscriber management and it looks like some numbers are very low on the MX204 compared to MX10003 LC These are control plane tasks that are distributed to the PFE so I

Re: [j-nsp] VTEP Scale

AFAIK VTEP scale is a lot lower at least in EVPN-VxLAN scenario But please ask your SE for the exact number as it is not public Nitzan On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:59 AM Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 25 septembre 2019 18:19 +03, Mohammad Khalil : > > > Am working with a customer of mine for DC

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN/VXLAN experience (was: EX4600 or QFX5110)

I dont see these warnings in 17.3R3 It looks like you should configure it under routing-instance type virtual-switch https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/evpn-virtual-switch-overview.html Nitzan On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:01 PM Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > * Rob

Re: [j-nsp] Manually creating a static route (or access route) in a DHCP dynamic subscriber management environment

AFAIK from LNS (but probably the same issue ) in Tomcat you can not use static route to subscriber Only via radius I suspect it is because there is no IFL for the subscriber only flow but take a look on

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP OIDs for Yellow/Red Alarm on MX204

Am 28.02.2019 um 23:00 schrieb Nitzan Tzelniker < > nitzan.tzelni...@gmail.com>: > > > > I open TAC case about it few months ago > > We tried hard with our SE and the JTAC but the developers didnt agreed to > > add it > > Maybe if more people will push it

Re: [j-nsp] SNMP OIDs for Yellow/Red Alarm on MX204

I open TAC case about it few months ago We tried hard with our SE and the JTAC but the developers didnt agreed to add it Maybe if more people will push it they will add it as QFX/SRX/EX ... does not have craft interface and they support this MIB BTW you can also try to monitor it with Netconf or

Re: [j-nsp] Junos Arp Expiration Timer Behavior & Active Flows

>From what I understand the router will not delete the arp entry immediately after it expired so it will not queue/drop the packet Take a look on this output where the arp is expired you the entry is kept without expiration time for few seconds until the other side answer to the arp

Re: [j-nsp] About Secure Transport for RPKI on JUNOS

If we are talking about SSH in Junos I am waiting for TrustedUserCAKeys support as describe in https://code.fb.com/security/scalable-and-secure-access-with-ssh/ Nitzan On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 8:39 PM Bjørn Mork wrote: > Chris Morrow writes: > > On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 16:15:24 -0500, > > Melchior

Re: [j-nsp] qfx5100 software upgrades and virtual-chassis

If you cant afford taking down the whole VC do not work with VC This is my philosophy with VC Do MC-LAG or EVPN in these environment (even with VC just to increase the number of ports ) Regarding the host they dont have to be the same unless there is a known issue From

Re: [j-nsp] MX480

AFAIK from few JTAC cases both 16.1R7 and 17.3R3 should be out in the end of this month or sometime next month but as always it could be changed Nitzan On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:36 AM Sebastian Becker wrote: > The ETA for GA was 31-MAY-2018. So hopefully only a matter of days. > > — >

Re: [j-nsp] VXLAN, BGP EVPN, remote VTEP

Try to remove the "ingress-node-replication" from the vlans and add " set protocols evpn multicast-mode ingress replication " few months ago a TAC engineer told it to me "This knob will add all the remote VTEPs under the VNIs on local device even though the remote devices do not have these VNIs

Re: [j-nsp] Ansible juniper_junos -add license module?

Thanks All, This RPC command works for me via ansible I used ansible lookup module to take the license content from a file with the hostname as filename but more advanced use should be to take it directly from Juniper bulk activation excel based on the serial number Nitzan On Wed, Mar 28,

Re: [j-nsp] BGP EVPN, VXLAN and ECMP

Not sure I understand you but both can run 17.3R2 (just time of installation ) On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:16 PM Vincent Bernat <ber...@luffy.cx> wrote: > ❦ 28 mars 2018 19:06 GMT, Nitzan Tzelniker <nitzan.tzelni...@gmail.com> : > > > The 5100 run 15.1X53-D63 and the 511

Re: [j-nsp] BGP EVPN, VXLAN and ECMP

t; just a display issue. > -- > The lunatic, the lover, and the poet, > Are of imagination all compact... > -- Wm. Shakespeare, "A Midsummer Night's Dream" > > ――― Original Message ――― > From: Nitzan Tzelniker <nitzan.tzelni...@gmail.com>

Re: [j-nsp] BGP EVPN, VXLAN and ECMP

Hi, Just check with 5110 and 5100 and on both I see two next hops but I am using OSPF for the underlay I think that you have multipath under BGP from the fact that we see two paths under inet.0 but do you have forwarding-table policy with "load-balance per-packet" ? BTW take a look here

Re: [j-nsp] Ansible juniper_junos -add license module?

I dont think rpc will be good option as the command "request system license add " dose not have rpc May be junos_command will do it but I am not sure user@switch> request system license add jj | display xml rpc http://xml.juniper.net/junos/17.3R2/junos;> xml rpc equivalent of this

Re: [j-nsp] Experience with Junos 15.1 on MX960?

We are running MX480 with NG-RE and Junous Fusion and doing basic MPLS on 17.2R2 so far without an issue We started with 16.1R5 and hit by Fusion issue that force us to upgrade to 17.1R2 where we hit by another Fusion issue Nitzan On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Michael Hare

Re: [j-nsp] Ex4550 sfid process increase cpu

Check the mac learning history I saw one event when a EX4500 has high CPU because of that Try to clear the offending mac address Nitzan On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Rodrigo 1telecom wrote: > Nothing . this switchs is only layer2... > these vlans passthrough

Re: [j-nsp] L2TP LNS on MX

You probably missing S-MX80-SA-FP Licenses installed: License identifier: XX License version: 4 Features: subscriber-accounting - Per Subscriber Radius Accounting permanent subscriber-authentication - Per Subscriber Radius Authentication permanent

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 Buffer allocation for burst be traffic

We are doing using this config and it reduce the amount of drops IIRC I did the change without any issue Nitzan On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:26 PM, Chen Jiang wrote: > Hi! Experts > > Sorry for disturbing, we are using QFX5100 virtual-chassis for > distrubiuting storage

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 firewall family ethernet-switching rules

As this is also applied to L2 it might also kill l2 traffic like LACP/ARP ... Try to add another term with then accept in the end of acl1 like you did in acl2 Nitzan On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:46 PM, Panny Malialis wrote: > Hi all, > > > I am trying to configure an input

Re: [j-nsp] QFX10002

Currently only sflow On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Giuliano C. Medalha wrote: > People, > > Does anyone knows about QFX10002 ... if it is possible to configure some > kind of flow export ... like NETFLOW or IPFIX ? > > Thanks a lot, > > Giuliano >

Re: [j-nsp] Negative ARP caching, on an MX router (again)

Did someone test if ddos-protraction for protocol resolve with flow-detection detect the source IP and drop its requests Nitzan On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Alexander Arseniev wrote: > Hello, > > If You have control over Your L3 space assignments, have You tried >

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 limitation

> 2017-03-20 12:15 GMT-03:00 Javier Rodriguez <rodriguezsot...@gmail.com>: > > > >> Nitzan, thank you very much, I'll keep that in mind. > >> Anyway I can not understand how the router "eats" the packets without > >> being counted That gives me pan

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 limitation

We saw a limitation around 40Gbps when running MX80 with RE based jflow (inline works good ) we didnt got good explanation why it limit the traffic so try to disable some features and see if it help Nitzan On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 6:14 AM, Javier Rodriguez wrote: >

Re: [j-nsp] multi services cards - MX

I think that you should ask your Juniper SE There is a file they have Nitzan On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:24 PM, harbor235 wrote: > My google-fu is preventing me from finding performance data on the various > MS-MPC linecards for the MX router series. I am looking for IPSEC >

Re: [j-nsp] Netflow/Jflow

>From 15.1F2 (I test it on 15.1F6 ) changing the flow table size dose not restart the FPC Nitzan On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Scott Granados wrote: > +1, this is how I have set things up as well and yes, changing the table > sizes will cause an FPC reboot. > > > On

Re: [j-nsp] Next-Hop Verification for static route WITHOUT BFD

You can work based on this blog http://nextheader.net/2013/07/22/changing-the-configuration-using-event-policy-action/ Thanks Nitzan On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Stefan Stoyanov wrote: > Hi Alex, > > Try to check if "ip-monitoring" will fits your needs. ( >

Re: [j-nsp] EX3400 switches, QSFP+ breakout

Like the EX4300 the 40GE ports cannot be channelized to 4 x 10G Nitzan On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Jim Troutman wrote: > Anyone have any experience or opinions on the EX3400 switches? > > Can anyone confirm that the software supports breaking out a QSFP+ ports >

Re: [j-nsp] Channelization on EX4300

You cant do it They didnt want to create a switch with 16 x 10G for 5K$ list price Nitzan On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Paul S. wrote: > Hi folks, > > Do the QSFP+ ports on the EX4300 support channelization ( >

Re: [j-nsp] B-RAS services

You can take vMX and do subscriber management on it (It is very new so be careful ) It has license for 1K subscribers and it should be the best for you http://www.juniper.net/assets/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000522-en.pdf In the cisco world you can take CSR1K Nitzan On Mon, May 9, 2016 at

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

AFAIK it is mostly VPLS and maybe some OAM feature btw the QFX5100 with D35 release has a new feature that I dont know if it available on the ACX5K ECMP for MPLS traffic using firewall filter Nitzan On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Colton Conor wrote: > Jerry, > > Can

Re: [j-nsp] QFX10002 as P Router

kov...@gamma.co.uk> wrote: > > Nitzan Tzelniker > > Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2016 8:22 PM > > > > 1. Same performance 500G > > 2. Same memory technology (3d memory architecture ) 3. Both use Virtual > > output Queue 4. Both announce on the same day > > > Wel

Re: [j-nsp] QFX10002 as P Router

<s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > On 16 April 2016 at 20:54, Nitzan Tzelniker <nitzan.tzelni...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > QFX10K use almost the same ASIC as the PTX1K so the hardware is capable > to > > be P (But the memory is partition differently for data center use cases

Re: [j-nsp] QFX10002 as P Router

QFX10K use almost the same ASIC as the PTX1K so the hardware is capable to be P (But the memory is partition differently for data center use cases ) So check the feature table and scaling for your needs (256K routes if you are not using BGP free core ) and dont forget the license for MPLS If

Re: [j-nsp] Encrypted MPLS between MXes

The new MPC7-10G (Only the 10G version ) support macsec if you need it for 10G Nitzan On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On 27 March 2016 at 23:44, Alex K. wrote: > > But as far as Juniper documentation is concerned, MIC-3D-20GE-SFP-E only

Re: [j-nsp] firewall filter prefix-list ordering

BTW if you have MPC5 or 6 you can use fast-lookup-filter to increase the performance http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos15.1/topics/concept/firewall-filter-fast-lookup-filter.html Nitzan On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:23 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On 15 March 2016 at 21:48,

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN

I don't remember if there is a log message but you can write some event script that disable/enable the port when it become standby Other vendor solve it with mvrp

Re: [j-nsp] Firwall Counter IPv6 : MIB

age- > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf > Of > Niall Donaghy > Sent: 11 December 2015 03:19 > To: david....@orange.com; Nitzan Tzelniker > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Firwall Counter IPv6 : MIB > >

Re: [j-nsp] Firwall Counter IPv6 : MIB

Hi David, It works for me on MX80 running 11.4R8.4 snmpwalk -c X -v2c 1.1.1.1 .1.3.6.1.4.1.2636.3.5.2.1.5.28.118.54.45.105.110.98.111.117.110.100.45.102.105.108.116.101.114.45.97.101.48.46.49.48.48.48.45.105.23.105.112.118.54.95.116.114.97.102.102.105.99.45.97.101.48.46.49.48.48.48.45.105.2

Re: [j-nsp] Firwall Counter IPv6 : MIB

Yes it is DS Nitzan On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:18 PM, <david@orange.com> wrote: > Thank you. In 12.3 it doesn’t work. > > > > Does your interface is a dual stack interface ? > > > > David > > > > > > *De :* Nitzan Tzelniker [mailto:nitzan

Re: [j-nsp] Cisco ASR 9001 vs Juniper MX104

Regarding CGNAT the MX104 can have MS-MIC that can do all of the PBA/NAPT/ALG/EIM features for near 10G Nitzan On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Payam Chychi wrote: > Asr1000 line are solid if needed for nat > > -- > Payam Chychi > Solution Architect > > > On Monday,

Re: [j-nsp] MX480 + RE-S-1300 with more than 1024 VRRP instances possible?

Did you try vrrp-inherit-from https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos12.1/topics/task/configuration/vrrp-inheritance-for-a-group-configuring.html Nitzan On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 7:25 PM, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote: > Hi, > > just ran into that issue after creating a

Re: [j-nsp] dynamic-db for prefix-list filter on ex3200, ex2200

mbers of prefixes for filtering purposes > without having to churn the unit with a typical commit operation and it’s > associated churn. I’d hate to have to migrate to MX because EX can’t/won’t > do it. > > > > Cheers! > > > > Dan > > > > *From:* Nitzan T

Re: [j-nsp] dynamic-db for prefix-list filter on ex3200, ex2200

Dan, AFAIK dynamic-db is for routing policy only it dose not work for firewall filters Nitzan On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Dan Farrell wrote: > Howdy List, > > I can't seem to get a dynamic-db prefix-list to work correctly on either > an ex3200 or ex2200 on JUNOS 12.3

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS label stack limits on MX line cards

The default limit is 3 but you can change it to 5 http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos14.2/topics/task/configuration/interfaces-mpls-maximum-labels.html I heard something about increasing this limit probably for segment routing (but it was two years ago ) BTW I didn't find a reference

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS label stack limits on MX line cards

:04 +0300), Nitzan Tzelniker wrote: Hey, The default limit is 3 but you can change it to 5 http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos14.2/topics/task/configuration/interfaces-mpls-maximum-labels.html I heard something about increasing this limit probably for segment routing

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 redundant RE and virtual-chassis

AFAIK The second RE is spawn only during the upgrade and shutdown after the upgrade Nitzan On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Octavio Alfageme octavio.alfag...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, Soon I'm gonna have to configure a virtual-chassis of two QFX5100s. I'd be grateful if you could

Re: [j-nsp] juniper qfx5100 vs ex9200

My view EX9200 has better qos features, larger buffers 100G interfaces , better L2 features (QinQ,Vlan per port ... ) ,VxLAN routing BTW to prevent SP from using the 9200 as P router it doesn't support RSVP For most cases QFX will do the job but if you want MX for your DC but 80/104 is to small

Re: [j-nsp] Q-in-Q - QFX5100 [ new ELS CLI ]

Hi, This is an example I got from the TAC before it is supported from 13.2x51-D25 set vlans v10 interface ge-0/0/1.10 set vlans v10 interface ge-0/0/2.10 set vlans v99 interface ge-0/0/2.99 set vlans v99 vlan-id 99 l3-interface irb.99 set interfaces irb unit 99 family inet address

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 Licensing

From what I understand EX4600 will have some unique features compared to the QFX5100 (e.g. 802.1x if I remember correctly ). BTW The cost of AFL license for the EX4600 is two times the cost of AFL license for the QFX5100 so that the price difference is almost nothing if you need AFL Nitzan

Re: [j-nsp] Plotting Junos Policer in SNMP

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.3/topics/reference/mibs/mib-jnx-firewall.txt Nitzan On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net wrote: Once upon a time, Fahad Khan fahad.k...@gmail.com said: Hi Team, Is there a MIB available for a Policer (in Junos) to be

Re: [j-nsp] MX480 BNG

Where is your PPPoE configuration (access dynamic-profiles ... ) ? May be you can start with this document http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.3/information-products/pathway-pages/subscriber-access/mpls/subscriber-management-mpls.pdf Nitzan On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Brijesh

Re: [j-nsp] NTP Reflection

There is a very detailed day one book Securing the Routing Engine on M, MX, and T Series http://www.juniper.net/us/en/community/junos/training-certification/day-one/fundamentals-series/securing-routing-engine/ Nitzan On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:07 PM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote: On

Re: [j-nsp] MX80 Route table Size

Hi, The problem with the MX80 is not the FIB size but the slow RE The time it take to receive full routing table is long and to put it into the FIB is even worst Nitzan On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Krasimir Avramski kr...@smartcom.bgwrote: Agree.. other elements like counters, filters,

Re: [j-nsp] EX4550 version

There was a bug in 12.2R3 which cause VC cable not to forward traffic should be fixed in R4 (look in the list archive for the PSN ) Now I am working with 12.2R3 and R4 without VC Nitzan On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Nick Kritsky nick.krit...@gmail.comwrote: I have several running

Re: [j-nsp] MX - Changing MAC address on different unit of the same interface

Another use case is for DPI or other transparent devices when your traffic is not symmetrical (more downstream than upstream ) you are installing the DPI between two vrf on the same router and use switch as port extender This way you are using less ports on the router for almost the same amount of

Re: [j-nsp] EX series junos 12.x version

We had case with vc on 12.2R3 The vc cable didnt forwared traffic in one of the directions I think it is PSN 2013-03-868 Nitzan On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Tore Anderson t...@fud.no wrote: * Timh Bergström That's interesting, have you seen any other 'gotchas' with 12.2R3? I'm

Re: [j-nsp] EX VC mixed mode experience

The case with the 4550 in VC is PSN 2013-03-868 Nitzan On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Amos Rosenboim a...@oasis-tech.net wrote: We have deployed a mixed mode 4500/4200 small VC as a part of mobile network core and it is running smoothly so far. We don't have significant throughput, and we

Re: [j-nsp] RPM MIB

try the script i send to the cacti forums http://forums.cacti.net/about32000.html Nitzan On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 16:53, Shiva S Narayana sshankar...@yahoo.comwrote: I meant: how to decode the probe name and each test under the probe, as they are encoded There must be a easy and scalable

Re: [j-nsp] Same netflow data to same collector but different ports

Not in the router but you can use http://code.google.com/p/samplicator/ On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 20:14, Emmanuel Halbwachs emmanuel.halbwa...@obspm.fr wrote: Hello, I would like to run more than one collector software on the same host. The use case is: - benchmarking different tools with

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper QoS Using AS Match

Hi Try to use classification-override you can match bgp community and set it to forwarding-class http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos93/swconfig-cos/overriding-the-input-classification.html#id-10946761 Nitzan

Re: [j-nsp] Force ports with only RX connected to UP

What version are you running on the EX ? In the past I see a version when you couldn't disable autoneg (you can but it didn't disable it ) Nitzan On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 04:04, Chuck Anderson c...@wpi.edu wrote: On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 08:55:36PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: On Sun, Jul 11,

Re: [j-nsp] EX-4200 VC, unable to lock config on fpc

Hi do you have firewall filter on lo0 ? I see similar issue when I did it Thanks Nitzan On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 04:41, Ross Vandegrift r...@kallisti.us wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:30:38PM -0700, Cord MacLeod wrote: I had this issue adding members to an existing VC. Did you upgrade

Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 and speed/duplex

Hi I have a case about this issue it should be fixed in the next version 9.3R4 9.4R3 9.5R2 Nitzan On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 15:48, Bjørn Tore b...@paulen.net wrote: We are trying out some EX 4200 switches running 9.5R1.8. Anyone managed to actually lock the port to 1000Fdx? Seems that this is

Re: [j-nsp] Crashing rpd on 8.5R4.3 on Backup RE (M20)

I see smiler problem on M120 with 9.1R2.1 take a look on PR312098 Nitzan On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 21:48, Joerg Staedele j...@tnib.de wrote: No, i only got the version (from August 2008) from the J Website ... I read the PSN again and don't think that this is my problem. Meanwhile i just

Re: [j-nsp] SONET/SDH OC48/STM16 (Multi-Rate) PIC

As far as I know you can use it as one STM-1 port but you can't use the *non-concatenated feature to cut it to 16 * STM1 but you can cut it to 4 * STM4 Nitzan * On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 20:46, Marlon Duksa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know if this PIC supports channelization down to

Re: [j-nsp] RE/FEB Vitals Monitoring - Cacti

Hi, If you are tacking about http://forums.cacti.net/about11320.html Try to remove these lines from the XML -jnxFruType - nameFRU Type/name - methodwalk/method - sourcevalue/source -