C duid=[00:03:00:01:60:db:98:12:34:56], tid=0xda1fb6:
lease for prefix 1234:abcd::4010::/60 and iaid=1 has been allocated
for 4000 seconds
-Aaron
On 7/3/2024 10:05 AM, Chris Adams via juniper-nsp wrote:
Once upon a time, Aaron Gould said:
This might be a moot point for me since we m
oh wait, i think you just answered that... pay for it.
-Aaron
On 7/3/2024 11:42 AM, Aaron Gould via juniper-nsp wrote:
how are we supposed to deploy ipv6 without the ability to log who has
what?
-Aaron
On 7/3/2024 10:10 AM, Gert Doering via juniper-nsp wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at
how are we supposed to deploy ipv6 without the ability to log who has what?
-Aaron
On 7/3/2024 10:10 AM, Gert Doering via juniper-nsp wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 10:05:43AM -0500, Chris Adams via juniper-nsp wrote:
I haven't looked in a bit, but at one point Kea's built-in l
Pv6 server changed a
binding to state BOUND:default/five, interface irb.1010, MAC
60:db:98:12:34:56, IP 1234:abcd:::a, lease-time 86400.
-Aaron
On 7/3/2024 12:45 AM, Wojciech Janiszewski wrote:
Hi Aaron,
You can try log session option under dhcp-service process as described in
https://www.j
at configuration statement(s) do I need to automatically import
prefix delegations into ospf3? I see the WAN and PD in the relay
bindings but no advertisement of the PD.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/m
fxp0 : Ethernet Link Down
2024-02-28 09:28:15 CST Major Management Ethernet Links Down
--
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
the time I implement IPv6. lol
thanks y'all
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
stand
why ospf inside an l2circuit is affected by my pim/igmp configs ...
furthermore, why it breaks in the field and works in the lab
-Aaron
On 2/2/2024 10:32 AM, Crist Clark wrote:
I thought this was asked, but don’t recall an answer, what’s the point
of turning on a querier if the switch is
use 224
routes seen in inet.0 and inet.1 for l2circuits?
-Aaron
me@lab-5048-2> show route 224/8
inet.0: 846 destinations, 847 routes (846 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
224.0.0.2/32 *[PIM/0] 16:56:50
MultiRecv
and igmp, then there OSPF neighbors up and stabilizes
i just don't know how running igmp inside vlan 100 with ports ge-0/0/4,
5 and 6 would have anything to do with an l2circuit on ge-0/0/2
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list junipe
-S6.1 - will move to this if problem not seen in 19.2
17.4R2-S11 - will move to this if problem not seen in 18.3...this 17.4
is what is in the field
-Aaron
On 2/1/2024 3:15 PM, Karsten Thomann wrote:
Hi Aaron,
as you're using a 3,5 years old junos, is it possible to upgrade and ch
to route ssm multicast joins to
the multicast sender
- port ge-0/0/2 is mapped to an l2circuit over mpls to some remote location
--- i don't see ge-0/0/2 related at all to the vlan 100 where i run
multicast
-Aaron
On 2/1/2024 8:19 AM, Andrey Kostin wrote:
Hi Aaron,
It's not clear
igmp interface irb.100 version 3
set protocols pim interface irb.100
set protocols igmp-snooping vlan vlan100 l2-querier source-address 10.100.4.1
Model: acx5048
Junos: 17.4R2-S11
--
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
market of
Linux PCI users who want wire rate programmable features for multiple
ports? Maybe ESXi server integration for various pre-VPC protection
features at wire-rate? I think there might be a lot of potential in
NPU-PCI, perhaps even FAB-PCI, to have more ports than si
27;s when the router never worked after
that. Strange that this would "fry" the FPC. Maybe there was already
something wrong with it... I don't know. Perhaps I'll try to reproduce
it after the new chassis comes back.
-Aaron
I wonder if the "request vmhost reboot
22.2R3.15
On 10/25/2023 7:50 AM, Richard McGovern wrote:
Aaron, what version of Junos are you using on your MX304? This should
NOT happen and if it did/is, then I suggest you open a Case with JTAC.
Minimally your account team should be able to get you a temp license
to work-around this
more about this, as I'm considering buying MX304's.
-Aaron
On 10/24/2023 4:18 AM, Karl Gerhard via juniper-nsp wrote:
On 18/10/2023 18:55, Tom Beecher via juniper-nsp wrote:
Juniper licensing is honor based. Won't impact functionality, will
just grump at
may soon see the back of this.
Mark.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
--
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-
I'm starting to wonder if this has something to do with different
telemetry models/methodologies. Forgive me as I forget the correct
terminology, but, I think the MX960 sending native telem models, seems
to be always-on... and I'm wondering if the ACX7100 is more based on the
grpc subscription
pb messages
gpb-sdm Use gpb self-describing-message format
json-gnmi Use gnmi format for json messages
[edit]
i've tried remote-port 50020, and nothing...
--
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
t should be fixed in my version? 22.2R3.13-EVO
me@lab-7100-2> show version
...
Junos: 22.2R3.13-EVO
-Aaron
On 6/7/2023 2:29 PM, Roger Wiklund wrote:
Hi
Some generic pointers here:
Checklist for Collecting Crash Data - TechLibrary - Juniper Networks
<https://www.juniper.net/
darn, i should've check that before upgrading/rebooting to 22.2R3 , 10
mins ago
-Aaron
On 6/7/2023 2:29 PM, Roger Wiklund wrote:
Hi
Some generic pointers here:
Checklist for Collecting Crash Data - TechLibrary - Juniper Networks
<https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/top
ps
re0:
--
agould@eng-lab-7100-2> file ls /var/crash
/var/crash: No such file or directory
agould@eng-lab-7100-2>
--
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.neth
Does anyone know when and where the Juniper NXTWORK conference is this year?
--
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Thanks, Looks good now.
https://www.isitdownrightnow.com/juniper.net.html
shows it was down 8 minutes ago for everyone
-Aaron
From: Liam Farr
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 1:21 PM
To: aar...@gvtc.com
Cc: juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] juniper.net down?
Loading fine
juniper.net down?
Aaron
aar...@gvtc.com
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
user defined cos config is present)
root@srx-1> show configuration class-of-service | display set
root@srx-1>
Aaron
aar...@gvtc.com
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
if I set those values, I
can't even get lacp bundles to come up, once I bump the resources, the bundles
come up.
I've asked my SE, but I would like to know what the community has set in their
environments?
Thanks,
Aaron
1.
https://interestingtraffic.nl/2017/11/21/an-oddly-spec
n one side or both can sometimes help.
Just make sure to wait 1min after committing as changes to take effect can be
delayed.
-Aaron
Jun 12, 2020, 13:55 by e...@telic.us:
> That's what I was going to chime in on. Behaviour differences between
> software versions have done di
This ?
[edit protocols pim ]
user@host# set interface all mode sparse version 2
user@host# set join-load-balance
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/task/configuration/
mcast-pim-join-load-balance.html
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-b
There should have been a banner up for the last few weeks detailing changes
that were going to happen May 2 to My Juniper. There may have also been an
email but I don't recall that myself.
http://casemanager.juniper.net is the place to go for your case management
needs now.
On May 2 2020, at 1
-profile my-exprt-prfl]
-reporting-rate 1;
+reporting-rate 0;
{master}[edit]
agould@lab-960# commit check
re0:
[edit services analytics]
'sensor my-sensor-14'
reporting-rate of 0 not supported for PFE sensor
error: configuration check-out failed
-Aaron
_
sensors and data models”
https://community.grafana.com/t/how-to-send-juniper-router-telemetry-to-grafana/11071/9
-Aaron
From: Colton Conor [mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2020 9:05 AM
To: Aaron Gould
Cc: Juniper List
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Junos Telemetry
ensor-13 export-name my-exprt-prfl
set services analytics sensor my-sensor-13 resource
/junos/system/linecard/firewall/
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Colton Conor
Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 3:25 PM
To: Juniper
rfaces et-0/1/0 gigether-options fec ?
Possible completions:
fec74FEC74 enabled
fec91IEEE 802.3bj Clause 91, Reed-Solomon FEC (RS-FEC)
none FEC disabled
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juni
Just fyi, I'm running evpn-mpls between a couple dc's and ms-mpc-128g for my
cable modem communities all in the same mx960 chassis's... been good so far.
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.net
to it... also, my dual 100 gig inet connections are on a couple of those
960's where I colo the mpc-128g card, yeah, it's all right there. Not the
case for dsl nat, that's across the network in a couple mx104's, but dsl
doesn't have near the speeds that my ftth
Hi,
>Prsearch disappeared what, Jan 2019.. this year will it be case management and
>download access we lose for almost a year?
FYI, PR search came back a long time ago sometime late 2019.
-Aaron
Jan 26, 2020, 08:30 by c...@ip4.de:
> Everything works here again - without resetting
ress, and I need to allow many more.
{master:0}[edit]
agould@eng-lab-5048-2# set system services rest control allowed-sources
123.123.0.80
{master:0}[edit]
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
here ...
https://senetsy.ru/upload/juniper-summit-2019/5G-ready_Transport_Networks_Ev
genii_Bugakov_Juniper.pdf
ACX710 and ACX753. I'm curious about interfaces and modules and
capabilities of both of them.
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list j
ed)"; ## SECRET-DATA
}
exclude-protocol lldp;
}
interfaces {
xe-0/1/0 {
connectivity-association my-ca1;
}
}
}
[edit]
me@site2-204-3#
- Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@p
Before or after I do that config test ? Asking since I didn't commit that
as it's on a MX204 in a far-away place during a thanksgiving week
network-change moratorium, I'm treading on thin ice. LOL
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing l
eeds
[edit]
me@site2-204-3#
- Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
uration mode
me@site2-204-3> show system information
Model: mx204
Family: junos
Junos: 18.4R1-S3.1
Hostname: site2-204-3
me@site2-204-3>
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Thanks, but I just moved the fxp0 ip address to a revenue interface to get the
pfe forwarding I needed.
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Thanks
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
---subnet B
<---is bi-dir comms possible?------>
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
00.100) Encapsulation: VLAN-VPLS
Input packets : 0
Output packets: 0
Protocol vpls, MTU: 9216
- Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
4-1# commit check
[edit routing-instances 100 interface]
'xe-0/1/1.300'
interface with input/output vlan-maps cannot be added to a
routing-instance with a vlan-id/vlan-tags configured
error: configuration check-out failed: (statements constraint chec
erfaces xe-0/1/5 gigether-options speed 1g
set interfaces xe-0/1/6 gigether-options speed 1g
set interfaces xe-0/1/7 gigether-options speed 1g
- Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
up multiservice
agould@dallas-204-1> show chassis fpc pic-status
Slot 0 Online MPC
PIC 0 Online 4XQSFP28 PIC
PIC 1 Online 8XSFPP PIC
- Aaron
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Clarke Morledge
Se
23.10.31: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=144.518 ms
64 bytes from 172.223.10.31: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=180.567 ms
^C
--- 172.223.10.31 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 106.272/143.786/180.567
On my EX4550, I recall going from 12 to 15 to get some mpls function. But I
also recall having issues with mpls services and then later removing those mpls
services.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Richard McGovern [mailto:rmcgov...@juniper.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 5:27
If you unicast email me, I’ll send you screen shots of my telem graphs that are
giving me concern and the sensor agent strings that I’m looking at.
Thanks y’all
- Aaron
From: Colton Conor [mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 6:47 AM
To: Aa
nd if I have any reason for concerns
regarding resource load, etc.
(should I post this to NANOG also?)
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
ler: Disabling
PHY stream for egress side failed - status 29, instance 0, phy_stream 1095
Aug 15 13:50:54 my-mx-960 fpc11 pfe_ifd_link_updown: Handling IFD link DOWN
failed - status 29, ifd xe-11/0/0:3
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
safest and
least changes as possible to the existing train of code you are currently
running ?
(I just read this as a refresher for my understanding)
https://forums.juniper.net/t5/Junos/Current-JUNOS-Release-numbers-explained/td-p/58396
-Aaron
fferent versions of Junos.
Should I stick with the current train I'm in ?
Resolved In
Release
junos
18.4R1
x
18.4R2
x
17.4R3
x
19.1R1
x
17.4R2-S2
x
...17.4R2-S2 is closest to what I'm currently using.
- Aaron
___
liance for getting into the network remotely.
I've heard Palo Alto are good.
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
5.1R5.1
ps-pulse-win-5.1r5.1-b61437-64bitinstaller.msi - windows 10 working
ps-pulse-mac-5.1r5.1-b61437-installer.dmg - macos not working
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Aaron Dewell
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 7:39
ected-resources 0.0.0.0/1
set security dynamic-vpn clients all remote-protected-resources 128.0.0.0/1
-Aaron
Old thread (2015)... [j-nsp] non-split tunneling to SRX dynamic vpn with
Pulse Secure client?
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2015-March/030059
My ISP network is core/agg mpls rings of MX960's and ACX5048's960's
connect 40 gig to 5048's using the MPC7E-MRATE in the MX960.
Seems good to me so far
Also use MX960 40 gig on MPC7E-MRATE to DC/CDN deployments of QFX5120's
(pure E
Yes Hugo, I can pass non-ipsec encrypted traffic via the MPLS L3VPN inside
the SRX... isn't that what the IKE Phase 1 and IKE Phase 2 success is
proving ?
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nethe
behind the SRX or MX, but I
will do that this morning I simply wanted to put a subnet on the secure
tunnel interfaces and ping from st0.0 to ms-0/0/0.1 first, but I can do the
further edge config also.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Slabbert [mailto:h...@slabnet.com]
Sent: Friday,
Interface Label space ID Hold time
10.101.14.197 ge-0/0/0.0 10.101.0.254:0 10
root@demo-srx300>
-Original Message-
From: Emille Blanc [mailto:emi...@abccommunications.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 3:04 PM
To: Aaron Gould; juniper-nsp@
0
Errors:
AH authentication failures: 0, Replay errors: 0
ESP authentication failures: 0, ESP decryption failures: 0
Bad headers: 0, Bad trailers: 0
root@demo-srx300> show security flow statistics | grep rop
Packets dropped: 15755
-Aaron
___
2nd edition page 332 "IPv6 RE Protection Filter"
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Hey check it out... I just heard that Cisco is opening up recert with
continuing education to associate, specialist and professional levels... on
2/24/2020
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/training-events/training-certifications/recertification-policy.html
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From
By the looks of it, seems so.
EVPN Interworking with IPVPN
draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02
Abstract
EVPN is used as a unified control plane for tenant network intra and
inter-subnet forwarding. When a tenant network spans not only EVPN
domains
-policy
-Aaron
After putting the above evpn ospf export on an evpn pe, I see this on a
non-evpn ospf router across the network...
root@blvr-witness> show route table inet.0 172.223.10.0/24
inet.0: 39 destinations, 39 routes (39 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Act
N/7] 00:00:17
> to 10.103.129.14 via ae0.0, Push 301728, Push
299840(top)
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
00:03
> via irb.0
... how would I get this same behavior if the irb.0 interface was in inet.0
routing domain and not vrf ?
-Aaron
Details.
root@stlr-960-e> show evpn database
Instance: 10
VLAN DomainId MAC addressActive source Timestamp
Looks like that PR applies to all platforms...not just qfx. Correct?
Product J Series, M Series, T Series, MX-series, EX Series, SRX Series,
Customer Care, QFX Series, NFX Series, PTX Series, ACX Series
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper
I think the definition of SFP+ is 1g or 10g whichever you insert
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
https://apps.juniper.net/home/#MX204/Hardware+Compatibility
maybe it's one of those listed as QSFP+ to SFP+
- Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
I just remembered another really cool thing about Juniper certification, that I
don't think exists with Cisco...
Remote online cert exams !
https://home.pearsonvue.com/junipernetworks/op
love it
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list junipe
rtify website."
Juniper does it for course attendance to recertify certs at any level !
“Taking any higher-level course will recertify the corresponding certification
listed as well as all lower-level certifications within the same track”
Am I missing something ?
-Aaron
Availability
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Does Cisco have recertification through continuing education (attend a class
and recert!) like Juniper does ?
https://www.juniper.net/us/en/training/certification/recertification/
touché :)
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Btw, I just heard back from Juniper (certificat...@juniper.net) that the
fast track study guides are no longer available.
- Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
used MPLS in SDN era, MX book, etc. Oh, also I used GNS3 (free), and now,
EVE-NG (community free) for virtual labs for olives/vMX (60 day trial).
Have fun, and wish you the best on your journey.
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
ndancy Group IDs Joined: None
Client Application: l2ald_iccpd_client
Redundancy Group IDs Joined: 1
{master:0}
root@stlr-qfx-01>
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Last received packet: 00:00:06
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Ok thanks
...was purely a training/familiarization question as an attempt to spin-up some
fusion in my eve-ng lab
I'll resort to my hardware, which is limited, but good gear... mx960, mx204,
qfx5120 of which I only have 1-each in my lab... but it's good nonetheless
Tha
Can I do Fusion using vMX and vQFX ? Will it work?
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
---(refreshed at 2018-11-30 13:34:03 CST)---
Memory utilization 59 percent
15.1X54-D61.6 - leaking jdhcpd
17.3R3.10 - permanently fixed
- Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/
Thanks Jason, that question was for Crist Clark since he mentioned logging.
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Can you log DHCPv6 PD (Prefix Delegation) also ?
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
t, I'm about to test that as a must-have for where I intend
on deploying, to which I'll let you know findings.
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
erent units (subinterfaces)
all seems good at this point
The interfaces were interesting trying to get those up...
I had to set chassis fpc speed for all of them pic 0 and pic 1 to get a 40
gig interface on pic 0 to work (bounce pic's... request chassis fpc pic etc
offline... then online
To circle back, my vendor team has confirmed that this is purely an
honor-based license. .no need to input anything into cli.
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Lately, we have been upgrading lots of our ACX5048's from 15.1X54 (D51 and
D61) to 17.3R3.10
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
ke to hear from someone who actually installed the JAA-NAT-x
(1,10,100) cgnat license and exactly how they did it. cli commands please
with show output before and after would be nice.
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://
interface (ams0.551) to be configured to
export flow data (jflow, sflow, ipfix, whichever version i can use) to a
flow collector server, this is important so we can have flow data of
*pre-nat) private ip traffic.
Anyone know how ?
-Aaron
aking of scp chipset sx or fx...
...i may have misread somethings, but let me know what y'all know about the
capabilities of the ms-mpc-128g inside an MX960 as it pertains to napt-44
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
onfig'd et-11/1/1 with gigether-options, commited, restarted ISSU,
and all is well.
- Aaron
Details of the 3rd MX960 upgrade 2nd issue... but was easily overcome and
restarted issu and completed successfully.
.
Mounting junos-daemons-mx-x86-64-20181003.235426
online or something like that
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
ilure for power supply 0
(status bits: 0x2); check circuit breaker
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
e 0 REV 17 750-054758 (removed) RE-S-X6-64G-S
Routing Engine 1 REV 15 750-054758 (removed) RE-S-X6-64G-S
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
works is
eye-opening.
I have more to learn I'm sure. If you have anything to add, I'm all ears
..or, eyes, you know : )
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
1 - 100 of 537 matches
Mail list logo
