-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Behalf Of
joel jaeggli
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:00 PM
To: Saku Ytti
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote
On (2013-11-14 06:51 -0500), Paul Stewart wrote:
The MX104 most likely won’t be able to handle any more subscribers than 4k
neither - but have not seen any POC”s or deployments yet on that hardware.
I'm bit more optimistic, as it has double the DRAM and somewhat faster PPC
CPU, scale should
Hi Saku…
I hope it really is - but based on the 16k number on MX80 becoming 4k
realistically and with only minimal code changes implemented on MX104 vs MX80 I
am not optimistic at this point. I really hope to be proven wrong though :)
Paul
On Nov 14, 2013, at 7:22 AM, Saku Ytti
] On
Behalf Of
joel jaeggli
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:00 PM
To: Saku Ytti
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-11-12 20:14 +), Tom Storey wrote
Why so much just to enable some ports? How do they come up with that
kind of price? Pluck it out of thin air?
The hardware has been paid for, and I know thats only list pricing,
but it still seems ridiculous.
On 8 November 2013 16:46, Paul Nazario naza...@doit.wisc.edu wrote:
That is what we've
On (2013-11-12 20:14 +), Tom Storey wrote:
Why so much just to enable some ports? How do they come up with that
kind of price? Pluck it out of thin air?
The hardware has been paid for, and I know thats only list pricing,
but it still seems ridiculous.
The question might have been
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-11-12 20:14 +), Tom Storey wrote:
Why so much just to enable some ports? How do they come up with that
kind of price? Pluck it out of thin air?
The hardware has been paid for, and I know thats only list pricing,
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-11-12 20:14 +), Tom Storey wrote:
Why so much just to enable some ports? How do they come up with that
kind of price? Pluck it out of thin air
-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-11-12 20:14 +), Tom Storey wrote:
Why so much just to enable some ports? How do they come up with that
kind of price? Pluck it out of thin air?
The hardware has been paid for, and I
scheduling.
-evt
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Behalf Of
joel jaeggli
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:00 PM
To: Saku Ytti
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46
: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:00 PM
To: Saku Ytti
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-11-12 20:14 +), Tom Storey wrote:
Why so much just to enable some ports? How do they come up
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Behalf Of
joel jaeggli
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:00 PM
To: Saku Ytti
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-11-12 20:14 +), Tom
To: Saku Ytti
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-11-12 20:14 +), Tom Storey wrote:
Why so much just to enable some ports? How do they come up with
that
kind of price
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-11-12 20:14 +), Tom Storey wrote:
Why so much just to enable some ports? How do they come up with
that
kind of price? Pluck it out of thin air?
The hardware
...@puck.nether.net] On
Behalf Of
joel jaeggli
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:00 PM
To: Saku Ytti
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-11-12 20:14 +), Tom Storey wrote
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net]
On
Behalf Of
joel jaeggli
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:00 PM
To: Saku Ytti
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On
Behalf Of
joel jaeggli
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:00 PM
To: Saku Ytti
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX104
On Nov 12, 2013, at 12:46 PM, Saku Ytti s...@ytti.fi wrote:
On (2013-11-12 20:14 +), Tom Storey
On (2013-11-12 20:25 -0500), Eric Van Tol wrote:
One thing to keep in mind about these boxes is that, like the MX5/10/40/80,
the built-in 10G ports do not do hierarchical QoS (per-unit scheduling). I'm
confused as to why this is, considering they are Trio-based routers, but I
digress. I
That is what we've heard and they have the following two items in their $USD
list pricing:
S-MX104-UPG-2X10GE Upgrade License to activate 2 x 10GE fixed ports on
MX104 MX104 $10,000
S-MX104-UPG-4X10GE Upgrade License to activate 4 x 10GE fixed ports on
MX104 MX104
Hi everybody,
anybody had a chance yet to put their hands on the new MX104? According
to Juniper the 4 10G ports on-board are software locked this time but
I'd like to have a confirmation for that from an actual experience.
Thanks!
___
juniper-nsp
20 matches
Mail list logo
