Wait are the shipping these units now?
On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Cool. Is there another parameter specify which VM to power-on, maybe a
> service VM?
>
> I wonder why the MX150 doesn't have any vmhost commands. It would come in
> handy for some issues.
>
> On Mon,
Mike,
For 20K you can get a new MX204 (not to be confused with MX240). However, I
don't think the MX204 support CGNAT if needed, but I could be wrong. But I
wouldn't touch a MX80 or MX104 if buying new.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 8:45 PM, wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I am looking for some advice con
I received a quote for right at 40k for two of them with J-Care.
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 3:31 AM, Edward Dore <
edward.d...@freethought-internet.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 27/05/2018, 09:28, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Vincent Bernat" <
> juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of ber...@luffy.cx>
What is the main difference between these two boxes? Hardware wise they
look identical. Is there anything on the hardware side that makes the
ACX5048 better than a QFX5100, or is it only software related?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.neth
brought one peace ACX5048 after jtac didnt responds why and
>> solution for the leaking...( I have only two acx5048 and hundreds on
>> QFX...).
>>
>> The new promise is the new acx5448. No vlan leaking, a good load
>> balance(ae) algorithm, full of this full of t
Chuck,
Did this Junos issue ever get resolved?
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Has anyone tried to use or implement polling of the Q-BRIDGE-MIB on
> any Juniper products, using either commercial or open source NMS
> software or custom in-house software? What has been y
Nick,
Did you find the PR for this memory leak?
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Nick Ryce wrote:
> If you use BFD, do not upgrade to 17.3R2 as there is a memory leak. Will
> find the PR.
>
> N
>
> On 04/07/2018, 15:31, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Colton Cono
nfoCenter/index?page=
> prcontent&id=PR1280492
>
>
>
> This is being resolved in 17.3R3 which is due for release in a couple of
> weeks.
>
>
>
> N
>
>
>
> *From: *Colton Conor
> *Date: *Wednesday, 11 July 2018 at 12:30
> *To: *Nick Ryce
>
Strange we had no issues upgrading from 17.3R2 from 15.1X.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Gustavo Santos
wrote:
> Yes... Exactly.
>
> I upgraded to 17.3R2 and was a total mess. And had to downgrade to 15.1X
> train.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:31 AM Colton Conor
We are constantly having to mount these larger switches to two post racks.
To my knowledge Juniper does not make 2 post mounting brackets for these
switches. Does anyone have any recommendations on a shelf or something to
hold these up? We are dealing with 19 and 23 inch racks.
Chris,
So the EX4200 rack ears fit on the QFX5100?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:19 PM, Chris Wopat wrote:
> We still use EX4200 rack ears and center mount them. Holes line up, works
> fine. I believe it's "EX-RMK". It's more problematic to flush mount it as
> one always needs some support on the
urther forward. The weight is more balanced and it works
> fine.
>
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 06:39:43PM -0400, Colton Conor wrote:
> > We are constantly having to mount these larger switches to two post
> racks.
> > To my knowledge Juniper does not make 2 post mounting bracket
tml
>
> --
> Tim
>
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Colton Conor
> wrote:
>
>> We are constantly having to mount these larger switches to two post racks.
>> To my knowledge Juniper does not make 2 post mounting brackets for these
>> switches. Does anyone have any
;
> Brian Nelson
>
> On 08/02/2018 10:08 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
> > Tim,
> >
> > Have you used this 2 post rack rails with the QFX5100? It looks like this
> > rail kit has a back plate, does the power cables fit through those holes?
> > This QFX5100 is long.
>
We have used Juniper for a long time across various lines. What I have
noticed is on the JTAC recommend version website piratically all of their
product lines are running on different code trains. They all run Junos yes,
but they all have different features. It seems like Juniper has a different
so
Are there any third party network monitoring systems capable of interacting
with Junos Telemetry Interface (JTI)? Many of the third party systems are
SNMP and ICMP based, but we are looking for more real-time metrics. We
could set the SNMP polling to intervals of less than a minute, but I assume
th
Dave,
Yep, it looks like the video is mentioning SevOne that's them thanks
https://www.sevone.com/streamingdatacollectors
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 8:34 AM Dave Bell wrote:
> Sounds like SevOne to me (https://www.sevone.com/)
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 14:08, Colton Conor w
>
> Sounds like SevOne to me (https://www.sevone.com/)
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 14:08, Colton Conor wrote:
>
>
> Are there any third party network monitoring systems capable of
>
> interacting
>
> with Junos Telemetry Interface (JTI)? Many of the third party syst
I was wondering if Juniper supports anything like fq-codel to prevent
buffer bloat? Specifically we would like to do rate shaping and subscriber
management on core Juniper MX's. However, most network devices do simple
buffers and queuing that does not work well compared to fq-codel and newer
algori
point, that DSLAM, or that CMTS, and not the CPE. Packets are going to
build up on the access device not the CPE right?
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 3:06 PM James Bensley wrote:
>
>
> On 17 October 2018 20:53:44 CEST, Colton Conor
> wrote:
> >I was wondering if Juniper support
Benny,
That is what I was thinking. Throttle the customer upstream traffic at the
CPE so they can't upload anymore traffic into the network, and throttle
their downstream traffic at the provider edge (PE) or access switch so they
can't congest any more links than required.
For fq-codel on the CPE
s, we
know about DSL bonding, GPON, and other access technologies that provide
more speed, but that is not always economically viable.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 5:57 PM Benny Lyne Amorsen
wrote:
> Colton Conor writes:
>
> > I am more wondering how to do this properly on the provider
the wireless isp market.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 6:30 PM Benny Lyne Amorsen
wrote:
> Colton Conor writes:
>
> > Benny,
> >
> > Great information! So what would you do to avoid congest on access
> > networks? Example DSLAM's fed by 10G links. The 10G link
I am sorry I didn't mean to start an argument on the list.
For clarification, the DSLAM uplinks (10G) and backplane doesn't have a
limit that we are hitting. However, the CO DSL ports is the first place
where there is a limit. Example
10G Internet Connect ---> 10 G Port on Juniper MX204 >
Benny,
So does putting an in-line X86 box that supports FQ-Codel before the DSLAM
solve the problem in your point of view? It would have to know for each
subscriber what their speed was of course to do the proper rate limiting.
If this device did rate limiting both on downstream and upstream would
What is the difference between the Inline Active Flow Monitoring using
IPFIX compared to the Junos Telemetry Interface (JTI)?
Both of these seem to be a push technology that pushes data to a collector
vs a pull data model like SNMP which is good. But what is the difference
between the two? I know
,
> >> Niall
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Aaron Gould [mailto:aar...@gvtc.com]
> >> Sent: 11 October 2018 13:59
> >> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> >> Cc: James Burnett ; Niall Donaghy
> >> ;
Aaron,
What version are you running on?
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 4:07 PM Aaron Gould wrote:
> Wanted to circle back with y'all... this message...
>
> fpc0 brcm_pkt_fp_thread:700 FP thread is unscheduled for more than 30ms.
> Sleep time: 44ms.^M
>
> ...seemed to be coupled with, or somewhat relat
Do you know when this will be fixed in the mainline releases? I have no
clue what 3.5R1-S4.1 is?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 2:22 PM Timothy Creswick
wrote:
> For anyone interested in this, JTAC released to us 3.5R1-S4.1 for the
> satellite devices (I don't believe this will be generally available
John did you google this?
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/general/mic-mx-series-40-gigabit-ethernet-qsfp.html
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 5:59 PM John Brown wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a client that is wanting a 40Gig ether handoff. What would
> fo
Liam,
Did you ever get this worked out?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:25 PM Philippe Girard <
philippe.gir...@metrooptic.com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Some important information:
>
> Top level encapsulation flex-eth and flex-vlan-tagging is not supported on
> QFabric (QFX family) devices. That means you
We too have the ACX5048 and QFX5100's, and have been unhappy with them
both. They both have the same Trident II chip set, but run different code
which is annoying to say the least. Not to mention these aren't really
built for Metro-E deployments. They are not hardened, so datacenter only.
Plus, th
What is Cisco's upgrade path from the ASR920 if you need more 10G ports?
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:52 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 23/Jan/20 16:00, Shamen Snyder wrote:
>
> > I have been following the ACX 710 for a while now. We have a use case
> > in rural markets where we need a dense 10G har
Mark,
So which box is best to just get customers a simple IP, but has all the
management and metro-e requirements you need?
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 1:53 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 24/Jan/20 08:49, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> >
> > When we asked JNPR why Jericho instead of Paradise, as we see thes
Instead of monitoring Juniper equipment by SNMP with 5 minute polling we
would like to use streaming telemetry to monitor the devices in real-time.
This requires the Junos Telemetry Interface.
Looking in the Juniper Feature Explorer, Junos Telemetry Interface is not a
feature, but rater a whole ca
; set services analytics sensor my-sensor-13 server-name my-grafana-srvr
> set services analytics sensor my-sensor-13 export-name my-exprt-prfl
> set services analytics sensor my-sensor-13 resource
> /junos/system/linecard/firewall/
>
> -Aaron
>
> -Original Message-
>
Is anyone using Juniper Networks® AppFormix, and what are your thoughts on
the platform? How does it compare to a more traditional NMS such as
SolarWinds?
How much does Juniper Networks® AppFormix cost? I can't seem to find
pricing on licencing this platform.
__
t;
>>
>>
>> https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/2018-October/036602.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> https://openeye.blog/2017/06/26/using-opennti-as-a-collector-for-streaming-telemetry-from-juniper-devices-part-1/
>>
>>
>&g
t; out of band.
>
> /Roger
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:07 PM Colton Conor
> wrote:
>
>> Roger,
>>
>> Thanks for the information. It seem like most all of these telemetry and
>> flow solutions require service providers to build their own solutions
>>
ve to go payed version and buy a HB license per device
> you want to monitor.
>
> /Roger
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:43 PM Colton Conor
> wrote:
>
>> Healthbot looks interesting. However, most of our Juniper gear we buy is
>> used, so I doubt we have a supp
How do you plan which JUNOS version to deploy on your network? Do you stick
to the KB21476 - JTAC Recommended Junos Software Versions or go a different
route? Some of the JTAC recommended code seems to be very dated, but that
is probably by design for stability.
https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/in
I was unaware of Junos OS Evolved until recently. At what version did
regular Junos evolve into Junos OS Evolved? Is there a certain version
where after that version, everything ongoing is Junos OS Evolved?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.ne
So is Junos OS Evolved available for the MX routers? How would you go from
regular Junos to Junos OS Evolved on a MX 240/480/960 for example?
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:38 AM Saku Ytti wrote:
> Hey Colton,
>
> > I was unaware of Junos OS Evolved until recently. At what version did
> > regular Jun
Is anyone using the free version of Healthbot, and do you find it useful
for monitoring your network? The documentation says: HealthBot Standard
(Free)—This is the free model solution and is available for customers that
have a valid support contract. No license is required.
Are the limitations the
For the ACX line, what is the Maximum number of MPLS labels in a packet’s
label stack (push, pop, and swap operations)? Specifically, mostly
interested in the ACX5048 and ACX2200's
I found the following chart for the QFX line, and it was extremely helpful.
I haven't been able to find the same info
Is there a Juniper SE that has the ability to answer these questions?
On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 12:49 PM Colton Conor wrote:
> For the ACX line, what is the Maximum number of MPLS labels in a packet’s
> label stack (push, pop, and swap operations)? Specifically, mostly
> interested in th
Thanks all for this information. Aaron I had my client run this same
command on their QFX5100, and it too has max 3 labels. It seems the issue
is that the client needs a layer 2 transport over a layer 3 network. VPLS
is the logical choice, and the ACX5048 supports this according to the
Juniper Feat
://apps.juniper.net/feature-explorer/feature-info.html?fKey=6620&fn=Ethernet-over-MPLS%20(L2%20circuit)
I do see
20.3R1
Starting in Junos OS Release 20.3R1, support for Layer 2 circuit to provide
Layer 2 VPN and VPWS with LDP signaling.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:52 AM Colton Conor wrote:
> Thanks
Jason,
Did you ever get any feedback or implement this on the QFX's?
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 9:00 PM Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I’m starting to test martini l2circuits on a QFX5110 (17.3R3-S4.2). I’m
> looking at possibly using these boxes, or QFX5120s on a larger scale to
> termina
What causes Route Record Lookup Failures? What do you have to enable to
perform route record lookups?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Does anyone have any clarification on if the MS-MIC-16G has any included
licenses by default? For example, if I buy a MS-MIC-16G off ebay or used
form somewhere else, and slide it into the back of a MX5 router. Will any
of the MS-MIC-16G features function? Are there any default included
licenses
Why is the JTAC Recommended Junos Software Version for the MX routers
currently Junos 12.3R8.7? There are much newer versions of JUNOS out there.
>From the posts I have read so far, Junos 12.3 in general has flow and nat
issues. I assume some of these bugs have been fixed with the latest .x
version
, MX104 is on par with other MX only in 13.3 anyway.
>
> Not very different on newer PTX chassis.
>
>
> > Le 30 avr. 2015 à 08:18, Mark Tinka a écrit :
> >
> > On 29/Apr/15 18:58, Colton Conor wrote:
> >>
> >> I notice that the Juniper JTAC recomm
I know legally you are not supposed to use the four 10G built in ports on a
Juniper MX5 unless you buy an upgrade license to a MX40 or MX80 level. I
would like to know if technically will these ports work, or has Juniper
software locked them down?
Some old posts said that they have not locked them
What are the limitations of buying a used Juniper MX router? I assume there
will be no JTAC support, but what would it take to licenses a used router
to get JTAC support? Does JTAC offer a one time support call fee for
unlicensed routers?
Assuming I already have access to all the latest releases o
they has some sort of oh you don't have a support contract one time
help fee.
What's the list price on a MX480-PREMIUM-AC Juniper Base system with
redundant RE-2000, SCB, and power supplies?
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Raphael Mazelier wrote:
>
>
> Le 05/05/15 18:
Correction, $500 per hour not $5000. So basically a one time fee of $2000.
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Colton Conor
wrote:
> Well, we have a smaller MX80 that doesn't have a support contract. Called
> JTAC with an issue, and they said the unit does not have a support
> contr
er.net/customers/support/downloads/7100156-001-EN.pdf
> http://www.juniper.net/support/990222.pdf
>
>
>
> - Damien
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Colton Conor
> wrote:
>
>> Correction, $500 per hour not $5000. So basically a one time fee of $2000.
>>
>>
Has juniper implemented the use of multicore processors in their software
yet? From what I read I heard it was coming, but I am not sure in what
release. I can't seem to find any information about it on Juniper's
website? What is the current status of multi core threads in Junos?
For example, the
Release 15 or in 2015?
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Arie Vayner wrote:
> It's coming in 15
> On May 8, 2015 7:13 AM, "Colton Conor" wrote:
>
>> Has juniper implemented the use of multicore processors in their software
>> yet? From what I read I heard it w
When is that supposed to be released?
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Arie Vayner wrote:
> Junos 15
> On May 8, 2015 7:57 AM, "Colton Conor" wrote:
>
>> Release 15 or in 2015?
>>
>> On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Arie Vayner wrote:
>>
>&
So are the other vendors, Brocade, Cisco and ALU all single core in
software as well, or is this just a Juniper thing? Whats the point of
having all these cores on the RE's if you unable to use be one of them?
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 8/May/15
s blows my mind.
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, wrote:
> Alu uses 10 cores.
>
> Br
>
>
>
> ---- Message d'origine
> De : Colton Conor
> Date :08/05/2015 20:09 (GMT+01:00)
> À : Mark Tinka
> Cc : juniper-nsp
What version of 13.3 is this available in Adam?
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Adam Vitkovsky
wrote:
> > From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu]
> > Sent: 10 May 2015 11:44
> >
> >
> > On 9/May/15 20:12, Adam Vitkovsky wrote:
> >
> > > If you are struggling with memory utilization you m
; that happens so people can have some time to assess the new release and to
> schedule the upgrades.
>
>
> adam
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
> > Of Colton Conor
> > Sent: 29
Ah! You are right looks like Juniper recently did update the document now
recommending Junos 13.3R6! Glad they made the jump now time to upgrade!
There should be no issues from going from 12.3R8.7 to Junos 13.3R6 right?
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:38 AM, Euan Galloway <
euang+juniper-...@lists.eusah
We need a Juniper switch with at least 24 built in SFP+ ports. Looks like
Juniper has a ton of options including the EX4500, EX4550, EX4600, and the
QFX line which I don't know much about. This switch will be for aggregation
purposes for an access network that has GPON OLT's with 10G uplinks on
the
We are considering upgrading to a Juniper MX104, but another vendor (not
Juniper) pointed out the following limitations about the MX104 in their
comparison. I am wondering how much of it is actually true about the MX104?
And if true, is it really that big of a deal?:
1. No fabric redundancy
What does the price point of the ME3600X/ASR920 platform look like? Looks
like for at least the ASR920 and 10G SPF+ ports you have the buy the
chassis and then upgrade licenses?
Considering a Juniper GFX5100 is ~$11k brand new does it make any sense to
go with something like an ASR920, or does the
I am considering buying a used MX480. It will have the following:
1x MX480-PREMIUM-AC - MX480 Base system with redundant RE-2000, SCB, and AC
power
2x DPCE-R-4XGE-XFP - 4x10GE Enhanced DPC for MX, requires optics sold
separately
1 x Juniper MS-DPC - IP services line card for MX Series Requi
sappointing, but I haven't used one in about a year and a
> half now.
> In the past, mixed mode wasn't recommended, but it doesn't seem to be a
> big deal now. (If you are considering buying MPCs at some point to use with
> the R blades.)
>
> Will
>
> On We
Eventhough the RE-2000 is going into EOL status, it is still faster and has
more memory than the RE's in the MX80 or MX104 right?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Jerry Jones wrote:
> The RE-2000 and SCB have been announced EOL for next year.
>
> On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Colto
nt of your DPCs (you cannot
> mix DPC and MPC on the same chassis) and depending on the MPC choices,
> possibly the fans, SBCs and REs as well. Just something to keep in mind.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jul 22, 2015, at 06:24, Colton Conor wrote:
> >
> > I
So how redundant an reliable would a MX480 be with two RE-2000's, 2 SCB's,
and 4 AC power supplies? I know in the ideal world there would be two of
these, but due to budget that is not an option. What have you seen fail on
MX480's?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 22/
We are evaluating the three Juniper platforms, and trying to understand the
power consumption differences between the 3. Space is not really an issue,
but overall power consumption is.
So if all three have the following cards in the, how much difference will
there be in power consumption between t
Is anyone aware of any licensing limitations on the MS-DPC card?
Considering buying a couple used ones, and throwing them into a MX960. I
can't seem to find much about the capabilities of this card. What do most
people use this card for?
I know the MS-MIC is the replacement, but nowhere near the
t; rates. They can also be used for stateful firewall, tunnel services,
> ipsec.
> >
> >
> http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/general/dpc-mx-series-ms-features.html
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > Mike
> >
> >
Does anyone have an update on when Juniper will release SMP (symmetrical
multi processor) aka the ability to use multiple cores? Do you think the
second core on the MX80 or MX104 will ever be used? Does the RE-2000 in the
MX240/480 have one or 2 cores?
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Mark Tinka
Saku,
You seem to be very familiar with the major routing vendors implementations
on SMP. Do you consider the lack of SMP support on Juniper a reason not to
go with Juniper until implemented. Particularly interested to hear about
JunOS vs TimOS.
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
How many full routes can two RE-S-2000-4096 in a MX480 support? How limited
is this older card? How does it compare to the RE found in the MX104 or
built into the MX80?
On the MX480, when do most make the decision to upgrade from the RE-S-2000-4096
to a RE-S-1800X4-16G? What does the extra process
I have looked and priced both platforms from Juniper and Cisco. Both would
require two routers for true redundancy as expected. Cisco said instead of
getting two 9001s, why not look at the ASR9010. They had a promo for free
RSPs if you buy two cards. The price of the ASR9010 with two cards was just
Stephen,
Which RE is that on the MX480? The RE2000 or the quad core one?
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Stepan Kucherenko wrote:
> Should've put it here in the first post, got already asked about it
> offlist couple of times.
>
> I was testing it on MX80 with slow RE, so obviously numbers will
Is it possible to have 3 RE's in a MX960? For example:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Juniper-MX960PREMIUM-DC-ECM-4x-PWR-MX960-DC-3x-SCB-MX960-3x-RE-S-2000-4096-/271739188162?hash=item3f44eaf3c2:g:Z~IAAOSwnDZT8lpv
shows 3s RE's installed?
The documentation I have seen shows that a MX960 can have 3 SCB's,
Then how do they have 3 RE's listed and house in the picture? Is the 3 RE
in the 3 SBC just in there, but would not be powered on or usable?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 12/Jan/16 22:40, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to have
Just to confirm though, its the extra RE that is different and not
supported in this config right? The MX960 can use 3 SCB's at once, but only
2 REs? Or do I have the wrong too?
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 13/Jan/16 12:42, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
>
> > Looks like
Thanks for the overwhelming wealth of information.
So sounds like the ideal, supported setup would be a MX960 with 3 SBC, 2
RE-S-2000-4096, and redundant power supplies. For a recommended option, we
would have a third RE-S-2000-4096 as a spare (well really we should have a
spare for everything), a
Well it would be RE-S-2000-4096 running the JTAC Recommended Junos Software
Version Junos 13.3R8 plus the standard (not enhanced SCBs).
I know more memory and 64 bit is usually better, but how does this help in
Junos? From past threads, we have concluded that Junos is currently single
thread/core
:
>
>
> On 14/Jan/16 02:07, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> Well it would be RE-S-2000-4096 running the JTAC Recommended Junos
> Software Version Junos 13.3R8 plus the standard (not enhanced SCBs).
>
> I know more memory and 64 bit is usually better, but how does this help in
> Junos?
So assuming I got with something like this setup:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Juniper-MX960BASE-AC-10x-DPC-R-4XGE-XFP-MS-DPC-1yrWrnty-Free-Ship-40x-10G-MX960-/351615023814?hash=item51dde37ac6:g:WUcAAOSwLVZViHc~
That has RE-2000's, Regular SCBs, and all DPC linecards. Would these all be
able to run at
Thanks for the replies, but I am not interested in the 16XGE card. The
configuration I am referencing would be this:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Juniper-MX960BASE-AC-10x-DPC-R-4XGE-XFP-MS-DPC-1yrWrnty-Free-Ship-40x-10G-MX960-/351615023814?hash=item51dde37ac6:g:WUcAAOSwLVZViHc~
Should I run into any pr
What are the options for powering a MX960 using AC power? The datacenter
provider is offering us power in the following options:
120V/20AMP A/B Power
120V/30AMP A/B Power
208V/30AMP A/B Power
We are leaning towards using a MX960 with 4 AC power supplies and limited
cards installed. More than lik
0 PDU
> outlets/cords.
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:25:02PM -0600, Colton Conor wrote:
> > What are the options for powering a MX960 using AC power? The datacenter
> > provider is offering us power in the following options:
> >
> > 120V/20AMP A/B Power
> > 120V/3
particular case, for example
> when use power 4 blade chassis in a rack (two chassis per pair of plugsets).
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
> 2016-01-26 16:50 GMT+01:00 Colton Conor :
>
>> So from what I gather, there are 4 AC power supplies, and each AC power
>> supply has
So is the MX-104 processor really that underpowered? I have heard reports
that is was too underpowered for its pricepoint, and now I am starting to
believe it. Vincent what are your thoughts?
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 17 février 2016 22:56 GMT, Adam Vitkovsky >
, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On 18 February 2016 at 15:31, Colton Conor wrote:
> > So is the MX-104 processor really that underpowered? I have heard reports
> > that is was too underpowered for its pricepoint, and now I am starting to
> > believe it. Vincent what are your thoughts?
&g
Where is the best place to buy used Juniper gear?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
official used, Juniper-certified gear is available here:
> http://junipercpo.net/
>
> HTH,
> Graham
>
> Graham Brown
> Twitter - @mountainrescuer <https://twitter.com/#!/mountainrescuer>
> LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/grahamcbrown>
>
> On 27 Marc
What are the difference between these two cards?
Based on the descriptions found online, the MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP-R-B offers
full scale L3 features whereas the MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP offers reduced scale
L3 features and requires license to support full scale L3 routes and L3VPN.
What is the difference be
Go with a MX104 not a MX80. New a MX104 is less expensive than a MX80.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Doug McIntyre wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 06:20:45PM -0400, Satish Patel wrote:
> > I talked to one of vendore he gave me following price for MX80. Does
> > MX80 base model support 20G th
Eduardo,
So if I am reading that right, the box is using 96 percent of its memory?
It looks like it has 2 Million routes, so is that 4 full BGP
tables/upstream providers?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Eduardo Schoedler
wrote:
> 2016-04-26 13:15 GMT-03:00 Javier Rodriguez :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Ho
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
