Yes, that's a shame.
Of course, our firewall would block those emails unless explicitly instructed
not to...
One could tell such a company that serious organizations won't receive their
emails...
Sent from my test iPhone
> On May 16, 2019, at 20:26, Calum Mackay wrote:
>
>> On 17/05/2019
On 17/05/2019 12:44 am, Uri Blumenthal wrote:
Nobody in their right mind would click on a link in an email, especially
insecure email. But pictures and such that the email app downloads
automatically for you is a different story (of course, reasonable people
configure their clients to never do
Nobody in their right mind would click on a link in an email, especially
insecure email. But pictures and such that the email app downloads
automatically for you is a different story (of course, reasonable people
configure their clients to never do that).
If a person cannot create email
On Thursday, May 16, 2019 at 5:56:41 PM UTC-5, David W. Jones wrote:
Yes, adding images provides great functionality for tracking and other
> privacy invasions.
>
Yes, but I have a saying: "Ban plastic knifes from the school cafeteria? I
do wish [insert school principle] would realize that I
On May 16, 2019 12:54:01 PM HST, Pen Dragon wrote:
>On Thursday, May 16, 2019 at 7:07:42 AM UTC-5, S wrote:
>
>> It is not required to work with CSS effects or to create
>sophisticated
>> layouts. It's rather about enabling simple formatting, like bold,
>italic,
>> underline, enumerations, etc.
On Thursday, May 16, 2019 at 7:07:42 AM UTC-5, S wrote:
> It is not required to work with CSS effects or to create sophisticated
> layouts. It's rather about enabling simple formatting, like bold, italic,
> underline, enumerations, etc.
Yes! This is the point that we trying to convey. Thank
I didn't get it... I can understand people who have a concerns reading HTML
mails. If a client is programmed wrong or sloppy, this can lead to
problems, especially with trackers and the like. If the displaying client
is set up correctly, displaying HTML mails is no problem either. Tracker,
There is some convenience in HTML emails and HTML signatures (though I consider
them quite silly), but IMHO the risks and downsides heavily outweigh the
benefits. To answer the statement, an even greater quantity of K-9 users would
be victimized by HTML signatures.
I'm against this feature.
I understand all of your concerns, but a great quantity of K9 users will be
benefited from HTML signatures.
I myself want it, so I can automatically insert pictures as buttons (pictures
with links, like with a small picture of a Facebook logo, that goes to my
profile).
I like the idea of
On 5/15/19 3:15 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
S writes:
That would be indeed a nice feature. It is a total bogus assumption that
HTML mails are bad or can cause damage. As long as the feature is optional
and only activated when needed, there is absolutely nothing wrong with it.
Nobody is forced to
10 matches
Mail list logo
