On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:27 PM Jens wrote:
> My assumption was that they where focus points for a set time period. A sort
> of "lets do this!" kind of thing where the "lets" and "this" was varying in
> style and format.
>
> Sure some kinda slipped under the radar, but for the vast majority its
On 2019.08.23 00:24, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
El jue., 22 de ago. de 2019 a la(s) 22:13, Myriam Schweingruber
(myr...@kde.org) escribió:
> Any particular reason I got this survey request twice? That gives
me technically two votes, so there might be something wrong,
especially if I am not the
My assumption was that they where focus points for a set time period. A sort
of "lets do this!" kind of thing where the "lets" and "this" was varying in
style and format.
Sure some kinda slipped under the radar, but for the vast majority its just
not possible to invest the time needed to make
On Friday, 23 August 2019 09:13:11 CEST Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > Sorry, these all are... Irrelevant, incomprehensible, ineligible or
> > inconsiderable.
> Care to explain why you think that is?
(Not intending to put words in Boud's mouth here, and trying not to opine on
any specific
Hi,
Sorry, these all are... Irrelevant, incomprehensible, ineligible or
inconsiderable.
Care to explain why you think that is?
Besides, the previous set of goals has not been achieved by a country mile.
Ignoring the fact that this isn't a SI unit, this is just not true. For
instance,
