[kde-community] Akademy/QtCon Flat looking for Cool People

2016-07-21 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I've booked a flat near the Akademy location for Akademy/QtCon From Wed Aug 31st to Thu Sep 8th. This covers the e.V. AGM. https://www.airbnb.co.uk/rooms/11644885 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RKha7JfHQmHpRdvwVtcv2-wTDMhtA5oUCWxFkp8-o4o/edit There's 4 beds left, if you're interested in ta

KDE Store

2016-09-03 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Announced today at QtCon Akademy https://dot.kde.org/2016/09/03/kde-software-store https://store.kde.org/

Re: Creating a map of KDE contributors?

2016-09-20 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Gnome already do this https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeWorldWide and I have vauge memories of KDE doing it in the past too, or maybe I dreamt that Jonathan

KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-20 Thread Jonathan Riddell
It's time for a new updates to the KDE Licensing Policy The purpose of the policy is to ensure a common understanding of what KDE code and contributions can be licenced as for copying. It should allow maximum reusability amongst KDE and other free software groups while ensuring people are encoura

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-21 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:42:55PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2016-09-20, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Differences: > > Removed > > "code may not be copied from Qt into KDE Platform as Qt is LGPL 2.1" > > Rationale: Qt is now LGPL 3 as well as 2 > &g

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-21 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:17:57PM +0200, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Precision is needed here; ​I can easily copy some Qt project's code ​and even > relicense if I find it useful. I mean the BSD examples. I hope that goes without saying > ​If I have icons that are part of my LGPL framework, I don'

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-21 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:11:10PM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Rationale: we have no policy for wikis but they are very important to > > us especially with wikitoLearn so we should add one. Our wikis are > > currently CC 3.0+FDL but we should consider moving to CC 4.0 (CC > > includes an or la

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-21 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 09:19:26PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > On 20.09.2016 19:52, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > >2016-09-20 14:04 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Riddell : > >>Added: > >>''Applications which are intended to be run on a server'' can be > >&g

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-21 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 04:24:13PM +0200, Sebastian Kügler wrote: > On dinsdag 20 september 2016 22:54:54 CEST Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > > On the other hand: Is Qt still used much for web services? > > It may in the future. During QtCon, Lars Knoll mentioned to make Qt render to > web browser as

Re: Creating a map of KDE contributors?

2016-09-21 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Have you been sleeping with Ade too? On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 02:04:47PM +0200, Heiko Tietze wrote: > What does it mean to have the same lucid dream? > > +1 for Thomas > > 2016-09-20 13:49 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Riddell : > > > > Gnome already do this > > http

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-23 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:41:57PM +0200, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > Hi all, > > On 20 September 2016 at 19:04, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Added: > > "Content on collaborative edited websites such as wikis must be > > licensed under the Creative Co

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-27 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 06:52:13PM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Still, as I mentioned, it would introduced problems if we move documentation > forth and back from wikis to other formats, and also with mixing content from > older documentation. It would allow sharing content from wikis. Current

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-29 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:28:37PM +0200, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Have you contacted the people that actually write docs if they are happy with > you imposing a change on the docs they write? > > CC'ing them just in case they did not see it. I'm not imposing :( It's a suggested change we're

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-09-29 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I've changed the recommended version of the MIT licence text in the draft to the MIT Modern Style with sublicense. This is to put it in line with OSI and Linux Foundation SPDX form. https://community.kde.org/index.php?title=Policies%2FLicensing_Policy%2FDraft&type=revision&diff=74184&oldid=74120

Plasma 5.9 Kickoff Meeting

2016-10-07 Thread Jonathan Riddell
There will be a kickoff meeting to discuss plans for Plasma 5.9 in #plasma on Freenode on Monday at 11:00UTC / 12:00midday BST / 13:00CEST. All welcome. Jonathan

Re: KDE Licensing Policy Updates

2016-10-07 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 06:04:47PM +0100, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Added: > "Content on collaborative edited websites such as wikis must be > licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0 > International." > Rationale: we have no policy for wikis but t

Plasma 5.9 Kickoff meeting delayed until next Monday

2016-10-10 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Plasma 5.9 Kickoff meeting is delayed until Monday 17th October, 11:00UTC, 12:00BST, 13:00CEST in #plasma on Freenode. Jonathan

FOSDEM stall and party

2016-11-01 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Time to start thinking about FOSDEM. https://community.kde.org/Promo/Events/FOSDEM/2017 Pau has booked a dev room, please submit talks. We hope to get a stall again. Does anyone have merchandise they can bring or do we need to look at buying some? Should I organise a Saturday party again? It

Re: FOSDEM stall and party

2016-11-03 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Anyone able to help me with organising this? I'm feeling lonely and unloved doing it on my own and want someone to bounce decisions off. Jonathan On 1 November 2016 at 18:11, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Time to start thinking about FOSDEM. > > https://community.kde.org/Promo/Even

Affenfels: Plasma Sprint 6-12 Feb 2017

2016-11-03 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Come one and all and sign up for the Plasma Sprint, 6-12 Feb 2017 in Stuttgart. https://community.kde.org/Plasma/Affenfels https://reimbursements.kde.org/events/25 Includes the option of a road trip from FOSDEM if you're going to both. Jonathan

Re: FOSDEM stall and party

2017-01-06 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On 1 November 2016 at 19:08, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > I can provide big bunches of Krita postcards and, say, fifty, Krita > training dvd's that can be sold with all proceeds going to KDE. I'm not > sure I will be at Fosdem, though I really need to visit Brussels again > soon to buy BD's... Any up

FOSDEM demos

2017-01-06 Thread Jonathan Riddell
If you have something you'd like to demo on the stall at FOSDEM time to get it sorted now. Currently I expect to have a demo of KDE neon and maybe Plasma Mobile. And a reminder, if you're coming you need to sign up to the wiki page to get into the party https://community.kde.org/Promo/Events/FOSD

Re: KDE and Slimbook release a laptop for KDE fans

2017-01-26 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:22:08PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Thursday, January 26, 2017 12:32:36 PM Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2017, Aleix Pol wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Today, we're announcing a partnership between Slimbook a laptop > > > retailer and KDE to produce the KDE Sl

telepathy-morse moved out of KDE?

2017-01-27 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Telepathy morse development seems to have moved out of KDE https://cgit.kde.org/telepathy-morse.git/ vs https://github.com/TelepathyIM/telepathy-morse/ Should we remove the KDE branches? Jonathan

KDE at FOSDEM 2017 wrapup

2017-02-06 Thread Jonathan Riddell
FOSDEM 2017 Wrapup We had a pleasingly successful FOSDEM this year with a KDE stall and Desktop devroom and KDE Slimbook launch party meal/drinks. We had 19 people at the Saturday party. I asked for 200euro of food and charged people 20euro each which worked perfectly with enough money left over

Re: KDE at FOSDEM 2017 wrapup

2017-02-06 Thread Jonathan Riddell
cher escrigué: > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> >>> Sadly no women at the party again which was commented on social media, >>> la presidencia stood us up for VLC. >>> >> >> Important diplomatic mission ;-)

KDE licence policy update

2017-02-10 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I'd like to get back to my proposed update of the KDE licence policy https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy/Draft I got some comments from Matija Šuklje which I incorporated and it now includes a handy changelog. -Note that Qt is LGPL 3 not 2.1 -Code copied from Qt can be GPL 3 as w

Re: KDE licence policy update

2017-02-10 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 06:48:41PM +0100, Burkhard Lück wrote: > I fail to understand why FDL is dropped for Documentation, content on > userbase > is still dual licensed (CC_BY-SA 3.0 and FDL 1.2) and even the > Licensing_Policy/Draft content itself is available under Creative Commons > Licen

Re: KDE at FOSDEM 2017 wrapup

2017-02-15 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I also gave away £113 worth of KDE stickers I bought from handylabels.co.uk. These were very popular and all went on Saturday morning. The same quantity of lower quality stickers from vistaprint have never gone as fast before. Jonathan On 6 February 2017 at 12:16, Jonathan Riddell wrote

Exhibition Kit Chez Moi

2017-02-15 Thread Jonathan Riddell
After FOSDEM I have some exhibition kit including 2 poster stands for KDE and KDE neon stickers leaflets t-shirts, shirts and jumpers krita videos table cloths and backdrops lanyards 20 years of KDE books FLA to sign https://www.flickr.com/photos/jriddell/32876651876/ I expect to use it at UKUUG/

Re: KDE licence policy update

2017-02-17 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:18:55PM +0100, Burkhard Lück wrote: > Am Freitag, 10. Februar 2017, 18:43:38 CET schrieb Adriaan de Groot: > > This point is listed under "All new source code and related data files ..." > > and? there's an additional point 12, "Documentation started before 2016 can > > b

Re: KDE licence policy update

2017-02-17 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 12:37:23AM +0100, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Jonathan Riddell ha scritto: > > > The main change is for docs and other non-code files to become > > CC-BY-SA 4. This allows it to be converted to code (it's one-way > > compatible with LGPL 3) > D

Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Jonathan Riddell
The applications lifecycle policy needs an update Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? https://community.kde.org/Policies/Application_Lifecycle/Draft Jonathan

Re: [kde-community] Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Are we focusing on the graph for now, and then we can move to the content of > the page, or can we start the general discussion as well? Go wild :) Jonathan

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-04 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 01:43:32PM +0200, Kevin Ottens wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 13:20:43 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > The applications lifecycle policy needs an update > > > > Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? > &g

Re: [kde-community] Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-05 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 11:44:40AM +0200, Harald Sitter wrote: > We do not review the maintenance of the baseline we established during > review. I am guessing we do not re-review because the expectation is > that the authors are able to follow our community policies after the > initial review. Fai

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-05 Thread Jonathan Riddell
be out of fashion. It EBN and krazy still valid? I said stuff should go into unmaintained if it's no longer useful, with a suggestion to ask the KDE Gardening team to look after it. Is the gardening team still active? Jonathan On 4 July 2017 at 12:20, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > The appl

Re: [kde-community] Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-05 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 01:45:14PM +0200, Luigi Toscano wrote: > Jonathan Riddell ha scritto: > > > I used the Sanity Checklist I made for the releasing extragear page as > > the list of some stuff people will look at in kdereview > > https://techbase.kde.org/Re

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-05 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I added in a requirement for released apps so they can't release with unreleased software deps * These projects should depend only on stable released software (or software known it will get a stable release before the project does). Jonathan

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-05 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On 5 July 2017 at 13:04, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Why not? I can imagine we can make the process more dynamic. > Whole apps or their parts can go back to being maintained, what seems to be > a core property of FOSS. > > If so how about back-arrow from Unmaintained? Probably not worth making the

Re: [kde-community] Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-05 Thread Jonathan Riddell
> Maybe something like: > > "Documentation appropriate to the project: API documentation, user > documentation (including docbook or other format documented by the > Documentation team)" Updated Jonathan

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-05 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On 5 July 2017 at 13:54, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Thanks, I'd think not "earlier stage" but explicitly "playground" because in > the meantime the unmaintained project might lost its "reviewed" stamp. > Technology and other requirements move forward. Example: unmaintained > project XYZ got restor

Re: [kde-community] Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-06 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:37:09PM +0200, Martin Flöser wrote: > Let's just remove it and separate into applications released as part > of a larger bundle for release simplification and applications > having their own release cycle. That's what I've written, they're all the same just different det

Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-17 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I propose to make this final if there's no further comments. Jonathan On 4 July 2017 at 12:20, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > The applications lifecycle policy needs an update > > Is this a good current state of it or are there more stages? > > https://commun

Re: [kde-community] Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-17 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 06:01:39PM +0200, Martin Flöser wrote: > Am 2017-07-17 17:47, schrieb Jonathan Riddell: > >I propose to make this final if there's no further comments. > > as I explained: I think the review process should be removed, > playground should be remove

Martin k and olaf win akademy award

2017-07-23 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Martin k and olaf won an akademy award for many years hard work on KDE free qt foundation Other awards to kai uwe and plasma 5. And cornelius for lots of hard work all over

Re: [kde-community] Re: Applications Lifecycle Policy

2017-07-26 Thread Jonathan Riddell
At the BoF today we approved the draft lifecycle policy as a reflection of current practice. One addition is that apps in kdereview should take no more than two months and after that should be moved to unmaintained or back to playground. More notes were taken on discussion about improving the rev

Licensing Policy

2017-07-27 Thread Jonathan Riddell
At Akademy today we agreed to adopt the updated licensing policy https://community.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy This means docs, wikis etc should now be CC-BY-SA 4.0 which is internationally recognised, well understood and compatible with other popular sources such as Wikipedia and important

radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

2017-08-08 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Like all sensible open source communities we use IRC lots for real time communication essential to making low bandwidth decisions in a reasonable timeframe as well as socialising. 20 years ago IRC was cool but these days real-time communication in the non-geek world long since moved other places s

Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

2017-08-08 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On 8 August 2017 at 19:51, Christian Loosli wrote: > Out of interest: what exactly does IRC lack? There are 4 things coming to mind > for me, all of them with my personal opinion: Option for full names, photos of people, timezone, e-mail addresses. Just a few of the useful and user friendly featu

Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

2017-08-08 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On 8 August 2017 at 19:51, Christian Loosli wrote: > Out of interest: what exactly does IRC lack? Would be worth asking the teams who don't use IRC why they don't. Sysadmins use Slack, VDG uses Hangouts, Promo uses Telegram... anyone from those teams able to tell us why? Jonathan

Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

2017-08-08 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On 8 August 2017 at 21:46, Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > I'm not sure I get this argument. Do we have evidence that new contributors > are scared by IRC? How is signin up on RocketChat/Telegram/whatever easier > than using http://webchat.freenode.net/ ? Teams including VDG, Promo and Sysadmins chose

Re: How about an inclusive "and" approach instead of fighting IRC versus

2017-08-10 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 09:24:08AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > *Either* IRC and nothing else *or* something new and nothing else. > > Seriously? > > I mean: Seriously? I'm always serious :) But sure it's a long shot and I never expected it to happen, but I thought I'd try. Moving whole

Re: Collecting requirements for a KDE-wide instant messaging solution

2017-08-10 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 08:51:53PM +0200, Christian Loosli wrote: > Then, on the subject of emojis, stickers or even the protocol used being so > important: > > Let's see what others do. My proposal is to lead rather than follow others. We can learn from their experience but leading would be

Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

2017-08-10 Thread Jonathan Riddell
they ought to be. Jonathan On 8 August 2017 at 16:52, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Like all sensible open source communities we use IRC lots for real > time communication essential to making low bandwidth decisions in a > reasonable timeframe as well as socialising. > > 20 years ago IR

Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

2017-08-11 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On 11 August 2017 at 13:49, Eike Hein wrote: > I've given some more thought to Matrix as a contender and I'm > increasingly liking this option among the available contenders. Am I right in thinking that the bridging in Matrix/Riot isn't the same as various IRC/Telegram channels have where message

Re: [kde-community] Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

2017-08-15 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 09:49:11PM +0900, Eike Hein wrote: > > I've given some more thought to Matrix as a contender and I'm > increasingly liking this option among the available contenders. We have the possibility of moving to Matrix and allowing individual IRC channels to move to real Matrix ch

Re: [kde-community] Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

2017-08-15 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On 15 August 2017 at 10:44, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > The VDG has contributed to the Etherpad, so their requirements are covered in > there. How to evaluate if Matrix/Riot covers them? Stuff like "Have a UI that someone who is < 20 years old and cares about the looks of a UI would use" is hard t

Re: [kde-community] Conservative proposal: let's work with Kiwi IRC

2017-08-16 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:58:35PM +0300, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: > The work-in-progress Kiwi Next client can be tested like so: > https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/#irc://irc.freenode.net/kde > You can add more channels separated with commas. Looks like another IRC web client. It's just as full of

Re: KDE exhibiting at freenode live in Bristol, maybe?

2017-09-13 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Let me know if you need me to post down whatever I have On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:21:36PM +0200, David Edmundson wrote: > ​I can be there and help run a booth. > > I'll take leftover flyers from QtWs. > > David

FOSDEM stall

2017-12-08 Thread Jonathan Riddell
KDE has a stall at FOSDEM again this year, however due to a slightly overlapping booking I won't be able to help organise the stall or any Saturday entertainment. If someone else is able to take this on I can tell them how to get going. Jonathan

Shipping non-free drivers

2017-12-15 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Here at Neon we're looking to build images for some ARM hardware which needs a proprietary driver, it comes under a BSD style licence but without source code http://files.pine64.org/doc/MALI/MALI%20EULA.pdf It's not part of Neon itself, just the base system we put our packages onto. Can we ship i

Re: FOSDEM stall

2017-12-17 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 05:00:15PM -0500, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Friday, December 8, 2017 1:22:45 PM EST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > KDE has a stall at FOSDEM again this year, however due to a slightly > > overlapping booking I won't be able to help organise the stall

Re: FOSDEM booth box

2018-01-31 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Take a pinebook too? It has always taken lots of conjoling to get people organised for fosdem nothing new there. Although I always prepared stuff for the stall it was often overlooked. And nobody wants to organise saturday evening until saturday evening comes and everyone asks what's happening. J

Re: [kde-community] Re: FOSDEM retrospective

2018-02-09 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 11:27:29PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > Well-said. There's two aspects: > - why are we here (at this specific event)? It's the largest free software expo going, it keeps us in contact with our user and contributor community, if we weren't there or at similar events it

Re: [kde-community] Re: FOSDEM retrospective

2018-02-12 Thread Jonathan Riddell
nd > giving the audience a unified experience about the chosen topic to attract > their attention and inform them accordingly. We could attempt to measure the > impact from such efforts afterwards in terms of visits to projects' websites, > mailing lists, interest from new people etc. >

Re: kde.org and Plasma LTS

2018-02-28 Thread Jonathan Riddell
It needs an artist to make a new 5.12 banner. Same for the slimbook. Jonathan On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:09:48PM +0100, Ivan Čukić wrote: > Hi all, > > Can someone (who has the permissions to do so) update www.kde.org - > the scrolling banner thingie shows Plasma 5.8 LTS instead of 5.12 LTS.

Re: [kde-community] Re: kde.org and Plasma LTS

2018-02-28 Thread Jonathan Riddell
The image is a large 8 so the whole thing needs changed. The background behind the 8 image would be best to update but I don't suppose anyone is too fussed. The 'Plasma 5.8 LTS' text is just text which is changed in a json file. Jonathan On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:59:52AM -0700, Andy Betts

Re: kde.org and Plasma LTS

2018-02-28 Thread Jonathan Riddell
t; big "12" nor > anything similar, but it is ... something :] > > Cheers, > Ivan > > [edit] just realized it does 'contain' one and two in a sense > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:39 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > > The image is a large 8

Neon Pinebook Remix as part of KDE

2018-04-11 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Dearest KDE KDE neon is a project to bring KDE's software to the people by various convenient and rapid methods. Recently we've been working on packages for the Pinebook [1]. Pinebook is a < $100 laptop using an ARM processor which will open up whole new markets to KDE software and computing gen

Re: Neon Pinebook Remix as part of KDE

2018-04-17 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Seems nobody is too fussed about this and since KDE already has done this for some years I'll release it Jonathan On 11 April 2018 at 14:18, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Dearest KDE > > KDE neon is a project to bring KDE's software to the people by various > conven

Re: Neon Pinebook Remix as part of KDE

2018-04-17 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 08:45:27PM +0200, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dimarts, 17 d’abril de 2018, a les 15:27:52 CEST, Jonathan Riddell va > escriure: > > Seems nobody is too fussed about this and since KDE already has done > > this for some years I'll release it >

Twitter access

2018-07-16 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Hi KDE community I'd like to request access to post on the @kdecommunity Twitter account. This is to make announcements of Plasma releases, our flagship product. I already do this on G+ and Facebook. I'm told there are higher powers who have to approve this but I've no idea who they are or how t

Re: Twitter access

2018-07-18 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I'll stop doing KDE promo again then. KDE shouldn't have unnamed higher powers who block community contributions. Jonathan On 16 July 2018 at 10:26, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Hi KDE community I'd like to request access to post on the > @kdecommunity Twitter acco

Re: Twitter access

2018-07-19 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 03:31:42PM +0200, Luca Beltrame wrote: > Il giorno Wed, 18 Jul 2018 14:16:39 +0100 > Jonathan Riddell ha > scritto: > > > I'll stop doing KDE promo again then. KDE shouldn't have unnamed > > higher powers who block community contrib

Re: Twitter access

2018-07-19 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 03:45:26PM +0200, Paul Brown wrote: > On miércoles, 18 de julio de 2018 15:16:39 (CEST) Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > I'll stop doing KDE promo again then. > > Please don't. I for one value your contributions and think that a rift > between &

Re: Twitter access

2018-07-19 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:01:25PM +0100, David Edmundson wrote: > > So that's a no then.  Tell these higher-ups that partial blocking of a > proven contributor from completing a specific task when they have 15 > years of track record is demotivating and not how things should be >

Re: Twitter access

2018-07-19 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 09:13:16PM +0900, Eike Hein wrote: > I agree the "unnamed" and not having good docs (hello again, topic) > on this is bad. > > There's a long history of the web presence being treated in a special > way, though. Even in the good old CVS/SVN days, you needed a special > perm

Re: Twitter access

2018-07-19 Thread Jonathan Riddell
> On 07/19/2018 09:25 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > As I say I am aware of the process and the need for restrictions. But > > I have access to KDE social media and have done since we started > > having any. But for some reason I am being blocked from this one > > ac

Re: Twitter access

2018-07-19 Thread Jonathan Riddell
> On Thursday, 19 July 2018 14:25:41 CEST Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > But > > I have access to KDE social media and have done since we started > > having any. But for some reason I am being blocked from this one > > account. Nobody has yet said who by or why. It'

Re: Twitter access

2018-07-19 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 03:10:29PM +0200, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Nobody has wronged you. There are no unnamed higher powers blocking community > contributions. As Paul has explained in detail in his reply to your email, > there is a standard procedure within the Promo community that everyone >

Re: Twitter access

2018-07-19 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 04:19:50PM +0200, Aleix Pol wrote: > I don't see how requesting access to by-pass the team is to be part of the > team. > Do you want to be part of the KDE promo team? I did but I see nobody has an interest in me being a full part of it and I've no interest in being a part

Re: Twitter access

2018-08-11 Thread Jonathan Riddell
9:26:03 AM, David Narvaez (david.narv...@computer.org) > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Jonathan Riddell > > wrote: > >> I did but I see nobody has an interest in me being a full part of it > > > > That's simply not true: we have

Re: Twitter access

2018-08-11 Thread Jonathan Riddell
ndom stuff as I felt the need. Jonathan On 11 August 2018 at 20:59, Paul Brown wrote: > On sábado, 11 de agosto de 2018 20:39:51 (CEST) Jonathan Riddell wrote: >> Everyone seems fine for Promo to be run in an opaque way with >> community members unable to take a full part. > &

Re: FOSDEM: call to action!

2018-08-26 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Yes, I send them out every year after the stall to this list. The links are on the Phab item for FOSDEM where FOSDEM work is also being coordinated. Jonathan On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 09:14:11PM +0200, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > Do we actually have any numbers about how much merchandise we can g

Re: FOSDEM: call to action!

2018-08-26 Thread Jonathan Riddell
https://phabricator.kde.org/T9477 On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 03:12:43PM +, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > Yes, I send them out every year after the stall to this list. The links are > on the Phab item for FOSDEM where FOSDEM work is also being coordinated.

Re: Public report of the Community Working Group

2018-09-18 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Sat, 11 Aug 2018 at 16:53, Valorie Zimmerman wrote: > * Case: conflict between Plasma release manager and Promo team in > public (KDE Community list) > Outcome: Open This has now been resolved and the team has reverted back to it's previous state as a community team where all can play a full p

Re: pseudonymous contributions to KDE

2018-09-19 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:38:35PM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote: > Hi all, > > What is the KDE policy on accepting code contributions under pseudonym? I've > gotten review requests on Rust Qt Binding Generator under a pseudonym. Now I > wonder if I can accept the contribution. The contributor

Re: pseudonymous contributions to KDE

2018-09-19 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 06:38:15AM -0400, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Wednesday, September 19, 2018 6:02:22 AM EDT Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Jonathan Riddell ha scritto: > > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:38:35PM +0200, Jos van den Oever wrote: > > >> Can one sign a Fid

Re: help desk vs bug tracker

2018-10-29 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 03:31:35PM +0100, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > As for a helpdesk system vs bugzilla: we get too many user support questions > in bugzilla, like https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399639 or https:// > bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399494. For Ubuntu there is a Questions featu

Discourse

2018-10-29 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Discourse is modern forum and mailing list software. Examples at https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/ or https://discourse.ubuntu.com/ I went to a talk at the Embedded Linux Summit about how Fedora moved to use Discourse. Similar to the discussion of moving away from IRC we had last year I

Re: Discourse

2018-10-29 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 20:56, Luca Beltrame wrote: > - As far as I remember, they *only* supported deployment with Docker. > This is is IMO a terrible and black-magic approach Seems like a perfectly sensible and modern way to deploy. You can log into the running container fine and twiddle as n

Re: Discourse

2018-10-29 Thread Jonathan Riddell
More information on Fedora use experience, the graphs are impressive for those who think it's important to keep people in KDE https://theforeman.org/2018/07/discourse-6-months-on-impact-assesment.html Jonathan On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 18:32, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > Disco

social-media list

2018-10-31 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Is anyone using this list or can we shut it down? https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media Jonathan

Re: Fwd: Top 15 Mailinglists with messages in moderation

2018-11-01 Thread Jonathan Riddell
Why not just use kde-apps-announce? Having a separate mailing list for each application just means people won't bother subscribing or moderating. Jonathan On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 03:30:33PM -0500, Scott Petrovic wrote: > @boud - Yes, that is the mailing list for Krita release notifications. T

Re: social-media list

2018-11-01 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 08:34:31PM +, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > Is anyone using this list or can we shut it down? > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media Guess not, I'll ask for it to be removed. Jonathan

Re: social-media list

2018-11-02 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 11:24:26PM +0100, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El dijous, 1 de novembre de 2018, a les 21:48:36 CET, Jonathan Riddell va > escriure: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 08:34:31PM +0000, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > > > Is anyone using this list o

Re: Discourse

2018-12-04 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I asked Greg from Fedora who has led their change away from mailing lists onto Discourse. gwmngilfen: over in KDE land the discussion about Discourse continues with queries about whether running in a Docker is a good idea (seems ideal to me but sysadmins disagree) and if there's any security c

Re: Discourse

2018-12-04 Thread Jonathan Riddell
I asked Alan the Ubuntu community manager if he had insights into their setup and security concerns, he said: In short, do what upstream supports. I setup a discourse recently which I did using digitialocean and the upstream install process, which indeed is inside docker ( I haven't read th

Re: Licensing policy change proposal

2019-01-28 Thread Jonathan Riddell
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 18:04, Krešimir Čohar wrote: > The licenses are: > - the Pexels license: https://www.pexels.com/photo-license/ > - the Unsplash license: https://unsplash.com/license, > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsplash#License These are both non-free licences and we can not ship file

  1   2   3   >