May I ask if you have rumors for free tickets to KDE?
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote:
Hello all,
As you might know, the Qt DevDays 2013 Call for Papers has been out for a
little while now. It looks like there's not many proposals sent by KDE
people... I
On March 11, 2013, 5:19 a.m., Andrea Scarpino wrote:
I was quite clear: qmake must point by default to Qt 4 if Qt 4 present.
While qtchooser sounds like a great solution to handle this, it only adds
more confusion from a packager view: we cannot have N differents
configurations for qt
On Feb. 7, 2013, 9:14 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
I see this has a ship it but marked as uncommited. Was it commited and you
forgot to close the request or is still uncommited?
Thomas Fischer wrote:
I am quite new to git, so I hope the push I just made is correct:
Adding Rolf, as he was working on this:
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=scratch%2Fdakon%2Fcmake-cxx11.git
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Ivan Čukić ivan.cu...@kde.org wrote:
Hi all!
The CMake modules for detecting C++11 features are going to get in
kdereview
soon. The target for the repository
This thread reminds me the name of the very useful assimp library. :-)
Laszlo
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Thomas Lübking
thomas.luebk...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sonntag, 27. Januar 2013 12:16:39 CEST, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Analyze etc. is fine, but wordplays starting with anal and
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Allen Winter win...@kde.org wrote:
If you have the Krazy command line tool installed (
https://gitorious.org/krazy)
then you could write a pre-commit hook that runs 'krazy2 --style' on the
files
being committed.
./krazy2 --style
Unknown option: style
of this sufficiently explained by my
follow-up email, or does anyone think this issue needs further
discussion?
Best regards,
Sven
2012/12/7 Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de wrote:
On Friday 07 December 2012 06:01:19 Laszlo Papp wrote
On Dec. 20, 2012, 6:58 p.m., Laszlo Papp wrote:
Great, thank you for your care! One suggestion to this, and I think then it
is fine from that point of view: you could write a foreach on top of the
copy_icons macro, and avoid the same function name in each line.
Yue Liu wrote
, Windows and so forth, and if
you do not wish to improve it, you have my +1.
- Laszlo Papp
On Dec. 20, 2012, 6:10 p.m., Yue Liu wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r
think then it is
fine from that point of view: you could write a foreach on top of the
copy_icons macro, and avoid the same function name in each line.
- Laszlo Papp
On Dec. 20, 2012, 6:10 p.m., Yue Liu wrote
On Dec. 20, 2012, 6:58 p.m., Laszlo Papp wrote:
Great, thank you for your care! One suggestion to this, and I think then it
is fine from that point of view: you could write a foreach on top of the
copy_icons macro, and avoid the same function name in each line.
Yue Liu wrote
On Dec. 20, 2012, 6:58 p.m., Laszlo Papp wrote:
Great, thank you for your care! One suggestion to this, and I think then it
is fine from that point of view: you could write a foreach on top of the
copy_icons macro, and avoid the same function name in each line.
Yue Liu wrote
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Alexander Neundorf neund...@kde.orgwrote:
Not really. For the frameworks branch the most current cmake is required,
which is 2.8.10.1 currently.
We will stay there with the most current until we get somewhat stable.
I see.
My post seems to date back then
/r/107752/#comment18079
Wouldn't it be nicer to write a loop for this with the icon resolutions?
- Laszlo Papp
On Dec. 16, 2012, 7:26 a.m., Yue Liu wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http
On Dec. 16, 2012, 1:47 p.m., Laszlo Papp wrote:
cmake/modules/KDE4Macros.cmake, line 1293
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107752/diff/1/?file=99544#file99544line1293
Wouldn't it be nicer to write a loop for this with the icon resolutions?
Yue Liu wrote:
osx icon only uses
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote:
El Dilluns, 17 de desembre de 2012, a les 00:03:38, Luigi Toscano va
escriure:
Albert Astals Cid wrote:
El Diumenge, 16 de desembre de 2012, a les 23:53:23, Antonis
Tsiapaliokas
va
escriure:
Hello,
On Dec. 12, 2012, 6:43 p.m., Laszlo Papp wrote:
It did not get a ship it back then for the plasma components, but I would
not like to block the rediscussion, just saying what happened earlier. :-)
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104895/
David Edmundson wrote:
One of the key
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107716/#review23516
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Laszlo Papp
On Dec. 14, 2012, 1:17 p.m
, but I would not
like to block the rediscussion, just saying what happened earlier. :-)
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104895/
- Laszlo Papp
On Dec. 12, 2012, 5:10 p.m., Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e
Pau reminds me: Anyone a KDE Mobile talk for the embedded room? I already
have a different proposal idea, but it would be nice to see the KDE
presence there, too!
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.orgwrote:
Guys,
No frameworks talk at FOSDEM CrossDesktop
On Dec. 12, 2012, 6:43 p.m., Laszlo Papp wrote:
It did not get a ship it back then for the plasma components, but I would
not like to block the rediscussion, just saying what happened earlier. :-)
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104895/
David Edmundson wrote:
One of the key
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.orgwrote:
Laszlo,
Aaron submitted a proposal for a Plasma Active talk:
https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/crossdesktop-devroom/2012-November/30.html
Aaron everywhere, great. ;-)
I personally think that it would fit
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Milian Wolff m...@milianw.de wrote:
On Friday 07 December 2012 06:01:19 Laszlo Papp wrote:
Out of the curiosity: how much python3 is available? Thank you for your
work.
python3 _support_
please read http://scummos.blogspot.de/2012/11/kdev-python-14
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Sven Brauch svenbra...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hi!
For quite exactly two years I have been working on integrating the
Python scripting language into KDevelop. Recently this project, called
kdev-python, has seen its first stable release (called 1.4 in order to
Out of the curiosity: how much python3 is available? Thank you for your
work.
python3 _support_
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,39912
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Ben Cooksley bcooks...@kde.org wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick notice that due to Qt breaking their ABI it is now
necessary for build.kde.org (Jenkins) to initiate a rebuild of all
binaries.
This will take a long
As it turns out, the correction in this case was the cause of this
breakage. Somehow the original breakage (which was built and deployed
by build.kde.org 3 builds ago) did not have any impact upon the
system, yet the revert of the breakage caused this.
Because as the Gerrit text wrote: it
I think libs would be a much better place then.
+1
Laszlo
Ok from Harmattan side as I do not work on it anymore. I am not aware
of anybody doing so either. L.
On 10/21/12, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote:
On Thursday 18 October 2012 22:32:12 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
Dependency freeze for 4.10 releases is in two weeks (November 1st),
please
be sure
If you merge stable into master you cannot miss changes.
Sure, but what I was referring to, is more than that. People should do
that for their changes, but you cannot expect there will be no
mistakes at all in the procedure. Someone making sure about this on
top of the utilities that can just be
I think the problem is we don't know the commit policy for kde-runtime. Is it:
fix-master-and-backport: fix in master, cherry-pick to KDE/4.x
-- or --
fix-stable-and-merge: fix in KDE/4.x, merge KDE/4.x in master
I personally prefer the former as in contributors should make sure if
it is
Problem with this approach is the code you backport is usually a lot less
tested as you made all your developments on master. In the svn days I even
remember people telling me they were blind-backporting to stable because it
was too much work to test the backported code.
One could say the
Hm, as kde-runtime is not frozen in master, whoever does fixes in 4.9 should
merge them to master.
Unfortunately, there may always be changes missing. Unsure how much it
can be automated, but I have the impression we do not exactly know
until a person is responsible for making sure.
Laszlo
+1 for always building unit tests!
Actually I've always been unsure why packagers don't run unit tests...
Maybe this would help.
Because the tests are broken in certain environments (just like last
time on Harmattan with the frameworks branch) and due to the lack of
time on the packagers' side
Because the tests are broken in certain environments (just like last
time on Harmattan with the frameworks branch) and due to the lack of
time on the packagers' side to fix upstream bugs, they choose the
simpler way as a temporary workaround. Therefore, they can proceed
with the project, and
I think David took the responsibility for the merge:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-release-teamm=134510779413123w=4
Laszlo
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm sending this e-mail because I was experiencing some bug with the
ScrollBar and I thought about
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
I think David took the responsibility for the merge:
http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-release-teamm=134510779413123w=4
Oh, that was mentioned for kdelibs, and not kde-runtime. Can someone
do that for kde-runtime as well?
Laszlo
Objections ?
None from Harmattan side either. I have already updated [1] the cmake
version to 2.8.9 previously due to the frameworks experiment. :-)
Thank you for bringing this topic up.
Laszlo
http://lpapp.blogspot.ie/2012/09/randa-kde-frameworks-build-experiment.html
---
There may be another approaches for fixing this build issue I have not yet
discovered, hence putting for review.
Diffs
-
kjs/jsonstringify.cpp f816e98
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106539/diff/
Testing
---
Build test
Thanks,
Laszlo Papp
characters here, but I do not mind either way. :-)
- Laszlo Papp
On Sept. 23, 2012, 8 a.m., Laszlo Papp wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106539
Yeah, I think something along the lines of the following weeks. Like in
2-4
weeks or so as far as I heard.
Indeed, here is the proof:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2012-August/005571.html
Laszlo
.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
Regards,
Laszlo Papp
need
to brainwash. ;)
I can just speak up about the Download numbers Patrick and Patrick
mentioned during the aKademy talk, and it is not an insignificant
number. Meaning, many people use KDE on Windows, already.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
was thinking about the server itself (MS license), compiler tools
(if you want anything more then the free compiler) and the rest.
I believe, most of us using msvc, use the free express edition. I have
not needed more so far while working on Qt or/and KDE Windows.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
] at 0x77649d72
ntdll.dll!RtlInitializeExceptionChain() [[unknown] @ -1] at 0x77649d45
Thank you for your collaboration, again!
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
With the latest push to master, all of these points should be addressed
(except the icon, I'm still looking).
Does the game work on Windows?
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
these. I can also commit the
fixes myself, if it is accepted by whoever the maintainer is.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
: 'kgamedifficulty.h': No such file or directory -
Something is wrong around the private libkdegames topic.
This is the point where I have given up the further investigation for
now. I will continue the help once you fix these essential build
issues. :-)
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
Was added already by Yuri yesterday.
Sure. I did not want to commit because I am unsure what is the
committing policy to the various branches. At any rate, I think the
content of the patch is fine, so thanks for the contribution. :)
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
Hi,
Usually, we use reviewboard for patches. For instance, I cannot
unfortunately open up this attachment on my phone (N9) for reviewing.
I can do that in few hours. Perhaps, you also meant against the
frameworks branch (saying this without even seeing the patch).
BR,
Laszlo
On 6/22/12,
:
http://community.kde.org/KDE_at_QCS
I thought to take a look at the notes last year before writing up new
ones this time.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
Just checked the Qt docs for 4.8 and this new method is not marked as
new in 4.8, bad Qt coder!
Forgot to mention, but should be fixed in the future versions:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,28087
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
Thank you for pushing a bunch of untested huge changes in the minor
point
release. Really appreciated.
what are those untested changes please?
+1.
Bit of nitpick about wording, but 4.8.4 is a new patch level release, not minor.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
Are there any further objections to moving these forward into extragear?
No objections, just a question: How much of this works on Windows ?
Unsure about the call UI, but I presume the logger could at least ?
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Are there any further objections to moving these forward into extragear?
This is probably not the best way:
https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdereview/ktp-call-ui/repository/revisions/master/entry/libktpcall/CMakeLists.txt#L25
not now instantly) to get that resolved. I
presume this would mean a python3 porting or some other way around.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
To re-iterate, it is policy that any dependency changes are discussed
and approved on k-c-d first.
It was discussed and disapproved as far as I understood.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
I'm sorry, but unless there's an objective objection, I'll rename the library
and everything inside to LibKGAPI.
I personally like this the best so far amongst the discussed.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
it is case by case situation). I do not
feel safe until a lawyer tells that. Therefore, probably better not to
go for google usage unless the safetyness is coming from a
trustworthy lawyer.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
/apper/repository
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
is empty
- it the user clicks into a text field, the placeholder also disappears
immediatelly
Laszlo Papp wrote:
I do not have too strong opinions about either way; just some additional
data fwiw:
1) QLineEdit - clear for focus
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8
On May 9, 2012, 6:30 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
Ehh optional perhaps?
I've seen forms behave like this before and back then when i first saw it i
tried to delete the text.. Which obviously didn't happen. The text just
disappears as soon as i start typing. I kinda dislike that behavior.
are relevant to k-c-d. I
would rather include the plasma devel team for reviews. Other Aaron, Marco or
other plasma developers might miss this. :-)
- Laszlo Papp
On May 9, 2012, 4:41 p.m., Sebastian Gottfried wrote
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/104140/#review13003
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Laszlo Papp
On March 5, 2012, 9:55 p.m
the current situation with regards to that. My impression
is that the submodules in kdesdk should be separated in the end
(after the git migration, the latest), so I do not need to clone
okteta for instance, if I would just like to work on lokalize.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
[1] http://websvn.kde.org
though the outcome looks quite impressive
from what I can say, it is probably better to involve kde sc and
extragear projects first because of the limited resources.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
, is a good and handy service after all in
my opinion. I am not worried about that, and it comes with cmake (at
least on the distributions I use).
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
PS.: Plus what Alex said about other ctest usages.
. It would be a pity, if we cannot update to new
versions (with bug fixes and so forth).
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
with those topics. :-)
The current setup is comfortable and good enough to me, but I am open,
thus I will check out Jenkins.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
just build errors/warnings and test-results. Since
some of these things are handy - especially when working on libraries.
Could you please precisely enumerate the technical pros and cons so
that we can all understand ? Thank you in advance!
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
, and also my playground dictionary I worked on:
http://my.cdash.org/index.php?project=Mula
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Feb. 6, 2012, 9:38 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Good from my POV (cmake stuff).
Christoph Feck wrote:
UI-wise looks also fine. Was there anything else we needed to do? If not,
merge to master. Thanks, you rock!
Alex, we need this FindKdeclarative.cmake in kdelibs, and not in
, but the cmake example,
about it, puts it into the $projectroot. Admittedly, it would be nice to hear
some kde-buildsystem guy(s) to comment on this, like Alex, Stephen, etc. :)
Thank you for your effort about it really, by the way!
- Laszlo Papp
On March 2, 2012, 6:01 p.m., Lamarque Vieira
,
Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Alex Fiestas afies...@kde.org wrote:
Mext week the biggest mobile congress will start in Barcelona from 27 February
to 1 March. I got an invitation for the developing area and I'm planning to do
some networking KDE related and I want to go well
The suggestion remains: to allow everyone to edit and close bugs, as is
apparently the case in some other bug trackers.
+1.
Worked fine on the MeeGo bugzilla for instance, I previously used.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
frameworks where
there is only one, and properly working constructor.
Diffs (updated)
-
kdeui/dialogs/kconfigdialog.h 2ac0eda
kdeui/dialogs/kconfigdialog.cpp e815e54
Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103716/diff/
Testing
---
On Archlinux (build test only)
Thanks,
Laszlo Papp
Regards,
Laszlo Papp
Is there already something like that ?
There is already something here:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Git_Workflow#Local_branches_are_always_rebased.2C_remote_branches_never
Might be a good idea to extend it with git config
branch.autosetuprebase always and the gitk advice.
-- Laszlo
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103829/diff/diff
Testing
---
Tested on Archlinux for building only.
Thanks,
Laszlo Papp
from me.
- Laszlo Papp
On Jan. 28, 2012, 8:39 p.m., Laszlo Papp wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103815
are properly generated. That said, it is being
planned against the frameworks branch since no new features involved in the
KDE4.X series anymore.
Thanks,
Laszlo Papp
for our N9/N950
devices (kdelibs, plasma-components and so forth).
I would personally be a bit disappointed, if I cannot experiment with
hot features, like plasma components, on my Harmattan, if the hard
dependency is agreed upon. It is just my two cents though. :)
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103716/#review9903
---
On Jan. 17, 2012, 3:54 p.m., Laszlo Papp wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http
, which would be a valid point.
Laszlo Papp wrote:
The desktop application uses kdeui.
KConfigDialog (QWidget *parent, const QString name, KConfigSkeleton
*config) - It is now impossible to generate only one settings class
inheriting KCoreConfigSkeleton, and use that in each
http://www.kde.org/applications/multimedia/kmix/development
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Mark mark...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In git i can only find some kmix scratch repos, but it seems nowhere
to be found on http://quickgit.kde.org/.
What i want to do (or try) is looking at the kmix code
really see no point in them
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
to plymouth in it. That is
a bit funny, but it might be just that I am lacking something... :)
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
[1]
http://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpeople.redhat.com%2Fjakub%2Fprelink.pdf
since the prelink information is ignored.
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
Hi,
In playground/base (SVN) create a file called .krazy with the line:
EXTRASUBS ksecretservice
then commit playground/base/.krazy
Are there any plans to parse some xml on projects.kde.org so as to get
rid of SVN entries, if your project is on projects.kde.org ?
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
, and there is
some progress.
It might be that, it is a bit late. Unfortunately, I have just only
now found the time to answer. I am not sure about the legal part of
kde codebase reuse, but let me know if there is anything i can do to
help.
Thank you in advance! :)
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
(it
will take me a while to get it also working on the Community OBS).
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101949/#review4755
---
Ship it!
The compilation issue was not personally talkative
just fine for my host
PC with the same active-development/4.7. branch,
That is the exact command I was trying to run from my build directory:
cmake ../ -DKDE_PLATFORM_PROFILE=Mobile
Thank you in advance!
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
/scratchbox/users/lpapp/home/lpapp/kde_test/kdelibs
95 matches
Mail list logo
